– Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC) (Moved by bot)
– Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 20:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC) (Moved by bot)
203.78.194.162(talk·contribs·deleted contribs·filter log·WHOIS·RDNS·RBLs·http·block user·block log) Hi I am a Nepali Citizen of Magar ethnicity who is interested in sociological aspect of my country . this user with IP address 203.78.194.162 keeps on changing Hindu percentages of Tamang people from 9 % to 0 % and Buddhist from 87 % to 97 % . Even though I myself is a Buddhist but I want to have accurate data. What is frustrating is my data is based on the Nepali census data link of which is attached to the percentages number. I have told him why I changed data numerous times as you yourself can attest it from the edit history but he changes every morning. please do something about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RamThapaMagar (talk • contribs) 20:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared.
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Question:@Lorry Gundersen: Can you please point out specific recent edits that are vandalism and briefly explain why they are vandalism? And which ones are from autoconfirmed editors? Large portions of the article are unsourced so it is difficult to tell. Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Note: Other administrators: please feel free to resolve this as you see fit based on the response, especially if I take too long to respond. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption resumed within hours of expiry of the previous 1-week protection. As the disruption comes from new accounts that are already autoconfirmed, ECP protection might be necessary. — kashmīrīTALK 09:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent vandalism or addition of poor quality content immediately after a protection expired. ser!(chat to me - see my edits) 10:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated BLP violation (i.e. addition of unsourced date of birth) by several IPs and also User:Pumpkin7135GrindtXX (talk) 11:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disuprtive editing, and long-term violation of MOS policy. livelikemusic(TALK!) 13:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting extended-confirmed protection for this page. Reasons: preventing vandalism, Israel/Palestine conflict, etc. Yello231 (talk) 15:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – On main page for DYK, just getting driveby poor quality edits to add puffery. Shut it down to anon IPs until tomorrow or until off DYK, please. Montanabw(talk) 16:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IPs insist upon adding protagonist info despite MOS:FILMCAST stating "Subjective interpretation using labels such as protagonist, antagonist, villain, or main character, should be avoided. Skywatcher68 (talk) 18:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Aggressive POV pushing / OR by an IP hopping editor about the software author's politics. MrOllie (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Here's an example of what I'm talking about. It's a blatant BLP violation. - MrOllie (talk) 20:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IPs continually adding protagonist & antagonist info here as well. Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Non-official sources reporting he’s signed on as Maple Leafs HC, which IP editors are continuously adding to the article. TheKip 20:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems at least one LTA has found this page. DatGuy hasn't edited in about two weeks but I doubt he'll object. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 20:31, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Full creation protection seems unjustified. The corresponding mainspace page is unprotected and no one has recreated it. I personally do not intend to create an article on this topic but in case an autoconfirmed editor does, it would be reasonable to drop the SALT level to semi to match mainspace. Protecting admin has been desysoped so I brought it here directly. Nickps (talk) 11:54, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
@Nickps: The SALT does seem justifiable, given three speedy deletions. I do agree with you that full-protection is unnecessary for it, however. Semi-protection would seem to me to be too low; maybe XCP? —Jéské Courianov^_^vthreadscritiques 15:44, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Even that sounds wrong to me to be honest. Protecting the draft but not the mainspace article is a weird thing to do. It's essentially directing any spam to mainspace. Since there has been no such spam all this time, I'd argue that the protection has outlived its purpose. But, lowering the protection would still be a positive in any case so I won't get too hung up on the level. Do XCP if you think it's right. Nickps (talk) 16:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
It doesn't look like there's been any attempt to re-create the mainspace page after the AfD (which, I should note, post-dates the most recent draft deletion). —Jéské Courianov^_^vthreadscritiques 16:33, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Meh This is one of those cases who pop up from time to time where I am always on the fence. Yes, the page shouldn't be protected anymore (or only at lower level); on the other hand there is no expressed need to create a page under said draft. Lectonar (talk) 07:17, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the edits were correct and not vandalism. Charles has three children, not two, and he did divorce Tetyana and had a relationship with someone else with whom he shares a child and whom he left mid-pregnancy. He wants to hide this information because he wants a picture perfect bio but people deserve to know the truth about their politicians. 2A00:23EE:2218:FD3:A528:9F83:6245:898B (talk) 18:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Change "Since the start of the Israeli operation, more than 35,000 Palestinians in Gaza have been killed,[86] including over 15,000 children and 10,000 women.[87][88]" to "Since the start of the Israeli operation, nearly 35,000 Palestinians in Gaza have been killed,[86] including over 7,000 children and nearly 5,000 women.[87][88]." This is based on the data recently revised by the UN, accessible here: https://www.ochaopt.org/content/hostilities-gaza-strip-and-israel-reported-impact-day-215. ConDissenter (talk) 21:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Is there another place to request this change? The talk page for Israel-Hamas war is restricted as well. The current source for casualty data is palinfo.com, which describes itself by saying it "does not lay any claim to neutrality for it blatantly sides with the oppressed Palestinian people." https://english.palinfo.com/about-us/. Recognizing that reliable sources do not need to have a neutral POV, why should we use this as a source rather than a less biased source like the United Nations? ConDissenter (talk) 18:28, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
@ConDissenter Please go check Talk:Israel–Hamas war for earlier discussions and to see why your request is unlikely to succeed. FYI, the lower numbers refer not to the killed overall but to the killed who have additionally been identified by name. Besides, all the numbers are sourced to Gaza MoH anyway. — kashmīrīTALK 09:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
The death toll statistics are presented in an imbalanced way. Include the israeli statistics for the palestinian casualties. Egaga1 (talk) 06:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
I recently noticed this user, Princess of Ara. An editor who works mainly on Nigerian related articles and others. While trying to appreciate the user's effort, I got in love with the lovely articles, well sources, written from a volunteer in good faith and now, I am requesting that she be granted the auto patrol user right. It'll also help reduce heavy backlog of NPP. Thanks for your consideration! Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 08:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
I have created 78 articles, primarily focused on Sinophone cinema and fantasy literature, with 2 currently undergoing GAN. All of my articles have been promptly reviewed, and none of them have been deleted or marked for maintenance. I am requesting autopatrolled rights to alleviate the workload of the patrollers, especially those who actively review film articles and have reviewed the majority of my articles, allowing them to allocate more time to address articles that truly require attention. As a side note, I am a veteran editor with patroller rights on Chinese Wikipedia, having authored over 200 articles, including a dozen featured and good articles. While I fully understand that there are differences in policies and MOS across different Wikipedias, I believe this demonstrates my credibility and knowledge in assessing article quality.— Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 13:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
I frequently create articles on notable subjects, having authored 530 articles, with the majority facing no issues. Only three were deleted, mainly due to changes in election results affecting their notability. I'm requesting autopatroller rights to ease the burden on other editors reviewing my articles and help reduce the backlog of new article reviews. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 23:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to request Autopatrolled rights, please. A list of articles I created is here, and articles in various states of completion waiting in the wings are here. Cheers, >MinorProphet (talk) 16:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC) MinorProphet (talk) 16:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
I have written 93 articles HERE, mostly music, biographies, golf, history, architecture, and people from Tennessee. I'd like to apply for auto patrolled status. I have done many BLPs including 5 GAs and I am familiar with the guidelines. Thank you.Eagledj (talk) 14:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC) Eagledj (talk) 14:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Not done, no reflection on the past decline, which after several months of attempts and ANI threads that included a nontrivial amount of support for a CIR indef (!), is regrettably now more of a "never" than a "not now". signed, Rosguilltalk 17:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Hey, I'm requesting Autopatrolled because I mainly make election maps and correct election maps. For a while now, I have been requesting individual files so I can override them with updated data or shape the maps. I'm very experienced in making maps and always make sure I have correct information. Would I be able to have Autopatrolled? Thank you GatewayPolitics (talk) 21:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
also I've created a decent amount of articles GatewayPolitics (talk) 01:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
According to what I've read, after 221 edits and an account that's 3 months old, I should have already been autoconfirmed. I believe that it's possible that I actually was autoconfirmed before, but that it disappeared after my account name change (it had been requested of me that I change my account name because I was told that it sounded like a company name). May I please be confirmed to correct this error? Grammar crackers (talk) 00:25, 16 May 2024 (UTC) Grammar crackers (talk) 00:25, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Oh, good. I'm sure it's irrelevant, but do you know why it doesn't display that under my account name on edits the way it does other users? Thanks. Grammar crackers (talk) 03:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the extended confirmed flag.
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
I got busy in real life for most of March and April, so my request was put on hold per [3]. Here is my original reason for requesting NPR permissions again.
I have over 120 new articles under my belt, mostly relating to medieval history, monasteries, saints, and geographical features. I am familiar with the kinds of content that would fall under CSD criteria, since I have experience wikifying new pages and tagging obviously problematic new pages for speedy deletion. I know the guidelines on notability, proper sourcing, draftifying new articles, rating talk pages using scripts, AfC, AfD, and other essential patrolling tasks. Would be quite happy to reduce the backlog while being cautious and careful. Also currently a Pending Changes Reviewer. Florificapis (talk) 00:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([4]). — MusikBottalk 00:10, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Within the past several days, I have been active cleaning up new articles listed at NPR. Having a few more tools would help me speed up the process and do a more comprehensive job. Florificapis (talk) 03:08, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
I participated in the December backlog drive, being granted a trial. At the end of the trial I requested permanent NPP, which was denied with the denying admin expressing concern that I hadn't created any articles. I've since created an article about Neeraj Gupta (refer to User_talk:TarnishedPath/Archive_2#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Neeraj_Gupta_(sculptor)_has_been_accepted) and been responsible for the bulk of the material in the newly created article Bruce Lehrmann. I had been working on Draft:Bruce Lehrmann but someone else started work on Bruce Lehrmann just as I submitted Draft:Bruce Lehrmann to AfC so I ended up merging my work over to the mainspace article and issuing a CSD for deletion of the draft. I've continued to be semi-regularly involved with AfD. I'm applying because I got a notification a while ago that there was a backlog drive for May and I'm willing to help out a bit with that. TarnishedPathtalk 06:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC) TarnishedPathtalk 06:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Courtesy ping to Rosguill, as they granted the trial perm. Clovermoss🍀(talk) 15:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I was initially given a month long trial as a new page reviewer after receiving an invitation on my user page, and I've been enjoying everything so far: reviewing pages, providing feedback, sending WikiLove to new and returning users who have made exceptional first attempts, tagging issues, and resolving issues myself (that could otherwise be tagged) when I have time in an attempt to reduce the backlog. I have already been renewed once, and my second trial expires in a little over two weeks (May 26th). I'm requesting either an indefinite or longer-term ability to review new pages before my time lapses. Haven't had any behavioral issues, and I try to treat all users with respect. I will continue to help clear the backlog in the meantime. Thanks again. Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 00:06, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Hey man im josh (expires 00:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBottalk 00:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Forgot to re-apply before the permission ran out. Would like to continue participating in the drive as well as afterwards. — ♠ Ixtal( T / C ) ⁂ Sign up for the 2024 DCWC! — Non nobis solum ♠ 06:12, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
I was turned down last July 2023 as being too early. I have since increased my article (incl. BLP) creation, and have done major overhaul and expansions of important topic articles here. I remain autopatrolled on Wikipedia and WikiCommons, continue to participate in AfD, and have done some PRODS. Am willing to learn the NPP process. Thank you. Aszx5000 (talk) 13:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I had the new page reviewer permission but for some reason it was taken away without any explanation. I would like to apply for it again or at least get the reasoning for the removal of my permission Rahammz (talk) 01:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Basically I would like to have a longer term as a reviewer. If the time had run out Rahammz (talk) 01:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I was granted a one month trial with the NPP right and feel as though I did a decent job. I mainly focused on marking obviously acceptable articles. I didn't do a ton of reviewing, but I then again I felt like doing more than a handful a day would have been overstepping the constraints of a trial permission. If it is ok with the coordinating admins, I'd like to keep using the NPP right; feel welcome to simply renew the trial period for another month if you need more indication that I'll stick to procedure. ~ Pbritti (talk) 13:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Joe Roe (expires 00:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBottalk 13:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
I was suggested to apply here, and I've decided to volunteer. To make this more consistent:
I'm an AFC reviewer and I mostly create articles and review articles relating to biographies, as well as biological or scientific topics. I have DYK, GA, and vast experience with AFD and other noticeboard discussions. I'd like to volunteer in new pages patrolling as well to help reduce the queue. (I most likely won't be reviewing pages daily, but whenever I do, I'd do a thorough review, and I'm very collaborative. I provide feedback and at times amend issues myself of the pages I review).
Note that I've had a name change, so certain stats tool pages might not work properly. And 3 out of 4 of my deleted pages were self delete.
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Reason for requesting page mover rights: multiple reasons including to swap pages (as a result of RM discussions) and suppress redirects, especially R2 eligible. I understood that I won't abuse this privileged right and read the instructions. ToadetteEdit! 15:41, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I request to volunteer in moving pages with the extended right. I usually draftify pages and instead if automatically deleting them, it is being marked for CSD, another increase to the backlog. Following my involvement with early page moving, I was advised to get the page mover right by Liz, and now, I also saw it can be granted at the discretion of the admin. Also, while moving pages, I at times submit technical request if a closed move request—something I can do with page mover right. This is a volunteer work I have decided to take and thanks for you consideration. I also promise not to misuse the right Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 19:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had an account for 122 days. — MusikBottalk 19:40, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Not done, fails minimum requirements. Primefac (talk) 15:16, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Re-requesting after my one-month trial expired a month ago. I rename pages when it's necessary to make a round-robin swap, draftify new articles, and periodically close RMs. I also sometimes help in renaming categories for CfD. Cremastra (talk) 20:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
I have spent some time patrolling recent edits and have draftified some articles and would like page-mover rights so that I can suppress redirects that would be R2-elegible. Additionally, while not something I have done as much recently, I have spent time editing tropical cyclone articles, which have been targeted over the years by an LTA known for page-move vandalism. TornadoLGS (talk) 02:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC) TornadoLGS (talk) 02:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
I've created many biographies and have a good understanding of Wikipedia policies. I've fixed vandalism many times and fixed many biography of living persons violations. RowanJ LP (talk) 15:20, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
I have been editing for around 2.5 years now, with specialised focus on field of entertainment. I also often correct typos or do general fixes on articles of various subjects. I have a good knowledge of wikipedia policies and would like to get this pending changes reviewer rights to broaden by experience and get more expertise of Wikipedia. Imsaneikigai (talk) 12:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
I have read all the articles and tips for reviewing pending edits. I also have a large, significant history of editing many Engkish and Korean articles about Academics, Music theory, etc. AnAlpineSymphony (talk) 05:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I commonly do anti-vandalism work with recent changes patrolling, and I have familiarized myself with the criteria. BerryForPerpetuity (talk) 13:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
I've done reverting vandalism (Although I was on a hiatus since Golden Week as the vandal level hit 5) for some months now, with my edits growing over 2000 from 89ish including other works, and I request this permission to help with the works. I understand that I did make a misunderstandment couple of weeks ago and I have revised the guidelines to prevent another instance of that happening. (I've been making sure not to miss placing a uw as well). Not planning to request rollbacker until I stop making accidents. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
I have made some very high quality articles (Aston Martin DB9 FA and Aston Martin Rapide at FAC) so I am very familiar with what content is reliable and what is not. I have reverted vandalism (in fact, reverting vandalism was the first edit I made) and whenever i seen vandalism, I take extreme pride in reverting it. Best 750h+ 13:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Finally being bold enough to request. Most of my edits come anti-vandalism, I have over 1000 mainspace edits, and know policies to be able to detect the difference between vandalism, disruptive editing, and test edits. I also actively use RedWarn and Twinkle to help with a faster warning system and to help the undo process.Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 13:51, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
I want rollback so that I can revert vandalism more efficiently and use more anti vandalism tools. I was granted this right for 3 months by Red-tailed hawk, and I am now here to request it permanently, in accordance with the request. GrayStorm(converse|look at what i do) 04:44, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user was granted temporary rollback rights by Red-tailed hawk (expires 04:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBottalk 04:50, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
I have been working on preparing templates for dark mode and have needed to make several edits to template-protected pages.[1][2][3][4][5] I would like TPE to reduce the friction of this work. Snowmanonahoe (talk·contribs·typos) 21:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Y (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: ~170)
Y (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: N/A)
Y (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: 10+)
? (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: 3?)
Just noting that the last guideline does not seem to be met quite yet; there are still pending requests, and some of the requested changes seem trivial (though I do recognise that figuring out something like Special:Diff/1222657015 may be non-trivial even though it looks like a simple change). Primefac (talk) 12:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
I don't really interpret any of my requests as non-trivial. Even the ones that do take time really just amount to bug-fixes. I figured I'd request the permission anyway because it's unlikely that I will ever make those sorts of significant requests, in the course of what I'm currently doing anyway.For the record though, I consider Chembox, Multiple image, and Tree chart to be non-trivial by your definition. Snowmanonahoe (talk·contribs·typos) 13:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Well, I did give you credit for three... But that's just the numbers, not the interpretation.
Re: your latest comment, though: is this something that you see yourself needing indefinitely, or is it more of a short-term "sort out dark mode and then I'm done" sort of thing? Primefac (talk) 13:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
When I'm done with this, if I have the perm indefinitely I probably won't actively seek out new template work to do. Might handle edit reqs occasionally and do things that need doing as I stumble upon them, but not much more unless I find some other big 'project' I like. I have no objections to a limited time/scope grant. Snowmanonahoe (talk·contribs·typos) 14:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Done until the end of the year. If you need it for longer let us know. Primefac (talk) 15:02, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
You wanted it for dark mode-related content, so I suspect that's what you'll primarily be using it for. If you happen to answer some TPERs, I don't think anyone is going to give you any grief. I'm not going to get so formal as to state that you can only use it for one purpose, that would be silly. Just don't screw anything up Primefac (talk) 15:06, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
