Talk:When We Are in Need

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleWhen We Are in Need has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 23, 2024Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 22, 2023.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Bella Ramsey struggled to hold a real rifle while filming the eighth episode of The Last of Us?

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 01:35, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bella Ramsey
Bella Ramsey
Troy Baker
Troy Baker
Scott Shepherd
Scott Shepherd

Converted from a redirect by Rhain (talk). Self-nominated at 01:00, 7 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/When We Are in Need; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • Article and hook meet requirements and the QPQ is completed. I personally think ALT1 is probably the most "interesting" for the DYK section, although ALT0 is just a smidge behind for me in that regard. ALT2 and 3 work as well, but 0 and 1 are great choices. Soulbust (talk) 02:22, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I see a source for ALT0 the gun was heavy, the other source seems to be a video. Bruxton (talk) 01:34, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why so squeamish?[edit]

It's a little irritating that we have to use a PC euphemism like 'sexual assault' to describe what David tries to do to Ellie. Be honest. He tries to rape her. Adding extra syllables, making it sound more abstract, just under-communicates how horrid the scene was (in a bad way). 2600:8800:7000:4DE0:9557:76EB:4763:E267 (talk) 20:24, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:When We Are in Need/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Rhain (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: Skyshifter (talk · contribs) 13:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Looking forward to that season 1 good topic! Skyshiftertalk 13:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

General comments[edit]

  • The infobox image has a valid fair use rationale. The other images have valid free use licenses for Commons.
  • No copyvio

Prose[edit]

  • Infobox, lead, plot, and conception and writing are fine.

Casting and characters[edit]

  • a turning point for Ellie, and felt she will have -> feel like it should be "would"
  • he expected a small role feels a bit redundant with the previous except perhaps as a small cameo. Could remove the former sentence or merge these two sentences together.
  • Prior to the announcement of Scott Shepherd's casting, rumors suggested Baker would play David, but he felt it "would've been too on the nose". Shepherd's casting was revealed in the first trailer in December. While the way it is written can suggest Shepherd was casted to interpret David, this is never directly mentioned, and it slighly confused me when reading for the first time (probably for being a non-native speaker though). Either way, I'd suggest changing it to something like Prior to the announcement of Scott Shepherd's casting as David, rumors suggested Baker would play the character [...]
  • the first trailer in December. I'd suggest adding the year here, as the previous mention of the year was two paragraphs ago.

Filming[edit]

  • Production took place in Okotoks mention the town is in Canada, or at least Alberta
  • including adding trees -> including the addition of trees
  • I think semicolons are used too much in this section. I'd recommend rephrasing some sentences (some semicolons can also just be replaced by a dot).

Reception[edit]

  • Broadcast and ratings is fine
  • The website's critical consensus noted I think "noted" is commonly used for facts, but the quote is subjective. I'd recommend going with the usual "reads".
  • and maintaining focus -> and the maintenance of focus; "the" is needed in this sentence
  • Pedro Pascal's performance as Joel was well received. Would recommend expanding or attributing the sentence

Sources + spot-check[edit]

  • All sources seem to be correctly formatted and reliable, and the usage of primary sources is valid here.
  • Numbers based on this revision
  • 1: Green tickY did a small edit
  • 2: Green tickY
  • 3: Green tickY
  • 10: Green tickY
  • 17: Green tickY
  • 21: Green tickY
  • 35: Green tickY
  • 42: I don't think this confirms the episode was rushed. The review says that there are "pieces missing" and similar, but doesn't say the episode is "rushed", "fast-paced" or anything similar — in fact, the reviewer says "it's got a good pace". "Streamlining", apparently (again, not a native speaker), doesn't necessarily mean "fast" etc. I believe this should be removed from "Several critics considered the episode rushed", unless I missed something.

@Rhain: I saw everything was applied correctly so far; will pass after the above comment is responded to. Skyshiftertalk 00:25, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Skyshifter: Thanks for the review! Good catch—I've removed the ref from that particular sentence. Please let me know if there's anything else. Rhain (he/him) 00:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Pass Congratulations! Skyshiftertalk 00:32, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.