Talk:Social Democratic and Labour Party

Untitled

There is a strong school of thought that sees their position on the border as being rather more ambiguous than "A vote for the SDLP is a vote for a united Ireland" - some think the SDLP is first and foremost a party primarily representing Catholics, particularly amongst rural, church going and/or middle class voters, than a constitutional party pushing for changes in the border. And dare we mention the "Schoolteachers, Doctors and Lawyers Party" joke? -- Timrollpickering 15:35 Feb 9, 2004 (UTC)

This seems too substantial to be a "stub" anymore. Of course, everything can always be edited and improved, and nothing is really "finished", but this has several paragraphs of substance, not just a small amount of the barest of facts, and merits "promotion" in my opinion.

Rlquall 15:41, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Raw material

Somebody wrote a page on The SDLP. I'm about to transform that into a redirect to this page. However, there could be something of interest in it that could be merged into this article. Here (complete with odd Unicode entities, etc.) is a dump of its content:

THE SDLPØ Origins it was formed on the 21 August 1970 by six Stormont MPs and one Senator who represented a variety of Nationalist Republican and labour parties. Drawing on these roots the party established itself as a left of centre and became a member of the Socialist Group in the European parliament. Ø Its critics have described it as more of a Nationalist party than a Socialist one. It draws its support from middle class and middle class Catholics, Gerry Fitt its first leader resigned in 1979 claiming it had become more Nationalist than Socialist. Ø SDLP probably reached its Nationalist vote ceiling by 1980 and relied upon Republican votes to bolster its position. Ø This vote would potentially leave but if and when SF became more acceptable. Ø The party supports the reunification of Ireland by consent and has opposed violence. Ø It withdrew from the Stormont Parliament in July 1971 when the Unionist government refused to set up an inquiry into army killings in Londonderry/Derry. It supported the civil disobedience campaign of withholding rent and rates for public sector housing in protest at internment without trial. Ø The party refused to take part in the 1972 Darlington Conference but agreed to participate in the Power Sharing Executive that lasted from Jan to May 1974. Gerry Fitt was appointed Deputy Chief Executive and five of his colleagues held ministerial posts. Ø Under Hume’s leadership, the party engaged in a series of initiatives at home and abroad, that have had an impact on how the British, Irish and American governments view the conflict. Ø The SDLP supported the Anglo-Irish Agreement and used it in their attempts to involve Sinn Fein more closely in Constitutional politics. Discussions between the parties eventually led to the Hume/Adams dialogue whose proposals were believed to have informed the agenda on which the 1993 Downing Street Declaration was based. The SDLP backed the 1995 Framework Document And the 1998 GFA. Ø After more than twenty years as leader of the party John Hume announced that he was making way for a new leader. In one of his first acts as head of the nationalist party Mark Durkan addressed a Unionist Association meeting. Ø The approach of the SDLP Ø SDLP- positive and enthusiastic torch bearers. Strand one was largely an SDLP policy document dusted down from the New- Ireland Forum in the mid 80s.

NB I didn't write the stuff above; I simply moved it here. -- Hoary 14:27, 2005 Jan 21 (UTC)

The SDLP's evolving position on a United Ireland

The party has changed a lot over the years - in particular going from Fitt and Devlin leaving it because it was first and foremost nationalist not socialist to talking about a "post nationalist" era to heavily playing up their nationalist credentials (arguably trying to out-green Sinn Fein). Even now it seems as though not all their leading figures are behind the current direction. Does anyone want to try to chart the course of their evolving position, especially on the border? Timrollpickering 13:47, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I'm dumb

Please remember that most of us don't understand Northern Ireland politics -- I'm British and I don't. Please assume that your readers are dumb and explain the basics...

Saying the SDLP is one of the two nationalist parties is all well and good, but:

What's the other one, then? Pray do tell...

I can *never* remember which side of the argument is 'nationalist', please don't just use a technical political term without explanation (particularly when the wikilink is irrelevent). The wikilink isn't helpful; based on that article *both* sides are nationalist, it's just that they want to be part of different nations.

The NI 'nationalists' are the people who would prefer NI to be part of the UK nation rather than the ROI nation? I think that's right... But surely this article should tell me, a clueless reader, whether SDLP would rather NI be part of UK or ROI in the first para in no uncertain terms...

Roy Badami 01:09, 30 July 2005 (UTC) (wearing a dunce hat)

Actually, now I'm confused. Maybe 'nationalists' are people who want to be part of ROI? Yes, I could google for this, but I expect Wikipedia to give me a useful answer... :-)

Roy Badami 01:13, 30 July 2005 (UTC)

Roy you are correct in your assumptions: the unionists (who want Northern Ireland to remain in the United Kingdom) are indeed a nationalist party - in respect of the UK (I hesitate to use the term "British nationalists" because that would imply a link with the BNP). But the SDLP, Sinn Féin and the Workers' Party are also nationalists in respect of the Republic of Ireland. They could also be regarded as separatists. I could help clear this up for you if you feel that the article is still unclear in this regard. I appreciate this is an old comment, so I will leave you a message on your talk page about it. Cheers. --Mal 19:28, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your response. It appears the wikilink was changed some time ago to point to Irish nationalism which is rather more helpful in this context than nationalism Roy Badami 22:34, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

The terms "Nationalist" and "Unionists" are linked, so if the reader is not aware of these terms, they simply click the word and it will bring them to the Nationalist or Unionist page that will explain the terms. Like every wikipedia article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.71.82.55 (talk) 13:26, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

If you read this discussion section you will see that an editor raised it as a problem in 2005, but in 2006 they left another comment to say that the situation was resolved due to an update of the wikilinks in the article. As the situation has been resolved for over 2 years there is little need for further comment. Road Wizard (talk) 13:37, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

What is the correct name of the UK's Olympic team?

Is the UK's Olympic team "Great Britain" or "Great Britain and Northern Ireland"?

see Cfd discussion: Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion#Category:Great_Britain_at_the_Olympics_to_Category:Great_Britain_and_Northern_Ireland_at_the_Olympics --Mais oui! 22:30, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Joint authority

Why does the joint authority link bring me a page about home ownership? If no one has any objections I'm going to change it. 86.144.177.123

You've made another redlink. Is there an article on coalition government? (let's see if this link turns blue) --Mal 19:33, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Merger with Fianna Fail

Is this a genuine idea/proposal, or merely a rumour? I find it quite difficult to accept that FF and the SDLP could merge, beyond the Irish nationalism, FF is a conservative, centre right party, quite at odds ideologically one would think to a party that is a member of Socialist International. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.6.216.186 (talk) 01:38, 17 February 2007 (UTC).

Relationship with UK Labour

The article mentions their unspoken electoral agreement, but never actually explains it. I'd be very interested in learning more about this relationship, does anyone have something they can add? -MichiganCharms (talk) 22:36, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

As I understand it, the agreement is mostly the understanding that Labour Party do not stand candidates in Northern Ireland.--Free Socialist 23:06, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

It's worth noting that when SDLP MPs speak in the Commons, they seem to sit and speak from th--Milzo1986 (talk) 00:20, 12 August 2010 (UTC)e Labour/government benches. I am watching Mark Durkan speaking now from the government benches on BBC Parliament. 94pjg (talk) 16:29, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

The SDLP MPs have traditionally taken the Labour whip although I'm not sure how long for formally (Gerry Fitt famously abstained in the 1979 No Confidence vote that brought down the Callaghan government, something that would have been difficult if he'd been taking the whip). The British Labour Party's constitutional position on Northern Ireland is historically complicated and long predates the formation of the SDLP - my rough understanding is that before the First World War they agreed to not organise in favour of the Irish Labour Party and after partition the labour flag in Northern Ireland was flown by the Northern Ireland Labour Party who didn't take a position on the border until 1949. There were strong links between the British and Northern Irish parties but the NILP rapidly declined as a force during the Troubles. IIRC the formal policy position of the Labour Party as decided internally (which is a different thing from their manifesto for government) was that there should be Irish unification and it's possible that the ban on organising in the province stemmed from that. This policy may still be in place though legal advice in 2003 was that rules that banned residents of Northern Ireland from joining (technically they couldn't join a constituency party as there weren't any and they couldn't join as overseas members because they weren't in a foreign country) were illegal. In more recent times the SDLP affiliated to the various trans-national Labour groupings and I've read that there is an understanding or rule that member parties do not stand against one another. Timrollpickering (talk) 20:49, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Do you think this is notable enough for a section in this and/or the UK Labour article? -MichiganCharms (talk) 01:52, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

The only relevance to the SDLP article is their taking the Labour whip and how strong this is - for instance in the recent vote on 42 days detention without charging they voted en bloc against the government and I've not seen anything about this being a defiance. "An unspoken electoral agreement" isn't terribly accurate as for as long as I can remember the announced Labour position on who Northern Irish voters should vote for is the SDLP and Labour's absence from elections in the province has very little to with the SDLP. As for the Labour Party article I'm not sure how much prominence this has to be included but that's best discussed there. Timrollpickering (talk) 14:57, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Hold on, this section implies there is an agreement between all three parties, meaning that an agreement also exists between UK Labour and Irish Labour, I'd like someone to explain where these two parties might field candidates in the same constituencies--Milzo1986 (talk) 00:20, 12 August 2010 (UTC)--Milzo1986 (talk) 00:20, 12 August 2010 (UTC)--Milzo1986 (talk) 00:20, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

It took a while, but they're getting there... The editorrrr (talk) 22:17, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Full Manifesto

My site has a copy of the full SDLP Manifesto and their 'Policy Overview' section. We're driving towards having all English-language political manifestos of every political party in the world on our site in the same/similar format. All the content, except the Policy Summaries are contained in PDF files on the SDLP website. As more and more manifestos are added over time, in my opinion, it could become a useful resource for Wikipedia. SDLP Manifesto Declaration of Interest: I own the site so shouldn't add the link myself. Jdfjurn (talk) 04:33, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Straight from Margaret's mouth

Is this section

With the collapse of the UUP in the 2005 UK general election and Sinn Féin's continual abstention from Westminster, the SDLP is once more the second largest parliamentary grouping from Northern Ireland at Westminster. The SDLP sees this as a major opportunity to become the voice of Irish Nationalism in Westminster and to provide effective opposition to the much enlarged DUP group. The SDLP is consequently paying more attention to the Westminster Parliament and working to strengthen its ties with the Parliamentary Labour Party, whose whip they informally accept. The SDLP has been a vocal opponent at Westminster of the proposal to extend detention without trial to 42 days and previously opposed measures to extend detention to 90 days and 28 days. SDLP Leader Mark Durkan recently tabled an Early Day Motion on cluster munitions which gained cross-party support and was quickly followed by a decision by the UK government to support a ban.

taken straight from the SDLP Manifesto? There are no citations and the whole thing seems very biased —Preceding unsigned comment added by Milzo1986 (talk • contribs) 00:15, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Images of pictures

I have started a discussion on images of pictures at Talk:Provisional Irish Republican Army#Images of pictures. --Scolaire (talk) 07:37, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Catholic party?!

I dispute that the SDLP is a "Catholic" party. It was founded by a mixture of Protestants (e.g. Ivan Cooper) and Catholics, and has been avowedly non-sectarian since the beginning.--MacRusgail (talk) 13:31, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Social Democratic and Labour Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20060704151702/http://www.irishecho.com/newspaper/story.cfm?id=17364 to http://www.irishecho.com/newspaper/story.cfm?id=17364

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:41, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

SDLP-FF partnership

This move has been officially ratified by party members:

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-47179888 Culloty82 (talk) 17:31, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Claire Hanna

Although she has resigned the SDLP whip, she hasn't formally left the Party itself- https://sluggerotoole.com/2019/02/11/claire-hanna-resigns-from-sdlp-whip-at-assembly-after-ff-vote-but-remains-member-of-party/ Culloty82 (talk) 17:16, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Still no reliable reference for pro-Europeanism

If an edit has been reverted saying rv, that's WP:SYNTH. The source doesn't even use the term "pro-European" or "pro-Europeanism" then adding another reference that also doesn't use the terms is not acceptable. There's also zero evidence the SDLP have pro-Europeanism as an ideology, the linked article in the infobox defines (or tries to) ideologies as different from a single issue such as pro-Europeanism, with the caveat that pro-Europeanism may central to a particular ideology. So to sum up, the references don't use pro-Europeanism, and even if they did it's not actually an ideology. FDW777 (talk) 07:13, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Once again, I have removed this. Pro-Europeanism. Is. Not. An. Ideology. FDW777 (talk) 20:53, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Reference to the most recent SDLP Manifesto(at this time 2019) provided, in which the party itself claims to take a Pro-European position. This completely negates the points made about the referenced source not containing Pro-European or Pro-Europeanism within them. The argument that Pro-Europeanism is a single issue, therefore not to be included, is surprising as the User making the argument did not see fit to question or removed "United Ireland" from the ideology list. The User previous has also repeated a claim that it is not an ideology yet a page exists (See Pro-Europeanism) for this political position which contains a list of parties which subscribe to it and the User which makes this argument has referred to Pro-Europeanism as an ideoloy in a previous amendment to the page which defeats the users point. Fhirleighinn (talk) 02:44, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

If you believe any items merits removal, please start a new discussion. You openly admit pro-Europeanism is a political position, which as I've said is not the same as an ideology. That's why it's not listed on List of political ideologies and the article in fact states that ideologies are different from single issues, specifically mentioning pro-Europeanism. This has recently come up at Template talk:Infobox political party#Proposal to add Policies and Factions where @Davide King: says that pro-Europeanism isn't an ideology but a political position. Do you see the common theme here? A political position is not the same as an ideology, and you have no reference stating the SDLP's ideology is pro-Europeanism. As such I am removed the claim per WP:BURDEN. FDW777 (talk) 11:39, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Also do not edit talk page headings as you did in this edit. FDW777 (talk) 12:56, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

I see there's now been an attempt to squeeze it somewhere else in the infobox. Unfortunately, despite the piped link the article it links to is political spectrum. Pro-Europeanism is nothing to do with the political spectrum, that field is for where a party is on it, be it far left, left centrist, right, far right, or various shades of each. If pro-Europeanism really is so important feel free to mention it elsewhere in the article, but the constant attempts to squeeze it into inappropriate places in the infobox should cease. FDW777 (talk) 18:41, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Political spectrums come in many forms: left-right, liberal-conservative, monarchist-republican, Europhile-eurosceptic. Being pro-European is clearly a political position, and is listed as an ideology on many political parties including Liberal Democrat, Fine Gael, and the Italian Democratic Party. It's not being jammed in inappropriately, it's a major dividing line in European, Irish and UK politics. There is a very reliable reference for pro-Europeanism, you're just being pedantic. — Blue-Haired Lawyer ^t 17:24, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

That other articles may incorrectly list a political position as an ideology is a reason for amending those articles, not for downgrading the quality of this one. Using your articles as an unscientific sample, Lib Dems's political position spectrum field is "Centre to centre-left", Fine Gael's is "Centre to centre-right" and Democratic Party's is "Centre-left". Do you see how all of them use that field for place on the political spectrum, and not for shoehorning in a political position people feel is worthy of emphasis? As I said feel free to add pro-Europeanism somewhere in the article where it's supposed to go, instead of trying to put a square peg in a round hole in the infobox. FDW777 (talk) 18:17, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Their manifesto is the most reliable source there is, as well as various news articles that were previously removed. If it's on for other UK parties (including Northern Irish ones), the SDLP should be no different.

Oh, and i'll add that "United Ireland" isn't an ideology either. --Jayhood97 (talk) 22:37, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Pro-Europeanism isn't an ideology. If you want to remove it from other articles, that's your business. And, like I've already suggested, if you want to add pro-Europeanism somewhere in the article where it's supposed to go go right ahead. Just don't put it in a totally inappropriate place in the infobox, since it's neither an ideology or a position on the political spectrum. FDW777 (talk) 22:45, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

FDW777, thanks for mentioning me and sorry for coming up late, but I pretty much agree with everything you have wrote. I noticed too that now that was moved to Political position, but as you correctly pointed out that, that does properly link to Political spectrum. Either way, I think you're losing time here. What we should be doing is discussing the Infobox's parameters which is what I tried to do here. Besides adding a Factions parameter, we should change Political position to Political spectrum and add a Political position parameter where we can put things like Anti-clericalism, Anti-immigration, British unionism, Christian left, Euroscepticism, Laissez-faire, Monarchism, Pro-Europeanism, Republicanism, Two-state solution, United Ireland and things like that as those aren't proper ideologies but rather political positions. If you want them to be in the Infobox, then you need to help me getting consensus for changing the Infobox first. Otherwhise I agree that until then they shouldn't be listed improperly in the Infobox.--Davide King (talk) 16:43, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Profile fearghal mckinney.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:23, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Political position of SDLP

On other Northern Irish parties their position on the political scale is shown on the wiki 2A00:23C8:916:F701:FD7D:87E0:ACE6:B1E0 (talk) 14:36, 2 December 2023 (UTC)