Talk:Hubert Pierlot

Hubert Pierlot has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 17, 2015. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hubert Pierlot article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Belgium Mid‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Military / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Military history: Biography / British / European / World War I / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force
	World War II task force

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hubert Pierlot/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 18:47, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
No copyvios detected.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:59, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't find any problems with the prose.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
MOS followed.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:
Citation and reference sections are detailed and well-formatted.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:
Adequate citations to reliable sources. I cannot access the sources right now, so I'm accepting them AGF.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

C. No original research:
All content and analysis is verifiable.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
Stays focused on major aspects.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

B. Focused:
Remains focused on the subject.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Fair, neutral presentation, all analysis is attributed to reliable sources.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
No edit warring or other disruptions since this article was created in 2006.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:59, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
All images are licensed for public domain or under Creative Commons.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:59, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Images are highly informative, with appropriate captions.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:59, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Overall: A very good article, should be ready for the FAC process.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pass or Fail:

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hubert Pierlot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131225015556/http://archive.dirupo.belgium.be/fr/biographie/hubert-pierlot to http://archive.dirupo.belgium.be/fr/biographie/hubert-pierlot

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:03, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous[edit]

The first confrontation between the government and the King occurred on 10 May, when the King, against the wishes of the government, left for his military headquarters without addressing the Chamber of Representatives like his father, Albert I, had done in 1914.

Do you mean that his father did, or didn't, address the Chamber? Valetude (talk) 19:48, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]