Talk:Hubert Pierlot/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 18:47, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
No copyvios detected.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:59, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't find any problems with the prose.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
MOS followed.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:
Citation and reference sections are detailed and well-formatted.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:
Adequate citations to reliable sources. I cannot access the sources right now, so I'm accepting them AGF.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

C. No original research:
All content and analysis is verifiable.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
Stays focused on major aspects.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

B. Focused:
Remains focused on the subject.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Fair, neutral presentation, all analysis is attributed to reliable sources.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
No edit warring or other disruptions since this article was created in 2006.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:59, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
All images are licensed for public domain or under Creative Commons.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:59, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Images are highly informative, with appropriate captions.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:59, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Overall: A very good article, should be ready for the FAC process.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pass or Fail: