Wikipedia:Requested moves/Current discussions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Requested moves

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RMCD bot (talk | contribs) at 21:19, 9 August 2019 (Updating requested pagemoves list). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Shortcuts
This page lists all requests filed or identified as potentially controversial which are currently under discussion.

This list is also available in a page-link-first format and in table format. 39 discussions have been relisted, indicated by (Discuss)

August 9, 2019

  • (Discuss) – Ginan (star) → Epsilon Crucis – The titles of several articles about stars in the constellation Crux were recently moved from being titled with their Bayer designations to being titled with proper names. The moves were made (on 25 April 2019) as reverts of undiscussed moves with the rationale that the proper names were now approved by the IAU. This basis was somewhat misleading: Alpha, Beta, and Gamma Crucis were renamed in 2006, and for 13 years nobody had a problem; Delta Crucis had never been called Imai or Imai (star), although it was titled Decrux until 2009; and Epsilon Crucis had never been named Ginan or Ginan (star) (originally titled Juxta Crucem!). In any case, now is a good time to have a discussion. I have included all five star articles that were renamed, hopefully that doesn't become too confusing. Based on WP:TITLE, the title of the article should reflect the most recognisable and commonly-used name for the subject of the article. I'm not in the southern hemisphere so clearly not the best judge, but I would contend that the most recognisable names for Epsilon and Delta are certainly not the proper names, and it is arguable whether the proper names for Alpha, Beta, and Gamma are really the most recognisable and widely-used. I would propose that all five be moved back to their Bayer designations. Lithopsian (talk) 13:53, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Lawful permanent residents (United States) → Green card – Per the discussion on my talk page, I'm proposing this move. The current topics at Green card are all obscure, and the fairly obvious primary topic for it is the US immigration status. Here is an assortment of non-US sources commenting on the term and the visa status' popularity: [7], [8], [9], including one that uses the Green card as an analogy for non-US immigration systems: [10].
    In terms of why move LPR (US) to Green card: it is the WP:COMMONNAME to the point where it isn't even funny. While permanent resident is the official title, saying "apply for a green card" or "has a green card" or "green card holder" has become synonymous with the legal status in the United States: [11], [12], [13]. This is even the case in legal publications. The term green card has become ubiquitous with the status, that moving the article there as a title to me makes the most sense. The other option would be to move Green card to the disambiguation page, and redirect to here, which I'd also be fine with. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:12, 31 July 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. Primefac (talk) 03:29, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Keya (disambiguation) → Keya – There is no primary topic for this term; all meanings are comparably obscure. Move the page and quash the existing redirect of an alternate transliteration of a tiny Iranian settlement. bd2412 T 03:11, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Danish Handball League → Danish Men's Handball League – To mirror Danish Women's Handball League. In a country where handball is one of the most popular sports for both men and women, I frankly think it's distasteful that the Wikipedia article titled "Danish Handball League" refers to the men's league. Not only is the women's league actually more successful internationally speaking (over the past 3 seasons, 3 Danish men's teams have made it to the play-offs rounds of the two most important European club competitions, the Champions League and the EHF Cup – compared to 11 Danish teams on the women's side), the women's league [14] even ranks higher than the men's league [15] in the European Handball Federation's coefficient ranking. On an average, the games broadcast from the women's league accumulate as many viewers as the games broadcast from the men's league. Additionally, the current (sponsorless – contrary to the women) title of the men's league is (directly translated from Danish) "The Men's Handball League" [16] – not "The Handball League" or anything that would suggest that when you think about "the Danish handball league", you'd automatically think of the men's league. In general, I believe Wikipedia has a very unfortunate problem in terms of equality in their sports articles – a problem that's primarily excused with statements such as "but the men's *insert league or team* is much more popular than the women's side" or "the men are more successful and therefore they're synonymous with general name". In this case, such arguments just don't hold and as such, I think it would only be fair to the country's general passion for the sport if the women's league isn't treated as though it's somehow secondary to the men's league. Cotillards (talk) 01:58, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 8, 2019

  • (Discuss) – Puerto Ricans in the United States → Stateside Puerto Ricans – I reverted an edit by Llakew18. They recently moved page "Puerto Ricans in the United States" to "Stateside Puerto Ricans (Puerto Ricans in the United States)" with the reasoning Original title make Puerto Ricans look like foreign immigrants which they are not. They Stateside Puerto Ricans are ethnic Puerto Ricans living in the mainland and non-mainland states (e.g. Hawaii) of the U.S. I agree, but think that such a bold move needs discussion. epicgenius (talk) 14:58, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Damot → Kingdom of Damot – There seems to be a precedence to name medieval Ethiopian kingdoms via the adjective - noun format. Also many kingdoms that existed during the same time period follow this naming format. Take for example the Zagwe dynasty. But my main reason for moving is for disambiguation purposes because the current title is confusing, There are many other locations called Damot which have nothing to do with its currently professed location at the Ethiopian rift. For example Damit Gale is much further west. Similarly there is a locality called "Damot" in the Wardhere zone in Ethiopia, much further east. There is also a sub-province with a similar name. As such, the term Damot is currently attributed to three ethnic groups as well as split between two sub-clans of one of those ethnic groups. TLDR; there are many places in Ethiopia called Damot. Furthmore, when looking at reliable sources such as An ethiopian journal, abc CLIO, Otto Harrassowitz etc. 79.67.81.203 (talk) 08:02, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 7, 2019

  • (Discuss) – 1000 (number) → 1000 – Given the preponderance of the decimal numbering system throughout human history (chiefly because we have ten fingers), the number 1000 should be considered the primary topic for title "1000". In addition, a dab page should be created for usages of "1000" that are not about the number itself; they are currently conflated with discussion of the number in this article. (maybe in a later proposal) — JFG talk 23:52, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Camp Becket → Becket-Chimney Corners YMCA – Chimney Corners Camp is a separate organization from camp becket. The fact that Chimney is a subset of becket is evidence that sexism is alive and well in America. Becket-Chimney Corners YMCA is the official title of both organizations as they are represented in the YMCA group in America. The camps are brother and sister, but otherwise, they run independently. The girls camp should not be labeled as lesser or a subset to camp Becket. Jmansfield2021 (talk) 02:33, 29 July 2019 (UTC)--Relisted. – Ammarpad (talk) 19:36, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 6, 2019

  • (Discuss) – Buthrotum → Butrint – The official name of the archaeological site its Butrint, both in English and native Albanian languages. Officially known and registered from UNESCO and Ramsar Convention with the name of Butrint. Common name in google search as well with more than 2 million hits more than the actual name changed without consensus form a greek Wikipedian. Bes-ARTTalk 12:30, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Chungha (singer) → Chungha – This page is currently disambiguated because her name in Korean, 청하, can also be romanized as "Cheongha". However, this is the English Wikipedia, and if you look at the Cheongha page she is the only one who romanizes 청하 as "Chungha". Thus, there isn't a need to disambiguate it. DanielleTH (Say hi!) 02:25, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Western Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Montana → American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Bullock – The new name, which is currently a redirect to this page, is the name for this case when it was appealed to the Supreme Court. This has become a famous case and it is ALWAYS referenced with the Supreme Court decision when discussed, not the name used in the State Court system. The case is commonly talked about in reference to how the Supreme Court overturns state campaign finance laws, not how States have challenged the Citizens United decision. It should absolutely be switched so that Western Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Montana redirects to American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Bullock and not the other way around. A Google Search of both case names using quotations and restricting it to the last year shows 18 results for "American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Bullock" compared to 1 for Western Tradition and that one is a wikipedia page that uses the old name so that it will correctly link to this article. If you remove the restriction of 1 year, you get 33 results for the Western Tradition case name (when using quotes). Many of those are wikipedia pages, articles that were written before the SCOTUS decision, or technical writing that often uses both case names. For the SCOTUS name of the case, you get 1,670 results. Similar results appear if you leave off the "inc." in both case names. Sfieldman (talk) 01:11, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 5, 2019

  • (Discuss) – Transcaucasia → South Caucasus – The above discussion is from 3 years ago, and I think that the consensus has changed since then. As someone familiar on a professional level with the region, "Transcaucasia" or (more accurately) "Transcaucasus" is a dated term that has fallen out of favour in the post-Soviet era. It is referred to almost exclusively as "South Caucasus" in modern academic literature, something Ngram clearly shows. Kaiser matias (talk) 23:56, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Goldust → Dustin Rhodes – Widely regarded today in AEW. The title was changed to Goldust in '13 when he teamed up with Cody Rhodes/Stardust. Since, he didn't appear much in the main roster and now he is probably in the upper midcard level or possibly even a legend of AEW, once again teaming with Cody. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 12:35, 27 July 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. Wug·a·po·des​ 17:52, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – House of Saint Ananias → Chapel of Saint Ananias – As reflected in Spanish and Italian Wikipedia, this could be a preferred scope. The chapel and its annexed buildings comprise the very house, but not the other way around. The article pertains to the whole building complex. PPEMES (talk) 16:18, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Lord Granville Somerset → Granville Somerset – First, isn't our convention that honorifics should only be part of article's titles when required for disambiguation? Second, the current article title implies he is a member of the peerage. As the second son of a Duke the honorific "Lord" is only a courtesy. He was born and remained a commoner. Geo Swan (talk) 13:36, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 4, 2019

  • (Discuss) – Eiríkr Magnússon → Eiríkur Magnússon – Eiríkur Magnússon is (a) the birth name of the individual, (b) the name he himself used except in some scholarly contexts and in his translation work with William Morris, (c) the name used in digital resources/databases such as the manuscript catalogue of the National Library of Iceland (handrit.is), and (d) the name used in modern scholarship about the individual (for example the work of Andrew Wawn, Richard Harris and Jón Karl Helgason). In the nineteenth century, Icelanders used -ur for male names such as Eiríkur in the nominative and not the much older -r ending. Eiríkur Magnússon was born and raised EiríkUR and continued to use this spelling throughout his life, e.g. in his manuscript translation of "Hávamál: Hávamál or The Song of the High One translated from the original in the so-called Edda of Sæmund by Eiríkur Magnússon M.A., KD. Cambridge, 1884" in the National Library of Iceland. In his academic publications on Old Norse subjects and his published William Morris collaborations, the name is often archaized to "Eiríkr" - the Icelandic equivalent of writing "ye old scholar" for "the old scholar". For an original source confirming the conventional -ur spelling, see the parish record for Stöð in Stöðvarsókn in 1839 (image from the National Archives of Iceland), when Eiríkur was 6 (and could already read according to his father, who was the local minister who wrote the record). Since he did publish some work under the name "Eiríkr", a brief explanation of -r vs. -ur is useful, but later research on Eiríkur and his work does not adopt the archaized spelling. Sylgja (talk) 21:54, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Five Points (TV series) → Five Points (web series) – Considering that the episodes of this run well less than the standard 22–30 minutes, and that it is released on Facebook Watch, I think disambiguating this with "web series" over "TV series" would be more accurate disambiguation. Gauging support for the proposal... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:03, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Benjamín Ndong → Benjamín Edú – Benjamín Edú is the way he is called by the Equatoguinean Football Federation (FEGUIFUT).[28][29][30] Also, national-football-teams.com (used source in the article) call him that.[31] Note: Benjamín Edú Ndong Ndoho belongs to the Fang people. They have their own naming custom, which differs from the Spanish one. Firstly, a Spanish given name (in this case, Benjamín) (this was added after the arrival of the Spaniards to the region); secondly, the name of a relative (deceased or not) (in this case, Edú); thirdly, the name of a relative (deceased or not) from his father (in this case, Ndong); lastly, the name of a relative (deceased or not) from his mother (in this case, Ndoho). Sources about the Fang naming customs (the Obiang family does use it): [32][33] That is why FEGUIFUT call him Benjamín Edú and not Benjamín Ndong.--MonFrontieres (talk) 23:42, 27 July 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. Steel1943 (talk) 03:34, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – 2019 Venezuelan uprising → 2019 Venezuelan uprising attempt – As a continuous supporter of the current title and as an user that has participated in the three consecutive RM proposals (only to reach "no consensus"), I would like to propose a quick fix hoping to reach a compromise with the users that oppose "uprising". The idea of changing "uprising" to "uprising attempt" was first raised by users that opposed the current title during the first RM, but the idea has been brought back and put aside in all three previous RMs. Indeed, in the last RM some of the arguments to oppose "uprising" were that (1) "uprising" alone is no longer used by current new sources, it is always used with some adjective "attempt, military, attempted, failed, unachieved, call etc." (and that merits a change, see WP:NAMECHANGES) and (2) that "uprising" suggested a successful rebellion, which it is not. Both of these two can be solved by adding "attempt" to the title. I would suggest that we put aside other title options and focus on the addition of the adjective. Please do not oppose just because you do not approve "uprising" altogether. If you think an additional adjective (aside from attempt) should also be added please support and state which other addition should be considered. MaoGo (talk) 01:18, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 3, 2019

  • (Discuss) – List of the verified oldest people → List of the known oldest people – The current title is confusing, because the "verified" qualifier does not have the same meaning on Wikipedia (WP:V) and in longevity circles (having enough documentation). It is also a reality that we do not have any adequate sourcing or research about supercentenarians in "non-first-world" countries, so that adding "known" would acknowledge that those lists are highly skewed towards some countries that have maintained appropriate records. The lead section of the article should be adjusted accordingly. Even in affluent countries, many supercentenarians are likely unknown, as their family does not seek publicity. Finally, a lot of the entries in the men's list are not "verified" in the longevity sense, because the "verifying" organizations have stopped documenting cases under 112 years old for a few years. That list is now maintained thanks to press reports, obituaries and the like. — JFG talk 16:18, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – H.264/MPEG-4 AVC → Advanced Video Coding – WP does not put alternative names/titles, after a slash or other punctuation, into the article title. Such other terms are created as redirects instead. This article should be at the most common name for the subject, which is H.264. The MPEG-4 AVC string isn't even really a name, anyway, but an abbreviation of one. 66.167.126.10 (talk) 16:08, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2, 2019

Elapsed listings

Shortcut
The 7-day listing period has elapsed. Items below may be closed if there's a consensus, or if discussion has run its course and consensus could not be achieved.
  • (Discuss) – Neanderthal genome project → Neanderthal genome – The current name was never a 'thing', just one research group's facetious play on the human genome project to describe their effort at acquiring neanderthal genome sequence. Since then there have been at least several additional findings dealing with Neanderthal genome sequencing that were not part of the original effort, and this page would be better dedicated to the topic as a whole rather than focusing on one group's now-dated and more limited initial push. Agricolae (talk) 20:21, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Solent → The Solent – "The" is an integral part of the name per the Ordnance Survey (note that is uses "Solent, The" becuase that's how things are sorted there, just like here we will defaultsort it in this way). Per WP:WIAN and WP:CONSISTENCY we should generally follow the Ordnance Survey (unless a more specific name is preferred (say for idiomatic reasons), such as per WP:UKDISTRICTS or WP:NATURAL). The Swale and The Wash are other similar example of a geographical features that have "The" in them. Note that the Isle of Wight is without the "The" but The Needles isn't even though the Emirates Spinnaker Tower uses "the Needles" in running text and as noted above "the Beatles" is also used sometimes in running text. WP:THE is useful in situations where its unclear but a reliable nationally used map makes it clear that the "The" is part of the name. Encyclopædia Britannica also uses "The Solent" and indeed "The Solent" is used in running text along with "The Needles" but "the Isle of Wight" is used for the island. Thus per WP:COMMONNAME "Other encyclopedias are among the sources that may be helpful in deciding what titles are in an encyclopedic register". The last RM included moving the DAB to the base name, I have omitted that in this RM so that "Solent" can continue to redirect here but if people think the DAB should be moved then I'm OK with that. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:27, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Shaio (TransMilenio) → Av. Suba Calle 116 (TransMilenio) – station renamed"1". 181.53.12.70 21:55, 23 July 2019 (UTC) --Relisting.  — Amakuru (talk) 16:31, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Thirteen Assyrian Fathers → Thirteen Syrian Fathers – Clearly preferred in English-language reliable sources. The Gorgias Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Syriac Heritage article on Georgian Christianity, Syriac contacts with only uses "Syrian". Emma Loosley Leeming in her open access book Architecture and Asceticism: Cultural Interaction between Syria and Georgia in Late Antiquity cannot make up her mind and uses "(As)Syrian Fathers" throughout. The actual ethnic identity and geographic origin of the Thirteen Fathers—and, of course, even their historicity—are open to question. Srnec (talk) 14:23, 16 July 2019 (UTC) --Relisting.  — Amakuru (talk) 14:26, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Backlog

Shortcut
Elapsed listings fall into the backlog after 24 hours. Consider relisting 8-day-old discussions with minimal participation.

References

  1. ^ Gruemm, H. "Safeguards and Tamuz:setting the record straight" (PDF). IAEA BULLETIN. 23 (4): 10. Tuwaitha Nuclear Research Centre
  2. ^ "UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL OFFICIAL RECORDS THIRTY-SIXTH YEAR 2288th MEETING: 19 JUNE 1981" (PDF). p. 2. All those facilities and that fuel are located at the Tuwaitha Research Centre
49.198.7.235 (talk) 15:26, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Thai Social Democratic Party → New Politics Party – Thai Social Democratic Party and New Politics Party may be formally the same party that only changed its name. But politically they are two very different animals. TSDP is practically a one-man show of Somsak Kosaisuuk (and a small group of his supporters), who broke away from the People's Alliance for Democracy ("Yellow Shirts" movement) in 2011. So, unlike the former NPP, the TSDP cannot be described as "the political party of the PAD, with which it shares the same principles and ideas". However, only the 2009–11 NPP that was the party branch of the "Yellow Shirts" was notable and received attention from media and academics. After the split from the PAD movement in 2011, Somsak's tiny splinter party quickly sank into insignificance. TSDP only got 0.02% of votes in the latest election. There are very few news reports and barely any (if at all) academic mentions of the post-split TSDP. Google Books or Scholar have zero results for the present TSDP, while there are quite a few results for the NPP. More than 90% of the article deals with the NPP when it was still linked with the Yellow Shirt movement, until the split. All references but one date from 2008 to 2011. Today's TSDP is only mentioned as a side note. RJFF (talk) 13:09, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – French Cameroons → ? – Proposed titles: French Cameroon or French Cameroon (colony). When France annexed the German Kamerun, they did not separated it in two colonies. French Cameroon was rarely, at most, referred as "French Cameroons" in the English language and I don't know why it is still there when there is literally no source backing it up. The Encyclopedia Britannica uses the singular form[1], the BBC uses "French Cameroon"[2], the US department of State uses "French Cameroon.[3] Those who defend "French Cameroons" has failed to provide any authoritative source that pluralize the French or back up this title hence this title is incorrect and must be renamed..

References

  1. ^ https://www.britannica.com/place/Cameroon/British-Cameroons-1916-61-and-French-Cameroun-1916-60
  2. ^ https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-13148483
  3. ^ https://www.thoughtco.com/brief-history-of-cameroon-43616
Onbec (talk) 22:16, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Same-sex marriage under United States tribal jurisdictions → Same-sex marriage in tribal nations in the United States – I propose that we rename this page to "Same-sex marriage in Sovereign Nations in the United States." Tribal Nations are nations[1] and are due the respect given to nations. The Supreme Court of the United States,[2] the Federal Government,[3] and the United Nations[4] recognizes Tribal Nations as Sovereign Nations. I believe that "jurisdictions" does not do justice to the Nationhood of American Indian tribes. Calling it "jurisdictions" effectively reduces sovereign nations to city wards or villages. Yes, Nations is the right term. In Worcester v. Georgia, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that American Indian tribes are neither foreign nations nor states, but are domestic dependent nations.[5][6] As Nations, American Indian Tribes are sovereign and this sovereignty is protected by the United States Constitution[7] and is affirmed in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. I take tribal sovereignty and tribal consultation seriously, so I contacted Equality Navajo as it is an organization working for LGBTQ equality within Navajo Nation as I believe their voice matters on pages such as this. I received a response from Alray Nelson, the President of and founder of Navajo Equality (The Campaign for Diné Equality) and he said that this page should be called "Same-sex marriage in Sovereign Nations in the United States" and he cited that "We are sovereign nations in the eyes of the United Nations and to the federal government." Wikipedia is an encyclopedic source and we deserve to have information presented be educational and worthy of replication. Because this page has been titled "under United States tribal jurisdictions," I have seen discourse directly stemming from this page referring to Tribal Nations simply as "jurisdictions."[8][9] Use of "Nations" in the title is informative and accurate and respectful of the civil rights and sovereignty of American Indian Nations. I believe this page should be renamed to reflect this. Thank you.

References

  1. ^ https://www.bia.gov/frequently-asked-questions
  2. ^ https://www.nlm.nih.gov/nativevoices/timeline/278.html
  3. ^ https://www.bia.gov/frequently-asked-questions
  4. ^ https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf
  5. ^ https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2205&=&context=ggulrev&=&sei-redir=1&referer=https%253A%252F%252Fwww.bing.com%252Fsearch%253Fq%253Dthe%252Bunseen%252Bharm%252Bus%252Bindian%252Brelations%252Band%252Btribal%252Bsovereignty%2526form%253DEDGTCT%2526qs%253DPF%2526cvid%253D2d35cdd06106465aac89b4bb6eb74619%2526cc%253DUS%2526setlang%253Den-US%2526elv%253DAQj93OAhDTi%252AHzTv1paQdnhuGQwoXxILBB4KiLkJfAu4BaVeJyyolcSGxtkdOqAGpSubE1LPo4YKC4LgiEp0N2XXdml4w%252521w%252AWdQ4mVw7IZPm#search=%22unseen%20harm%20us%20indian%20relations%20tribal%20sovereignty%22
  6. ^ https://lawreview.vermontlaw.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/07-Bower.pdf
  7. ^ http://lawreview.colorado.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Fredericks-Heibel-Standing-Rock-the-Sioux-Treaties-and-the-Limits-of-the-Supremacy-Clause.pdf
  8. ^ http://www.equalityontrial.com/2013/09/09/colville-tribe-votes-to-recognize-marriage-equality/
  9. ^ https://twitter.com/Jamppa/status/1011610433466314752

TenorTwelve (talk) 22:43, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • (Discuss) – Computer case screws → Personal-computer case screws – The current article title is misleading. The text of this article is really about the de facto standard for the screws of a personal computer (PC): mainly UNC #6-32 screws and M3 screws. Other computer types, for example, a ZX Spectrum, do not comply with this standard. In fact, it wound not have much sense to write an article about computer screws in general, because a computer can potentially include any screw type. See the corresponding French and Spanish articles, their title specifies a personal computer Ddrazir (talk) 14:54, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Municipal government of Toronto → City of Toronto government – The government of the City of Toronto is the City of Toronto Corporation. It is commonly called the City of Toronto, although by convention City of titles redirect to the short form. The term Municipal government of Toronto is not used and is more of a technical term. We do not use Federal Government of Canada or Provincial Government of Ontario. Alaney2k (talk) 19:18, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – College Republicans → College Republican National Committee – This article is titled "College Republicans", which is a general descriptor. However, this page's content discusses the College Republican National Committee, an independent 527 PAC. As an organization, it does not necessarily represent all college republicans, but rather the college republicans that register or participate in the College Republican National Committee organization. The new name would serve to clarify the subject matter and eliminate any confusion that the College Republican National Committee inherently speaks for all college republicans. 76.176.202.180 (talk) 03:04, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Der Hölle Rache kocht in meinem Herzen → Queen of the Night aria – The article's second paragraph describes it as "one of the most famous of all opera arias" — it is instantly identifiable as part of general cultural perception and, in the English-speaking world, referenced as "Queen of the Night aria", or simply "Queen of the Night", rather than as the lengthy and virtually unrecognizable to English speakers, "Der Hölle Rache kocht in meinem Herzen". Another option, if preferred by consensus and / or WP:WikiProject Opera could be Queen of the Night (aria), thus enabling, under appropriate circumstances, the aria's name to be piped as simply Queen of the Night (aria)|Queen of the Night. In fact, a good argument might be made that this aria's English name, "Queen of the Night", can claim to be the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC of the Queen of the Night disambiguation page where the origin of every entry's English name can be said to stem in one way or another from this aria's English name. The topic was previously raised (at 09:06, 19 October 2010, above), but never submitted to a vote. Two other arias from The Magic Flute, "Dies Bildnis ist bezaubernd schön" and the Queen of the Night's other aria, "O zittre nicht, mein lieber Sohn", have Wikipedia articles under their German titles, but neither one has the instant iconic recognizability of this aria nor an instantly recognizable English-language title. A few other German arias, such as "Adele's Laughing Song" or "Song to the Evening Star" are also listed under their English titles as is The Magic Flute opera, itself. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 19:06, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Airport gets its original name back". BBC News. 25 July 2019. Retrieved 25 July 2019.
  2. ^ "Teesside International Airport - Latest news updates, pictures, video, reaction - Teesside Live". Gazette Live. 25 July 2019. Retrieved 25 July 2019.
  3. ^ "Teesside Airport name returns". ITV News. 25 July 2019. Retrieved 25 July 2019.
  4. ^ Gullon, Nick (25 July 2019). "Lengthy rights dispute ends as airport is officially renamed Teesside International Airport". The Northern Echo. Retrieved 25 July 2019.

The joy of all things (talk) 18:22, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • (Discuss) – Go-Jek → Gojek – Go-Jek's brand name is now simply "Gojek" (without dash) starting from July 22, 2019 following the launch of their new logo. I can't move the page by myself because the new title that I want is currently used as redirect page. Tiktomoro (talk) 05:07, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – LiSA (Japanese musician, born 1987) → LiSA – Per the reasons spelled out here, I think it's time for a more WP:PRECISE title. LiSA is an awfully specific stylization of Lisa (disambiguation). As I proposed there, we could simply install a hatnote for any person who was confused. WP:NATURALDIS should be preferred to the current disambiguation we have now. Though, it was recently pointed out to me that this article is the example used for WP:SINGERDAB, but I'm taking my chances anyways!
    Typing LiSA into the search bar is awfully different than typing in LISA, Lisa, or lisa. Unlike the others, this title can't be plausibly confused with anything else. Any links that result from typos can fixed as they already would (because mainspace links would be linking to a disamb. page anyways and need correcting). Hope that addresses most of the concerns, but I know Steel1943 will make a more compelling case against this than I probably could preemptively muster. lol
    Cheers! –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 00:48, 12 July 2019 (UTC)--Relisting. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 18:27, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – America the Beautiful Quarters → America the Beautiful quarters – All these US coin articles break the standard that just about every other US circulating coin article follows. This standard is a description of the coin (usually the name of its design) followed by a lowercase denomination, which is proper per WP:NCCAPS. The result of a discussion in 2011 was that "quarters" should be capitalized as it is part of the program name. I believe that the articles should be about the coins themselves, not the program that authorized the coins. "Quarters" is not a proper noun unless "Program" is included in the title. In the case of the dollar coins, once again I believe that the articles should be about the coins themselves and not the programs that authorized them. ZLEA T\C 16:28, 26 June 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. — Newslinger talk 22:45, 8 July 2019 (UTC) There is clear consensus for the first two moves as proposed, and there is consensus that the other three pages should be moved, but there is no consensus yet on which titles those pages should be moved to. --Relisting. KSFT (t|c) 22:02, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

References generally should not appear here. Use {{reflist-talk}} in the talk page section with the requested move to show references there.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requested_moves/Current_discussions&oldid=910129447"