Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hey man im josh (talk | contribs) at 16:03, 27 February 2024 (→‎User:Klbrain: done (using userRightsManager)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


New page reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Shortcuts
See Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers#Guidelines for granting for the granting guidelines. Guidelines include account age at least 90 days old, at least 500 edits to mainspace, demonstrated knowledge of page quality control (usually shown through participation in processes such as WP:AFD, WP:CSD, WP:AFC reviewing, etc.), no blocks or 3RR violations in the past 6 months, and no indications of undisclosed paid editing. Applicants should show some evidence that they generally meet the guidelines, have a demonstrated need for the right, and that they have read and fully understood the tutorial at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Editors may want to consider WP:NPPSCHOOL before applying.

User:Broc

Adding new pages can bring large value to the encyclopedia, but it is critical that articles are checked shortly after they are created and not months later, so that there is a good chance the editor will still be around to improve the page. That's why I would like to help reducing the backlog.

I have been more active on Wikipedia since a couple months but I have been here since many years, I have created some articles myself of which 2 DYI, and have some experience with AfD.

I started NPPschool but the trainer has been unresponsive ever since I started; as the alternative is learn by doing, I am applying for a trial period as patroller. Broc (talk) 16:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy link: User:Cassiopeia/NPPSchool/Broc. –Novem Linguae (talk) 04:17, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
a bit off-topic
@Broc: User:Cassiopeia/NPPSchool/Broc isn't a talk page, so mentions don't send notifications from there. That would be why User:Cassiopeia didn't see your messages. SilverLocust 💬 05:58, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh dear, that's not true. I should have tested that first. I had misunderstood WP:MENTION's "when someone mentions you on a talk page" as being a requirement (on non-project pages, that is). SilverLocust 💬 06:10, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for pointing that out, but it was specifically requested by the trainer to use that page as communication channel. The message was indeed received as you can see by the entry in User:Cassiopeia/todo. I feel this is a bit off-topic, however. Broc (talk) 06:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You can remove these four comments if you'd like. (I've collapsed it.) SilverLocust 💬 07:05, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Broc Good day. As I mentioned, I was on 6 weeks holiday and just got back a few weeks ago and swam with many tasks and things to do. To review the assignment do take time and I need to log in a time to do that as it is not an edit I can just add a short sourced content. I apologies for the waiting. Give me a few days and I will review your assignment. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 07:45, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm leaning towards granting a trial period, but I'll wait until you're done NPP school before making a decision. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 17:25, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps WP:PERM/NPP requests should be evaluated independent of NPPSCHOOL status. Else that adds a de facto extra requirement of "completed NPP school" to the criteria. As a graduate of NPPSCHOOL myself, I think NPPSCHOOL is great, but requiring it or waiting on it really does tighten up the criteria a lot. –Novem Linguae (talk) 23:41, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would ask this RfP to be evaluated according to the official criteria. The above courtesy link to the (unfinished) NPPschool can be used as part of the evaluation, together with the usual aspects (AfD/AfC history etc.) Broc (talk) 13:52, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:PharyngealImplosive7

Last month, I was able to get this perm for a trial of one month. I reviewed many new pages, and believe that I can get this perm indefinitely now. Thanks for your consideration. See my draftify log also. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 16:34, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 22 February 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 16:40, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:IgelRM

Hi, I have gained some experience with wiki processes and would to help with the NPP process. (Note: I have also applied for AFC helper rights) Regards IgelRM (talk) 04:13, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Zoglophie

I had the AFCH permission last to last month, in which I did a lot of article reviews. I am also an active participant in Afd, where I have decent record. I believe that with my own multiple article creations as well, i understand the relevant policies and am ready for handling the new page review requests. I have currently a privilege of being an Autpatrolled user in Wikipedia. Thankyou. zoglophie•talk• 16:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done for a 2-month trial. You are encouraged you re-apply roughly a week before the permission is set to expire. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:47, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:GSS

Hi, I've noticed that my new page reviewer right was revoked due to my inactivity. Now that I'm back and active, I would like to request to have this user right reinstated so I can continue using the tool to review newly created articles when necessary. Thank you. GSS 💬 07:19, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There has been a serious accusation made against this user, which I have forwarded to ARBCOM. I would strongly advise against granting this right until it has been investigated. SmartSE (talk) 14:09, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Smartse: Has there been a conclusion to the oversighted report at ANI / submission to ARBCOM? I saw the initial report before oversighting, so I'm aware of the situation, but I'd just like to know if the matter is resolved or still pending. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:29, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@@Hey man im josh: ARBCOM replied to me saying that they think the "evidence is not compelling" and there is no need not to give the right. Personally I have some reservations given that this can readily be abused by paid editors and the cost-benefit of granting it should be considered. I'll leave it to others to decide and happy to discuss via email. SmartSE (talk) 10:15, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is a relief. I did not see the report but given it came from an account with zero edits, and I used to know GSS to be a solid anti-spam editor when they were active (although they did not answer my mail, the one time I had asked their opinion ), I was really hoping it was nothing but someone trying to get GSS or getting scammed by someone that used GSS' name. GSS was great and I think will be great. We shouldn't decline their offer to help without compelling reason. — Usedtobecool ☎️ 10:38, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for updating, SmartSE. Well, this is not the first time I've faced such attacks. Since I strongly oppose paid editing and spamming and aggressively deal with spammers, they are unhappy with my return. I suspect they were triggered by one or more of my recent AfC declines or page moves.
@Usedtobecool:, I apologize for missing your request. It might have been because I was inactive and didn't check my inbox. If you still need help, please feel free to send me an email. Thank you. GSS 💬 11:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Based on the complaint at ANI being oversighted and ARBCOM not believing the evidence to be compelling, I can find no reason not to give this user a trial at least. 2 month trial granted. You're encouraged to re-apply a week before the permission is set to expire. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:38, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Moriwen

Hi! I got the automated invitation to apply for NPP, and I'd like to give it a shot. I've read through the linked tutorial, and I have a little experience with adjacent tasks (e.g. I've hit a few hundred articles in the current unreferenced articles drive). — Moriwen (talk) 16:53, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done for a 2-month trial. I would like to see some activity at AfD during the trial, as we do expect that reviewers may occasionally need to nominate an article there. You are encouraged you re-apply roughly a week before the permission is set to expire. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:52, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much! Will do.— Moriwen (talk) 15:00, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:খাঁ শুভেন্দু

I got the invitation to apply for NPP on my talk page. I have read the invitation message carefully, and followed the instructions in the message. Finally I decided to apply. খাঁ শুভেন্দু (talk) 18:09, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Erincoktem

I have received an invitation to apply NPP, I read the what needs to be done and it seems interesting to me. That's why I prefer to apply. Thank for evaluating my application. Erincoktem (talk) 19:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Andykatib

I have worked on a range of articles relevant to New Zealand politics, current affairs and history. Notable contributions have included co-governance, Voices for Freedom, biographies such as Hannah Tamaki and Rob Campbell (economist), and various government departments and bills such as Te Whatu Ora and the Russia Sanctions Act 2022. I also regularly update politicians' biographies, current affairs pages such as 2024 in New Zealand, and politics-related pages such as the Sixth National Government of New Zealand. I have also worked on Star Wars and other fantasy related articles such as Young Jedi Adventures, Shadow and Bone and Draft:Mech Cadets. I am familiar with Wikipedia's policies including referencing, impartiality and avoiding conflicts of interests. I am also involved with the New Zealand Wikimedia community. Willing to help out. Andykatib (talk) 20:49, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done for a 2-month trial. During the trial I'd like to see some activity at AfD to show familiarization with the deletion process, since your AfD record doesn't show very much. You are encouraged you re-apply roughly a week before the permission is set to expire. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:29, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Esprit15d

My primary contributions to Wikipedia have to do with improving the quality and formatting of the references in articles. Doing this in newly formed articles is crucial in deciding which articles should be here, and establishing the articles for future growth.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 20:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC) Esprit15d • talk • contribs 20:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done for a 2-month trial. During the trial I'd like to see some more activity at AfD to show familiarization with the deletion process. You are encouraged you re-apply roughly a week before the permission is set to expire. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:36, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Викидим

I was invited on my talk page to join the NPP. I have read and understand the tutorial, have sufficient experience, and think that I can perform the associated tasks. I have a patrol flag (similar, but different) in the Russian Wikipedia. Викидим (talk) 21:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wikisteveb4

I would enjoy making Wikipedia a better place by reviewing new articles to see if they are fitting for the platform. I have made roughly 10,000 edits and enjoy contributing. Thank you. Wikisteveb4 (talk) 22:30, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Saintandy7

I have been invited on my talk page to join the NPP and have read through the tutorial page and understand the role I would be taking up. I would love to help review new Wikipedia articles. I have been a user for 13 years and have made more than 100,000 edits. Thanks. Saintandy7 (talk) 22:36, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Quaerens-veritatem

I received an invitation. Wikipedia needs reviewers, I am an experienced editor, meet the guidelines, like to help make the encyclopedia better, have read and fully understand the tutorial at Wikipedia:New pages patrol, and can constructively help deal with the backlog. Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 01:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Preferwiki

Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights is because I got invitation to join New pages patrol from Media Wiki. Preferwiki (talk) 04:06, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Florificapis

I have over 120 new articles under my belt, mostly relating to medieval history, monasteries, saints, and geographical features. I am familiar with the kinds of content that would fall under CSD criteria, since I have experience wikifying new pages and tagging obviously problematic new pages for speedy deletion. Familiar with guidelines on AfC, AfD, notability, and proper sourcing, and also draftifying new articles and rating talk pages using scripts. Would be quite happy to help out with the backlog while being cautious and careful. Also currently a Pending Changes Reviewer. Florificapis (talk) 08:26, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Maxim Masiutin

My name is Maxim Masiutin, and I would like to submit my application for the new page reviewer role. I have enough edits and days in Wikipedia. I hope I have a good knowledge of content policies and guidelines and experience with quality control processes. Although I have limited but existing experience in page deletion, I'm a pending page reviewer, and I'm also reviewing pages with recent changes. I also have experience in policy-compliant content editing because I nominated a few pages for Good Article nomination; some passed the criteria, and some failed. However, I'm improving the content of the pages that failed and nominate again. I'm not the one who can judge my behavior, but I hope that I have a solid track record of interacting with other editors, including the new editors, in a civil and constructive manner. I have never had any 3RR violations, but I had a 1-hour block in the last 6 months. Still, I hope that this block should not prevent my application from proceeding. Maxim Masiutin (talk) 09:13, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Novem Linguae is familiar with me. By the way, a message to my Talk page arrived me invited to submit my request for a New page reviewer submission. Maxim Masiutin (talk) 02:56, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'll let another admin process this request to avoid bias. Our interaction was slightly negative, but everything is resolved at the moment. –Novem Linguae (talk) 03:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vijethnbharadwaj

I have crated 500+ articles, mainly focusing on Politics related Topics and Geography. -Vijethnbharadwaj (talk) 11:03, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done for a 2-month trial. During the trial I'd like to see some more activity at AfD to show familiarization with the deletion process. You are encouraged you re-apply roughly a week before the permission is set to expire. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:57, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Morekar

I am applying to be a new page reviewer after receiving an invitation to my talk page. With the experience in deletion processes, Articles for Creation, and policy-compliant editing, I believe I meet the criteria. I have a proven record of civil interaction, experience in page management, and a clean behavioral record. I understand the responsibilities associated with the New Page Reviewer role and am eager to contribute to the maintenance and quality control of new Wikipedia pages. Morekar (talk) 11:34, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Whywhenwhohow

A message posted on my talk page suggested I help out. Whywhenwhohow (talk) 21:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Request withdrawn Whywhenwhohow (talk) 07:54, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:OpalYosutebito

I'm interested in becoming a new page patroller, as I feel that each edit, no matter how small, helps with the completion of new articles. Also, I tried getting in touch with Cassiopeia yesterday so I could attend NPP school, but they haven't gotten back to me yet. OpalYosutebito (talk) 23:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OpalYosutebito I have just replied to you on my talk page. Besides doing my volunteer work in Wikipedia, I have a full time job which I worked 14 hours yesterday and could not reply as soon as you wish. I believe you understand that no all editors can reply in timely manner. Cassiopeia talk 00:30, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I understand, but I didn't know you had a job. Thanks for letting me know - OpalYosutebito (talk) 02:14, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Klbrain

Responding to a recent call on my talk page, and having read the tutorial, I'd be very happy to help with this. I've been actively editing for a decade, and over the last 5 years been focussing on the merge backlog; when I started, the backlog was about 3 years; it's now 6 months, and so I feel that I can diversify my editing approach to engage with a different, and important, task. While not directly active in many AfD discussions, I've been heavily involved in implementing AfD-merge outcomes, and hence am very familiar with the AfD approach. I'm familiar with page moves, primarily as an adjunct to merges (for example, moving to a joint name in preparation for a merge of two closely-related topics). I'm happy to work on a broad range of topics. Klbrain (talk) 08:23, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done for a 2-month trial. During the trial I'd like to see some more activity at AfD to show familiarization with the deletion process. You are encouraged you re-apply roughly a week before the permission is set to expire. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:03, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ogress

Hi! I'm a very longterm Wikieditor (twenty years, ugh). I recently received an Invitation to join New pages patrol box on my talk page. I think this work looks important and also very backlogged, so I'd like to try to contribute. Much of my work on Wikipedia has involved fixing grammar and coherency issues and checking and finding cites alongside non-English formatting, spelling, and romanisation issues, although I have researched topics and expanded articles. If you have any questions, I'd be happy to answer them, I'm not 100% sure what else I should note here. Ogress 20:59, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Betterkeks

I received an invitation to apply on my talk page, so I read the tutorial, thought about it for a few days, and decided to go ahead. You're looking for people to help, and I’m willing to give it a go. Betterkeks (talk) 14:34, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Done Thanks for pitching in! I've assigned you the right for a trial period of a month. Feel free to reach out if you ever have any questions and also when the trial period ends so I can check your progress. Good luck. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 12:09, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wk3v78k23tnsa

Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 15:27, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Hello. I was invited to join New pages patrol. I have thoroughly read the the tutorial and will enroll in WP:NPPSCHOOL. Thank you for considering my application. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 15:27, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Macbeejack

I can see a huge load of new page creation. Please check if i am eligible to help as NPP reviewer. Thank You. Macbeejack ☎ 17:33, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user has 497 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 17:40, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Trainsskyscrapers

Hello. I recently received an invitation to participate, and it sounds like fun. As someone who has both created and edited pages (under various accounts) since 2011, I have experienced the joy of a new created page being reviewed and accepted, and the slight irritation of created pages that were "sent back to the drawing board" to be further expanded with reliable sources and additional proof of notability. While the latter may cause brief unhappiness in the short term, the process allowed me the time (and motivation) to create some of my best, well-sourced pages. Looking back, you can definitely see the improvement between the two versions of each of those pages, and understand why they were initially rejected. It would be an honor to share this learned knowledge with others while helping to reduce the backlog by reviewing the work of fellow creators. Cheers. Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 06:13, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Done You don't have experience with AfC or AfD but you do have a good track record with article creation, so I'm willing to give you a chance. :) I appreciate the willingness to help out. I'm going to give you the NPP right for a trial period of a month and then you can contact me afterwards if you wish to continue reviewing and I can check your progress. Make sure you read this page and feel free to reach out anytime you have questions. There's no harm in skipping pages you're unsure about either. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 09:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Clovermoss (expires 09:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 09:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rickyurs

I am responding to the invitation to join New pages patrol. I joined 5 years ago and have 77,000+ edits from 25 projects. I have created 720+ articles and gained enough experience as required under Guidelines for granting WP:NPRCRITERIA. If you find me suitable for WP:NPP, please grant the rights. Thanks. Rickyurs (talk) 09:15, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:NotAGenious

My permission expires soon. Though I have been less active than I intended to be, I think my patrol log of 300 is pretty self-explanatory. NotAGenious (talk) 15:04, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Hey man im josh (expires 00:00, 27 February 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 15:10, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Hey man im josh (talk) 15:29, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Heh, that was pretty fast. Thanks! NotAGenious (talk) 15:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vanderwaalforces

I was initially given a month long trial, during which I participated at the November AfC backlog elimination drive. Because of some issues spotted by admins during the drive, I was denied the permanence of the NPR right when I requested it in December 2023. I am sure I no longer have any problems, I have 3 GAs, over 90 articles created on mainspace and still counting. I want to continue helping out with the serious work going on at NPP, and also AfC, as I have a passion for these areas. Thank you for looking into my request. Wanted to add some links, but I think MusikBot will do it ;) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:47, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 10:50, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging @Joe Roe in case he has any interest in chiming in on this one. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:50, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheChineseGroundnut

I've been active for more than 90 days. I'm an AFC reviewer and I have reviewed over 30+ articles and I have also participated a bit on AFD. I also have the Pending Changing Reviewers right and I wish to help the community assess impending modifications of new pages. I am aware of and have read the pertinent guidelines for this authorization. TheChineseGroundnut (talk) 15:05, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot talk 15:10, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/New_page_reviewer&oldid=1210636277"