Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sdkb (talk | contribs) at 19:37, 8 October 2020 (→‎Draft:Template:DYK humor: Replying to Sdkb (using reply-link)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

    This page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.

    Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in two cases. The first case is restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions (G6) or stale Articles for creation drafts (G13)), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. In the second use case, this page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be "userfied", i.e., restored as a draft or emailed to you; this way, the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here).

    This means that content deleted after discussion – through deletion processes – may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process but through deletion review instead. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided.

    Do not request that pages deleted under speedy deletion criteria F7, F9, F11, U5, A7, A9, A11, G3, G4, G10, G11 or G12 be undeleted here.

    Instructions for special cases:


    Hammouda Salhi

    I wish to recover content and also i still believe that there is no violation of the policy and that rredirects have been produced by mistake and ignorance.

    and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Meaning Translated (talk) 22:00, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    
    Hey Liz. Am I reading this right if I assume that this page was moved around a lot and ended up resulting in the G11 deletion noted in the section below? – Muboshgu (talk) 22:07, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello, Muboshgu,
    I'm sorry to have missed this notification. Yes, this page was moved around at least 4 or 5 times in a short period of time. But it looks as if Meaning Translated has already recreated the article now. Liz Read! Talk! 22:52, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Hammouda Salhi --

    Wish to recover up to date content from this page and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Meaning Translated (talk) 22:02, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:06, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I am prepared to edit that content to avoid any promotional tone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meaning Translated (talkcontribs) 22:11, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    - Hammouda Salhi -

    Wishing to recover the information in the page and then can be deleted and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Meaning Translated (talk) 23:01, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:41, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      @Deepfriedokra: i just wanted to note the user still went ahead and recreated the same article. Moumou82 (talk) 07:43, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Dillon Danis

    Please move to Draft:Dillon Danis, so that it can be worked. Has attained notability. —2409:4073:0:84CD:1F9:20B6:FA92:D927 (talk) 17:17, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – Muboshgu (talk) 02:55, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Muboshgu, where is the draft? I can't find it. 2409:4073:8D:BB56:0:0:2383:10AC (talk) 22:34, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Good question. I restored it again. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:37, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    peyman keshavarzi nazarloo

    I was doing works on Sabail's team last day ( you can see my works here, creating category, template and amending issues, so I created Peyman Keshavarzi nazarloo and no history showed to me (i had a mistake for the name then i corrected according to soccerway.com).I don't know whom created this before and what was the content of article before but my structure of works are similar. [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/pages/en.wikipedia.org/Mojtaba2361/all see my pages (no deletion in 80 creation). I know the policies and wp:N. The article is Notable according to WP:NFOOTY.He played in two Profesional league in Iran Pro League (Iran) and Azerbaijan Premier League (Azerbaijan). the WP:SALT says that if a page is repeatedly recreated by a single user but my article's content is not substantially identical to the deleted version. Another issue is, if an article create in a correct edition (by confirmed user) and it be survive, we can get rid of repeatedly creation by banned users. Thanks. —Mojtaba2361 (talk) 01:57, 1 October 2020 (UTC) --Mojtaba2361 (talk) 01:57, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @GiantSnowman: Hello. Just for informing as you said. Thanks.--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 02:00, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • @Mojtaba2361: Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peyman Keshavarz, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Eddie891 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 03:34, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Eddie891 and ReaderofthePack: i talked to admin. that deletion was for something else not for notability of article. He said in my talk page to open a request here. please wait until his answer.thanks--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 04:02, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    The issue here is that the topic has been deleted by AFD, and also repeatedly deleted at numerous locations (now SALTed - Peyman Keshavarzi nazarloo, Peyman Keshavarzi Nazarloo, Peyman Keshavarzi and Peyman Keshavarz) due to G4/G5. GiantSnowman 09:49, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    The AfD reached the consensus that the topic fails WP:GNG. If you feel that my closing of that discussion was a poor interpretation of consensus or that recreation should be allowed, please take it to deletion review, because I stand by the decision of the AfD. Best, Eddie891 Talk Work 11:20, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Dr Lawrence Ajayi

    I, Samuelsarah1, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Samuelsarah1 (talk) 03:42, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:24, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Care For Wild Rhino Sanctuary

    I, BlueCloudDesign, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BlueCloudDesign (talk) 07:16, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:25, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Nescher & Nesher

    I, Nesherin, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nesherin (talk) 08:46, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I, Nesherin, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nesherin (talk) 09:02, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:26, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:19, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Viktor Huszar

    Article that I created was proposed for deletion due to suggested failure of WP:GNG and sources only including passing mentions. Further information and sources can be added to demonstrate subject's notability. Further sources were added following proposal for deletion, including feature interviews with the subject in Press Association and Xinhua. Further sources intended to be added. —Davidrcgreen12 (talk) 10:11, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:RECOM

    I, Posidonos1, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Posidonos1 (talk) 11:32, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:20, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Ghost Fishing UK

    I, JasonBramwell, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. JasonBramwell (talk) 12:41, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:20, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Scissor Manohar

    Article that I created and deleted without discussion due to sources, but now sources exist: [1] [2].TamilMirchi (talk) 17:10, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:24, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Citizen Mani

    Article that I created and deleted without discussion due to sources, but now sources exist: [3] [4] [5].TamilMirchi (talk) 17:10, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – Muboshgu (talk) 18:23, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Zinc8 Energy Solutions

    I, Roberto Orendain, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Roberto Orendain (talk) 17:25, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:19, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Hari Viswanath

    Soft deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hari Viswanath. I am expressing my disappointment on the deletion of the page 'Hari Viswanath', the award winning film director who has directed tamil as well as hindi films, apart from award winning short films. His Radiopetti became the first tamil film to win the KNN Audience Award in the official competition in Busan International Film Festival and has been selected in many prestigious film festivals. He had also directed award winning short films. The director is easily notable among Intellectual audience as well as class audience. I also checked the contributions of the editor TamilMirchi who nominated to delete the page and was surprised to see many of his pages in draft space was rejected because of not notable subjects. How can he nominate a page that has the notable eligibility and at the same time create several pages that are not notable? Moreover he has even nominated page to delete that has been created by himself! I don't know, what has to be stated here. Hope some good administrators will look into this and take a right decision, atleast undelete the subject. —Ht18vis (talk) 19:10, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done Soft delete at AfD is treated as a contested WP:PROD. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:16, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Eric Rhein

    I, GetDaFacts, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I stopped working on it due to COVID-19 but am not ready to resume. GetDaFacts (talk) 19:25, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:23, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Gil Fagiani

    I, GetDaFacts, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I had temporarily discountinued work due to COVID-19 but am now ready to resume. GetDaFacts (talk) 19:28, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:24, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Birmingham Wasps Hockey Club

    I, Geoffstokes, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Geoffstokes (talk) 19:37, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:25, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:The Good Nurse

    Wasn't alerted to this draft's speedy deletion status, I still intend on working on this. —Rusted AutoParts 20:09, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:26, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Cottontail (film)

    I, Rusted AutoParts, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rusted AutoParts 02:36, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:44, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Anna Patten

    I would like to request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Thanks. Hmlarson (talk) 03:16, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • @Hmlarson: Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 03:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Jamie Peck

    I, MJL's Evil Sister, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I previously lost access to this account, as i have been able to get it back, i intend to continue working on editing my first article! (0u0✿) ~𝓜𝓙𝓛'𝓼 𝓔𝓿𝓲𝓵 𝓢𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓻 (talk) 04:55, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:21, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hubert Gatignon

    I, HubertGatignon, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. HubertGatignon (talk) 07:38, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Adrian Griffin (drummer)

    Deleted as expired PROD as an unreferenced BLP, but the version I can still find cached on Google cache had 4 references, including this: https://web.archive.org/web/20090109043936/http://www.thedwarf.com.au/nd/interviews/28_days_beating_their_own_drum. I suspect it was deleted in error after someone added references but forgot to remove the PROD; request it be restored. —Yngvadottir (talk) 08:02, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Phil Hilborne

    I, Sanepete, very apologetically request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. I now realise wikipedia resources are very precious and will be not make use of them in such a cavalier manner moving forward. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sane Pete (talk) 08:27, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:51, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —ThoughtfulCreativity247 (talk) 08:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    The article log says it was deleted for unambiguous advertising. I will happily edit and remove whatever is considered advertising within the article as we are now the only law firm that is not linked here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_law_firms_by_revenue As a large company with many offices around the world, I believe it is important that the company has an unbiased and impartial online presence through wikipedia.

    • @ThoughtfulCreativity247: Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. This was deleted by DGG (I've tagged him in this) - we can't restore this here, but you could ask him if he would be willing to email you a copy. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 09:44, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Ravensprings Park

    I, Narrowgauge725, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Narrowgauge725 (talk) 11:07, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:49, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Simon Škrlec

    I, Simon.skrlec, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Simon.skrlec (talk) 13:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:49, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Restoration

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 2804:D49:4915:AA00:E92A:2DDA:546B:4DF4 (talk) 14:17, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Hi, I don't see any deleted edits in your edit history. We need to have the name of the page you want restored. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 02:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:World Read Aloud Day

    I, Hannahmgp, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hannahmgp (talk) 17:16, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:50, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Manoj Shah

    I, Gazal world, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gazal world (talk) 18:29, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:48, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Windows Security

    I, null, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 96.19.71.229 (talk) 20:22, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:51, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:People Analytics

    I, Dignitice, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dignitice (talk) 23:17, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:54, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Bauhinia yunnanensis

    I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:07, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:55, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Bernardo de Brihuega

    I, null, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 78.145.135.145 (talk) 07:11, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:48, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Helen Obiageli Oshikoya

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —OBIAGELI2020 (talk) 11:09, 3 October 2020 (UTC) The article with the above name is been deleted but you didnt give me a tangible reason for it can you send back the article let me edit it.contest this speedy deletion[reply]

     Not done Re: Draft:HELEN OBIAGELI OSHIKOYA On the contrary, you were bluntly told, "This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic." We won't send back the deleted version because it was unsalvageable advertisement and promotion. You should instead focus on creating a totally new version which is impartial and based solely on reliable sources. You will also need to fully disclose your conflict of interest with regard to this person. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:18, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:New Vision University

    I, Radamanthras, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Radamanthras (talk) 13:10, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:02, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Martin W. Sandler

    I, null, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2601:18F:600:4580:DA6:CE51:7A0C:72C3 (talk) 20:38, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined pending further information. This was undeleted three times now with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no significant improvements were made to the entry for resubmission any of those times (and two out of the three times, no changes were made whatsoever). Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Lee Hochul Literary Prize for Peace

    I wanted to look over this and verify that there isn't any reason to histmerge it into Lee Hochul Literary Prize for Peace now that that article has been created. Nathan2055talk - contribs 23:34, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done Nathan2055, I don't think there's any need for a histmerge, but you can decide if you want one. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:07, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rawlinsville Mennonite Church

    I, Areeser, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Areeser (talk) 01:03, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:06, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Naseebon Jali

    No reasoning given. —AmrozRomaanvi (talk) 12:26, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @AmrozRomaanvi: The page is already live. This is not the place to contest content being removed/edited from the article; use the talk page for that. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Hasteur Hasteur Ha-- oh.... 13:16, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    And if you're asking about the older version, Note: This page appears to have been deleted under speedy deletion criterion G5, indicating a page that was created by a sockpuppet account created to evade a block or ban, or a user editing on behalf of the blocked/banned user. G5 speedy deletions will not be overturned here.A little blue Bori v^_^v Hasteur Hasteur Ha-- oh.... 13:18, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    This probably is Pakistanipedia's latest sock - this isn't the first deleted article they've recreated - Thori Si Wafa Roshan Sitara. Ravensfire (talk) 14:09, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nishita Goswami

    I, Mask2blu, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mask2blu (talk) 14:17, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:13, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Fishing Pole Trap

    I, null, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 73.221.162.155 (talk) 15:38, 4 October 2020 (UTC)It was done.[reply]

    • Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:14, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Suryansh

    Kindly undelete the above mentioned draft I intend to work on it. —Yabasicc (talk) 17:51, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suryansh, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Premeditated Chaos (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:22, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Hollensen/sandbox/Svend Hollensen

    Please undelete Hollensen/sandbox/Svend Hollensen, as I am still working on it to improve it. The speedy deletion of the article was a request done by me, but it was a mistake by me, and I want to restore the article, if possible. All what I wanted was to delete the picture where there was a problem with copyright (EURO FH), but I was not using this picture at all in the article - thank you very much - Svend Hollensen —Hollensen (talk) 19:46, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion U5. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, Fastily (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:23, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Timothy Greer

    I, Hoosierdaddyblue, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hoosierdaddyblue (talk) 19:57, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Liz Read! Talk! 22:55, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Asking for recovering Draft of Mira Demartino's article


    I would like to request undeletion of an article, that O originally created, for an artist Mira Demartino - I am the author of the original draft, and I would like to recover the draft and save it for future posting, after making it ready for publication on Wikipedia - I would like to successfully argue that this artist deserves a Wikipedia page. The administrator who deleted the page has a user name

    Celestina007‬

    as I was instructed, I should first ask that the article, that I created for Mira DeMartino, be "userfied" meaning the former article be moved to a draft space so that it could be improved - and its context discussed with Wikipedia administrator(s). I would appreciate this opportunity, as I am learning more about creating Wikipedia pages that include photos of artists' art works. --Monitor333 (talk) 00:24, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:34, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Hello Muboshgu,

    I appreciate your comments - I would like to understand why this page was deleted "as a blatant advertisement under section G11" - I would appreciate your points explaining where in the article, its content could be interpreted as such. The artist has an objective track record - multiple sources that confirm her career as a succesful sculptor - I would welcome your reply with point by point suggestions how the article should be altered to highlight the accomplishments - that you must agree that have been documented - and remove from the text what you may perceive as something that does not belong there.

    in the link that you provided me with I read that:

    "If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced with text written from a neutral point of view, this is preferable to deletion"

    can you please help me edit the page, in a manner, that would not be consdered for future deletion.

    can you please help me with recovering my latest draft of the article - how this can be recovered?

    Regards, --Monitor333 (talk) 03:57, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Monitor333: Using "™", "prestigious", "awarded ", "empower" is a flag of promotion. A section about personal life has no references, and suggests a close personal knowledge, rather than reflecting what is published. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:51, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello Graeme Bartlett, Thank you very much for your comments - I agree that these adjectives should be removed from the text. How can I access the draft of the article, since it seemed to be entirely removed - I would like to able to edit the article, instead of writing it again from scratch, since I have not retained it. Best --Monitor333 (talk) 14:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC) Hello Graeme Bartlett - I appreciate comments from everybody - I plan to rewrite the entire article about the artist - Thank you for you input. --Monitor333 (talk) 13:48, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Thomas S. Hermansen

    I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:30, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined pending further information. This was undeleted twice with pledges that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission either time. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. Jackmcbarn (talk) 01:50, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    FloridaArmy, you made one edit to this draft, Thomas S. Hermanson was an early filmmaker. Then it was deleted on March 30, and I undeleted it for you on April 3. You made no edits, and it was deleted again yesterday. Why should any admin here reinstate this? – Muboshgu (talk) 02:04, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    So I can work on it. If the restoration process was half as efficient as the deletion process it would make ot a lot easier. FloridaArmy (talk) 16:32, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    FloridaArmy, maybe if you didn't create so many of these one sentence drafts that you seem to lose track of you might be able to focus your efforts on a smaller number of drafts that you'd actually work on? – Muboshgu (talk) 17:23, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Wikipedia is a collaborative enterprise. Anyone can work on the draft. He appears notable to me. I don't see an issue. Far too many subjects are missing. It's all hands on deck. We should minimize the time wasting obstruction and bureaucracy. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:17, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    PayPay

    Page was deleted in 2008 due to spam. In 2018, a Japanese electronic payment system called PayPay was created. Want to create a page for the new PayPay payment system. —Comfortably Paranoid (talk) 05:53, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I have unsalted the page. The deleted version was for a Czech system, and so sounds unrelated, so I have not restored. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:03, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I wonder what happened to make that article bounce? I apologise for naught!A little blue Bori v^_^v Hasteur Hasteur Ha-- oh.... 09:10, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Double delete was due to double create of a very similar page within a short time period. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:23, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Super Pollo

    Hi! I am requesting this be undeleted on the grounds that the VFD was only 1-0 for deletion. 1-0 is not a consensus, had it been 1-0 to be kept, I suspect the deletionists would have re-listed it again. So this page needs to be undeleted and then re-listed at AFD. Thanks and God bless you! Antonio Super Crazy Nuts Martin (que/) 07:47, 5 September, 2020 (UTC)

    First off, they aren't votes; they're debates. Second, given the opposing "keep" argument this is not restorable here. The proper venue is WP:DRV for this; admins will not unilaterally overturn a AfD debate here. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Hasteur Hasteur Ha-- oh.... 09:09, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    FYI, in case you missed it, this editor is the keep argument (who subsequently asked to vote twice?). --Izno (talk) 12:43, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Well you should first ask user:Izno who closed the debate, there was one supporter, and one opposer. Anyway the AFD rules apply. A draft is a possibility if you think the page could be improved with better references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:41, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Multiple editors indicated they could not find sources, and your comment was basically a handwave to the existence of sourcing. I have little issue restoring to draft, or sending to DRV if you believe you have such and simply did not present it, but this should not be returned to mainspace as-is. --Izno (talk) 12:43, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Viktor Huszár

    I, N77dawes, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. N77dawes (talk) 07:49, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:43, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Done – Muboshgu (talk) 15:38, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Kamp Salamon

    I, Belek44, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Belek44 (talk) 08:16, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. @Belek44: This appears to be in Hungarian, and so will need translation to English to use here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:46, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Category:Buildings and structures in Vejen Municipality

    Speedy-deleted as empty per WP:C1 ... but no longer empty. —BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:24, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – Muboshgu (talk) 15:37, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Paul Roberts Choreographer

    Has been deleted in error under speedy deletion code U5 —Paul Roberts Choreographer (talk) 15:24, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion U5. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:36, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Eberhard von Boremski.jpg

    File was deleted as F5 "Unused non-free media file" when article Eberhard von Boremski was redirected, now restored and expanded so would be good to get image restored as well. Cheers —MisterBee1966 (talk) 18:18, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    The Jacks (band)

    This page was written from scratch so I'm not clear on the copyright issue. —PSPazW (talk) 18:51, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    The page was written by user:Operator873. It was only there for a minute and then the writer tagged it with db-author. There was no mention of a copyright issue. So perhaps you can ask user:Operator873 why they wanted it deleted. This could be restored. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:06, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    The page log is misleading. The log shows I created the page because Barkeep49 moved the article into Draft space while I had an active edit open. When I saved, it recreated the page. I requested Barkeep49 delete the page as I had intended on moving my edits to the Draft. I honestly do not recall if I ever did so, however. Operator873talkconnect 22:09, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    After checking the history on that Draft, I can confirm I made the edits I intended to. Operator873talkconnect 22:10, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for that Operator873, so I can mark this  Not done, as the page is at Draft:The Jacks (band). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:16, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Category:Legal education in Pakistan

    deleted as empty, but no longer empty —BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:53, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Lali Sekhon

    I, Lalisekhon, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lalisekhon (talk) 19:10, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I, Lalisekhon, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lalisekhon (talk) 19:21, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:18, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mista Blessington

    I, Mistabless, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mistabless (talk) 21:11, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:20, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Secular Institute of Schoenstatt Fathers

    I, Franciscosobral, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Franciscosobral (talk) 02:18, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 02:59, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Shen-Kai

    I, Jenchenblissculture, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jenchenblissculture (talk) 06:02, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:05, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Amanat Ali

    I, 39.34.149.169, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 39.34.149.169 (talk) 06:52, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:39, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi [User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] dear administrator thank you and i have edited the page and added all the references from fresh.

    --39.34.149.169 (talk) 09:21, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Alphado pet care

    I, null, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 194.157.32.198 (talk) 07:33, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:40, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Escapology.

    I, null, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2A00:23C6:C00A:C300:28FE:2695:780D:5625 (talk) 07:39, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Currently this looks like an ad. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:42, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Category:Russian and Soviet military history articles by quality

    deleted by WP:C1 as empty, but no longer empty —BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:08, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Fuzia

    I, Rachana Dhabalia, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rachana Dhabalia (talk) 09:54, 6 October 2020 (UTC) I would like to inform the team that this article is not for any person, group or company promotion. In fact, this article is for FUZIA which works for Women Empowerment.[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. see Draft:Fuzia, but it is not the version you wrote, which was too promotional. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:32, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Texas Petawatt Laser

    I, BenjaminLS, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BenjaminLS (talk) 10:47, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:34, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Blue LoLãn

    Subject was written about in several articles, there were over 20 sources on this new wiki page and it was put up for speedy deletion due to a previous wiki article being deleted that was different than this one and had way fewer sources/references. Seems that a bot or a person put it up for speedy deletion without reading wiki page. —Ömer Ezgi Erdoğan (talk) 11:07, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    It was not nominated by a bot, but was deleted by User:CambridgeBayWeather, so that should be where you ask first for a reconsideration. I do agree that your article was different to the deleted one though. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:38, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:IndieCentralMusic

    I, null, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 86.26.243.175 (talk) 12:35, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:59, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:RadRoyal Enterprises

    I, Zaxo8, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Zaxo8 (talk) 17:30, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done Barkeep49 (talk) 20:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Digital Sustainability

    I, Maemst, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I will address the critique and improve the article. Maemst (talk) 18:12, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:01, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Pouya Karami

    I, Isavoiu, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Isavoiu (talk) 23:20, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:27, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Done – Muboshgu (talk) 17:25, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Wikipedia Treasure Hunt

    I, BoatyBen, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BoatyBen (talk) 07:37, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I, BoatyBen, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BoatyBen (talk) 07:37, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:42, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:LittleBoy.png

    I believe I can make a good case for fair use on The Little Boy that Santa Claus Forgot. —Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:58, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Anna Balestrieri/sandbox/Alexander Kulik

    I, Anna Balestrieri, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Anna Balestrieri (talk) 12:41, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:24, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Parimatch (company)

    I think the page was deleted by a mistake. This is quite old (since 1996 active) betting company, a leader in CIS region and ono of the biggest in Europe. It easily meets basic notability critearia, however it was not covered in Bloomberg or New York Times. I hope, that there is enough reasons to recover the page. It was also edited by many other experienced wikipedians who cleaned up it and fixed. I hope, it's quite fair to ask your community assistance and make the page live again. Thank you so much. --Czhechguy (talk) 14:20, 7 October 2020 (UTC) —Czhechguy (talk) 14:20, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Konstantin Scherbakov

    Page was deleted with an assertion of non-notability, but this pianist clearly is notable, with many widely praised recordings to his credit, and coverage on Wikipedia in several other languages. Several links from other articles were broken by the deletion. —94.196.234.146 (talk) 16:34, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Odborové sdružení křesťanského dělnictva

    I, Soman, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Soman (talk) 16:38, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:28, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Richie Williamson

    I, Rachelkauffman, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rachel Kauffman 17:46, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

    • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:06, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:National Women's Music Festival

    I, Woodsy lesfem, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Woodsy lesfem (talk) 19:09, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 19:14, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Ingrid M. Evans

    I, MarkRennie, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2601:645:C000:6C10:D1A6:F78:AF36:3154 (talk) 20:21, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I, null, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2601:645:C000:6C10:D1A6:F78:AF36:3154 (talk) 20:27, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:11, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Claudiocsfreitas89/sandbox

    There appear to be deleted edits on this draft about the same topic, prior to it being rewritten in a less promotional way. I would like someone to restore them and merge them into the history of the current version. Thanks in advance! —Nathan2055talk - contribs 20:35, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Ingrid M. Evans

    I,MarkRennie, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2601:645:C000:6C10:D1A6:F78:AF36:3154 (talk) 21:32, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft talk:Jamie Peck

    Should've been restored along with Draft:Jamie Peck. —–MJLTalk 03:08, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:RutOS

    I, null, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 88.119.152.93 (talk) 04:27, 8 October 2020 (UTC)U[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:08, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Urban and regional planning in Western Australia

    I, Adondai, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Adondai (talk) 09:25, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Manuel Cortés-Castañeda

    I, Annalea Cortes, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 65.185.107.226 (talk) 12:12, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    draft:zyggandia

    {{subst:refund|1=draft:zyggandia|2= It got deleted for being a hoax even though I clearly stated it was fictional, not real. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zyggand (talkcontribs) 14:52, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Russian Broadcasting Network

    I, Геннадий Чигирев, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Геннадий Чигирев (talk) 15:20, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Clarabridge

    Requesting this page be undeleted as it represented legitimate historical information on Clarabridge and has value for the customer experience industry. Nevertheless, the content was stale; this will be remedied upon undeletion. Many thanks. —Cb-author-wiki (talk) 19:27, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Template:DYK humor

    I, Sdkb, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 19:35, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Jackmcbarn: If you want to lessen the number of undeletion requests that are made, it might be a good idea to wait more than five minutes between the six month talk page notification and actioning G13 deletions. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 19:37, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]