User talk:SwisterTwister

Please sign your messages with four tildes ('''~~~~''') and please be as specific and concise as possible. If I reviewed your Articles for Creation submission, please read the message(s) at the draft page clearly before adding a message here. As this has happened multiple times, please ensure your message is only posted here once (not doubled).

PLEASE ADD YOUR MESSAGE AT THE BOTTOM and generally, I will reply here so please watch this page for a response. Unless it's an AfC page, where I'll usually comment there and you will get a notification for that. If I have taken time reviewing your draft, please be patient and I will get to it as I am quite busy with other tasks but am certainly willing to look at it and will not need reminding.

New users: If you want to learn the basics of Wikipedia, my page for new users here contains useful information. Information such as citing sources, submitting images and changing & deleting username. If that page hasn't answered your question(s), contact me here.

• User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 1 (2008-May 2012)
• User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 2 (May 2012-November 2015)
• User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 3 (November 2015-March 2016)
• User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 4 (April 2016 - present)

Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #31

Benjamin Teitelbaum

Your reasons for declining this page seem to be following their own logic. I have been told in the commons that this should be accepted as it was (let alone with the new edits). It meets the guidelines Wikipedia names for notability (secondary coverage in major media, academic accolades). Whether you personally think it counts as being notable is something else, but that seems to be what you are running on. AxelRR (talk) 13:25, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

AOMB

I received notification stating that my newly created page is advertorial and you requested for speedy deletion. I am new to Wikipedia and may I know what is the problem of the article? When I read through pages of other charity organization, for eg: beyondblue in Australia, I didn't find any differences in the editorial style. May I know how to rectify my problem? Thank you.Celestina wang (talk) 05:03, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi.excuse me I'm new here and I just was trying to make a page for my friend Arsha Aghdasi, he is a famous Stuntman in Iran. And he doesn't have only one award, there is three, I was about to improve the page and I still have about 40 links of his video and interviews. I can't understand why you delete the page? What was wrong with that?because he is a big deal! Please let me know how should I make this page. Thank you.Setareh Malek (talk) 03:34, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturals_Ice_Cream

You mentioned that the above mentioned article will be deleted within a week because it didnot have any credible reference apart from Hindustan Times. I have added new more credible references (Economic Times, Times of India, Business Today and Indian Express); even external links have been added for the same (other wikipedia articles). Do let me know if any further enhancement needs to be done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aditya.mishra.ace (talk • contribs) 06:30, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Kea ho

I see you prodded Kea ho which in fact is a duplicate article of Kea Ho. Wgolf (talk) 04:17, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Personal Filing Cabinet

I added additional citations to reliable sources as required for Personal Filing Cabinet, Anuraag Singh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anuraag Singh (talk • contribs) 06:16, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Wildago

Are there specific sources that should be removed/changed or do you think the article itself should be removed from Wikipedia? I want to comply with the protocols and appreciate your guidance. Polqa (talk) 06:41, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Redirect Cis-Kuen Lun Tract to Trans-Karakoram Tract

The Cis-Kuen Lun Tract is the same as the Trans-Karakoram Tract which I have edited extensively! You wanted sources. The Times Atlas link which shows the depiction of the northern border of Kashmir is the source! The map displays an enclosed area in northern Kashmir with the caption "Undefined Frontier area". The area encompassing the caption "Undefined Frontier area" is the Cis-Kuen Lun Tract. It is the same thing as the Trans-Karakoram Tract. The only difference is that the while the Trans-Karakoram Tract extends from the Karakoram Range northwards to the Kuen Lun Range, the Cis-Kuen Lun Tract extends from the Kuen Lun Range southwards towards the Karakoram range in central Kashmir. View the Times Atlas map of 1954 which depicts the northern border of Kashmir on the watershed of the Kuen Lun Range on the Taghdumbash Pamir, Mariom Pamir, and the Raskam range or ridge and depicts the caption "Undefined Frontier area" below it extending towards the Karakoram range and the Chhogori Peak K2 but not actually touching K2 as even the Times Atlas did not consider the K2 peak to be disputed. Nor did the Times Atlas consider the Shaksgam Valley disputed for that matter as can be seen in the 1954 map published by the Times Atlas.I am adding this because there is a concerted effort to restrict the Trans-Karakoram Tract to the Shaksgam Valley which is clearly erroneous and not borne out by records!Even the official map published by the The Government of Pakistan depicting the alignment of the northern Border of Kashmir in 1962, depicted much of the Cis-Kuen Lun Tract as part of Kashmir and the alignment published by the Government of Pakistan predominantly was similar to and coincided with the portrayal of the northern Border of Kashmir in 1954 by the Times Atlas which had predominantly depicted the Cis-Kuen Lun Tract as a part of Kashmir under the caption "Undefined Frontier area" though at places, the official position of the Government of

Map depicting the official alignment of the northern border of Kashmir in 1962 according to the Government of Pakistan

Pakistan deviated from the position of the Times Atlas and the Government of Pakistan even depicted areas as part of Kashmir which were to the north of the border of Kashmir as published in 1954 by the Times Atlas! Also for an idea of the extent of the Trans-Karakoram Tract or the Cis-Kuen Lun Tract, please view this map (C) from the Joe Schwartzberg's Historical Atlas of South Asia at DSAL in Chicagowith the caption, "The boundary of Kashmir with China as portrayed and proposed by Britain prior to 1947". The geographical and territorial extent of the Trans-Karakoram Tract or the Trans-Kuen Lun Tract is more or less the territory enclosed between the northern most line and the innermost lines! Also if one were to look for sources or references for the Trans-Karakoram Tract on the internet, the only references would be the articles on Wikipedia and no other. So there!

Hence I request you to redirect Cis-Kuen Lun Tract to Trans-Karakoram Tract and then there will be no need for a separate article titled Cis-Kuen Lun Tract. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.51.31.23 (talk) 07:45, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

10:30:49, 10 May 2016 review of submission by Nairji

• Nairji (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Gitanjali Sinha (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello David,

Thank you again for your review and the feedback. Appreciate it.

With complete regard and due respect to your judgement I would like to put my argument forward to reconsider the declination because the citations and links provided are from some of the leading publications in India. And moreover the links / references submitted are not "passing comments" about the subject, most of them are dedicated interviews given by her in main-line media (print as well as television) and these television channels are in top 10 channels based on the popularity as well as the viewership when it comes to entertainment segment in India.

Requesting you to re-look at it, the references and links have been kept very specific and the selected sources are notable from a geo-specific popularity viewpoint.

Looking forward to a response from your side.

Thanks and best regards, Nairji (talk) 10:30, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Anthony Jakobs

Reviewing Anthony Jakobs you spend less than 60 seconds and chose to tag it with {{notability}} using Page Curation in Previous revision of Anthony Jakobs. To me the article with sentences like

Jakobs has gone through multiple aliases including Antonio Cabreja, Anthony Jako, and West Jaco, before deciding on Anthony Jakobs. He's stated that Anthony Jakobs is simply the most professional and flows the best.

reeks of 14-year old writing his WP:AB, and I can't find a single thing that, to me, sounds like a credible claim of significance. Which do you find is a CCS?

Another thing I would have done prior to tagging with {{db-person}} would have been to remove this entire section

Personal life

Jakobs identifies as bisexual, having had publicly come out on April 10, 2016. In the same video he revealed that he's been in a relationship with photographer Tyson Leon-Guerrero since February. Jakobs has also publicly talked about his struggles with having Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

pursuant to WP:GRAPEVINE and obviously disregarding a post such as this. Why did you leave it in? Sam Sailor ^Talk! 11:47, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Missed the above? Sam Sailor ^Talk! 12:39, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Sam Sailor No I have not, I saw it the first time, I saw the article the first time and I would've Speedied but imagined someone would remove as 'significant'. I Speedied it now but it was also removed, ha! We'll at best have G4 now for later. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 15:14, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

But I asked you two questions, and you only sort-of replied to one.

(a) Why would you as a NPPer avoid A7 tagging with the argument that "(I) imagined someone would remove as 'significant'" if at the same time you say that "I would've Speedied"?

(b) Your reply to the BLP violation is anticipated.

Sam Sailor ^Talk! 21:02, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

FWIW, again, I actually speedied it earlier today but it was removed. In case you've haven't noticed, Sam Sailor, several speedies and PRODs are roughly removed recently and several of mine included (*ahem* Adam9007 *ahem*), who seem to think even the slightest thing sometimes (for his example a listed filmography or discography) is a claim of significance. Looking again now, I would've taken my chances and gone with the speedy or PROD if needed. I hope this answers your question and we can resolve this thread. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 22:51, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Yes, naturally your A7 of the article today was removed, as we are in the middle of the consensus driven part of DELPRO at AfD. Basic stuff.

Frankly, it does not make much sense to me what you are saying, yes, CCS is not written in stone, but in this case there is f*ck-O (US en: not a g*ddamn) CCS.

You still dodge the BLP violation. It is difficult to imagine, that you would not be aware of it, if you had seen it. Does that mean that you simply did not read the whole article before tagging?

Sam Sailor ^Talk! 23:07, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Sam Sailor I looked at the article but I still would not have been surprised if the tag had been removed given the apparent filmography and discography. It's certainly a useless article and is best tagged, I'm an advocate of tagging articles regardless of AfDs if it certainly still applies like this case. Easier for everyone and also AfD which has enough nominations as it is. As it is, I encountered an article a few moments ago that was controversial so I have simply tagged the hell out of it. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 23:19, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

In the less than 60 seconds you spend on the article, it seems highly unlikely that you should have had time to dig into the so-called "filmography". I also find it unlikely to think that a diligent NPPer would have fallen prey to this empty fluff.

The so-called "discography" was not present at the time you tagged it, so I'm not sure why you mention it. I hope that other editors than myself would hover over the songs and quickly conclude that the discography is another attempt to fool the superficial curator, e.g. subject had nothing to do with Justin Bieber's "Love Yourself" or any of the other four songs mentioned.

Until now nobody has reported a CCS was present in Anthony Jakobs, but since you mention Adam9007 as a user who "roughly removes speedies", why not ping him, and ask his opinion?

I take note that you disregard DELPRO when you state that I'm an advocate of tagging articles regardless of AfDs.

As for the BLP violation that you did not catch and still do not comment on: I urge you to spend much more time on actually reading articles that you intend to curate.

Sam Sailor ^Talk! 00:08, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

@SwisterTwister: Can you give us some examples please? I don't recall ever saying that merely having a filmography or discography is a claim of significance. It's much more likely it had something to do with one or more of the songs/films in them (such as the subject playing a major role in a notable film which happened to be on the filmography). Adam9007 (talk) 01:07, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Sydney Glaciarium

Hi, I got a tag from you for a reference improvement for the article on the Sydney Glaciarium. Before removing the tag you applied I thought I'd point out that absolutely every section of content on that article is in fact referenced and also every reference is from a major national newspaper. Newspaper articles from the time period, citing an event that took place in that time period, are about as credible a source and high quality a source that you can get ... I completely disagree that the credibility of the references need to be improved and do beg you to acknowledge national newspaper articles from the given time period as being one of the most credible references possible. I purposely try to not use reflective articles, written about an event years after the fact. I am happy to discuss this further with you if you still do not agree that articles written for national newspapers by first hand witnesses to the event, at the time the event occurred, are a credible reference.

How I would improve this article on the historic Sydney Glaciarium is not credibility of the references, but the quantity of information on the article itself. Something I am in the process of doing and in the very spirit of the wiki - hope others do too. Orion 2012 (talk) 12:42, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

People Against Bureaucracy

I've added several more sources to People Against Bureaucracy since you came by. Are there enough to warrant removing the insufficient sources template? Maswimelleu (talk) 14:11, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Zabdiel De Jesús

Looks like the page Zabdiel de Jesus is also a redirect, which the page Zabdiel De Jesús basically is the same guy! Wgolf (talk) 00:22, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

00:46:37, 11 May 2016 review of submission by Lx3h

• Lx3h (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Charged Hong Kong (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SwisterTwister, thanks for your second rejection and 3rd from Wiki's editor team as it allows me to provide even more references from international coverages of Charged Hong Kong despite the fact that it is a year old. There are now 56 references and they are either critically important to the development of the officially registered charity in Hong Kong or simply highly notable such as Forbes, Bloomberg, Reuters, CNBC, BBC, International Business Times, etc. Just to name a few. I have also written the article according to the Wikipedia's "guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:The_answer_to_life,_the_universe,_and_everything, which states that "Articles generally require significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic." As far as anyone can tell, age of the organisation as the reason you have repeatedly rejected my article on, in this case on Charged Hong Kong as a registered charity doing good things to the world advocating clean air through electric vehicle adaptation, does not appear in any sense as a specific requirement and prerequisite by Wikipedia as a reason for rejection of article submission. What's more, using 'age' of a person, an organisation and particularly for a registered charity to judge its influence to the world is immature and unprofessional. Simply because by naming a minimum age requirement to be worthy of an article on Wikipedia, there will be thousands of counter-examples on Wikipedia.

Hello SwisterTwister. I'm a very new Wikipedia contributor. Not even beginning to be an editor. Earlier this month I added an article about Joseph McCormackMD. Today, I wanted to start an article about his son Arthur T McCormack but somehow instead of putting it in my sandbox, I put in somewhere for all the world to see. I'm just about finished with it, but in the meantime, I'd really like to understand what changes you made so I'll better know how to write in the future. Plus, I've got some questions about things that aren't working correctly and would love it if someone like you could help me through the sweet spots. Drvalsummers (talk) 01:42, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

06:56:53, 11 May 2016 review of submission by Pyounger

• Pyounger (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Dion Lee (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Good evening,

Thank you for taking the time to review my application. Can I include these additional news articles in the external links area or do these need to be referenced throughout the text?

Kind regards,

Phoebe

Thank you

I've created a few new pages recently and it always seems to be you that patrols them. Thank you for your tireless work! All the best, Dubbin^{u | t | c} 10:12, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Delete as nothing all for any applicable notability

I have added some citation link to Promo Direct page. Kindly review Susan (talk). —Preceding undated comment added 10:35, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

new source in swedish

I ve added an article in swedish about the cuba project. there is more in swedish out there, that should be added by swedish speakers. Question, the commercial/fashion work does not count for notability ? thank you (Meridian00 (talk) 14:32, 11 May 2016 (UTC))

Rohan Ali and removed PROD

Hi, sorry about removing the prod. I didn't even notice I had. Probably an edit conflict as you said. The page author had taken Wgolf and me through a couple rounds of adding fake refs and removing a BLPprod so I was coming to the conclusion that AfD was for the best as it is harder to game (ie you can't kill it just by removing the tag). I'm glad the article is gone now anyhow. Happy Squirrel (talk) 15:09, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Catholic Bishops' Conference of Japan

Please see its talk page. Deus vult! Crusadestudent (talk) 18:34, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

About Du Dang (NuckleDu)

Du Dang also known as NuckleDu is a well known name in the Fighting Game Community. He has a Team Liquid sponsorship, has won many tournaments, and is a recognizable villain for his excessive taunting. He is getting plenty of coverage from mainstream eSports sites. He's also the best Street Fighter player in the Florida region and is considered one of the best SF players of the younger generation. Ask Valoem, Prisencolin, or NeoChaosX and they will all say yes. Thank You for your cooperation. ULTRA-DARKNESS^{:) 2 CHAT} 19:00, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Team Liquid is among the largest esports sponsors, being apart of it certainly means he is a professional. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 19:09, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Help me

Dear David!

I am user Valery Surkoff. I created a page dedicated to musician Dmitry Polyakov. You checked this page, but many users cast doubt on this page and want to delete it. Can you help in this question and what can I do for save this page.

User:Valery Surkoff —Preceding undated comment added 19:46, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Valery Surkoff Hello, he's currently still questionable for the applicable notability, WP:Notability (music), you need to still add any additional amount of sources such as news, anything that is in-depth and third-party. Please also see WP:Referencing for beginners. If you want, you can also request this be userfied to your own userspace, away from mainspace. SwisterTwister talk 20:13, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

email.

please check.Etimena (talk) 20:11, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

On the Wight

Hi, I note from the relevant activity log that you 'reviewed' this article (which I created earlier today). Can I ask what your opinion was of it? I ask mainly as it has been Speedily Deleted under criteria which I do not believe apply. Please see User talk:RHaworth#On_the_Wight for details. I would be interested to know whether your 'review' ended in a judgement for Speedy Deletion (and if so, why), or if RHaworth simply reached this view themselves. Thanks, --Peeky44 _{What's on your mind?} 21:47, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Deletion review for On the Wight

An editor has asked for a deletion review of On the Wight. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --Peeky44 _{What's on your mind?} 08:12, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Articles

Hello. I think it's the same articles: Qadeimah and Al Qadimah. The same location. Can you help with it?--27century (talk) 22:37, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Connor Flegal, SwisterTwister.

Unfortunately MrX has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

I'm not sure why this was marked as reviewed. It's utter nonsense.

To reply, leave a comment on MrX's talk page.

MrX I'm not sure I understand, I tagged it as speedy, why unreview it? SwisterTwister talk 01:45, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

According to the history, you didn't tag it at all. I did, however, tag it for speedy deletion as vandalism. - MrX 02:02, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

MrX I suppose my click of "Save" never went through. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 02:03, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

OK, that explains it.- MrX 02:35, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Aftab Group Issue

Hi,

ref: www.wikipedia.org/wiki/aftab_group

i made an article on Aftab Group of Bangladesh, where i had my internship few years back. And now have no relationship with them. (So no chance for any interest conflict)

However i found that the article has been nominated for deletion.

I know that my article is not very very informative for a big group of business like aftab group.

but i sense their presence should be on wiki.

Please do not delete my article at once rather help me out in retaining the same, as i am new as a writer on wiki..

Thanks

Moushum Ahmed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imcdhaka (talk • contribs) 06:02, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

About ADFiL Corporation

Hi,

You are not from Butuan do you? Do not delete that ADFiL Corporation article because this is part of "On the Job Training" Program of Father Saturnino Urios University. That article is about construction company in Butuan not yours. Please do not delete that article nor delete my account immediately!!!

SALAMAT KADYAW (Thank You in english) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronald Galope Barniso (talk • contribs) 06:44, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

More about ADFiL Corporation's deletion

If you have an International Passport, go to Butuan and face me. Please do not delete my account and my articles that I created and edited. Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia, not to delete all articles and accounts. Thank you and SALAMAT KADYAW DONG.(dude) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronald Galope Barniso (talk • contribs) 06:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: AutoWed

Hello SwisterTwister. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of AutoWed, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This is quite obviously ludicrous, and this kind of silly stuff is unworthy of an article in a serious encyclopedia, yeah? Reliable sources assert at least some WP:SIGNIFICANCE. WP:AfD candidate? Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 11:56, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Apologies for the templated speedy deletion decline. This article appears to me laughable, unrelentingly silly, and unworthy of an encyclopedia article. But it appears to have had significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.

SwisterTwister, long-time colleague and Wiki-friend, your thoughts about this? --Shirt58 (talk) 12:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

So Fricken Cute!!! <3

Ravenrene123 (talk) 20:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Docathlé2003, Fédération française d'athlétisme, 2003 is an actual book

Hi there,

Thanks for all your reviewing of the French track biops I have been doing.

I just thought I'd mention that the source in many of the articles:

Docathlé2003, Fédération française d'athlétisme, 2003

is an actual 650 page book that the French Athletic Foundation publishes and sells for 20 euros. I just bought a copy over the net last Sunday and I will have the book to check the sources by the end of June.

Endo999 (talk) 21:14, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello, SwisterTwister. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Hanspeterleupp (talk) 21:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion tagging of BoChamp

Hello SwisterTwister. You tagged "BoChamp" for speedy deletion, but you did not notify the article's creator that it had been so tagged. There is strong consensus that the creators of articles tagged for speedy deletion should be warned and that the person placing the tag has that responsibility. All of the major speedy deletion templates contain a pre-formatted warning for this purpose—just copy and paste to the creator's talk page. Thank you.Template:Z19. Passengerpigeon (talk) 23:53, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Micks

Looks like you accidently put 2 prod tags on Micks (though its not eligible for a BLP prod) Wgolf (talk) 01:50, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

review of Battle of Mogadishu in Somalia (1933)

What's the point of tagging this as needing sources when it is an obvious speedy candidate? Delta Force was not in Somalia in 1933. They did not even exist in 1933. The Battle of Mogadishu was in 1993 and we already have an article on it at Battle of Mogadishu (1993). The new article even uses the date 1993. I've tagged it for speedy. Meters (talk) 02:21, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Request on 03:47:56, 13 May 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Mirrezd

• Mirrezd (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Mir Abdolrez Daryabeigi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I already answer your question: If Mr. Daryabeig's art works are permanently collected by major museums?

Public & Private collectors: Tehran Museum of Contemporary Art
The reference is the book (catalogue)Iranian Modern Art Movement
Comment :The Iranian Collection of the Tehran Museum of Contemporary Art, Dryabeigi, pg.112 &113, published in 1385 (2006) by TMoCA(Tehran Museum of Contemporary Art) The book is in Farsi & English. short biography. there are 2 full page images of his work. Mirrezd (talk) 03:47, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Editing conspiracy (probably): User:Staszek Lem and User:Primefac

Dear David!

I want to get your opinion on the following question: Two users (User:Staszek Lem and User:Primefac) actively edit pages Dmitry Polyakov. I had to cancel editing them because they were unfounded (it's my opinion), after 4 times I was blocked. After that, I saw a message in a conversation, look here [[1]] this indicating their conspiracy. What do you think about it? I want to know your opinion?--Valery Surkoff (talk) 06:11, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Valery Surkoff I can assure you they are not conspiring anything and it's simply that your article is still questionable. SwisterTwister talk 06:13, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

SwisterTwister Ok. Thank you.--Valery Surkoff (talk) 06:16, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

GPX Global Systems Inc.

Hi, I restored your PROD tag on GPX Global Systems Inc. after the creator removed it with no explanation when I was working on copyediting the article. Since I restored your Prod the creator removed it again. Not sure what you might want done. fyi Fouetté rond de jambe en tournant (talk) 06:39, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

David, Fouetté rond de jambe en tournant We request you to please call back your nomination for deletion as this page in now way has any promotional content. It was created on the basis of facts collected from articles published on the internet. If you can, suggest us ways to improve the article but kindly do not delete it. Also, kindly remove the Afd Tag our dear request to you!Arnab2803 (talk) 06:54, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Request to keep Seraphim (American Band) page up

I would like to request that Seraphim (American Band) be kept up and not considered for deletion, as they are an established, even if unsigned, musical group. They have worked with higher-class musicians such as Johnny Franck of Attack Attack! and their music is legally obtainable through iTunes purchases.

Proof of Johnny Franck's work with them: http://www.johnnyfranck.com/

• Under selected credits and discography, Seraphim's music is listed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apartion (talk • contribs) 06:43, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Hasty speedy

Hi SwisterTwister. It should not be necessary to say, that we don't tag with A1 and A3 for the first 10-15 minutes after creation. In 粉絲專頁 yours came after only 4 minutes. I posted a {{subst:Welcomeen-zh}} to the new user Merlynjovita (talk · contribs). Sam Sailor ^Talk! 07:08, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Article Review

Hey, You had reviewed the article I had created and mention as I didn't have proper Citations. I have added more citation to the article please let me know how to take of those error messages. Here is the article URL. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Brooks_(musician) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mukundxg (talk • contribs) 08:55, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Article Review for ATP Electronics

Upon your review on April 26, that the article for Draft:ATP Electronics still needed more notability references, I have since then added more notable references to the article. would you kindly assess if the article can moved to public ? Thank you 10:28, 13 May 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by T.L Cheng ( ATP Electronics ) (talk • contribs)

Proper Sources

The sources listed on the Joey Fatts article are very reputable, Vibe Magazine, Billboard, MTVNEWS, XXL Magazine...... I'm not sure how much more credible it gets for a newer artist... He also has an upcoming tour that will give him much more press but I need his wiki up. Please please let me know how I can get this darn thing up because it has already taken up far more time than I allotted for it. Thank you so much for your help! JJBlvcklist (talk) 11:57, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

12:19:48, 13 May 2016 review of submission by BjoernSgav

• BjoernSgav (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Gothaer Group (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello SwisterTwister. Could you please let me know which passages in my submission are still too promotional? It would be a great help. Unfortunately your statement is slightly too generic and I am confused. Thanks in advance! BjoernSgav (talk) 12:19, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

When will you slow down?

In Diff of Me Adarayai you tagged with A7 10 min (9 min 59 sec actually) after creation with the edit summary ???? Over 10 minutes and nothing.......... Why would you tag what a Google search appears to reveal is a teledrama with A7? Sam Sailor ^Talk! 07:20, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Sam Sailor It's not about that, it's simply that the user needs to give reasonable time to at least actually start the article. I firmly comment I'm not interested with any heated comments and criticism. Frankly you may think I tag anything too soon, but knowing everyone else, it's always gets tagged sooner or later. Also, these users are obligated to at least give an reasonably acceptable article, or else restart it when they are set to begin. SwisterTwister talk 07:22, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I can understand you are not interested in criticism. I think there are other more productive ways to content creation in a case like this, e.g. tagging with {{New user article}}. But you again dodge the question: why did you tag with A7 specifically? Sam Sailor ^Talk! 07:28, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Sam Sailor I cordially welcome that you understand, I tagged it because it was applicable for both A3 and A7, no actual context aside from that and then also no significance. Even if there is information, there was enough reasonable time to at least make changes aside from that one action. SwisterTwister talk 07:30, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Is a teledrama eligible for A7? Sam Sailor ^Talk! 07:32, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Care to answer? Sam Sailor ^Talk! 18:49, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Goodstart Early Learning

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Goodstart Early Learning, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!

You spent c. 2 minutes (Diff of Dil Aur Mohabbat → Diff of Goodstart Early Learning) on verifying 8-10 references to secondary sources present before prodding it (Previous revision of Goodstart Early Learning) with the rationale still questionable for WP:Notability (organizations and companies) and WP:GNG.

I don't believe any editor would claim to be able to vet 8-10 refs in 2 minutes. Do you? Sam Sailor ^Talk! 18:49, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

To avoid fragmentation I move your edit made to my talk page:

I simply wanted to note that I'm starting to consider your behavior and comments a bit serious and I hope this is not going to lead to hounding. FWIW, I thought you and I had come to better ground so I hope you're not intent to criticize everything of mine including what Tom29739 says.... No need to respond if you're going to have attitude or sarcasm. 19:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
— User:SwisterTwister

— Preceding text originally posted on User talk:Sam Sailor (diff) by SwisterTwister (talk⋅contribs) 19:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

The note left on my talk page instead of some straight answers here makes little sense to me. I am not aware that we have been on bad ground, if that is implied. You consider my "behavior" serious with a potential of hounding to it? By all means, if you believe that the awareness I am trying to raise here in regards to your tagging in articles that I happened to come across or, as is the case with Goodstart Early Learning, have edited via Short Page patrol before you, gives you ground to cast aspersions on my "behavior", would you not please take it to AN/I? To me, may I be frank, what you say sounds more like you wish to continue to avoid communication about your tagging.

I do think you should take my comments serious as well as take any other comment left on your talk page by other editors serious. That starts by communicating.

It has been less than a month since your tagging was discussed at AN/I in the thread User:SwisterTwister's reviewing issues. I did not participate. A common view expressed by editors who opposed the proposed restrictions in patrolling was: "This is fixable - he should slow down." One of your replies was: I am willing to change my pace and better examine these articles. But I don't see that is the case in the examples given above. Prodding Goodstart Early Learning looks like it was done on sheer gut-feeling, as any vetting of existing references and a search for sources would have indicated that the article can be sourced and notability verified. To me there are no excuses that can be reasonably made here, it is a simple case of rushing through reviewing and give a hoot about WP:PRODNOM.

Since you bring up Tom29739, your IRC friend (Diff of User talk:SwisterTwister, Diff of User talk:SwisterTwister, Diff of User talk:SwisterTwister, Diff of User talk:SwisterTwister, Diff of User talk:SwisterTwister), I noticed that he turned up on my talk page 49 seconds after you (Diff of User talk:Sam Sailor). My only interaction with Tom has been his 2-minute pile-on delete vote in your ill-prepared AfD nomination Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FLAVORx. This is just one of four nominations made within minutes of each with very clear Keep outcomes:

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Cray, closed as Keep
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernardo Gómez-Pimienta, closed as Keep
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lindsey White (2nd nomination), closed as Keep

Do you suggest that any experienced editor would believe you had performed the slightest WP:BEFORE in these four cases?

Among the many kind words of advice given at AN/I was: I would much rather turn SwisterTwister's considerable energy into a force for good without such restrictions. I do think that it's important that he listen to the feedback from other experienced editors and take it to heart.. I fully agree. But if what we witness here is a bad habit pattern, the first challenge is to acknowledge it, and then implement the needed changes to create good habits. Your outright position that

I'm not interested with any [...] criticism

is not helpful in that regard. Sincerely, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 08:23, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

How to make Archive of my Talk page

Hey, Dear SwisterTwister, You have always been very kind, I observe that most of the new articles on Wikipedia I create you are the most and only Wikipedian who reviews my created articles, but here I am asking you for the help regarding y talk page archive. So its requested you kindly tell me how to create the archive of my User talk page and I also request you could you please make archive of my talk page or tell me how to make it. Thanks..--Jogi 007 (talk) 10:58, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar

Just a BIG thank you for the support I have received from you in chat on Wikipedia. As a newbie here, I have the utmost admiration for the people here who give their time - extremely generously - to help others, like myself, and tomaintain this amazing free resource - that is Wikipedia. The more I come here, the more impressed I am. There are corporate organisations that pay large wages to people, that don't provide any where close to the service that I have received on Wikipedia, and when you consider that the Wikipedia service is provided by committed volunteers who don't get paid anything, I feel I have to pay my respects and major gratitude to people like yourself. BIG respect and simply Thank You VERY much! Keep up the great work. Monty heath (talk) 15:44, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Good job reviewing the articles on New Pages Feed. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 18:51, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

American Nobility

You have proposed the page I am writing for deleting under what criteria, you know about theme? you wish sabotage? you want win something wiki award?. ..... The page is just creating in these moments and when you did that, you are demonstrating unknowing and disturbing. First I end the page and after you read and critizice, so is the correct method, meanwhile, please abstaint to interfere, no one will pay for that and you could learn something. It is not thrue?

--Siredejoinville (talk) 19:04, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

NPP Copyright

Hi ST! Just an FYI that the Earwig Bot is back online for botful copyright checking of articles that seem too copyrighty. Coren's bot is still offline, so the manual tool is all we have for the moment. Earwig is at: https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/ Thanks! Crow^Caw 19:15, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

references in Kora Boufflert article

Hi there,

I added three references to the Kora Boufflert article, so can I take off the BLP notice.

Endo999 (talk) 21:42, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Request on 00:23:47, 15 May 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Oceandocs

• Oceandocs (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:OceanDocs: Repository of Ocean Publications (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have tried twice to submit an article on OceanDocs. The second time I followed exactly the format of a similar repository Aquatic Commons which was accepted by Wikipedia. The reviewer still thinks it is an advertisement! I am trying to describe an information product - a global ocean repository hosted by the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (a Unesco agency). I do not see how I can make it acceptable. I do not understand how a description of an ocean information product is an advertisement? Oceandocs (talk) 00:23, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Oceandocs (talk) 00:23, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

This wiki-kitten is here to say thank you for your extensive contributions and activity in the deletion discussions!

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:27, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

14:47:27, 15 May 2016 review of submission by Bingargiola

• Bingargiola (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Sustainable Scuba Diving (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello,

What other information do you think would be needed in this article? I looked at many different sources, peer reviewed articles, scientific journals - and I cited them all, so I am a little confused about the references. I developed this page as an independent study with my college advisor while taking a scuba diving course. Based on direct experience and what I learned from the research, I believe I created a thorough and complete page. I think it is an important concept and needs to have its own page, not exist within the larger page of just Scuba Diving.

Thank you,

Brendan Ingargiola

Draft comment request

Hi! Since you accepted three of my drafts (Li Yajuan, Lan Shizhang, Liu Xiuhua) could you comment on another one of equal stub quality (Draft:Cai Jun)? It was declined by a different reviewer. Thank you! 93.238.17.57 (talk) 19:29, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Trevor Cornwell

I understand it looks like all the info is coming from Linkedin page, but please note there are at least two reliable sources included in the references, which is all that is needed to qualify the BLP as notable. I am removing your BLP tag and working on adding more notable sources. Thank you for your feedback. Any help would be appreciated. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 23:09, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Randykitty. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Team 1325 Inverse Paradox, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 01:28, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Hey Randykitty and Jbhunley it seems Ranfy unreviewed this to tag and Jbhunlry PRODed it but you'll see I actually PRODed it so it's unfortunately AfD time now. Nominating it now. SwisterTwister talk 02:12, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Dev Randhawa article

Hi SwisterTwister,

You have reviewed my article for Dev Randhawa (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dev_Randhawa) and (I presume this was you) marked it for speedy deletion. The reason given was:

"All still questionable for the needed solid independent notability at WP:GNG"

I looked at the link for WP:GNG and came to the conclusion that the articles sources are problematic? If this is so, do let me know and I'll make the necessary changes - if I have to provide new sources for you to review I'll happily do so.

Thanks,

HomersDoh (talk) 10:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

12:43:38, 16 May 2016 review of submission by PeterHunter12

• PeterHunter12 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Daniel Darling (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hey, I have followed the review history for this article and believe I have made the necessary changes. But rather than resubmit it, I thought I would ask you first. Daniel Darling is a significant contributor in the evangelical world whose position at the ERLC representing 16 million Southern Baptists qualifies him as someone "notable." Whoever made these recent edits clearly did not know what they were doing. Based on the edits I made, would you say I have acquired enough independent resources or should I still find my sources? Please advise! Thank you for your help making wikipedia a professional encyclopedia. -Peter

Good Job

Some of the previous pages I created have been patrolled by u,good job bro,I just would like to know y u added citation notification to the jut created one as I have sourced for info for him,I would appreciate if u can assist me on additions citations..thanks Newmusiclisting (talk) 19:06, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Hall Carbine Affair

Hello SwisterTwister,

Thanks for reviewing my article on The Hall Carbine Affair. You tagged it for notability while I was still in the midst of adding material. Could you take another look, and see if you think it might meed the notability criteria based on the information I provided?

The incident is what it is, but I'm sure I could add references ad infinitum, as the incident has been very widely reported and discussed over the years.JerryRussell (talk) 22:34, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Jana Ranjani edition

Let me know (In my talk page) what extra citations are needed for article Jana Ranjani Aaditya Rangan R (talk) 05:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

BB Centrum

You proposed this for deletion, and I endorsed it. The PROD was removed on the basis that the article appears in Czech Wikipedia. I opened an AfD. You may want to participate. ubiquity (talk) 19:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Request on 19:17:52, 17 May 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Buddroyce

• Buddroyce (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Play Records (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi,

Thanks for taking the time to review my (re)submission. I'm a bit confused because I'm trying to figure out what level of noteworthiness is required? When I look at something like:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spinnin%27_Records

They barely have anything at all on there that makes them noteworthy so I'm wondering how did that pass when my entry for Play Record doesn't. Am I missing something important?? Your feedback is greatly appreciated to help me improve as a contributor. Buddroyce (talk) 19:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Buddroyce (talk) 19:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Tina Dabi - deletion discussion

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether the article about Tina Dabi should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tina Dabi.

I've notified you as your edit was one of the few contributions to the Tina Dabi article space, other than the article's creator. --Bejnar (talk) 20:31, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Re: Donald Trump's Mar-A-Lago Barack Obama Assassination Plot Investigation

Author removed your PROD, do you think it's worth pursuing an AfD? Even if the subject is notable, the article as it stands now is so full of editorializing that it might not be worth keeping. RA0808 ^talk_contribs 22:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

I've decided to be bold and list it at AFD. Appreciate it if you could comment on the entry. RA0808 ^talk_contribs 23:48, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

22:56:10, 17 May 2016 review of submission by RV1348

• RV1348 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Raffaldini Vineyards (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello SwisterTwister,

This article has been declined several times for lack of sources. I provided multiple 3rd party, non local sources that confirm the vineyard's notability and it was declined.

North Carolina wine is a booming industry in the state that has recently attributed to it being also known as the East Coast's Wine Valley. Missouri and other smaller wine states have Wikipedia pages with substantially less credible and notable vineyard pages. The Raffaldini Vineyard is wildly popular, so much so that Obama brought a bottle of wine to the Italian President.

I understand Wikipedia's effort to keep the site credible, but it shouldn't be this difficult to get an article approved with valuable content. How can we work together to get this published?

Below are less notable vineyards and wine states with approved Wikipedia pages:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri_wine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._James_Winery https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stone_Hill_Winery https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Les_Bourgeois_Winery

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm ArtsRescuer. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, C. H. Atma, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. • ArtsRescuer 09:36, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Swpb. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Tomima Edmark, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. —swpb^T 12:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

DataInfosys

Hello Swister.

Please let me know if i have to provide more citations for notability or anything i have to do for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_Infosys_Limited AjayDAta 16:12, 18 May 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajaydata (talk • contribs)

This Week Newspaper

Hello David, thank you for reviewing the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:This_Week_Newspaper submission and I'll go through the references one by one to try weeding out the sources that don't fit the the golden rule exactingly. Because the article deals with historic publishing events, my first inclination, rightly or wrongly, was to provide evidence of their existence using documents and images throughout the referencing process. Like the article on "The Independent" newspaper at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Independent, a number of the references used are not entirely independent (sic) in that the sources are The Independent itself and I would welcome your advice on this. Caerhys (talk) 16:36, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

David, I've set up a User:Caerhys page at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Caerhys to query where best to develop this discussion. I'd be grateful for your advice.Caerhys (talk) 15:27, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Thank you

thank you for your contribution in Ritendra Prasad page — Preceding unsigned comment added by IlaisaK (talk • contribs) 19:45, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks and barnstar

Hello SwisterTwister, I would like to thank you for the review on Lemar (supermarket) and I highly appreciate that the page hasn't been nominated for deletion! :)

I really want to give you a barn star but I don't know how to :(

Please tell me and I shall award you with my gratitude.

Thanks again, East Anglian Regional (talk) 20:04, 18 May 2016 (UTC) East Anglian Regional (talk) 20:04, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you East Anglian Regional I'm always happy to help. For barnstars, see Wikipedia:Barnstars#General_barnstars. SwisterTwister talk 20:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for the help you offer on your Talk page. sheridanford 20:25, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

James R. Hansen

Hi SwisterTwister, Could you please take a second look at the article James R. Hansen It was deleted earlier today because of copyright infringement by the original author. I have now trimmed out all the copyrighted material and brought the article down to like a stub status. I plan to cleanup and expand the article from there. If you would decline the speedy I would thank you. Thanks, Fouetté rond de jambe en tournant (talk) 21:08, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you. Fouetté rond de jambe en tournant (talk) 08:50, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Clowns in the Sky - The Musical History Of Mystery Science Theater 3000

Hi there i saw that you reviewed this article I recently made and you left the message about reliable sources. Can you please take a look at it again and I changed around the sources a bit. If they are not up to par could you plase maybe help me find more reliable sources than these? --Captain8track (talk) 03:25, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Petey and Jaydee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Petey and Jaydee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petey and Jaydee (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Toddst1 (talk) 00:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Hi! — Etimena 01:26, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Notability assessment for ATP Electronics

Hi Swister, since our last talk, I have attempted more notability enhancement references for Draft:ATP Electronics, would you kindly assess my article for me ? Thanks T.L Cheng ( ATP Electronics ) (talk) 10:15, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Kiliaen Van Rensselaer redirect

Hello. As someone involved in recent changes to Kiliaen Van Rensselaer you may be interesting in a proposal I've made on the article talk page regarding reverting to the redirect that had been in place since 2005. Thanks for your attention. Gab4gab (talk) 17:52, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Giuseppe Prinzi (1962)

You probably should of checked for similar titles before patrolling Giuseppe Prinzi (1962) last week given the fact that's a birth year in the name-as it turns out the page was previously deleted (found out from trying to move the article) Wgolf (talk) 00:17, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Good morning

Good morning Squints FilmMakers20168 (talk) 03:27, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Request on 17:27:56, 21 May 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Weebuefweebuef

• Weebuefweebuef (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Maureen Selwood (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

We are having trouble getting approval of the image that was deleted. The photographer, Carlos Cazarro sent permission via email. Weebuefweebuef (talk) 17:27, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Weebuefweebuef (talk) 17:27, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

From Anna

Hello, my friend. I'm probably missing something obvious, but has anyone just asked you to maybe work other areas besides reviewing? A lot of people seem to find that you are going too fast or making errors or something. How would you feel about working other areas while watching other reviewer's outcomes to be sure, when you return to it, that all your calls will be acceptable to the community? Starting articles is bags of fun. We could work together on some of that. Thoughts? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:07, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

I review others quite frequently, yes, Anna Frodesiak, all honesty is that I live and breath NPP and I'm rather obsessed. :P Fortunately I work with other areas such as AfD, AfC, etc. I still occupy myself with those puzzles as you may remember. ;) I was about to go to AfD exactly now when I was your message. :P FWIW, I have also planned to particularly perhaps start some genus articles, I've attempted other subjects but they're often always non-notable. :P SwisterTwister talk 00:42, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

(sorry to intrude) Hey SwisterTwister! I don't want you to avoid NPP though, because a lot of the stuff you PROD/CSD turn out to be accurate (and it helps me to find COI editors lol). Maybe you can try reviewing at a slower rate, but you know, I would rather have you reviewing it rather than a random new editor whose motive may be something else. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 04:47, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

And hey, check this out. ;) --Lemongirl942 (talk) 04:52, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Lemongirl942, good point and good suggestion. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:55, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

07:39:51, 22 May 2016 review of submission by FRAXAXSIS

• FRAXAXSIS (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Bela Bognar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

hello twisted swiss d I've been thinking about contributing to wiki for quite a while now, but I'm really busy. trying to help a friend who's helped me got me started. we're behind this draft artist page bela bognar. I get the rules pretty thoroughly, I'm good with that kind o' thing. I'd love to get in 10 edits & be confirmed but right now seriously involved with a kickstarter or I'm going to have to sell my house which is going into foreclosure. we have a resolution document signed by the members of the los angeles city council recognizing bela, but until confirmed can't upload any images - my friend wants to ask if that doc would help lend notoriety. this user name has email confirmed if there's any way outside of wiki to pass u a copy of that doc - just askin'FRAXAXSIS (talk) 07:39, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi FRAXAXSIS I don't understand. What draft are you talking about? The draft you quoted above has not been edited by you. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:55, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Providing References

Hello, As suggested by you, I have provided few more references for the article The Last Raja of West Pakistan (novel), is it sufficient now. --Abhinav619 (talk) 14:55, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

@Abhinav619: Hey! If you don't mind, could you tell us how did you obtain this image? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:29, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

@Lemongirl942: This is from the ebook version of the book. Abhinav619 (talk) 17:32, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

@Abhinav619: However, you tagged it as your own work. Unless you own the copyrights, this is a copyright violation (see WP:COPYVIO). I'll take this to your talk page. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:15, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

@Lemongirl942: I have reverted out there. Thanks Abhinav619 (talk) 03:37, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

@Lemongirl942: I hope now the issue is completely resolved and you do not have any more issues with it. In case, there is, feel free to raise them. It was a good learning experience on Commons Abhinav619 (talk) 19:10, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Wicked Weather Watch

In this case, other editors had already added tags yet you still prodded for not particularly clear reasons (your C-P prod justifications are not particularly helpful). This strikes me as clearly WP:BITEy behavior and so is not uncontroversial. I request you either refrain from this or at least use WP:AFD due the potential controversy associated with nominations like this. ~Kvng (talk) 14:59, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Blue_Jays%E2%80%93Rangers_brawl

Good afternoon SwisterTwister, I think that your statement at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Blue_Jays-Rangers_brawl needs to be rewritten. --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:13, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Robert Buntine

Any suggestions how this bio can be saved with so much misinformation being included by deletionists? Castlemate (talk) 23:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

About delation of North African Arabs article

Hello Sir David
This article is created by some pan-arabists his name is alhaqiqa
This person vandalized many times the berbers article and also he commented on the articles for deletion to save his article so i deleted his comment
The North African Arabs article is created to abuse berbers and to distorting facts
In a section of this article "Berberisation and Berberised Arabs" they write Racism in North-Africa !!
There is an article "Arabs" so there is no need to create another article
I realy want your your opinion
This is his comment on the debate
"Keep Be Aware! This page is put up for deletion by a Berberist which has deleted many important information of many good pages on wikipedia about arabs. I already blocked AyOuBoXe of the page because he has deleted much reliable information without any sources or explanation. This is just a childish act of a North-African Berber which is playing games on Wikipedia and trying to remove the history of North-African Arabs. "
I removed this comment because it's his article .
My greetingsAyOuBoXe (talk) 01:05, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Replied here --Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:11, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

P S Surana

Hi David

Thanks for your response to my query about article on Shri P S Surana. Could you assist in reframing the article? Also, would you suggest that I upload the same as draft and get suggestions and then move ahead with final?

Justchillz (talk) 05:46, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Bot Clarification Needed

First, thank you very much for your help with an article. My question now about the same one found at [2] is about the bot's Clarification Needed notice. I believe we decided the article was now clarified. Who removes that from the main page of the article? Do I just leave it there? Sh33na 09:12, 23 May 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sh33na (talk • contribs)

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MAHANAYIKA

WP:BEFORE is not a dirty word. At the above AFD you wrote Delete, but your opinion saying "...nothing to assume this can be timely improved for the notability" makes it seem that you based that opinion upon current state and did not practice any diligence to see if sources existed to meet WP:NF and so allow improvement. However, the article was quite easy to find ample sourcing to bring into line with MOS:FILM and WP:NF. I ask you to look at Mahanayika, study the improvements and sourcing, and reconsider your stance at to the AFD discussion... and perhaps go for a keep. Thanks, Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 17:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Request for input at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Basile

As you seem to have recently stumbled across the mother load of nigh orphaned articles from Wikipedia's early days, I figured you may like to give some input for this one. For reasons I can't fathom, this AfD has not received any input, which seems rather unusual. DARTHBOTTO _talk•cont 06:05, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Request on 21:24:50, 26 May 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Pollyart123

• Pollyart123 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Raymond Watson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, I am a new user to Wikipedia, so am not sure what the procedure is. The article I submitted was declined on 24th April, I have reviewed and worked on it a few times and think I have now met the requirements. I resubmitted the article around the 6th May and wonder if I could get feedback on this please. Thank-you Pollyart123 (talk) 21:24, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Pollyart123 (talk) 21:24, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Your Delete Rational on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of current NASCAR races (2nd nomination)

I left a comment for you to look at. I disagree with delete and redirect as some of those pages in Jeopardy has been merged with other articles, also I want to merge what has not been not been merged into those articles. Then when that is done I will redirect to the appropriate pages. So I need more input into your deletion reasoning. TY Sawblade5 ^{(talk to me | my wiki life)} 01:25, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Uno Hoffmann

Just a note to say that some more work has come out concerning Uno Hoffmann. Would be great if we could review whether or not his page should be deleted. Please see:

http://www.brainproject.ca/portfolio/uno-hoffmann/ and https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2016/04/25/brainstorming-toronto-with-cranial-creations.html

What else would be needed to justify notability? Kutbil-ik (talk) 15:24, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Janka Boga

Just letting you know that while you tagged Janka Boga with an AfD notice, you haven't yet created the deletion discussion. Thanks. clpo13_(talk) 20:02, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

17:01:06, 29 May 2016 review of submission by GATalbot

• GATalbot (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:ACWA Power (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello David, Thank you for reviewing the original submission of the ACWA Power article and for pointing out the need for additional referencing. I have completed this and resubmitted, and would be grateful if you could review again and, hopefully, accept this submission. Wishing you a good day. GATalbot (talk) 17:03, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

AfD log overwriting

May I ask why you replaced four AfD transclusions? - HyperGaruda (talk) 09:07, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

I refreshed the page as I had had it open for hours to prevent any edit and I was not aware they still conflicted. SwisterTwister talk 16:49, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

authors

Please in nominating authors and professors for deletion,remember to consider first if they may meet WP:AUTHOr and WP:PROF. It's very easy to use WorldCat to check for the importance of published books. DGG ( talk ) 03:43, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

authors

i have added a new source link to Vicky Kewat remove the notice from this page if its meet the policy of wikipedia Thakur Anant Singh ( talk ) 11:53, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

naitikavyas

Hello, Would like to have your advise on what content should be exclude on the page [3] for it to get accepted. I have personally met this individual and honest to goodness his show "Yoga for you" on Zee International is so famous that it completed more than 1000 episodes. You can find out how many shows have crossed 1000+ episodes in Health and Wellness category, my belief is hardly any. I need your suggestion to make this article accepted in wikipedia. Naitikavyas (talk) 07:16, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

draft; Peter Reder

Hi re draft for Peter Reder

To answer your question, all the galleries and museums cited in the article are national institutions that have permanent collections. Just curious - why would this be a sticking point? Prestigious theatre venues and events also cited, and refs to well known publications. Thanks Celestial99 (talk) 08:38, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia newbie

Hey SwisterTwister,

This is FeelinGroovy (Keller from Greenville, SC). Thank you for offering your help!

So first things first, I gather sources? Like news articles or something?

Thank you a MILLION! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keller Champ (talk • contribs) 21:36, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Keller Champ Yes, hello, simply gather any of the best news sources that actually mention her. But no press releases or trivial passing mentions. To know how to add these sources, see Help:Referencing_for_beginners#Information_to_include. SwisterTwister talk 21:42, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

@Keller Champ: Just a friendly note: reliable sources that provide mentions about topics can be used to verify content in articles, but do not serve to establish topic notability. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:35, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Global Force Wrestling Amped

Hi, could you redirect GFW Amped to Global Force Wrestling#GFW Amped? I mentioned this in the AfD and nobody opposed; it seems uncontroversial but the page got salted after it was created following a previous AfD. Thanks.LM2000 (talk) 02:08, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Huh, I must be nuts. Turned out it wasn't salted after all and I was able to redirect it myself. Thanks anyway!LM2000 (talk) 02:40, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Promotional page

I do not have much experience in creating AFD, can you please check following AFDs'.

• Deskera
• Andriy Khlyvnyuk ‎
• Preparis Inc
• Spec Property
• Hootan Ahmadi

Aksnahar (talk) 17:06, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

1. @Aksnahar: What are you doing? To nominate all my pages for the deletion? seriously? do you know the wikipedia rules?--27century (talk) 18:51, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Deskera was previously nominated for deletion and thus has been tagged for deletion, I see no outstanding concerns from those other articles so I will not immediately examine them anytime soon. SwisterTwister talk 20:19, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

i think there are enough sources (Deskera): The Straits Times, The Business Times, India Infoline(was added today) and others.--27century (talk) 21:13, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Request on 21:38:24, 2 June 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by 50.187.57.196

• 50.187.57.196 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:BA Insight (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks for reviewing my submission. I'll add reliable news sources as you suggest. As a first timer, perhaps you can advise on a couple of things: 1) do references have to be public or (for example) would analyst reports or conference material that require a subscription to access be acceptable? 2) there are a few other folks that are independent of the company that could contribute to the article. Is it OK for them to do so on this draft page, or is it better that one of them resubmit?

appreciate the help!

50.187.57.196 (talk) 21:38, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

50.187.57.196 (talk) 21:38, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

50.187.57.196 Yes to all of your questions; as for the analyst reports, if it's specifically about the company, you could add them, news is particularly what's important here. SwisterTwister talk 22:00, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Signac, LLC: Request for assistance on AfC submission

• HusSchoMar (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Signac, LLC (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

You said the page could not be posted because the company was "only founded this year thus it's not yet notable because it's too soon". Is this a rule that Wikipedia has? I can't find anything like that in the "notability guidelines", and it seems like an arbitrary decision. Signac is a joint venture by two separate billion-dollar, very notable companies, and is using software with a well-established track record. I made sure that my article had multiple citations from major, independent news sources that described the significance of Signac, which fulfills the all primary criteria for notability (depth of coverage; audience; independence of sources; and illegal conduct - the last of which does not apply). As detailed in the coverage from secondary sources, Signac is already making a substantial global impact by helping banking institutions to eliminate rogue trading and avoid other financial crises that have made major headlines and cost billions of dollars in recent years.

Thus it doesn't seem "too soon", and it meets all of Wikipedia's criteria for notability. It seems to me that waiting a year to post a Wikipedia page about this company would just make Wikipedia out of date for that time. I appreciate any suggestions you can give me to improve the article otherwise.

HusSchoMar (talk) 08:53, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Need Help to Remove the Wrong Redirect at Ramanujan College

I want to write a separate article for a Delhi University College named Ramanujan College but it is wrongly redirected to the page of another article which is about it's neighboring college. RegardsAssefme (talk) 18:16, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Assefme: What do you need help with? Is your draft ready and you need help moving it? Or are you looking for advice on getting started with drafting? Or something else? –Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 12:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

References

It has been resolved and Thank you @compassionate727 :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Assefme (talk • contribs) 14:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Max Jury

Doing some work on this - would appreciate it if you had a glance over it over the next few days to see where we're at with this one. He has released an album now, which means there is some more material out there. Karst (talk) 10:30, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Valid ref. links to undelete 'Anandmurti Gurumaa' page

Dear SwisterTwister,

This is the reference to the wikipedia page of Anandmurti gurumaa" which has recently been deleted following the deletion debate at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Anandmurti_Gurumaa . I had requested to resume this page,in response to which I have been directed to contact you (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion#anandmurti_gurumaa). I would like to bring to your kind notice that the reason mentioned in the debate is lack of independent resources and dead links, whereas lot of sources and independent links exist featuring work of Anandmurti gurumaa as a renowned Indian spiritual master. Moreover these reliable links belong to national newspapers like Times of India, DNA, The Hindu, India today, Amar Ujala etc.

Below are the sources for your reference Tedx talk: (Times of India) Speaking tree: DNA Newspaper: The Hindu Newspaper: The Hindu: Amar Ujala Newspaper: Wikiquote: Verified Facebook page: Youtube channel: Wikipedia other pages reference: BBC News: Interview: BBC Interview: Interview: Red Fm Vancouver ( Canada) Interview: Interview: Gurumaa with swami ramdev in an event: MTV: Life positive: Life positive: "" Life positive: Life positive: Life positive: Life positive: Life positive: Official Website: Life positive: Life positive: Life positive: Life positive: Hungama: Life positive: Karmapa: Karmapa: Karmapa: "" Karmapa: Wikipedia page references: Wikipedia page references: Wikipedia page references: Wikipedia page references: Wikipedia page references: India Today Newspaper: PS: This information has also been posted to other admins of the debate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.111.135.192 (talk) 15:37, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

WP:Deletion review is the appropriate venue. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:09, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

References

Rockford Fosgate

Hi, I saw that you redirected the Rockford Fosgate page to Jim Fosgate back in 2015. You wrote "Nothing to suggest independent notability or better improvement and may be best moved to Jim's article". I want to rewrite the page focusing on the history of the company but wanted to get your buy-in first since you took down the page. If I send you a draft, will you review it?

Thanks, Ben 199.203.9.144 (talk) 06:55, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I just wanted to comment that I'd be willing to look at it, even if SwisterTwister does as well. –Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 22:04, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

199.203.9.144 I meant to reply earlier but have not found the time to, you can certainly start a draft but I encourage you to start an account first to maintain consistency. Also, I suggest gathering enough information and sources to actually suggest its own notable article because, when I found encountered, there wasn't anything at all. Frankly I'm not confident there's actually enough for his own notable article because it seems he was best known for this. SwisterTwister talk 22:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

SwisterTwister Thanks for the feedback. I'll ping you when a draft is ready. -Bheligman (talk) 10:59, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Reply to rant

"Any article that has "stated aim" within the first few paragraphs is not acceptable." {{citation needed}} (lol!)

Also, "you insist with criticizing and hounding me, please stay away as I cannot take your vulgarity seriously" is a personal attack, provide evidences of hounding or retreat your accusations. I avoided to comment in your last ANI ventures and I did not commented in the large mayority of your AfDs. Given I regularly check and comment AfDs, speedy deletions and prods, and you spend hours as AfDer and prodder and comment everywhere, our interaction stats are actually well beyond the expected level.And "the article does not appear so promotional, proceed via AfD" is arguably a very civil edit summary with no trace of vulgarity, it does not justify your rant. You would spend your time better if you would reflect about your terrible AfD record as a nominator [4], with one half of your nominations failing, and on the reason they fail so much (lack of WP:BEFORE). My best, Cavarrone 06:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

No, what's ranting is that I have specifically asked you to stay away because you actually go out of your way to remove PRODs, criticize me and my work, and respond quite vulgarly. See your talk page for your discussion with User:Chrisw80, where you basically never gave him an actual response. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bertinazzi, where you specifically called me "stupid" and actually defended yourself with this again at that ANI. Please kindly stay away as I have said before because you clearly cannot speak calmly to me without causing some heated criticism. For example, you have even removed my PRODs "simply because you did not like them" with is not at all what Wikipedia is. SwisterTwister talk 06:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

I never gave him a response?? Are you able to read this (I had to edit itand dividing it in paragraphes because it was a wall of text)? My response was very extended and accurate, what is not clear in it? about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bertinazzi you keep on citing again and again, are you able to EXPLAIN your vote there as long as you were not able to explain it nor in the AfD not at ANI (and again I did not called you stupid but I called your comment stupid)? I am ready to give you excuses if you are able to explain your vote there. Also, I when I removed PRODs "simply because you did not like them"? {{citation needed}}. Cavarrone 06:34, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

I cannot obviously give links to those now-deleted articles from which the PRODs you removed, but regardless, you have never acknowledged a needed apology or otherwise regret of still making a personal threatening message by calling my comments stupid. Regardless, you still have not heeded my warnings to stay away from me because of this. About Chrisw80, you never actually also acknowledged an apology or otherwise regret. Even then any apologies made could not be taken thoroughly seriously or genuine given your still disdain towards me. You simply thanked him instead, instead of saying "Yes, I know I have been too harsh and I will attempt better to distance myself". SwisterTwister talk 06:39, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Again, you would sound more convincing if you would actually explain your vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bertinazzi. Before your comment several editors including me posted articles, dictionary entries, encyclopedia voices and monographies about the subject, then you arrived and ignoring both the current discussion and the sources you said it had to be deleted "for now" because... I don't know. If you want to improve yourself and avoid criticism, you should analyze the reasons I considered (and still consider) such a comment stupid (and disruptive too) instead of complaining about the word. And I have no idea on why this should be a "personal threatening message", and I have no idea on why I should to stay away from you because of this (YOU were actually wrong, not me), at best is a warning on posting constructive arguments and not "just a vote". About regrets, have you actually regretted about nominating tons of notable subjects for deletion causing a much deeper stress to articles' creators, mostly unexperienced editors, who probably did not sourced them just because they did not know how to do it or did not know the en.wiki rules? Or did you regret about losing potential new editors who had needed some assistance and instead found their articles deleted without even being notified about the deletions (and the reasons their articles were deleted)? About Chrisw80, you were welcome to join the discussion in my talk page if you were not satisfied of my response. My only goal is improving Wikipedia, and about you, improve the quality of your contributions, period. I have nothing personal about you, and if it may count for something, I think you make an excellent work as AfC reviewer. Still, I stay the point your deletion arguments are too often poor, that you should improve your WP:BEFORE, and you should notify the articles' creators when you nominate their articles for deletions. You were often advised about that by multiple experienced editors, and you basically ignored these suggestions every time, not even replying to talk page messages, the time would be ripe to change such an approach.

When I started editing WP, I received some guidance and some criticism, and I have treasured of both, as long as this is a collaboration project, you should do the same. You should ask yourself on why you have issues with so many editors on WP and work to solve them. The fact this time you have not ignored/deleted the talk page message and engaged in a discussion is already a little improvement by you in the right direction. Cavarrone 07:30, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

As such because of our experiences and nothing to suggest there's anything better, that's also why I've repeatedly asked you to stay away and I hope this can actually happen thus I responded. SwisterTwister talk 07:33, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT response. I have to (sadly) retreat the comment above in which I said you were improving your approach, you apparently just do not care. And no, I will not avoid my very limited AfDs/prods interaction with you just because you don't like my arguments and don't accept any criticism. I never vote because of the nominator, I vote because of the specific article. Side note, I am pretty sure that virtually every time I voted in an AfD started by you to keep the article the article was eventually kept, so your request seems a bit a request of convenience. Cavarrone 07:56, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

09:40:07, 8 June 2016 review of submission by Jackie Partarrieu

• Jackie Partarrieu (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Rare Cancers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there. I am confused. You say that I did not use enough reliable sources (I cited NCBI, Lancet, Oxford Journals, the World Health Organisation, EORTC, ESMO, etc). Not sure where I can find more reliable/quality sources. You also said that there is not enough "significant coverage". We are talking about RARE cancers. That is the whole point. They are rare. Not many people care about them because they are "rare". Labs don't think there is enough money in them to make them profitable and interesting. Not enough research is done on them. Patients, children (all paediatric cancers are rare) are dying because of this. I was hoping a wikipedia article could add a little stone to the building of creating awareness of this not so rare, unfortunately, unmet health need. Can you please help me by explaining what more I can say and how I can go about it? I have mined Google to find more information but I think I have added all the quality sources I could find. Many thanks in advance for your guidance. Jackie

Nomination of List of tallest players in IBL Indonesia history for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of tallest players in IBL Indonesia history is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest players in IBL Indonesia history until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jrcla2 (talk) 13:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Request on 15:17:37, 9 June 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Caerhys

• Caerhys (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:This Week Newspaper (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Continuing the discussion under the This Week Newspaper header above, thanks, David, for your posting at my Caerhys talk page, which has answered my first question as to where best to respond to your Submission declined posting. Please bear with me, I'm still finding my way.

References [1] and [30] have been added to the Draft:This_Week_Newspaper article to underpin the newspaper's notability in that the National Library of Wales holds a collection of the newspaper's editions and issues, which it continues to build, together with copies of the 1999/ 2000 Reader Survey. The newspaper itself was a reliable source of information throughout its seventeen year lifetime but I'm not sure if that counts. It also falls within the scope of WikiProject Wales to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to authoritative articles on Wales, and articles on Wales in Wikipedia.

I've run through all the other references and note many of them are there to provide evidence of the newspaper's existence; of events that led to its success before new media gained ground, and Campaigns that resulted in significant outcomes. In reference [20] where a press release is used, this was to show how effective the newspaper had been in persuading visitors to abandon their cars and use public transport instead at their holiday destinations, to help reduce their carbon footprint in honeypot areas.

I trust we're edging closer to the golden rule, with further advice most welcome. --Caerhys (talk) 15:17, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) First things first, I changed your wikilink for WikiProject Wales so that it points into the Project namespace, which is where said page is located. I assume you won't mind, bit it's considered to polite to inform people that you've changed their comments even if it was trivial. The second thing is that notability guidelines are pretty strict about the type of coverage that's needed. The important part is getting significantly-sized articles in reliable sources. Looking at your references, it seems like a lot of them are primary sources, namely things published by the paper itself. This is fine for verifying basic information, but does not actually indicate the subject's notability, as notability itself is an assessment of how much something has been covered by reputable sources. Looking at your draft, it would seem you should find independent sources on the matter. –Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 22:49, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Compassionate727, no, I don't mind at all. I need all the help I can get right now and I'm grateful. Navigation's been testing; where best to say stuff so I don't lose the thread. For example, my last comment included the following para but it's disappeared. Possibly through my own making but I'll never know...

"Additional amounts of in-depth third-party news sources presents something of a challenge in that the newspaper itself by definition was a primary news source and apart from the BBC TV's 's coverage of the [ in 1989, reference [11], and their later coverage in 1990, reference [13], like the article on The Independent newspaper, a number of the references given are self-referencing and I would welcome your advice on this." Caerhys (talk) 08:17, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

I'm afraid I don't have any experience writing articles outside of WikiProject Military history, so I can't really help there. Sorry. My advice would be to ask at WikiProject Journals (and hope I pointed you to the right place, although I think I did). —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 15:53, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

17:29:57, 9 June 2016 review of submission by Wymiller

• Wymiller (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Grass it up (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Anne DeLong's comment concerning the fact that the band's mandolinist is employed by a newspaper contains no rationale supporting the conclusion she suggests that a conflict of interest could exist.

(talk page stalker) @Wymiller: First, it's worth noting that the comment you are talking about wasn't left by SwisterTwister, but by Anne Delong. That said, I can go ahead and answer your question for you. Anne Delong wasn't referring to a conflict of interest. She(?) was making the distinction between primary and other sources, as independent sources are what's used to establish notability. The comment was simply that the bands publication in the Colorado Springs Independent didn't really count as an independent source, because one of the members is affiliated with them. –Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 22:57, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the response, whoever wrote it. Sorry, I just don't get it. My items included ten citations to authority, each of which is as legitimate as any other citation to authority. Compare this article to any other article concerning a similar regionally significant performing artist and please explain why Wiki includes that artist and excludes this one. Thank you. And please excuse my errors communicating with Wiki volunteers; it's not abundantly clear how to do so. Wymiller (talk) 22:02, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Wymiller

Regarding my "Stalking"

I assume you don't mind me helping you deal with all the various queries on your talk page, but I just wanted to let you know that if you do, either now or in the future, you can always ask me to stop. Thanks! –Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 22:58, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

AfD !votes

Hello. I've seen you quite a lot around AfD and you do make some great article nominations, but I'm here for a different reason. I've been scrolling through quite a lot of AfDs to determine which ones can be relisted and to sort them into categories and I've come across a lot of your !votes, but your comments all have the same generic phrasing for a delete. Please don't take this criticism to heart but maybe you should slow down with your AfD !votes and look into the topics a bit further. I've come across topics today that you've voted delete consecutively within minutes whilst supposedly searching for sources. What I'm saying is that you ought to explore the topic in detail and when you conclude that there is no sources, then !vote delete. I'm saying this because of this AfD, which is an example where sources were found upon a 'quick search', as well as here and here. This AfD is an example where other avenues could've been explored rather than AfD. I admire your dedication to Wikipedia but please, please slow down. You could be !voting delete for something that is definitely salvageable. st170e^talk 00:44, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

13:26:03, 10 June 2016 review of submission by TreacleTurtle

• TreacleTurtle (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:William Cook Group (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I'm not yet requesting a re-review, just a bit of help and clarification.

Thank you so much for reviewing my article. I was wondering if you would be able to help me a little bit as to which references aren't strong enough, so that I can improve my submission. Or is it all of them?

Many thanks in advance.

TreacleTurtle (talk) 13:26, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

02:19:59, 11 June 2016 review of submission by 67.9.151.198

• 67.9.151.198 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Chris Fuller (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister,

I respectfully disagree with your decision to decline this article and request a re-review. It has been built up by several authors independent of the subject over a long period of time. It meets the Golden Rule guidelines and the Guidelines for the Notability of Creative Professionals (filmmakers, etc.)

The Golden Rule: The subject indeed has significant coverage (multi-page editorials, not Q&A interviews) in reliable sources (NY Times, LA Times, LA Weekly, Hollywood Reporter, Variety, Filmmaker Magazine, IndieWire, the Museum of Modern Art, etc.) that are independent of the topic (of course, the periodicals previously mentioned aren't related to the subject of the article in any way).

Guidelines for the Notability of Creative Professionals:

1) The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors.

The subject has been covered as one of the top 100 new filmmakers in a book published by Phaidon Press that was curated by major film festival programmers from around the world. The subject has also been nominated for an IFP Gotham Award. Also, included in the sources are interviews with other filmmakers who cite the work of the subject as an influence and something wholly original.

2) The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique.

See the above respond to #1. The filmmaker is known for the originality of his work.

3) The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.

The subject created a work that was deemed significant by the NY Times, the Museum of Modern Art and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. The work, "Loren Cass", has also been the one of the subjects of a book ("Take 100" published by Phaidon Press) and of multiple independent periodical articles and reviews. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.9.151.198 (talk) 02:26, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

4) The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.

The subject's feature film, "Loren Cass", is known for its originality (a), was featured in an exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art in NYC (b), has been named a NY Times Critic's Pick and received strong reviews in numerous mainstream publications (c), was nominated for an IFP Gotham Award (c), and is represented at the Museum of Modern Art along with the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (d), linked below for verification.

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences: http://catalog.oscars.org/vwebv/search?searchType=7&searchId=224&maxResultsPerPage=50&recCount=50&recPointer=0&resultPointer=0

Hi SwisterTwister,

I have updated the content as you advised. Please could you take a look.

Best wishes AlexisCarlson (talk) 12:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Updated content

Hi SwisterTwister,

I have updated the content as you advised. Please could you take a look.

Best wishes AlexisCarlson (talk) 12:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexisCarlson (talk • contribs)

Request on 17:17:06, 15 June 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Caerhys

• Caerhys (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:This Week Newspaper (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Continuing the discussion at User_talk:SwisterTwister#This_Week_Newspaper, thanks, David, for your posting at User_talk:Caerhys, which has answered my first question as to where best to respond to your "Submission declined..." posting at Draft:This_Week_Newspaper. Please bear with me, I'm still finding my way.

References [1] and [30] have been added to the article to underpin the newspaper's notability in that the National Library of Wales holds a collection of the newspaper's editions and issues, which it continues to build, together with copies of the 1999/ 2000 Reader Survey. The newspaper itself was a reliable source of information throughout its seventeen year lifetime but I'm not sure if that counts. It also falls within the scope of WikiProject Wales to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to authoritative articles on Wales, and articles on Wales in Wikipedia.

I've run through all the other references and note many of them are there to provide evidence of the newspaper's existence and of events that led to its popularity and success before new media gained ground. This was particularly the case with campaigns conducted by the newspaper that resulted in significant outcomes. In reference [20] where a press release is used, this, together with reference [21], was to show how effective the newspaper had been in persuading visitors to abandon their cars and use public transport instead at their holiday destinations, to help reduce their carbon footprint in honeypot areas.

Additional amounts of in-depth, third-party news sources presents something of a challenge in that the newspaper itself was a primary news source by definition and apart from BBC TV's coverage of the official launch in 1989, reference [11], and their later coverage in 1990, reference [13], like the article on The Independent newspaper, a number of the references given are self-referencing and I would welcome your advice on this.

Caerhys (talk) 17:17, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

References

Deleted article restored

I am contacting you in connection with the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two Sided Amphora 63.1515, in which you took part. I closed the discussion as "delete", but an editor has now contacted me, providing new sources. All but one of the sources are not available to me, so I cannot comment on their content, beyond the fact that they show that a larger number of scholarly works mention the amphora than was shown to be the case in the deletion discussion. However, I have obtained a copy of the other one of those sources, and I believe it significantly changes the situation from that which existed at the time of the AfD discussion. (It is available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/4171394 if you have JSTOR access.) Because I believe that this information significantly increases the amount of evidence of notability, I have recreated the article, but of course anyone who disagrees is free to take it back to AfD. I am informing everyone who took part in the discussion. The article is at Two-handled amphora (Boston 63.1515), having been moved from the original title given in the AfD page. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 22:36, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Mir Abdolrez Daryabeigi

For All Editors, There is a biography of Mr. Mir abdolreza Daryabeigi in the book 'Iranian Modern Art Movement' published by 'Tehran Museum of Contemporary of Art but nobody wants to check the book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mirrezd (talk • contribs) 02:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC) Mirrezd (talk) 02:34, 16 June 2016 (UTC)Mirrezd (talk) 02:37, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

QuestionPro Inc

Hi there. Made some significant changes. Iam new here so any help from you to make it better is most welcome. Can you please check if now it can be removed from deletion ? Thank you. RR007 (talk) 03:37, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Rohan

	Rohan
	HI Rohan Paudel (talk) 06:28, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Incubator/Indian military history

I invite you to join the Indian military history group, an initiative of the Military history WikiProject. This group is created to deal exclusively with the topics related to Indian military. If you're interested, please add you name to the participants list. KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 12:49, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

...because it's bloody cold today for an afternoon in June. If you live near me, that is. Otherwise, it's because the weather is just lovely today. OnionRing (talk) 18:16, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

18 June 2016 review of submission by Mr leroy playpus

• Mr leroy playpus (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:First Flights with Neil Armstrong (TV series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi David, Thanks so much for your review and suggestions. I've removed extraneous and original information and added citations and sources for notability and verifiability. Mr leroy playpus (talk) 17:12, 18 June 2016 (UTC) Mr Leroy Platypus

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How Funny

I love using due diligence, and while this sorry stub is how it looked when you first commented, THIS start class is how it has been improved. Though rare for you, I ask that you revisit and reconsider. Thoughts? Comments? Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 00:31, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

"Untold News" revision: please help.

Greetings.

You reviewed the original submission for "Untold News" and rejected it due to insignificant coverage about the subject and lack of media sources. I have subsequently revised the article, "Fleshed out the Untold News' mission, accomplishments and added many more media sources". You can see it here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Untold_News&oldid=724518258

THE PROBLEM is that I am not certain it was uploaded properly, and whether it is in the Wikipedia system for revision and acceptance. There is a message on the site that I do not understand: Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page).

Please advise, and if possible review the revision and hopefully approve it for publication.

Thanks very much.

1185Park (talk) 22:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Someone else took care of the ref issue, though you do need to resubmit the draft again yourself. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 19:53, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Helpppppp

Hi! I think I messed up the AFD for Himollywood, you seem to be familiar with the entire process, care to fix the AFD req please? Guthix no more (talk) 23:54, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Thank You

Hey There,

Thank you so much for giving your comments about the page I've created. I'd like to bring your attention that I'll edit this page to make it looks fit into Wikipedia guidelines. I've no association with this company whatsoever, it's just an intent to contribute to wikipedia and sharing the the topic/app I usually love. ->

06:36:21, 22 June 2016 review of submission by BjoernSgav

• BjoernSgav (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Gothaer Group (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

There have been some changes in the past weeks. We would be pleased, if you will have a review on it again. Please tell us, if there are specific parts, on which we should have a look agian. Thank you.

Ineligible speedy nomination

Per Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Speedy deletion, “If a page has survived a prior deletion discussion, it must not be speedy deleted except for newly discovered copyright violations.” You nominated the page for G11, purely promotional, when it went through an AfD, which you probably didn't notice, last year: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SANS Institute. I know this is probably an edge case, but it never hurts to check the talk page to see if a previous AfD kept the page. As history shows, however, it could still use a good bit of maintenance, so you are formally invited to help add balancing content and tone down whatever you see as promotion. Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 08:17, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to the Hall of Fame!

You are invited...
	Women in Halls of Fame worldwide online edit-a-thon Host: Women in Red July 2016 #wikiwomeninred

--Rosiestep (talk) 09:01, 23 June 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage (To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

14:11:18, 24 June 2016 review of submission by 2610:81:3001:8180:1E1:8862:E8C9:44C7

• 2610:81:3001:8180:1E1:8862:E8C9:44C7 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Candy Koh (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This is an entry to clarify information about the person behind a major political controversy which the entire South Korean nation knew and still knows about. It was in the headlines of major South Korean media for at least 5 days straight, and all of the news about this individual was the main topic of conversation among South Koreans for quite a long time. The topic has appeared on all major Korean shows and news outlets. Many Koreans still try to look up information about this individual because she recently reemerged into the spotlight via a series of interviews that she did about her work as an activist, writer, and an artist (the recent articles are also cited in the entry). The recent articles in question received thousands of likes on a major Korean news portal called "Daum" as well as other portals. Different articles that took from the original article also shared information about the individual through new articles that were created by different news outlets.

My reason for asking for this entry is that many people (both Korean and English-speakers) look up information about this individual because of the significant spotlight she has received starting from May 2014. You can even tell by typing in "candy koh" in a Google search bar, which tries to suggest that you complete the search by adding "law school" after the name.

Some people in forums have written false information about her. This wikipedia entry is necessary to correct any false information that has been spreading about her background, especially those that have been reported in the news already.

Urdupoint.com Notability

• Urdupoint.com is amoung top 500 most visited websites in the world.
• Urdupoint.com is among top 6 most visited websites in Pakistan while Blogspot.com is 7th and Wikipedia.org is 8th most visited web site of Pakistan.
• Urdupoint.com' facebook page has more than 6 million likes.
• Urdupoint.com is partner of Facebook's Internet.org (free basic).

If you have concern over notability, you must visit Category:Websites and its sub categories. Here you can find hundreds of web sites pages which are below Urdupoint.com, in term of traffic and notability. Please remove delete template from page. Webpage has also updated. Further i want to say if any page has less converge on Urdu Wiki, it does not mean its not important or less notable. On Urdu Wiki there is lack of contributor--Ameen Akbar (talk) 05:30, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

05:49:10, 25 June 2016 review of submission by 79.41.58.219

• 79.41.58.219 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Diego Massimiliano De Giorgi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SwisterTwister,

thank you for your message and for reviewing my article. I am a bit puzzled. My intention is not to create an article on someone who is not notable but, on the other hand, create a page (probably a stub) on a living person who is notable because of its inherited position in the House. I was inspired by several other articles of heir apparents (not head of Houses!) which I found on Wikipedia and, to be honest, have same notability. Check these pages, for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Scott,_Earl_of_Dalkeith / https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander,_Hereditary_Prince_of_Hohenzollern

I can add information on the page and I think it deserves to be published, at least as a stub. There are many stubs in Wikipedia with much less notability. I think it is more useful to have the page rather than not. Informing is our goal.

Thank you for your attention.

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for your undisputed editing at Wikipedia Abhaygoldvip (talk) 07:15, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

07:27:43, 25 June 2016 review of submission by Snehahurrain

• Snehahurrain (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Farman Nawaz (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have brought major changes in the body of the article. Few paras are removed. New official page and blog is provided. New references are added.

Sneha Hurrain (talk) 07:27, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Deprod of Bazel

Hi SwisterTwister,

I deprodded Bazel (software). I was able to find several in-depth reliable sources, upon which I built a short article on the topic. --Mark viking (talk) 10:53, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Admiral Markets review

Hello,

Hope you are doing well. The Admiral Markets article has been rewritten and sources have been added as per your recommendation. Can you please check it again? Thanks. Ifr ko (talk) 07:59, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Robert M. Ricketts

Hello, SwisterTwister. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Mongoose (web server)

I have deprodded. If you are unable to assess cited sources you probably can't make a good case for uncontroversial deletion and so proding is inappropriate in such cases. ~Kvng (talk) 22:27, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Article Review, Creation Submission- Solace Power

Hello David, I am reviewing my draft for re-submission, and am looking for some guidance on appropriate reference selection. Should I remove press releases all together or just limit them? Also in my existing reference list, which references are preferred for Wikipedia? Thank you for your time. FrankNie2010

Declined G11 nominations

Hello SwisterTwister, I'm contacting you due to having to decline several of your G11 speedy deletion nominations. In two cases, there was a version of the article in history that was not spammy and could be reverted to, while in another case the article had already survived an AfD. Please take a bit more care and check for these things prior to nominating an article for deletion under G11, a nomination isn't appropriate in such cases. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 08:07, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

20:40:30, 30 June 2016 review of submission by Beautiful4541

• Beautiful4541 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Rainforest (fashion label) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, I have checked similar company website on Wikipedia (ie. Andrew Marc, Nautica) and they seem to have only a couple sources of reference on their page yet have been approved for a spot on Wikipedia. What kind of notable sources do you need or are looking for in order to receive approval of submission? I have already included a whole list of references and sources that support Rainforest’s notability as an outerwear apparel company. What do you suggest I do?

2015–16 in Hungarian football listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2015–16 in Hungarian football. Since you had some involvement with the 2015–16 in Hungarian football redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Stefan2 (talk) 21:07, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

06:56:28, 1 July 2016 review of submission by Iamshoo

• Iamshoo (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Philippa Christian (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Request on 20:35:30, 1 July 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Raju Dubai

• Raju Dubai (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:TPConnects (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for reviewing the draft page TPConnects. TPConnects is one among the 48 companies accredited by International Air Transport Association (IATA) in their NDC registry which has been released last month.  The companies mentioned over there are not just trivial mentionings.  The same is accessible on http://www.iata.org/whatwedo/airline-distribution/ndc/Pages/registry.aspx.  There are case studies by IATA https://www.iata.org/whatwedo/airline-distribution/ndc/Documents/ndc-case-study-rotana-jet.pdf where TPConnects was mentioned in detail under Role of Partners, independent articles like http://www.thebeat.travel/post/2016/06/03/No-GDSs-Or-TMCs-Are-NDC-Capable-Yet-Based-On-IATA-Certification.aspx, http://cdn.nowmedia.co.za/NowMedia/ebrochures/TNW/Standard/TNW-Issue-2373-28October2015.pdf, http://www.travelweekly.com/Travel-News/Travel-Technology/IATA-NDC-standard-gaining-acceptance-in-travel-industry and mentioned in detail in IATA year end NDC report https://www.iata.org/whatwedo/airline-distribution/ndc/Documents/2015-ndc-pilot-year-end-report.pdf.  All these references independent notable references.  

IATA's New Distribution Capability is an initiative which has been widely accepted world wide in airline distribution to the travel agents.

Raju Dubai (talk) 20:35, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Central Solar Reserve Bank of Accompong

Thank for reviewing the Central Solar Reserve Bank of Accompong. We are trying to engage Wikipedia to the best of our ability and welcome any feedback. The Central Solar Reserve Bank of Accompong is an already active state institution which is now beginning to introduce itself internationally and will be fully operative before the year's end. We kindly request that you do not delete this article. It shall be regularly updated as the state establishes its international presence and the bank becomes active particularly in Africa.

Charles H. Cochrane

Hi. I've pinged you to the deletion debate but I thought I'd make a personal appeal for you to revisit the article and the evidence and hopefully alter your expressed opinion there. Best, —Tim /// Carrite (talk) 20:57, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

16:13:02, 5 July 2016 review of submission by Bioecojess

• Bioecojess (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Biohabitats, Inc. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi David! I looked at your profile, and I thought you might be able to help me out with a little more feedback. I know ecological restoration and onsite wastewater treatment aren't the center of the universe, but actually Biohabitats is very well-known as specialists in the field, which is growing rapidly and an important part of 21st century city planning and post-industrial development. I think I had more in the original submission about the firm's notoriety, but I took it out when it got dinged for sounding like an advertisement. So, for example, when north korea realized they had serious land use and degradation issues, they flew Biohabitats staff in for a consultation. (The staff had to sign a complete waiver for all bodily harm for the US government!) Stuff like that. It's not a big field, but Biohabitats is right on top of it. I know straight corporate pages aren't appropriate for Wikipedia without the notoriety criteria, but I think it's hard to show notoriety without sounding like bragging on the firm. Do you have any advice?

16:14:03, 5 July 2016 review of submission by Bioecojess

• Bioecojess (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Biohabitats, Inc. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi David! I looked at your profile, and I thought you might be able to help me out with a little more feedback. I know ecological restoration and onsite wastewater treatment aren't the center of the universe, but actually Biohabitats is very well-known as specialists in the field, which is growing rapidly and an important part of 21st century city planning and post-industrial development. I think I had more in the original submission about the firm's notoriety, but I took it out when it got dinged for sounding like an advertisement. So, for example, when north korea realized they had serious land use and degradation issues, they flew Biohabitats staff in for a consultation. (The staff had to sign a complete waiver for all bodily harm for the US government!) Stuff like that. It's not a big field, but Biohabitats is right on top of it. I know straight corporate pages aren't appropriate for Wikipedia without the notoriety criteria, but I think it's hard to show notoriety without sounding like bragging on the firm. Do you have any advice?

Bioecojess (talk) 16:14, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Bud Pierce

Hi,

Curious as to see why this hasn't been approved, it seems every moderator has a different threshold for approval.

I understand that Pierce hasn't been elected to the office yet, but there are others such as his primary opponent, Allen Alley, that have a wiki page but haven't even made it this far in a governor's election. How much sourcing do I need to get to meet this alternative criteria for politicians "Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the primary notability criterion of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article"."?

I am happy to put in every known newspaper article about the guy and his campaign, but it seems excessive to repeat the same points over and over again with new sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Black Dogg1169 (talk • contribs) 17:23, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Daniele Fortunato

I've been informed more in-depth sources must be provided to credit Daniele Fortuanto - Fusion Project. Could you please advise on the best way to submit as I would be happy to provide. Thank you for your help.

BryceLW (talk) 18:44, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

21:05:57, 5 July 2016 review of submission by Dmulan123

• Dmulan123 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Suiteness (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello - you had reviewed my draft article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Suiteness) and declined it because it lacked notability. I have now added a new citation - it is an in-depth feature about Suiteness on TechCrunch, as you had suggested. The article now has 15 citations from credible third-party sources including The New York Times, Tech Crunch, The Wall Street Journal, Conde Nast Traveler, LA Times and Robb Report. Hope it qualifies to be approved! Would really appreciate it if you could consider a re-review! Dmulan123 (talk) 21:05, 5 July 2016 (UTC)Dmulan123

References

A kitten for you!

Thanks for accepting my article!!

FredHerberg (talk) 20:37, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Walter Noetico article

Dear David,

I am a collaborator of Richard F Morris, who had been working for the past month on the article about the Artist, Walter Noetico. I thank you for your time in reviewing the page of Maestro Noetico. Sadly, I think that on your part there has been a hasty judgment and decision in considering this Artist, because it is fair that I let you know that Maestro Noetico does not desire to sell his work, even to the most important museums in the world, but this does not necessarily make him a less important artist. Quite on the contrary, it makes him more deserving.

The reason for this is that Noetico wishes to donate all of the works in his possession (circa 250 artworks) to the American Nation, and for this reason he is already in contact with philanthropist David Rockefeller Jr.

Maestro Noetico despises the mercantile speculation that is done to art and artists, and it’s incomprehensible why a serious encyclopedia, like Wikipedia, requires that the artists “sell” and great museums “buy”, in order to insert the artists into Wikipedia.

It really seems a contradiction, considering that Wikipedia is against those who want to be added to it, in order to make promotional speculation.

I think (and you, David, who appreciates the wisdom, I hope you will share my thoughts) that Wikipedia should have some different rules, to assess the artists, standards that have always been considered primary in art history.

Until not long ago, an artist was considered to be of value only if he had the support of either a philosopher, a humanist scholar, an art historian or an art critic of high reputation/value. Only these writers could historically decide on an artist's aesthetic validity.

Now, it must be considered that Walter Noetico has had the support of even four major writers and art critics known internationally as: Alexandre Cirici, being the critic who has made great Picasso and Mirò, and perhaps he did not manage to make great also Noetico, simply because he died prematurely. And only having in hand his presentation is already a title of merit and credit (which Maestro Noetico has).

Then: Gillo Dorfles - another great critic respected all over the world (and still alive, at 106), then the writer and art critic Raffaele De Grada, who was for many years the curator of the Venice Biennale, which - as you know - is the biggest art event of the world. Then, also the philosopher Silvio Ceccato.

It should also be considered that no more than 30 years ago, it was sufficient to have only one of those mentioned art critics, in order to make an artist of value and consequently encyclopaedic.

I truly hope you will agree in thinking that the value of an artist is not measured by assessing his market quotations, but it is measured by assessing his aesthetic value and cultural message – it is those values that enriche the Human Race. The things that one buys and sells, only form part of a market, and a mercenary speculation. But the true, real Art belongs only to the Spiritual sphere.

For these motives, I humbly ask you to reconsider your decision about the artist Noetico, in order to honor the diffusion of Art and Culture.

Thank you kindly, David. Jeremy --Jermy Alterman (talk) 21:45, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Paul Soulellis

Hello and thank you for reviewing the new page Paul Soulellis and raising the important issue of notability.
Soulellis is a notable artist in the field of artist's books, and his medium is the printed page. The highest honor for book artists is to be collected by special artists' books collections at major museums and universities worldwide. Several such institutions collect the work of Soulellis.
Two edits have been made to the page to better demonstrate his notability.
First, a list of some of the institutions who collect his artists' books has been added. Please note that this list includes the Museum of Modern Art in NYC, one of the most significant museums in the world. Also added are Yale University and the Walker Art Center and several other important institutions.
Second, a list of art exhibitions that featured the work of Soulellis during the last three years has now been added to the article. This was originally left out to keep the article shorter but I believe it should now be added to demonstrate his notability. Please note that this list includes the Museum of Modern Art in NYC and the Gagosian Gallery, one of the most significant private commercial galleries in the world.
I hope these additions help demonstrate the notability of this artist.
Thank you,
Daysof1971 (talk) 23:51, 7 July 2016 (UTC)Daysof1971

Re: Lloyd A. Jeffress

Dear ST: I appreciate you accepting my article, but I am confused as to why you rated it so poorly. Could you please help me understand what you find incomplete or missing? Reviewer LaMona said my previous draft was overstuffed, and I am afraid that much of my subject's work is ultra-technical and way over the heads of most people who are not in graduate programs in neuroscience or hearing, so I didn't want to get super deep (nor was I able to understand much more). As a new WP member, and apparently still a grade-hunter even years after school, I would like to make my articles as highly rated as possible. Thank you for any additional insight. Sincerely, and apparently insecurely, yours: TracieBurns (talk) 03:38, 8 July 2016 (UTC)TracieBurns

17:38:28, 8 July 2016 review of submission by Johnykundara

• Johnykundara (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:J Alexander IAS, Bangalore (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi

I have removed address including contact details as directed.

Some websites has been added where he was a part of the organisations.

Also I am holding a paper written by him giving all particulars mentioned in the article.

You are free to delete anything find non authentic and approve the rest instead of declining it. I think he is such a great person even at the age of 78 running the whole world to rejuvenate the good minds to do good to the society.

Welcome your suggestions and will be highly appreciated.

Johnykundara

Johnykundara. Helping out here: if you can provide a reference that he was a member of f the Legislative Assembly from Bharathi Nagar Constituency, Bangalore, this will meetthe notability requirement for politicans.I'd suggest also removing some of the minor material. DGG ( talk ) 10:31, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

17:45:50, 8 July 2016 review of submission by Johnykundara

• Johnykundara (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:J Alexander IAS, Bangalore (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister,

Possible corrections made as directed.Kindly review it and do the needful. Johnykundara

Footballers

Hi SwisterTwister,

I'm going through the new pages feed, and I keep seeing articles about footballers that just say their name, position and club. They're theoretically notable as per Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Notability, but if there is no actual information on the page, isn't it correct to just redirect them to their club's page? Or is that a losing battle? --Slashme (talk) 18:28, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello Slashme, with my years of experience at NPP, the footballers are in fact notable themselves if they have played for a notable league, yes. SwisterTwister talk 18:36, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

OK, thanks. I'll just mark them as "reviewed" and move on then, as long as they have at least one reference. --Slashme (talk) 18:41, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

JD Busfield Article

Thank you for taking the time to review the article. Your rejection based on lack of notability because of a professional baseball player's minor league status appears to be contradicted by existing articles such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryan_Boldt_(baseball). If you would like, I can compile a larger list of examples where professional baseball players are considered notable based on their minor league status alone. Please let me know. 108.71.78.101 (talk) 19:03, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

108.71.78.101 It was because it seems he was only selected for the Tampa Bay Rays Draft, and perhaps not for the actual permanent team especially because he's only playing for the minor team Hudson Valley Renegades (there's no notability from playing with the Renegades). SwisterTwister talk 19:19, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for responding. If you will review the existing article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryan_Boldt_(baseball) you will see that Ryan Boldt is currently playing on the Hudson Valley Renegades and is in fact a teammate of JD Busfield. It does, therefore, appear that playing with the Renegades provides enough notability to allow https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryan_Boldt_(baseball) to be an accepted article. The same acceptance criteria should therefore be applied to the JD Busfield article. 108.71.78.101 (talk) 20:04, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Additionally please refer to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York%E2%80%93Penn_League_rosters. The players with wikipedia links on this page all play at the same minor league level as the Renegades. Specifically under the Hudson Renegades you will find https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Travis_Ott and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garrett_Whitley_(baseball) in addition to the Ryan Boldt article listed above. The https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York%E2%80%93Penn_League_rosters article links to many, many players whose notability is purely based on their minor league status within a professional baseball organization. The JD Busfield article contains the same design and notability as these numerous examples. 108.71.78.101 (talk) 00:03, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Ingrid Bachmann

Hi! I added four references to Ingrid Bachmann. What do you think, does it cut it now?HappyValleyEditor (talk) 23:51, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello HappyValleyEditor, I tagged it because I wasn't sure if she's had any permanent museum collections, can you confirm if there are any? It would help for notability. SwisterTwister talk 23:56, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Can't find any, which is strange since artists are not usually short on ego. There do seem to be enough media mentions if one trusts her CV]. I'm a bit worn out from recent events but when I get a chance I shall beef up the refs section! HappyValleyEditor (talk) 00:01, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

PS: this is not too shabby.HappyValleyEditor (talk) 00:15, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

_______________________________________________________

Armenian Mafia

Hi ST,

I'm not sure if you're watching Armenian mafia, but a previous author has been restoring the list of alleged criminal activities there and removing the "citation needed" tags. I think there's a point to be made that it's a different topic from Armenian Power, but it can't go uncited, stub or not, so we need to keep an eye on it. --Slashme (talk) 00:31, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

What's Up SwisterTwister

LunaTunes5 (talk) 04:46, 9 July 2016 (UTC) Hey SwisterTwister-

Thanks for reviewing my page for Craig Donohue. So, I based this page off the basis that Robert Greifeld, Duncan Niederauer Terrence Duffy and Tom Farley have Wikipedia pages-- Greifeld being the CEO of Nasdaq (an exchange with OCC), Niederuaer being the CEO of NYSE until 2014, Terrence Duffy as the Executive Chairman and President of CME Group and Tom Farley being President of NYSE (Board member of/exchange with OCC). Donohue was the CEO of CME Group and led the development and completion of CME's merger with the Chicago Board of Trade and the acquistion of the New York Mercantile Exchange and the Commodity Exchange Inc. Ah, this was huge for the financial industry! It resulted in over $20 billion in mergers and acquistions. Donohue is now the Executive Chairman of OCC, which was designated a Systemically Important Financial Market Utility and advocates on behalf of the listed options industry while ensuring that the obligations of the contracts it clears are fulfilled to essentially be the foundation for secure markets by acting as guarantor. CME and OCC are both SIFMUs, meaning their failure could threaten the US economy, so the heads of these SIFMUs should be easy to search on Google for more information (in my opinion).

Thanks, looking forward to your feedback.

Cheers, Luna

LunaTunes5 (talk) 04:46, 9 July 2016 (UTC) LunaTunes5 (talk) 19:33, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

CS Afumati

It's not true, a football team gets professional when promoted to Liga III. Are a lot of teams from Liga II and Liga III that have pages on wikipedia and was not any problem ever, it's a football team, not a football player! The rule with at least one match at Liga I is for players!

Liga Profesionistă de Fotbal (Professional Football League) is a Romanian governing body that runs the Liga I, the top professional division of the Romanian football league system, and the Cupa Ligii, Romania's secondary club football tournament. But Liga II, III and Cupa Romaniei are organized by FRF, you can't tell me, or anyone that these are not professional, only because are all organized by FRF and not by their LPF's. For example, the winner of Cupa Romaniei is qualified for Europa League, so if this is not professional, how can the club participate in an UEFA competition? Liga II and Liga III clubs have also professional contracts with their players. When a club promoted from Liga IV to Liga III is affiliated to FRF, so, yes you can say that a Liga IV club is an amateur one, but not a Liga III and the less a Liga II one.

The Most Important

A football club it does not have to be professional to have a wikipedia page, are amateur clubs that have pages so I don't see why is a problem for a professional or a semi-professional club?

Ex: Whitehaven A.F.C., Blaenau Ffestiniog Amateur F.C., Ormond Amateur Football Club and these are fully amateur, CS Afumati is professional in my opinion, if you insist with the LPF thing, in the worst case I can say that is semi-professional. But I don't believe that, because all the FRF rules are made for a professional level.

Also Liga II have a governing body that is named LPF 2, but is not official.

http://www.frf.ro/public/images/uploads/files/ROAF%20actualizat%20012016.pdf

Rhinen (talk)

Herve Claude article proposed deletion

Hi there,

I am a bit confused about your reason for deletion

"Still questionable for the authors notability considering WorldCat only lists 340 libraries, 25 of them is for 1 book widely held at libraries."

Does this refer to his novels, which are crime noir novels. Also he was the main news reader for the main French news TV show for 20 years. That should be notability by itself.

Endo999 (talk) 22:51, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Lïfe Andruszkow

Hello SwisterTwister. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Lïfe Andruszkow, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Current version is not substantially identical to the deleted version. Thank you. –Darkwind (talk) 09:57, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Walter Noetico, Artist

Dear David /SwisterTwister, I believe my colleague, Jeremy Alterman, wrote to you on 7 July. I have now added the reference to one of the works that are being in a Collection of Pala Graziussi Museum in Venice (what I had managed to find for now). In the 1980 book "Indimensional Art", there are references to certain number of works that have been sent back in the late 1970s, to Kunst Museum, Wallraf Richart Museum, Ermitage, Tate Gallery, Getty Collection, Museum of Modern Art in New York and Kuunz Collection in Vienna (all of which are very old archives and cannot be seen on the web, but details of which are mentioned in the penultimate pages of this book). I am not sure what else you wish me to do. As Jeremy Alterman said in his note to you of 7 July, Maestro Noetico since the 1970s, never wished to sell his work to any museum, but has always been mindful to leave all his artworks to American Nation, which he has already discussed with David Rockefeller Jr in correspondence with him. I shall submit again my draft, having also made some grammar improvements etc, and hope that you could exercise your discretion. Many thanks for your kind attention, David. Richard--Richard F Morris (talk) 22:26, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

00:35:11, 11 July 2016 review of submission by 108.36.114.27

• 108.36.114.27 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Kuan Sanchez (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you so much for your revision... Kuan Sanchez has played in several games, however, all I could find is a photo during a Google search of him being tackled by #15 of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. There was also a photo of a fan that had taken a photograph with him. I put a photo of him that I found from the NFLPA Facebook page at the Philadelphia Regional Former Players Conference in 2015. Maybe because it was over 10 years ago that I can't find anything else?

Request on 05:03:33, 11 July 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by EddieRHartman

• EddieRHartman (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Durreen Shahnaz (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

You've just rejected my submission (Durreen Shahnaz) as "not notable." I have reviewed the guidelines for notability at some length. I observe:

• Ms. Shahnaz is a TED Fellow (WP:ANYBIO)
• Ms. Shahnaz won the Joseph P Wharton Award (WP:ANYBIO)
• Ms. Shahnaz played a pivotal part at Nobel Peace Prize-winning Grameen bank

On a personal note - anyone playing shortstop for a second-rate team is automatically worthy of a Wikipedia page, but this inspiring woman of color is not? She is about to be the subject of the Clinton Foundation plenary this coming fall. Would you please let me know what she would have to do to be worthy, or perhaps you might kindly relook your decision?

Yours,

Eddie Hartman (talk) 05:07, 11 July 2016 (UTC) Eddie Hartman

Eddie Hartman (talk) 05:03, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Big Mobile wikipedia page

Hello,

I am keen to pick up where we were at last week with getting approval for the Big Mobile wikipedia page :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sammus09 (talk • contribs) 06:13, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Good Reviewer Ranepa4 (talk) 06:16, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Premature WP:G13 nominations

I have declined several of your speedy deletion nominations under WP:G13 (e.g. Draft:Furquan Moharkan, Draft:Gyanu Basnet, Draft:Christopher Buchanan Shay, Draft:Nick Podehl, etc.) because the six-month mark of no edits to qualify for WP:G13 deletion has not yet transpired. Please wait until articles have not been edited for six months before nominating them for G13 deletion, because this creates unnecessary work for administrators in having to review your nominations and then decline them per the inherent inaccuracies in them. Thanks. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:34, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

First of all, Northamerica1000, I'm not entirely comfortable with how you seem to follow me too closely recently, especially to simply remove my deletion attempts. As you'll see, it's been over 6 months (January to the current month of July). See "have not been edited in over six months". SwisterTwister talk 06:43, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

The last edits prior to these nominations was 30 January 2016. 30 January 2016 to 11 July 2016 ≠ six months. You're about 20 days too early. Please view the actual dates, rather than just the months, in article revision histories. I have declined some of your proposed deletions when the rationales are faulty, such as these. Please try to be more accurate. Also, when I check out entries at the prod log, I'm not going to skip over your nominations. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:47, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Wealth Beyond Wall Street Suggested Deletion

Hey User:SwisterTwister I added this business "Wealth Beyond Wall Street" because of two things really:

1. The search "Wealth Beyond Wall Street" (And other longer tail searches combined with Free book etc) are searched 1800-2000 times more or less in Google every month.

2. The reason it is searched so much is, because this business is all over the radio, tv and other media (Not so much online mostly they are very "physical" sending postcards even from what I have heard from different people) this is happening all over the country it seems and people are interested in learning more about this company because of the economic times we live in.

Hence the high search volume.

I added into wikipedia so there is a neutral place for people to get information on the company because from what I see most reviews and such that are out there are mostly affiliates of theirs and this would be the one place that could be truly independent. Hopefully it won't get deleted. Clifffonte (talk) 07:37, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

07:47:15, 11 July 2016 review of submission by 86.145.3.159

• 86.145.3.159 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Jude Cook (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello there I'm not sure why this has been refused. There are third party reviews of Cook's novel in the New York Times, Financial Times, Daily Mail & Independent, & extensive interviews with him about his music in Repeat Fanzine & Pennyblack music, as well as a link to the major publisher Random House who publish his novel. Please could you let me know what more could be added? Thank you.

Notability

Hi SwisterTwister,

Thank you for reviewing World Branding Forum. I can see where you are coming from and I will add more references. Another thing to note is that they are a news publisher with an Alexa rank of 76,723. If they are not notable, then SF Site (2 references, Alexa 368,615); Odyssey Magazine (2 references; Alexa 9,665,835); and The Flea (3 references, Alexa 24,456,546), will all have notability issues in terms of lack of references (and perhaps audience). I do understand if this is just a normal organisation, then more references are required. But as they are also a publishing house, do you agree that the references that are there are sufficient for now? Thank you for your feedback. — SMasters (talk) 09:04, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Forever After (Paradise Lost song)

Hi, I noticed that you have deleted the aforementioned article. You write, "Still nothing suggestive of its own notability." I'm quite confused about this whole procedure. Did the article receive an earlier warning that it has to improved or risk deletion? Why such hurry to delete it? It's not that a single from a notable music band is necessarily so hopelessly obscure that there's no way it has its place on Wikipedia. Tiv kurss (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:36, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) @Tiv kurss: Most songs are not notable. A song needs significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to demonstrate notability. Songs should only have an individual article when there is enough material to warrant a detailed article.^{{{R from song}}} This version does not demonstrate that the song warrants an article. — JJMC89 (T·C) 16:33, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation! Got it. I just wonder how many of, say, these songs do deserve their own articles. A quick examination shows that a fair share of these articles do not contain much information about their notability. What is the criteria based on which some articles get to stay while others are deleted in a hurry, then? Tiv kurss (talk) 14:11, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Blue Label Records

Hello SwisterTwister. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Blue Label Records, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: My interpretation of G4 excludes pages where the AfD was closed because the article was speedied. Thank you. –Darkwind (talk) 12:38, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Re: Images for Harry Jackson (artist)

Hi, SwisterTwister. Normally I would not ask for priority or rushed assistance, but I received three talk page notifications informing me that the three images I've proposed adding to Harry Jackson (artist) will be deleted in a few days if they are not added to the article before then. Might you be willing to respond to the edit request I posted at Talk:Harry Jackson (artist) before these images are deleted? Thank you for your consideration. Inkian Jason (talk) 16:43, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft: Abt Associates

Hello, you rejected my draft submission with the reasoning that it does not meet the notability requirement. I have updated the page several times but cannot seem to understand why it continues to be rejected as it is quite similar to this page: [[5]] I am sure the company fits the notability requirements but I'm not sure what needs to be added to the article in order to effectively communciate that. Can you provide some guidance? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patriciaj102 (talk • contribs) 19:51, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Civilization: Beyond Earth - Rising Tide Articles for Deletion Page

The page Civilization: Beyond Earth - Rising Tide has been nominated for deletion. You have been invited to participate in the discussion Oldag07 (talk) 23:27, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

23:44:38, 11 July 2016 review of submission by Ultimatepowerecords

• Ultimatepowerecords (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Felix Andino (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello thank you for helping checking out the page can you help me in fixing this problem even if I have to pay I don't know how this works trying to fix it in every way .

Thank you

11:33:48, 12 July 2016 review of submission by Catrat999

• Catrat999 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Anurag Upadhyay (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you Sir for Reviewing my Draft :) Once subject gets clearer Notability, I will do the needful prior consulting you. Best Regards Catrat999 (talk) 11:33, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

12:19:24, 12 July 2016 review of submission by Usseryroad

• Usseryroad (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:ScholarshipOwl (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I really respect the reviewer's point of view! In most cases young companies risk closing down. However, I have seen plenty of companies, which are younger than ScholarshipOwl get featured. Case in point - GoodCall. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GoodCall. ScholarshipOwl had plenty of media mentions including ABC Televised interview and TechCrunch article. I would appreciate if you could please give a second look. Thanks!

Thoughts?

I PROD-tagged this article and it was de-prodded. Wondering if it is AfD material (see talk page discussion). I think this guy is non-notable and self-published, but he has some minor notoriety. I think AfD is appropriate, but I really don't have a lot of energy for yet more AfD drama, so thought I'd get your take first. Here's the article: Chuck Tingle. Montanabw^(talk) 20:15, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Patrol...

Hey Swister! I was wondering if you could patrol my page Laurence Bowers? It's been a few weeks and probably got lost in the shuffle. Thanks and great work! You're the best patroller I know. JTtheOG (talk) 05:55, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Positive Money

Hi, I noticed that you have flagged the Positive Money page as needing more citations. I am puzzled by this because it already has quite a few citations relative to the very short length of the article. Can you tell me which claims you feel need supporting? Reissgo (talk) 12:10, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Nina Ridge

I declined the speedy on Nina Ridge. The 2006 article was a one-line stub. She might still be non-notable but I don't think G4 can stretch that far, especially after ten years. Best, Mackensen (talk) 12:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Notability of Nina Tandon

Hi,

You recently tagged Nina Tandon with the notability tag. I've added even more references to reliable sources - could you review the article again? Thanks. Howkafkaesque (talk) 23:15, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

query about a user

Hi. User Jerena.llantos is taking part in the nomination of article for deletion (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Waseem_Tarar). This user has not contributed any thing so far. Even the article Waseem Tarar was created by such user whose contributions are only confined to this article. What do you say? Can user like this take part in the discussion? and What about me? can I take part in this discussion? someone deleted my comments too.Sneha Hurrain (talk) 06:22, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Mauro Pipani

Sorry, I made the page on Mauro Pipani because he is considered in Italy a great living artist. Among the other he is doing an exhibition in Rome (until 10 July) with Italian and foreign artists such as Warhol , Carlo Carra , Pistoletto , Mimmo Palladino etc ..

If you want to read something about him on page 80 there is an article in English on his art

--L'uomodisabbia (talk) L'uomodisabbia (talk) 10:24, 14 July 2016 (UTC)L'uomodisabbiaL'uomodisabbia (talk) 10:24, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Pati Jinich

Hi, Thank you for reviewing the Pati Jinich article. You tagged it for lacking inline citations, however almost every sentence in the article includes an inline reference. Can you specify which information needs citing? Krisenoel (talk) 15:59, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you!

Hello Akskdjfjrhrheh (talk) 20:47, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pegasus Sustainability Solutions

Hi ST,

Because you put a speedy template on the article, you might want to !vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pegasus Sustainability Solutions. --Slashme (talk) 07:52, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Request on 13:59:52, 15 July 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Kfidler0823

• Kfidler0823 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Michael Drapac (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Not necessarily requesting a re-review as none of the information has not changed, just trying to get some clarity on what criteria he doesn't meet in terms of the notability. I found dozens upon dozen of articles and radio interviews on Michael Drapac during my research, most of which were from major (and reliable) Australian and US newspapers. Many of the articles are solely about him and don't mention him as an "after-thought" or in a "trivial" way. All of the sources that were provided were secondary sources and written by people who have zero connection with him other than interviewing him for an article. He owns Australia's only Professional Cycling team and was just named co-owner of the Cannondale-Drapac Pro Cycling team, which is currently racing in the Tour de France (how I came to know about him and start researching him in the first place - huge Cannondale fan here).

Going through all of the General Notability Guidelines, I just don't see what criteria he doesn't meet. While I only provided 14 or so references (that's all I needed to build the article), there are dozens more articles about his company, cycling teams, and successes in investment/real estate and cycling.

Any further information you can provide to clarify why he doesn't meet the Notability Guidelines would be much appreciated. Thank you in advance for your time.

Kfidler0823 (talk) 14:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Kfidler0823 (talk) 13:59, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

"Unreferenced"

So you're telling me that you could care less about the List of firsts in Sweden, but when it comes to my article it is "unreferenced"? Wow. OK. The Copper Miner (talk) 15:28, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

22:21:31, 15 July 2016 review of submission by Ndinge

• Ndinge (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Fotemah Mba (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Greetings. From your comment after the review of the page you mentioned a lack of credible news sources for the reason why the article was rejected. I would like to know what you mean by credible news sources, because most of the sites from which my references were taken have been online delivering news and information for at least four years. And some wiki editors took down some of the references i put up while the article was pending review. So what do i need to do? add more references? and what kind of sources do you consider credible. i have looked at other articles here and the references are as good as mine. so please clarify me. thank you for your time Ndinge (talk) 22:21, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

AfC accept criteria

Sir, based on some Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk requests I have just looked at Draft:Godfrey_Sullivan and Draft:Laura_Boushnak both of which you recently rejected on notability grounds. To my eye, in both cases, there does appear to be very adequate cited coverage to establish notability. I know that you and I are unlikely to agree on marginal cases but these do not appear to be marginal. I hope you would not consider nominating either of these for deletion. Even if you would, would you gauge that they had a less than 50% chance of being kept? ~Kvng (talk) 23:33, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Meredith Graves

Hi there, Innisfree987 here--I wanted to give you a head's up that I reverted your redirect on Meredith Graves. I've also made some substantial edits to expand on the notice she's received for the record label she founded and her solo project, among other things. I hope this adequately responds to your concern about whether she's known beyond the band. If not, please do drop me a line to discuss--I still definitely have not exhausted the available secondary sources, so perhaps others might better respond to your concern. Innisfree987 (talk) 01:33, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Ghamai Zadran

Hi Swister Twister,

Please do not delete Ghamai Zadran. I am trying to fetch some reliable sources.

Don't you think Afghanistan domestic teams are notable? Those teams don't play Gulli/Street Cricket. Those matches are granted by Afghanistan Cricket board.

Sohanpandey (talk) 05:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

See that Article once again. I have found a resource which says He represented Afghanistan A team against Zimbabwe A. The match was Played at Greater Noida Cricket Stadium India. Sohanpandey (talk) 05:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Oneilius

I received notice regarding the potential deletion of Lace International Ltd because "Searches found nothing at all to suggest anything or enough for independent notability for its own article; nothing else convincing". Previously, one of this company's subsidiaries, Lace Mamba Global, had an article which was deleted on grounds that it was written in an advertising style. The grounds for deleting the previous article were not that there was insufficient "notability for its own article". Please clarify what qualifies for such notability. Also, "nothing else convincing" means what exactly? I would like to comply with Wikipedia's standards, but this message is vague and doesn't explain what is needed of a qualifying article. Noting that "you can address this concern by improving, copyediting, sourcing, renaming, or merging the page, please edit this page and do so" merely indicates that editing might help. It does not specify what qualifies or is needed in terms of additions or edits.

Oneilius (talk) 01:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Victor Cannella

I have removed your db-hoax tag, because he is in IMDn. That is not an RS, and notability seems to me doubtful, but he's not a hoax. JohnCD (talk) 13:27, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

SmithBucklin

I'm surprised by your request for more citations on this article. Every paragraph contains a citation, and most sentences within paragraphs are cited. Is there something I am missing? GrandLake editor (talk) 20:53, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Draft

Hi SwisterTwister, I recently created a draft Ali Kazmi. Please take a look at it and if possible make it better. I don't want it to be rejected because of any small mistake. Thank you.--175.110.48.234 (talk) 10:38, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

XBRL US

Hi SwisterTwister - I've revised this article to add detail and reference to Securities and Exchange Commission's mandate for public companies to use the XBRL US GAAP Taxonomy that was initially developed by XBRL US. I did not note in the article but can add that providing data in XBRL format with this taxonomy is a legal requirement for public companies.

I look forward to hearing from you - thanks for your help.

Davidtauriello (talk) 01:32, 19 July 2016 (UTC)davidtauriello

/* BEIJING JINGDIAO GROUP */

Respected Sir/Madam My page Submission declined on 7 July 2016 by you. As I am the new user of Wikipedia and trying my best to be good on it. I request you please explain me little bit more about my page and point out where I have mistakes. Secondly I have used all of the references which our company have until now, so please tell me what should I do ?

I will be very  thankful to you and highly appreciate if you guide me and help me.

(This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time).HafeezJD (talk) 07:28, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

References

Notability in Knight's Cross Holder articles

Hi, since you participated in an AfD discussion that involved this topic, I'm letting you know that I started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)#Notability in Knight's Cross Holder Articles -- to see if the issue can be dealt on a systemic basis, rather than one off AfDs.

One of the suggestions I got was to see if an RfC may need to be formulated, so I'm seeking input into this potential RfC or other possible ways to address the notability concern in similar articles. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:42, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Codementor

Hi SwisterTwister, good day. I Have updated some sources with the notability of Codementor (Chinese language source). It was an article reporting Codementor representing Taiwan in an event. I still left one source about funding but deleted the part where I described the investment/funding history. I hope you can review it again, please let me know if there is anything I should improv. Thank you very much! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Codementor — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jovianliu (talk • contribs) 09:29, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia and United Nations Women Project

Please join us...
	Wikipedia and United Nations Women Project A Women in Red worldwide, online editathon - 12 July till 12 August 2016 - #wikiwomeninred

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) Delivered by Rosiestep (talk) via MassMessage 04:27, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Please clarify reference to no interviews. Are you saying no internet talk show appearance and that a publication format has to be more than an introductory blurb followed by Q & A? Thanks. Hamilton ford (talk) 19:03, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Villain (2017 International film)

I have declined your db-hoax speedy, because I think "hoax" implies intent to deceive. This guy intends to make his Youtube film: it exists, at least in his head, it's just totally non-notable. Let the AfD take care of it. Cheers, JohnCD (talk) 21:39, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Walter Driver (entrepreneur)

I see that you proposed it for deletion, and the PROD was then removed, and an AFD was nominated in its place. Did you notice that there are two users working in favor of the article that have almost the same user name? I did, and have taken it to WP:SPI. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:44, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

06:16:15, 24 July 2016 review of submission by Divyanshu0.2

• Divyanshu0.2 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Bharti Sharma (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear Sir, the references I have given are the reviews, published on Indian Newspapers, of the plays she has directed and her Interviews published on newspapers, are they not the reliable references to prove her notability, can I upload the scan copies of published reviews of her earlier work which I am not able to find on web ? Pls help..

Anant Vidhaat

Hey ST. Since you reviewed Draft:Anant Vidhaat (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs), you may want to take a look at Anant Vidhaat Sharma (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). — JJMC89 (T·C) 09:01, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Indigenous women & Polar women editathons

You are invited...
	Indigenous women editathon & Polar women editathon Hosted by Women in Red - August 2016 - #wikiwomeninred

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 21:08, 24 July 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage

Hello. I am the writer of the Sydney Michael (Mike) Hudson article. I have been denied multiple times, but have made every requested change. My most recent submission was over a month ago, but I have still not been given a response. Can you please lead me in the right direction or let me know if my page has been accepted? This would be greatly appreciated! Thank you!

Tdwilson (talk) 15:43, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Kyle T. Leighton

Respectfully, the subject Draft:Kyle T. Leighton (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) is a professor, author, and notable electrical industry leader as described by Siena Heights University, and the National Association of Electrical Distributors (the governing body of the electrical industry), among other sources. The subject designed an initiative about energy efficient lighting that was adopted by an entire U.S. State. He has also published at least 13 studies nationally and internationally about lighting applications in 7 different publications, and has widely distributed work independent of those pieces by other universities such as University of California, Davis about lighting laws and lighting education. Articles about his work and career have appeared in at least 8 other different reliable sources referenced in the article. He received an international award for a video that explained lighting technology. He received 2 additional awards from 2 notable institutions (1 university) about his research and commitment to lighting technology. All of these facts including the subject are about the same thing: lighting science. Criterion #7 for WP:Academic is described as a "person to have made a substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity" and isn't defined as a single event. Other criterion of WP:Academic like #2 are in place for what you’re implying. All of the subject’s awards and facts count towards criterion 7 because criterion 7 is a criterion that has been met with totality, or in other words, “substantial”. While the interpretation of notability is broad, everyone should be able to agree that every notable impact or notable act could be recorded differently as each WP:Academic would likely be unique. It does not mean that the subject is not a notable lighting academic because someone may not be familiar with the subject or science. Evidence, and notable institutions clearly indicate that the subject is. GNG and WP:ANYBIO #2 also applies here. Looking forward to your response.Sciencegirl5858 (talk) 16:47, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Sciencegirl15858, let me help out here, as WP:PROF is sort of my specialty. I don't think that guideline applies to him at all. An adjunct professor is not a professor in the usual sense, he's a person teaching a course or two in a university part-time, either as a beginner, or, in this case, as someone from an outside profession or industry. In his linked bio , he is described not as a scientist or engineer, but as a professional public relations executive,"Lauded as one of the top PR professionals in the nationwide electrical industry, he has now represented 6 energy efficient commercial brands." He did not do the studies described in the article, he wrote the press releases and articles in trade magazines. His profile in tedmagazine says "Leighton has by-lined or ghost-written several articles for industry publications". Your article is carefully ambiguous about all this, and it would not have been clear if I had not actually read the references. Your statement here, is an attempt to disguise the facts of his career in the hopes of getting an article. In my opinion this is not good faith editing.

Furthermore, your user history shows you have written nothing else, yet you are familiar with the details of our rules, familiar enough find a guideline which you can use inappropriately in an attempt to justify your article. I remind you or our policy about WP:Sockpuppettry. I also remind you of our guidelines on WP:Conflict of Interest, and our Terms of Use, particularly with respect to paid contributions without disclosure. DGG ( talk ) 21:27, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Request on 21:27:14, 25 July 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by AuthorKJ

• AuthorKJ (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Richard S. Darling (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for reviewing my submission, however, I'm confused as to why my submission didn't make it. I was told by two previous reviewers what to do--get rid of any info that was not strict reportage, and cut down the length to 1/4 of what it was. I understand Wikipedia's notability policy, but I've done my best to adhere to Wikipedia's requirements. AuthorKJ (talk) 21:27, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Zotac International

You reviewed my page Draft:ZOTAC International a couple of weeks ago and rejected it due to a lack of citations. I have subsequently added additional citations from different news sources and kindly request you re review it since the afc is backlogged. Thanks in advance. 05:43, 26 July 2016 (UTC)Meiloorun talk

Wede Kadima

I think your latest edit to Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Webe_Kadima is missing some text: "and there's not convincingly enough" makes no sense. --Slashme (talk) 08:01, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Buses route 53

Hi, you previously contributed to a deletion discussion for London bus route W7, another similar deletion discussion is ongoing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Buses route 53 which you may wish to give your input on.

Note: I've placed (or am in the process of placing) this notification on the talk page of anyone who took part in the original deletion discussion, as the most recent similar discussion, regardless of deletion preference, which is allowable under WP:CANVASS. The only exception being if that person has already contributed, or has indicated on their profile that they are inactive.

Thanks for your time. Jeni ^(talk) 10:38, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Daniele Fortunato -Fusion Project

Hello,

I have updated the draft of Daniele Fortunato- The Fusion Project with addtional sources. Please advise on how to move forward to have the page activated live on the main page.

Thank you! BryceLW (talk) 17:30, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

EC?

Hi, ST. You put "(EC)" in front of your vote in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isaac Adni. I'm curious as to what it means. ubiquity (talk) 19:07, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

22:46:30, 27 July 2016 review of submission by Fagun99i

• Fagun99i (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Subrata Bhattacharya (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I see I have provided 15 references from the International media including from Oman,USA,Europe and India. I have also provided link from Univ. Of Illinois where he as served as Professor. I see in you comment you mentioned that no social media lilnks, I do not see any of my links are from Social media.

Could you please reconsider? He has played with many known artists which are already there on Wikipedia.

22:04:48, 28 July 2016 review of submission by Innisfree987

• Innisfree987 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Rembert Browne (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister. I'd like to touch base about the AfC draft I submitted a few weeks ago for Rembert Browne. Since you advised against resubmitting, I haven't done so; however, I have added 14 more secondary sources to the entry, as the press continues to take note of a wide variety of Browne's writing and appearances. Consequently I believe the entry would meet the consensus for notability at AfD (per AfC reviewing instructions)--and perhaps even more importantly, I believe it also meets the criteria for WP:WHYN, that we have a large, diverse selection of reliable sources necessary to ensure we're offering readers a balanced perspective on the subject.

Still I wanted to check with you before resubmitting because if you really believe it would only waste time for me to resubmit, I'll hold off: I don't want to create unconstructive work for anyone. I only ask because, even as I realize you and I might draw the line somewhat differently on borderline cases, it really is my impression this entry is one that the present community consensus would accept. Thanks in advance for your consideration and guidance. Innisfree987 (talk) 22:04, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Recreated article about Jason Binn

In August last year you took the article Jason Binn to AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Binn. The article was duly deleted. Since then it has twice been re-created and re-deleted under CSD G4 (Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion). Just over a month ago, the editor who had created the latest version posted to my talk page, objecting to the deletion, and expressing the wish to discuss it. It seems to me that the body of the article is substantially similar to the one discussed at AfD, but there are far more references, which is likely to be used as grounds for objecting to a G4 deletion. I therefore restored the article, but I am far from convinced that the new article answers the objections raised at AfD, so I am telling you in case you would like to take it to a second AfD.

Since I restored the article, the editor in question has made no attempt to initiate the discussion he said he wanted, and his only edit related to the article has been adding a photograph to it. In my opinion, the article does no more to show notability than the one discussed at AfD. It has been bombarded with large numbers of references to give the superficial impression that it is well sourced, as often happens with recreations of articles deleted for lack of evidence of notability, but most of the references do nothing or very little to indicate notability. I checked a more or less random sample of eight of the 28 references in the article. To give you an idea of the quality of the references, those eight were: one dead link; two pages not mentioning Jason Binn (one of them refers to a farm owned by "Moreton Binn", who apparently is Jason Binn's father, the other does not mention "Binn" at all); the personal page about Jason Binn on the web site of DuJour, of which he is the CEO; a page at www.etonline.com, where the only mention of Binn is a credit for a photograph on the page that he took; an announcement of launch of magazine, merely including Binn's name in a list of the owners of the magazine (and also the webstite where the announcement is made is "www.adweek.com", which may be an indication of how independent a source it is); a mere announcement of an appointment of Binn to a post; and a page about him on a website which claims to deal with "an increasingly complex marketplace" which "heightens the need for information and competitive intelligence", which to me reads very much like marketing speak for saying they provide PR. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:03, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Ronda Eller

Please explain how an article with images from 2007 and 2008 could be a repost of an article deleted in 2005? Hint: the current content is totally different from the deleted content. People who recklessly tag articles for deletion will be blocked. Nyttend (talk) 11:37, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

21:02:03, 29 July 2016 review of submission by Midwestguy80

• Midwestguy80 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Peter Johnson (sports executive) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I was hoping to get some additional feedback regarding the Wikipedia entry for Peter Johnson. The entry was denied due to a lack of notability. Mr. Johnson was notoriously press-shy, preferring that the focus remained on his clients. As such, there are not an overwhelming number of articles about him. However, Johnson did represent the #1 athlete in five different sports over the course of his career (football, men's tennis, women's tennis, women's golf and boxing). The Sports Business Journal, a leading source on sports business, named Mr. Johnson the most influential agent in all of sports in 2004. Of the other nineteen sports agents who finished below Mr. Johnson that year in the agent rankings, twelve of them have individual Wikipedia entries. Multiple agents who reported to Mr. Johnson during his time at IMG have Wikipedia entries, including Tom Condon, Pat Brisson, Casey Close and Jeff Schwartz.

It is my understand that when articles such as annual "Most Powerful in Sports" list were written, Mr. Johnson asked publications to highlight agents that worked for him instead and recused himself. Given these limitations, would you be able to provide some assistance as to how I can augment Peter Johnson's entry to meet Wikipedia's notability requirements?

Request on 22:27:32, 29 July 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Jtsymonds

• Jtsymonds (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:MapD (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Jtsymonds (talk) 22:27, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

With all due respect, your comment/rationale is completely arbitrary. You even use the work "seems" in your response. I would like to bring in an independent editor to help mediate our discussion.

15:39:54, 30 July 2016 review of submission by Wymiller

• Wymiller (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Grass it up (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello:

I am writing because you have blocked publication of a submission to Wikipedia. Please tell me how Wikipedia published, for example, the item https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Molly, which contains substantially less information, and substantially less citation, concerning a group of musical performers, than the article that I submitted. Thank you very much

Hello, I'm writing because as of today you put a tag on the article about Glenn S. Lipson saying the page should be deleted. He is the director at Alliant University for the forensic psychologist dept. I placed that under Notable Alumni for Alliant University as well as what he works on that they put out as Alliant Spotlights and wrote a whole summary of what he does and what he researches. I also connected under Alliant his listing as the department head and his interests and research. Each of the books listed that he contributed are text books. He writes a lot of chapters in text books that are used nationally in other universities. Any specific suggestions you can make as to showing all of this without using the PR release by Alliant University under their "spotlights" would be greatly appreciated.

I was about to begin helping with other waiting psychologists pages waiting for help that needed to be added to Wikipidia but obviously I need to learn more of what is required first. It was suggesting I not use links to his research papers because they weren't in text books and he did have chapters in multiple text books used today.

I' cross posting this on the talk page for my user page so I can get other help if you are busy this weekend.

Many thanks.

Joey — Preceding unsigned comment added by JoeyD2010 (talk • contribs) 17:45, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

proposed that this article be deleted of Glenn S. Lipson - GoogleScholar listing no citations

On the article talk page I listed 6 listings for Dr. Lipson under GoogleScholar, I outlined it there in detail, would you like me to put it here as well?

I can also replace the NY Times article with a much longer one I verified again today from the the Des Moines Register paid archives that listed almost all of Dr. Lipson testimony in the defense case of Stephen Blumberg, since that is a paid archive site of newspapers.com can I substitute that for the the othee NY Times artcle.

I really appreciate your help and input

JoeyD2010 (talk) 19:37, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

I also listed on Dr. Lipson's talk page the listings and concerns and what I found on World Cat as well as Google Scholar and I hope when you read it I have appropriately addressed your concerns with both categories of WP:AUTHOR and WP:PROF.

Can the two of us working together come to a consensus his article can be fixed to meet your concerns?

Thanks again for all of your great help

JoeyD2010 (talk) 22:27, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Request on 15:23:24, 31 July 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Kenny123mug

• Kenny123mug (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Alexey Igorevich Silichev (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

"Permanently collected by major art museums" is not the only means for accepting worthiness or notoriety. I would view that a contribution in one of the most prestigious fashion magazines, at least for a photographer, is also a veritable claim. Chris Floyd, another British photographer has indeed managed to get a page (well one line) in Wikipedia based it seems mainly on a contribution in the Guardian and an exhibition. His notoriety may just come from the photography of famous people but gives no concept of quality (his photos are actually not bad in my view but certainly not exceptional). I am not really sure that the criteria for a photographer´s entrance into Wikipedia is really associated with a permanent presence in a museum or similar. Kenny123mug 15:23, 31 July 2016 (UTC) Kenny123mug 15:23, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

15:40:34, 31 July 2016 review of submission by ShazzaMD

• ShazzaMD (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Pamela Schulz (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there - we exchanged messages earlier today - Sunday Australia time - about Pamela Schulz's entry. I've done some further research and found the following notability guideline for academics, on the Wikipedia:Notability (academics) page: "2. The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level." As the recipient of an OAM - listed here on Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_Australia, Pamela Schulz has indeed been awarded an 'honour at national or international level'. I will revisit the page now to attempt to address your concern about 'advert-like' language, but otherwise, according to Wikipedia's own guidelines, it appears that Pamela Schulz is notable. I will resubmit for review shortly. Thank you for your feedback.

18:43:15, 31 July 2016 review of submission by Musicwithoutlyrics

• Musicwithoutlyrics (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Abdul Rahman Katanani (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, I am confused why having art in a major museum is a requirement for this article when there is no suggestion of the same for other artists. Under the following pages I see no mention of having works in permanent museum collections: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sama_Raena_Alshaibi https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmad_Kanan

Abdul Rahman Katanani's work has been displayed in major art exhibitions in countries around the world, and is frequently sold in Christie's art auctions. Why is this not enough to add to wikipedia?

Musicwithoutlyrics See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, I can easily deleted those others myself, especially if they were unreviewed (at least yours is currently being reviewed). The permanent collections would've been the best shot at accepting, because a lot of artists can be exhibited, but only a certain number can be permanently collected thus notability. SwisterTwister talk 18:48, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Civility Barnstar

Because you refuse to write a RFA and I refuse to write an RFA on your behalf nom you, I will give you this... either way you deserve it... If you weren't on enwiki, I very well doubt it would exist. I think even some admins look up to you... SwisterTwister, you're by far the best wikipedian i've known, and if (like this will every happen) go on WikiLeave, you can count on me crying for 400 years straight, SwisterTwister you're not only a great wikipedian, but your great at being a wikipedian. Like Journey says Don't Stop Believing, Keep going and dream on. I know you can do it! <3 Zppix (BRB i need ice for my fingers now) Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 21:07, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Request on 22:40:45, 31 July 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Julie Bif

• Julie Bif (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Graham Guest (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

{{SAFESUBST:Void|

Julie Bif (talk) 22:40, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

GetWellNetwork

I removed the CSD tag. In this case, a CSD isn't really appropriate since it has already cleared a previous AFD. More importantly, the second AFD is almost over and it surely will be deleted. This empowers admin if someone recreates it, whereas an article deleted for CSD really doesn't. They can force a prior AFD to DRV, where a CSD deleted article can simply be recreated as long as it is "different". AFD is stronger and the best option for spam articles like this. It takes longer but we have plenty of time. Farmer Brown (talk) 23:27, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

• But by all means, feel free to opine at the AFD itself. Farmer Brown (talk) 23:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Sama (Raena) Alshaibi

Rapidly and neatly withdrawn: thank you!

I suspect that there's a problem with the first sentence. Imagine that we had an article on "Pablo Ruiz y Picasso" (really!) that started:

Pablo Ruiz y Picasso also known as Pablo Picasso (/pɪˈkɑːsoʊ, -ˈkæsoʊ/; Spanish: [ˈpaβlo piˈkaso]; 1881–1973) to a Spanish father and Genovese mother.

It would be as unenticing as one of the many articles on nobodies who happen to be twentieth or fortieth in line to the British throne.... Hoary (talk) 00:17, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

PS please see Talk:Sama Raena Alshaibi. -- Hoary (talk) 00:27, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

X-Rite

Your speedy deletion proposal was opposed, so why did you delete it anyway, replacing with a redirect? Seems a bit extreme. Surely there is a topic worth rescuing here, as they are a very notable firm in the color calibration and photography business, and makers of the famous Gretag Macbeth ColorChecker (shown in that article in my hands, by the way). Dicklyon (talk) 01:09, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

ST, I in fact was the one who declined the speedy, because I recognized several famous products. DGG ( talk ) 21:03, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Musicwithoutlyrics

{{SAFES

UBST:#time:H:i:s, j F Y}} review of submission by Musicwithoutlyrics ==

• Musicwithoutlyrics (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Abdul Rahman Katanani (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, good news! I actually found a piece of his that is in a permanent collection in a museum :)

http://www.mathaf.org.qa/en/collections then to see the piece in the collection via google arts & culture: https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/beta/u/0/asset/with-her-nephew-ahmad/VwGBvFT67ZnBNw

Now how/where should I add it? Do I need to create a new section or should I just mention it under an existing section?

Thanks for your help, by the way! :) (comment by User:Kfidler0823)

Interaction ban

What is this about an interaction ban? I did derod Mr. Right Services. Did I miss something? ~Kvng (talk) 13:47, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

15:28:06, 1 August 2016 review of submission by Musicwithoutlyrics

• Musicwithoutlyrics (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Abdul Rahman Katanani (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Okay I have done it :) :) Thank you!!!

Following Up on 15 July 2016 Question - Michael Drapac

Just following up on my previous question on 15 July 2016 about why the page about Michael Drapac was not approved and what criteria he doesn't meet in terms of notability. More than a dozen reliable sources were provided (although there are hundreds of articles about him, I only used about 14 to write the submission). He owns two major professional cycling teams and created a multi-million investment firm that accurately predicted several international economic trends (well-documented) over the last 20 years. His developments in Australia have won several awards for sustainability and one has even been deemed "the most sustainable project ever built."

I've gone through Wikipedia's notability guidelines and just don't see how he doesn't fulfill them. I would really appreciate if you could please take a moment to address my inquiry and provide my some insight.

Kfidler0823 (talk) 19:15, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

categorization of AfD

I just noticed an article for deletion page that you created on a car dealership had shown up in the biography section. B is for biography. When you are nomination an article on a business for deletion, you would probably want to use O, for organization (in full organization, group or product).John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:22, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

King Myers was previously prodded

I guess you missed it in the history, but King Myers was previously prodded and deprodded. Deletion will have to go through AfD. —C.Fred (talk) 20:51, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

PROD removed from Hazeldine (and please stop!)

I have removed your PROD from this article, and as your standard next step is to take an article to AfD I'll explain where you went wrong. You stated in your deletion rationale "Searches have noticeably found nothing actually suggestive of the needed substance and there's essentially nothing else better." Aside from this not really making any sense, if you had performed a competent Google search you would have found coverage from:

• No Depression: [6], [7], [8]
• Zitty: [9], [10]
• Les Inrockuptibles: [11], [12]
• Književna revija: [13]
• Rolling Stone: [14], [15]
• The Virgin Encyclopedia of Nineties Music: [16]
• Kreuzer: [17]
• The Independent: [18]
• Hot Press: [19]
• Allmusic: [20], [21], [22], [23], [24]

and likely more. That's plenty of coverage from good sources from multiple countries. If you were aware of the relevant guideline for notability (WP:NMUSIC) you would know that the band's album releases on Polydor and Glitterhouse are in themselves enough to indicate notability. PROD is solely for articles that are uncontroversial deletion candidates. Many of the articles you have prodded recently are nowhere near to being suitable for prod, and had you performed a competent web search you would be aware that neither are they good deletion candidates at AfD. Until you are better able to judge notability, please stop nominating articles for deletion. Thanks. --Michig (talk) 06:47, 2 August 2016 (UTC)