Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MAHANAYIKA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Closing this as keep because the nominator withdrew their nomination and general consensus was to keep with only one objection (I'm excluding one contribution due to WP:JUSTAVOTE). (non-admin closure) st170e^talk 21:40, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MAHANAYIKA[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Proposing WP:TNT. It may have some connection with this 2016 Bengali movie. but I feel the article needs to be rewritten. Tito Dutta (talk) 18:34, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I have improved the article a little bit along with a couple of sources since it has connection with the Bengali film Mahanayika. Thank You – GSS (talk) 07:23, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:44, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- ArtsRescuer • Talk me 11:12, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NOREASON. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there's no information about any filming and release, thus nothing to assume this can be timely improved for the notability. SwisterTwister talk 19:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment to closer: See WP:NOEFFORT. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:52, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 19:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

looking beyond the original article:

year/type(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

filmmaker:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lead:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

actor:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

studio:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:INDAFD: Mahanayika Movie Saikat Bhakat Rituparna Sengupta Indraneil Sengupta Soumitra Chatterjee Saheb Chatterjee RKB Films

Strongest of KEEPS with an expressed disappoint in the lack of due diligence on the parts of ArtsRescuer, and SwisterTwister. In looking it was quite easy to find the topic of this film has required media coverage to meet WP:NF. And while the stub first nominated was quite poor, it is more often easier to fix than to delete and re-write from scratch. The article's improvement to well-sourced start-class is undeniable... so come on folks, let's all thank Titodutta and GSS-1987 for showing the topic's potential. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 15:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – per WP:HEY and the improvements to the article by MichaelQSchmidt, and because this meets WP:NF. The delete !votes above appear to have not performed any source searching about the topic, and per WP:NEXIST, "notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article". North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:54, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer – The article has been renamed to Mahanayika. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:06, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because of the outstanding work completed by MichaelQSchmidt, which I thank him for. Others should emulate his attitude and investigate for a minute or two and improve an article before calling for deletion of an article about a notable topic. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 17:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw: Super great work by Schmidt. The article was in condition, and now there is no reason to delete. --Tito Dutta (talk) 18:13, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. And closer please note: from prior AFD discussion behaviors, I do not believe ArtsRescuer or SwisterTwister will revisit to see their concerns have been so easily addressed. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 18:31, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.