Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Btw Santhosh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Btw Santhosh

Btw Santhosh (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

15 April 2024[edit]

– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Block evasion: new SPA Techrd2000cork created 15 April. An hour later, recreated Draft:Hacktivist Vanguard at Draft:Team Hacktivist Vanguard. Wikishovel (talk) 16:10, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New SPA Brosscreater, created 16 April. Games autoconfirm, then recreates Rachana Shah, G5'd a day earlier. Requesting checkuser. Wikishovel (talk) 15:42, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

Please see my comments at User talk:Bbb23#Rachana Shah.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:45, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



21 April 2024[edit]

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Right after deletion that I nominated, its being created again so I just think this user is sock or employed by same person. HarryD (talk) 08:44, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]


26 April 2024[edit]

– An SPI clerk has declined a request for CheckUser, and the case is now awaiting a behavioural investigation.

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

This editor recreated two pages created by sockpuppet User:राहिल खान. The pages they created are Rachana-Rhythm and Rachana Shah. Rachana Shah was deleted 12 years ago Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachana Shah (2nd nomination) after deletion discussion, although it may still qualify for WP:G4. The account even triggered the edit filter with "sockpuppetry" and "editor shopping by globally banned user", with LTA, even though Btw Santhosh does not have LTA. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 13:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can this investigation be removed? This account was already blocked and this case is a duplicate because this a third time this account is in the investigation. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 17:46, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  •  Clerk declined - already checked on 20 April 2024 — JJMC89(T·C) 16:52, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

02 May 2024[edit]

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Obvious block evasion. New SPA HacktivistWasHere created 7 April. A minute after creation, first two edits were poorly sourced puffery about Hacktivist Vanguard at IIT Bombay: [1], [2]. Third edit just now was, as usual, to add Hacktivist Vanguard to List of hacker groups, with the usual rock-bottom blog sources: [3]. Checkuser might be a good idea at this point. Wikishovel (talk) 15:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  •  Blocked without tags, leaving open in case anyone wants to check for sleepers, or verify its not a different sock. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:51, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]