Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 25

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 20 ← Archive 23 Archive 24 Archive 25 Archive 26 Archive 27 → Archive 30

Valeri "Tiger" Lilov

Dear Wikipedia contributors,

I am a chess fan and small contibutor to Wikipedia. A few months ago I made a major update to an article about a chess master and teacher who is very famous in my country, but because of different reasons, his Wikipedia page didn't exist and it has been deleted repeteadly. I was provided with a copy of the article in question which I reformatted and submitted for review. After that, the article was approved by Wikipedia contributors and put live on Wikipedia. Now, a few months later I received a message saying that since the article was previously deleted, it has been deleted again. My question is: Is there any way for this article to go Live again and who I may turn to, in order to request the article to be reviewed and reforematted even more if needed. Here is the link for the article in question - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valeri_%22Tiger%22_Lilov. Thank you for your assistance!

Sincerely,

Dejan Stoynov -Chesszorro (talk) 16:24, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Karma:_A_Very_Twisted_Love_Story

No reasoning given. -24.90.232.208 (talk) 16:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

http://deletionpedia.dbatley.com/w/index.php?title=Prince_Mohammed_bin_Faisal_I_bin_Al_Hussein_El-Hashemite_(deleted_01_Aug_2008_at_23:59)

Deletion was groundless and without a justification or solid evidence to the claim. The information in the article is all true and correct and documents to verify this information can be requested upon request -109.105.236.170 (talk) 18:32, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Not done - As announced prominently at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Mohammed bin Faisal I bin Al Hussein El-Hashemite, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user DGG (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:37, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Gail_edwards_headshot_rdmedia.jpg

I guess I didn’t select the ‘appropriate license’ when I uploaded the picture. I didn't realize there was a problem until I visited the page and found it had been removed. I tried to reload the picture but received this warning: “A file identical to this file (File: Gail edwards headshot rdmedia.jpg) has previously been deleted. You should check that file's deletion history before proceeding to re-upload it.” I contacted http://webchat.freenode.net to help me with this and they said,"The easiest thing to do may be to ask an administrator if they would be willing to undelete the file so you can put the appropriate license on it." Can you help? Thanks, Robert -RustyWard (talk) 19:23, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Not done File was deleted at Commons. You'd need to speak to the Commons admin who deleted it there. There's nothing we can do here, this is a different website. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:49, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Etherealization

Can someone please userfy this page for me? I'm really curious what it said. -AaronSw (talk) 20:23, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:48, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Dead Frontier

The article was removed due to non-notability. I don't know the original contents of the old page, but I have created new content based on notable information, with proper sources as you can see on my page: User:WizTheDoc. -WizTheDoc (talk) 20:32, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Done, seems reasonable and appears good enough to avoid speedy deletion, so moved to mainspace (article was salted). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:53, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Supersmile

The Wikipedia page was detelete after we tried to update it. Supersmile is a popular at-home whitening line created by Dr. Irwin Smigel -72.248.75.120 (talk) 20:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user NawlinWiki (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:55, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

harmless harvest

reasoning -Dothewildthing (talk) 23:04, 1 December 2010 (UTC)


Please see our company info online www.harmlessharvest.com

I intend only to display our scientific research on wikipedia as we are on the breaking edge of the sustainable wild food and agricultural movement. I can't seem to find 5 minutes to edit this information in my user profile because it keeps getting flagged or deleted and I am honestly just trying to get the research and our references out there. I thought I could edit the page and submit it to wikipedia for approval within my user space. I am terribly confused and have been working on this for hours.

We have many legitimate affiliates and proven data to back up all the information I wish to post. If you can allow me to edit in my user space please let me know. I promise that we are honest people, enthusiastic about making positive changes in the way we eat and live as humans while learning to save our earth's vital ecosystems through diligent research. The information we have is unbiased and should be shared.

Not only do we have a scientific research but are about to launch a cultural initiative project with extremely well known performance and installation artists who are well affiliated worldwide.

Please advise on how to share our findings with your website? If I am to add research to a general search for the likes of CAMU CAMU or CUPUACU or Coconut Water for instance I need people to know I am a credible source and how can I do that if I am not given the time to even provide a 5 minute company history online?

Not done and will not be done The article was a blatant advert. You can try drafting a neutral version, but please read this and this first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:21, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Tank Johnson Drummer

because it's me, and I need to know how why it was deleted, and how I can fix it. -Gsmythe (talk) 05:39, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

paul bradley

-85.210.44.12 (talk) 14:31, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

  • We have several "Paul Bradley" articles - click the blue link above. If you are concerned about another, deleted, one, please give its exact title. JohnCD (talk) 14:44, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Elan (IIT Hyderabad)

Whatever was written in the article was true. I'm myself a student of IIT Hyderabad and a core member of the fest team. I request you to please undelete the page, or at least provide us with the text that was there in it. We will make sure that it adheres to WikiPedia standards. -Abrambk (talk) 18:46, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

  •  Not done. This article was deleted as a result of a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elan (IIT Hyderabad) so, as stated at the top of this page, it cannot be undeleted here. If you consider that the discussion was not correctly closed, or that there is new information, you should first approach user Courcelles (talk), the admin who closed the discussion; then, if you are not satisfied, you can take it to WP:Deletion review; but note that being true is not enough - subjects for Wikipedia articles must also be notable. I will advise you on your talk page how to enable email so that I can send you a copy of the article. JohnCD (talk) 23:08, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Flight Training Europe

No reasoning given. -212.145.130.186 (talk) 22:53, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Flight Training Europe

This article was deleted on the basis that the company was not noteworthy, the page lacked reliable third party sources and hadn't been updated recently. I don't believe that the first (and chief) of these reasons is valid. Flight Training Europe (now FTEJerez) is a major player in the Aviation Industry. The first pilots to complete the new MPL licence trained at FTE ([http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2008/03/03/221953/mpl-crews-prove-themselves-on-the-line.html citation]) and went on to work for Flybe (who has strong ties with the school). It also trains pilots directly for Qatar and Emirates as well as having graduates leave to start with most major European carriers (mostly Ryanair, Flybe and recently 4 graduates to BA CityFlyer), GAPAN Scholarship students are sent to FTEJerez to complete their ATPL. It owns and operates 29 aircraft and 2 simulators, including an advanced 737-800 simulator. The Company has appeared regularly in industry news: ([http://www.flighttrainingnews.co.uk/home/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=28:fte-named-as-flybes-mpl-training-partner&catid=1:news&Itemid=2 link])([http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2007/07/02/215296/europes-air-transport-boom-is-great-news-for-pilots.html link]). The company also has a rich history as a BAE systems Flight Training School, which used to train BA Scholarship students at Prestwick. It was BAE that moved the operation to Jerez. Independent Sources for all of this are being sought by myself. I ask that the article is restored and allowed to be updated. If this is unacceptable, I ask that the article is restored to my userspace where I will edit and amend as necessary to get the article to an acceptable standard for Wikipedia. -212.145.130.186 (talk) 23:20, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello. The majority of your response tells me you haven't carefully looked at what this page is for and what can and cannot be undeleted through it (nor carefully read the response you received immediately above). Articles deleted at a deletion discussions on the merits, as this one was, are never undeleted through this process. Accordingly, even if you wrote the most compelling reasons imaginable for undeletion, it would not be acted upon. This page is only for undeletion of articles deleted uncontroversially. Please read the boldfaced message at the top of this page, expanded upon in explanatory text below that message. If you want to seek undeletion, the only places you can ask for it are at the talk page of the admin who deleted it, or at WP:DRV, as explained by JohnCD above.

However, you do ask at the end of your post for the content to be userfied so that you can work on it—that can be done through this page and I will gladly provide this content to you if you create an account. We do not userfy content to IP talk pages. Please see Wikipedia:Userfication#What cannot be userfied. Creating an account takes literally moments. Once you have done so, give a ping here and I or someone else will userfy the content. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:03, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Coat of arms of Western Sahara.png

needed for article, keeps being deleted because users remove this as the political entity's status is controversial. Any way we can protect it from being deleted a fifth time? -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:04, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello?--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 11:18, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Not done I'm afraid this process here is only for uncontroversial stuff. As far as I see it is not even clear which or if any flag / coat of arms should be there. Then it has been deleted per Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2009_July_15#File:Coat_of_arms_of_Western_Sahara.png which you may want to evaluate, but which we we cannot simply overturn here anyways. Eventually, I'd start from raising once more the issue at the article itself.--Tikiwont (talk) 16:07, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing me to the deletion discussion, it wasn't even listed on the many deletes. Now I know where to start.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 17:18, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

stella von musulin

MUSULIN, STELLA von · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Stella on Musulin

I am at a total loss as to why this article has been deleted. I have provided references, citations etc. What exactly is required? Here is a distinguished writer and historian being ignored by you. Take a look a the piece of personal puff and crap on Pablo Ganguli (who?) There is a vast piece of self-serving rubbish on this nobody who was deported from Morocco by the Moroccan authorities. the site should be renamed Wikicrap.Natsyw (talk) 23:09, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

  • Your complaint has been noted and I'll give it the attention it deserves, given all the invective you have attached to it. Protonk (talk) 06:07, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
  •  Not done As completely explained in your previous entry about the exact same article a few sections above. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:16, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Dmitri1999

reasoning -http://www.dmitrimarkine.com (talk) 04:28, 4 December 2010 (UTC)


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dmitri1999

Was deleted for "advertising". This is my own little space and the only people who see this page is ME. There was no valid reason behind the deletion. I am extremely pissed right now to the point I am considering deleting all the contributions I've made. It's just bad how some can just come in to your own little page(not an article for god's sake) and just completely delete it!

  • I've restored the page and blanked it. Notwithstanding the fact that it is your talk page, you may not use any wikipedia page as a personal advertisement. Wikipedia is not the place to host your cv. I can see in the history that you have added that material several times. Please don't. I'm also going to remind you that when you made contributions to wikipedia you irrevocably released them to the GFDL--you can't come back later and unilaterally delete them. so please don't try that either. Protonk (talk) 05:59, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Tipper tapper

This is the name of the drum stick used to beat the Irish drum called the Bodhran. It is also used as the common polite name for the human penis in Western Ireland -Joetherob (talk) 10:11, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Not done and will not be done Even if that was common, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. --Tikiwont (talk) 16:14, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Najibahmed

The page was deleted because it was an Unsourced BLP; the only link provided came up 404) i have now fixed the problem can ypu pleasee restore it so i can update thank you-Northwood123 (talk) 19:00, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Not done and will not be done. You've just been warned by the deleting admin not to recreate this a fourth time. --Tikiwont (talk) 20:00, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Indian web talk show - On the Jogging Trail w/

-Hindtoday (talk) 21:25, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

These are professionally produced talk shows by "HIND TODAY", a name duly approved by Government of India [ https://rni.nic.in/letter2.asp?tcode=ORIENG00957 HINDTODAY ]

Talk shows are copyrighted contents and will eventually make it to Television channels of India. In addition to this, we are also producing two more shows 1) State of the Nation w/host <host name> 2) State of the State w/host <host name>

where <host name> would be replaced with a popular talk show host or popular blogger.

Please note that - India doesn't allow FM or AM channels to air conservative talk shows like in USA. The television channels in India are dominated by news. There is no equivalent of Fox and MSNBC in India and hence 'HIND TODAY', a duly approved Government of India media is creating contents by providing training and eventually will share contents with interested Television channels of India.

Indian web talk show - On the Jogging Trail w/Dr. Manmohan Singh Indian web talk show - On the Jogging Trail w/Dr. Naveen Patnaik Indian web talk show - On the Jogging Trail w/<any political leader/public official> are extremely popular, educating and thought provoking shows and the hosts are extremely popular.

I request you to please restore this page reasoning

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user TomStar81 (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.

Wesley Ngo Baheng

Footballer whose page was deleted numerous times as he failed WP:ATHLETE; now passes it. He played in the FA Cup for Aldershot Town (see [1]). I Did ask Skomorokh, a previous deleter of the article, to undelete, but they cannot as they are not an admin! This is totally uncontroversial. Thanks. -—Half Price 17:06, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

I've created a draft (with sources) at User:Half price/Wesley Ngo Baheng. —Half Price 17:38, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Afd is here. I'm inclined to undelete this. anyone else have a problem with that? Protonk (talk) 17:40, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
I agree, go ahead - he has got over the bar. JohnCD (talk) 22:27, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Restored. Protonk (talk) 07:39, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Elizabeth McCarthy

biography was quoted from IMDB.COM -Lizflicks (talk) 19:44, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - that's the trouble, it was deleted as a copyright violation because it was copied from IMDb. You must write it in your own words, but check out WP:Notability (people) first, especially the sectionWP:ENTERTAINER. JohnCD (talk) 19:53, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Raja Liaqat Ali

The information I provided is 100 percent true but wikipedia is giving warnings for deletion.I want my article not to delete.Please find some way out for me for your policy is very complicated -Cj.Raja (talk) 19:58, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

This article hs not been deleted: it is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raja Liaqat Ali and that is where you should state your case. It is not enough to be true; subjects for Wikipedia articles must also be notable as explained at WP:Notability (people). JohnCD (talk) 20:32, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

David Berger (theologian)

needed for article, keeps being deleted because users remove this as the theologian entity's status is controversial. The article is relevant because author wrote more than five books and he was a professor in Rome at university. The article has references and enough text for a good article.Frank Marco (talk) 14:00, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

  • There appears to be an assertion of the subject's importance, so I'm inclined to undelete it. However I am a bit worried that the most notable thing he seems to have done is very recently accused 20-40% of the catholic clergy of being gay. the rest of the article seems to be a bit of a WP:COATRACK for that claim. Also, teaching at a university for 7 years then leaving is not at all uncommon and it isn't particularly distinguishing (unless religious tenure arrangements are very different from tenure at secular schools). can you provide any more reason why the subject might be notable apart from the claims he has made about the church? Protonk (talk) 06:17, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Lectonar speeddeleted for two times a good, relevant biography of German catholic author and professor David Berger. Berger wrote several books . In 2010 he wrote in his new book, that 20 to 40 percentage of catholic clergy is homosexual. So this controversial biography should be kept.

Nope, neither evidence nor assertion of actual notability. Also: is User:Frank Marco the same person as User:Marco Frank? Both have created articles on this fellow. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:38, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Marianela Salazar Guillén

The article don't have the references so i add the references in the article before the november 29 day of delection -Evanex (talk) 00:54, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

I'd have doubts about two of the sources but one might be good, I'll drop the deleting admin a note.--Tikiwont (talk) 20:36, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Done, after some research it seems that Ellas Virtual is a supplement of La Prensa, so should fit the bill.--Tikiwont (talk) 21:10, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Hana movie poster.jpg

not my image, needed for article, I will fix tagging yada... cheers -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:30, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Done Courcelles 04:40, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Got it, thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 09:47, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Reann Ballslee

misunderstanding/significant -129.174.97.34 (talk) 15:00, 6 December 2010 (UTC)


I don't understand why this page has been deleted. The user comment for deletion states that they don't understand the significance of a cisgendered male being elected Homecoming queen of a university. It is very significant as Reann Ballslee is a drag queen and was elected by the entire student body to be homecoming queen. It made international news, and she is an important figure for the LGBTQ community in Northern Virginia, and the country (USA). She has won awards in this area from the drag and LGBTQ community. She's a public figure that should not be deleted by Wikipedia. Thank you for your time.

This page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reann Ballslee. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:41, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

File:bewbews.jpg

i would like you to un-delete file:bewbews.jpg please there is nothing wrong with it it is free from flickr full license! --RCSprinter123 (talk) 18:06, 6 December 2010 (UTC) (moved here from Wikipedia talk:Requests for undeletion/Current requests)

  • Did you mean File:Bewbews 2.jpg, File:Bewbews3.JPG or both? Also note that some of the "free" licenses on flickr are not sufficiently free to be used on wikipedia. Any photo that says non-commercial reuse permitted is too restrictive. Photos and text on wikipedia must be available for all downstream uses, including commercial uses. In any case, can you link to the original on flickr? Protonk (talk) 20:11, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
  • (ec) If I look e.g. at File:Bewbews 2.jpg, it says 'Full ©' which as already pointed at your talk page would induce one to think of full copyright.--Tikiwont (talk) 20:20, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

bitcoin

its more relevant than 90% of th crap articles on here -24.47.43.189 (talk) 11:55, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

 Not done You obviously came here to attempt to make a disruptive point rather than make a legitimate request and are well aware that this was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitcoin and will not be acted upon, so I'll dispense with the standard response to users who make such requests in good faith.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:24, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
You are acting uncivil by responding to him this way. You should NOT jump to accusations of bad faith WP:AOBF. The user is simply upset and unfamiliar with Wikipedia policies. While long-time Wikipedians know that his argument is not one accepted, "most of the articles here are crap" is a common public conception. Rather than respond to an inappropriate request with an inappropriate retort, you should calmly and politely inform the user of how things work around here 67.174.39.160 (talk) 06:19, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Wrong, wrong and wrong. Unfortunately, it's hard to gauge knowledge and skill level from anonymous editors, and the message in the statement was pure bad faith - it could be read no other way. If one thinks that articles are crap you do one of two things: go away, or fix them. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:58, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Indeed. The message is antagonistic on its face. We do not assume good faith in the presence of contrary evidence.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:24, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Bitcoin is a legitimate open-source project with growing support. Judging by the number of companies collaborating (http://www.bitcoin.org/trade), I'd say it's quite a bit more notable than some things that slip under the radar here. Plus, the concept and internal workings are very interesting in my opinion, being an excellent example of a unique use of public-key encryption. If the article cannot be undeleted as is, perhaps Bitcoin could still receive a subsection in the proof of work system article? EDIT: Further poof of insignificance: $22485 US dollars change hand via bitcoin every day (http://www.bitcoinwatch.com/). 174.68.103.235 (talk) 23:09, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
As clearly explained at the top of this page, this project is not for undeletion of articles deleted at any deletion discussion, as this one was at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitcoin. It is only for undeletion of articles that were deleted uncontroversially. Accordingly, Even if you wrote the most compelling reasons imaginable for undeletion it would not be acted upon. The only places where a deletion discussion can legitimately be asked to be undeleted is at the talk page of the administrator who deleted the article (here though, this cannot work because the user is no longer an administrator), or at Wikipedia:Deletion review. A separate path is to create the article anew. However, that recreated content must address the reasons for deletion (here the lack of significant coverage in independent, third party, reliable sources; see WP:N). If it does not it will just be speedily deleted under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:28, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
See the entry immediately below this. The way to get get Bitcoin restored is via WP:Deletion review; it has been rejected there twice, most recently at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 September 26. Don't try to create the article afresh: there is already a draft article at Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Bitcoin. If that can be improved with enough reliable, independent sources to demonstrate notability, it can be taken to Deletion Review again, but there is no point repeatedly coming here. JohnCD (talk) 10:47, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Afterjesus.jpg

I'm not necessarily requesting undeletion, I'm just trying to discover what happened to it. There was a photo of King of Kings (statue) at this filename, used in the article, showing the appearance of this sculpture following a fire. The photo isn't there any more, and there doesn't seem to be any deletion log or note that it was deleted for whatever reason, at least not that I can find. If it was moved, there's no redirect, and the article that pointed to it wasn't updated. A search isn't turning up any deletion discussion, so if it was deleted, it was probably speedy or prodded. Thanks, cmadler (talk) 10:06, 29 November 2010 (UTC) -cmadler (talk) 10:06, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Are you sure the photo was not at Commons? I see no history under that filename at all. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:41, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
The file was deleted at Commons, as shown here.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:42, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks! For some reason it didn't occur to me to check Commons. cmadler (talk) 18:16, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Edward Swift

Original reason "an announcer on a radio station with a <5% share of a market of 300,000. Roughly the equivalent of an accountant who wins an industry award." This station doesn't actually measure audience or share as they are a non-commercial station, and do not participate in audeience surveys. Therefore there are no statistics to backup this reason for deletion. This host could have 0% share or 100% share - no-one can ever know. -119.224.22.211 (talk) 10:04, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. The share argument is not really relevant here. The article needs better references though.--Tikiwont (talk) 10:22, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Waipoua Forest Trust

21:26, 5 December 2010 HJ Mitchell (talk -119.224.22.211 (talk) 10:26, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user L.tak (talk), who proposed it for deletion, in case they wishes to take it to Articles for deletion. The article's problem is that it is referenced only to the Trust's own website: to meet Wikipedia's criterion of notability it needs references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." JohnCD (talk) 10:55, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

LORC

LORC is a business fund with the goal of making renewable offshore energy cheaper via research and cooperation between academia and businesses. We have no commercial goal. -LORC2 (talk) 11:04, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

 Not done. Wikipedia is not a listing directory, and the article gave no indication that the organization is notable enough to have an encyclopedia article. The notability requirement applies also to non-commercial organizations. In writing about your own organization, you have a conflict of interest - see the WP:FAQ/Organizations for advice. JohnCD (talk) 11:16, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Bob Fox

I don't know if it's the same guy, if it is, his recent obit seems to be notable http://www.freep.com/article/20101206/NEWS08/101206063/1320/Concert-promoter-Bob-Fox-dies-at-62 -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 11:46, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

 Not done. Not the same - the deleted one was "the founder of Speed Stacks, The fast-paced sport where you stack up 12 specially designed plastic cups in 3 different ways." JohnCD (talk) 11:51, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Wow, that sounds like more fun than vandalizing Wikipedia! I'm gonna run right out and... no, wait, look, a penguin! Where was I? :) --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:21, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Mr Gowdie

I was planning to add much more detail to this article -Sozclarkey (talk) 17:10, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

 Not done There was no article; just a URL to a photo album on somebody's blog. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:22, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

David Berger (theologian) again

Could you restore a copy of David Berger (theologian) to my user space?

Say, for example, to User:Kevinkor2/David Berger (theologian)?

The article disappeared so fast that I didn't have time to see if I could improve the sourcing and notability.

Thank you! -Kevinkor2 (talk) 09:41, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

 Done, but in view of the remarks above and in the deletion log, you had better check with Lectonar (talk) before moving this back to the main space. JohnCD (talk) 10:28, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks! I appreciate it. And looking at the article, I see that it has a lot less references to establish notability than its equivalent in German Wikipedia .
--Kevinkor2 (talk) 18:46, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

File:GreatPumpkin.jpg

Many of these images that are in use are being deleted when they could just as easily be properly tagged and saved -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:16, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

 Done Restored - just remember that it's got to get back in the article space with a FuR. Gracias. Skier Dude (talk 07:05, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
As always, and thanks!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:35, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Anna Ardin

Obviously, not a hoax. Reliable source: http://www.counterpunch.org/shamir09142010.html -Elvey (talk) 23:35, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

BLP policy needs to be respected, however.

 Not done There is nothing to restore - just a redirect. Skier Dude (talk 07:08, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bigger_digger/Ebiquity

This article was originally deleted under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. The user who deleted it kindly moved it to their user space so I could edit it as they felt it could be turned into a good article. The main problem was that I used the companies website for a lot of the sourcing and not enough independent sources. I’ve rewritten this article after taking another look at the Wikipedia notes. It now has an extensive list of independent, well know and reliable sources. -Wwjx0p (talk) 11:51, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

  •  Not done You actually do not need anything undeleted, you need the draft article moved which can effectively be done by almost anyone. However, I will not do it - the entire article continues to read like a puff piece with no regards for actual notability. In short, it's an advertisement. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:05, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

WIRIS

The article contains valid information for a software widely used in many European countries and references to the pages of the several ministries of education who are using it. It has been deleted by user Lectonar twice for being publicity, but he never replied to any of my two requests of reasons for deletion, and he blocked recreation now. -Wirismath (talk) 15:48, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

  •  Not done. We can't reverse speedy deletions here. You should try deletion review. I can help you make a request there if you like. Protonk (talk) 16:38, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Stephen Burrows

He is living legend, cfda award winning fashion designer, and theres no reason for his life to not be on wikipedia

I am unsure why this page was deleted to begin with, but would greatly appreciate if it could be relisted! He has been around since the 70's, dressing everyone from Taylor Swift to Michelle Obama, Liza Minelli to Pat Cleveland. He recently showed his SS 2011 line, and is currently creating a fabulous collection for Fall 2011. -72.248.244.10 (talk) 19:24, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

The above linked article is (and has always been) about a screenwriter. The fashion designer Stephen Burrows may be notable for an article but I am unsure whether we had one to begin with. If I look at e.g. the aggregator Answers.com [2] the first links are about the designer but the wikipedia article is again the one about the film person. The Coty American Fashion Critics' Awards link to Stephen Burrows (designer) which also has never been an article. So either you let us know the exact title of the deleted article or it still needs to be written, e.g. at Wikipedia:Articles for creation.--Tikiwont (talk) 19:57, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larmenius_Charter

subjective analysis and complete removal. arguably a controversial subject, and likely self serving. no replacement with other information. apparent censoring effect. -75.175.117.186 (talk) 20:40, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

  • Restored as a contested proposed deletion. Protonk (talk) 21:02, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
  • There was plenty of time to contest this, and I fail to see how the IP (whose only edits are here) makes a strong enough case for "censorship" and "self-serving", or has any basis to claim a "subjective analysis" when multiple sources state clearly it is a forgery, the article has been tagged for two years with a "neutrality" tag, and there were complaints on the talk page about how the article read over a year ago. Moreover, no one even touched the article for eight months before I prodded it. There was plenty of time to do something about this when the prod was active; to put up a weak argument like this three days after the prod expired is subverting process. MSJapan (talk) 06:18, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
So, mark it for WP:AFD and argue for it's deletion. We often undelete months after a PROD expires. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:02, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
I've put this up on my talk page, but contesting a prod at any point isn't subverting process; it is the process. PROD is easy come, easy go. If you are worried that something might be restored without a detailed argument or investigation, don't use PROD. Literally the only requirement to overturn a prod is that some editor somewhere cares enough about the subject to contest it. Protonk (talk) 18:32, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Eatmewhileimhot

first off this band is made up of the exact same people as NeverShoutNever but they are two completely different styles of music, eatmewhileimhot is a metalcore band where nevershoutnever is a pop, acoustic band. when either of these bands preform they do not play the other bands music. http://www.myspace.com/eatmewhileimhot there blog on december 8, 2010 states that they will be releasing a new song soon and it will be called "Get Up And Die" http://www.myspace.com/eatmewhileimhot/blog it also goes on to say that eatmewhileimhot will be preforming at bamboozle 2011 http://www.thebamboozle.com/lineup.php The page was deleted because they thought the band broke up or renamed. If you would wish to keep this page off of wiki we should impliment the band eatmewhileimhot into the wiki page nevershoutnever -JohnGoesWiki (talk) 07:56, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

  •  Not done The article has been deleted three times as "A7: Article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject". Blogs are not valid sources, and I cannot find anywhere how they might meet any of the music notability guidelines. You might wish to draft an article in your personal userspace (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:58, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Therapure_BioPharma_Inc.

This page was deleted accidentally when I was editing this page two days ago and message for speedy deletion came on the article page. I haven't violated any Wikipedia terms and guidelines. Could you please restore? -Philiphayne (talk) 09:41, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_George_Kolath

I was wondering why Wikipedia deleted my personal profile, my movie cross-cultural film info? I haven't violated any Wikipedia terms and guidelines. Could you please restore, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_George_Kolath

here is my email address <redacted> Thank you,

Tom George Kolath

Hi Tom. Actually you were violating many Wikipedia guidelines and policies, though I think quite unintentionally. I think it most likely you are not clear on the difference between namespaces. You have a user page and user talk page. All user pages are at the name of an account with "user:" prefixed and talk pages are the same with "user talk:" prefixed. Thus your user page is at User:Tomgeorgeusa which you've never edited, and your talk page is at User talk:Tomgeorgeusa. A person's user page can be used for some self disclosure, which is what the page you created had on it, though I think most would think it a bit excessive even there. But what you did was create that content in the article mainspace where only encyclopedia articles should ever appear. There, such a page takes on a whole different meaning, appearing as an improper autobiography, empty of any encyclopedic content, without any hint of Notability, that is usually created for promotional purposes, with a signature included which should never appear in articles and so on.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:45, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Anarchopedia

It's time for the English one... -––虞海 (Yú Hǎi) ✍ 18:24, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

  • why? Spartaz Humbug! 18:29, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
  • For background, read Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anarchopedia 3rd nomination. If you think something has changed since that discussion, Yú Hǎi, then create a new, properly-constructed and well-sourced article in a sandbox in your userspace, then offer it for comment so that a new article may be created by somebody who can override the block against recreation if they agree that the website in question is now notable. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:31, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
    • Ok, what in my memory might be the former nomination, which tells me that there're no more than 3 articles in Anarchopedia. But it's still confusing to me why you mentioned it in WP:NOT but delete it in article namespace. ––虞海 (Yú Hǎi) ✍ 19:50, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
      • I didn't mention it in WP:NOT. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:06, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Dr._Lillian_Glass

My name is Dr. Lillian Glass and I had a former employee <redacted> who wrote up my Wikipedia page on my behalf. Initially he did not follow the rules of Wikipedia. Since I received the warning in early December which was that everything needed to be fixed in 10 days, I personally fixed the following: I added all of the references you requested, I took off all weasel words, I took off all peacock words, I also took out issbn numbers on all of my books. <redacted> was supposed to upload all of these changes within a 10 day period as you requested and ended up not doing so. He has not been working for me since two weeks ago. I would be grateful if you could please put it up again and I personally will make All of the necessary changes effective immediately. I will now take complete responsibility for this. Unfortunately at this point, I don't have the copy of the articles that was on wikipedia because <redacted> took them. I believe you may have emailed him as well but I did not receive this notification and was unaware of what happened until I checked wikipedia early this week. I believe my qualifications allow me to be in Wikipedia as I can document all of my accomplishments. Please help me to put the page up on wikipedia again. In case if you need to contact me my email address is <redacted>. Thank you so much for your consideration. -Drlillianglass (talk) 00:37, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Eventually this was not deleted as unreferenced biography after the 10 day grace period but at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lillian Glass. It therefore cannot be be undeleted through this process which is for uncontroversial restorations. Nevertheless, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Spartaz (talk · contribs). Let me just point out that it doesn't matter here whether you or some assistant drafted the original article and our policy on conflict of interest applies to both cases. For official communication please refer to WP:OTRS. I'll post some more pointers on your editor page. --Tikiwont (talk) 10:49, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Paul_Ruffino

Unsubstantiated Deletion -99.171.108.76 (talk) 01:24, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Shelter 2010 (film)

Reason for deletion of the page was that no such film could be found. However, the film does exist. -96.48.192.31 (talk) 09:38, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Gender stereotypes in Television Commercials

The main reason why my essay was deleted is that it looks like an essay. I understood the reasons why my page was deleted and I can update the article and erase the irrelevant information.I can change the contents in case you let me do so. Thank You -Olga.darii (talk) 18:00, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

 Not done. The article was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gender stereotypes in Television Commercials so, as stated at the top of this page, it cannot be restored here. You should first approach Ron Ritzman (talk), the administrator who closed the discussion; then, if you are not satisfied, you can go to WP:Deletion review. Before you do any of that, read WP:No original research, particularly the section "Synthesis of published material that advances a position." JohnCD (talk) 20:34, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

The New Message from God

I recently began writing the article The New Message from God, and it was speedily deleted by user:slakr citing Wikipedia:CSD#G11, and with the comments "was blatant advertising, used only to promote someone or something." I believe the criteria used by user:slakr to be in error, and that his decision was precipitous since my article was deleted within minutes of being created. Perhaps the use of proposed deletion would have been more appropriate instead, to give the article a survival chance.

This article's subject matter has been covered in several radio stations nation wide, has several published books, and has the potential to become encyclopedic. I believe notability can be established for this non-commercial, non-profit organization.

A little about me: I am not advocate for anything within wikipedia, but I am interested in the major religions of the world as well as religious articles in the Category:New Age organizations. I plan to become and active participant in the WikiProject Wikipedia:WikiProject Religion. I objectively engage in the study of anything related to human spirituality.

Respectfully, --JDIAZ001 (talk) 19:27, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

 Not done. I see that slakr has moved the article back into your user space where you can work on it. In order to establish the notability of the subject, you will need not only to cite Marshall Vian Summers' own writings, but also "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject," and that will be the key to making clear that the article is describing, not promoting, the message. JohnCD (talk) 21:03, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
It is userfied at User:JDIAZ001/The New Message from God. Work on it using reliable sources before considering moving it back. Fences&Windows 21:06, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Thank you. I will follow your advise before moving the article back to the main space.--JDIAZ001 (talk) 21:37, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Jumbleme (digital encryption service)

The user who suggested the article be deleted complained that there was no assertion of notability for the web site. There are now more sources that establish the notability criterion for jumbleme.com and so resolve this user's worry. -Evanmayo (talk) 21:02, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user Electrified Fooling Machine (talk), who proposed it for deletion, in case they wishes to take it to AfD; please add your new sources so that notability is clear. JohnCD (talk) 21:12, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

David A. Bell

Hi. I would like to make an entry for Mr. David A. Bell, who is currently on the [List_of_Macalester_College_people]. However the title was deleted and protected for further re-creation in 2007. I would like to know how i can proceed and create this page. Thanks! -Liaochao (talk) 21:29, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

The article was protected from creation because it was repeatedly created as a copyright violation. What you should do is make a draft in your user space at User:Liaochao/David A. Bell and then approach MZMcBride (talk), the admin who protected it, for permission to post your version. Read WP:Your first article and Wikipedia:Copy-paste before you start. JohnCD (talk) 21:42, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

user:Tim2k9

A page created purely to amuse friends, all persons mentioned are fictional, and some stories were a collaboration to gain the highest amusmant. Some may call it sick, but it is purely for humerous effect, an effect to which was felt by those who read it, no harm was intended in the making of the page, and no harm has been done by it. Please restore the page, so for those who read and want to read, can laugh and have fun, fulfilling the reason why the page was created -86.30.215.62 (talk) 23:15, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

 Not done:This page was deleted under {{db-g10}} - a page that serves no purpose but to disparage or threaten its subject or some other entity. It will not be undeleted. Skier Dude (talk 04:11, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Bitcoin (yet again, for the fifth or sixth but maybe the last time... )

PLEASEEEE!!! - 69.255.84.11 (talk) 03:04, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

This long-drawn-out saga may actually be reaching a conclusion. See Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 December 12 where it is proposed that the draft version in the Article Incubator is now ready to be returned to the main encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:27, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Jesus H. Van Halen it will be nice to see that crapmagnet off this list.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:17, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

D2 Communications

reasoning -Malina317 (talk) 03:19, 14 December 2010 (UTC)


Reference http://mobithinking.com/interview-akihisa-fujita-d2c

What's that got to do with deleting an obvious advertisement? --Orange Mike | Talk 03:52, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Ahmad AbuBsharah

It's just an information about me, it doesn't attak any groups or religions -Slash Designer (talk) 11:51, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

 Not done There's no place on all of Wikipedia where it's appropriate to post your résumé, and especially not in the mainspace where articles reside.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:11, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Giglio Material

This page appears to have been deleted because the term is "not notable." On the contrary, Gigilo material and the underlying Confrontation Clause issues which the the doctrine polices in a criminal trial are central features of due process. Giglio material is not an obscure term, and it is certainly less obscure than many other legal concepts which have Wikipedia pages (ie Change of Venue or In Camera -67.255.9.47 (talk) 13:58, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Moreover, my search of Lexis confirms that it is appears to be notable concept that could be expanded into a suitable article. Note that the article is at Giglio material.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 17:22, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Ram Sethi

This person, Mr. Ram Sethi is a notable personality in Bollywood since 1969, and has worked in more than 100 movies as well as more than 100 pilot TV serials. I see no notable reasoning to delete this page, except that not many references were added to this page. I would therefore request the Adminstrator/Wikipedia to re-instate this article, after which I will take full responsibility to improve this page, add references, link it with several other Wiki pages and make this page of the quality it deserves. -Sushantsethi (talk) 19:57, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user Guoguo12 (talk), who proposed it for deletion, in case he wishes to nominate it at Articles for deletion. What the article needs ro demonstrate notabilty is references from independent reliable sources. JohnCD (talk) 21:48, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Robert Eringer

This article describes an author Robert Eringer whose views maybe contested but cover subjects of general importance regarding the diseased historian Carroll Quigley. As a consequence of a deletion by mbisanz: 03:02, 14 September 2008 MBisanz (talk | contribs) deleted "Robert Eringer" ‎ (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Eringer) the information is not available.

Irrelevant material about MBisanz, who as admin closed the AfD

Regarding mbisanz we know: MBisanz is at law school and will be editing very sporadically for the time being.

Judging from the wide range Articles that are listed as authored by MBisanz:

  • Luther v. Borden
   * Frank G. Zarb School of Business
   * Herman A. Berliner
   * Church of the Holy Trinity, Poughkeepsie
   * Church of Regina Coeli (Hyde Park)
   * Dime Savings Bank of Williamsburgh
   * Empire Savings Bank
   * Australian Institute of Building
   * Frank G. ZarbDYKsquarecrop.png
   * The National Conference CenterDYKsquarecrop.pngSymbol support vote.svg
   * The Corporate CenterDYKsquarecrop.png
   * IBM Somers Office ComplexDYKsquarecrop.png
   * 800 Westchester AvenueDYKsquarecrop.png
   * Bell Labs Holmdel ComplexDYKsquarecrop.png
   * Merck headquartersDYKsquarecrop.png
   * National Park Community CollegeDYKsquarecrop.png
   * University of Arkansas Community College at HopeDYKsquarecrop.png
   * Rich Mountain Community CollegeDYKsquarecrop.png
   * Ozarka CollegeDYKsquarecrop.png
   * State Fair Community CollegeDYKsquarecrop.png
   * Front Range Community CollegeDYKsquarecrop.png
   * Illinois Valley Community CollegeDYKsquarecrop.png
   * Wallace Community CollegeDYKsquarecrop.png
   * Centralia CollegeDYKsquarecrop.png
   * Phillips Community College of the University of ArkansasDYKsquarecrop.png
   * List of State University of New York unitsDYKsquarecrop.pngFeatured article star.svg
   * List of City University of New York institutionsDYKsquarecrop.pngFeatured article star.svg
   * List of New Jersey County CollegesDYKsquarecrop.pngFeatured article star.svg
   * Connecticut State University System
   * List of colleges and universities in NevadaDYKsquarecrop.png
   * Central Alabama Community College
   * Bevill State Community CollegeDYKsquarecrop.png
   * Gadsden State Community CollegeDYKsquarecrop.png
   * List of colleges and universities in Wyoming
   * List of United States district and territorial courtsDYKsquarecrop.png
   * 461 Fifth AvenueDYKsquarecrop.png
   * Adam Clayton Powell Jr. State Office BuildingDYKsquarecrop.png
   * MasterCard International Global HeadquartersDYKsquarecrop.png
   * University Village, New YorkDYKsquarecrop.png
   * Upper division collegeDYKsquarecrop.png
   * Bank of New EnglandDYKsquarecrop.png
   * Mesa LaboratoryDYKsquarecrop.png
   * Arbitration Committee (English Wikipedia)
   * Glidden Co. v. ZdanokDYKsquarecrop.png
   * Cross v. United States (1871)DYKsquarecrop.png
   * Paul v. United States (1990)DYKsquarecrop.png
   * Hartsville Oil Mill v. United StatesDYKsquarecrop.png
   * Jes StaleyDYKsquarecrop.png
   * Cummins Corporate Office BuildingDYKsquarecrop.png
   * Becton, Dickinson and Company headquartersDYKsquarecrop.png
   * The Pyramids (Indianapolis)DYKsquarecrop.png
   * Edward B. Bunn S.J. Intercultural CenterDYKsquarecrop.png

Favorite architects 

   * Kevin Roche
   * I. M. Pei
   * Eero Saarinen
   * Skidmore, Owings and Merrill
   * McKim, Mead, and White

there is no evidence that he is an expert on any given subject that possesses superior knowledge regarding Robert Eringer.

Rather oddly he writes the following about himself, which raises questions about his identity and possible ulterior motives.

About

Hi, yea I've been on this site for a few years and finally got around to using my account. I have a variety of interests that I hope to work on. My name is Matthew Bisanz and I currently reside in Washington, DC. Feel free to refer to me by my username or real name, your choice. MBisanz talk 01:49, 25 October 2010 (UTC) Philosophy

If I'm reading a page and it has spelling errors or is formatted more like an IM conversation than an encyclopedia entry, I will probably trust it less, as I will think the creator and subsequent editors did not have enough knowledge of or interest in what they were doing to do a good job at it. We have lots of content editors, and when I can I add sources, images, and content, however, I mainly follow behind others making sure what they've written puts its best face to the world.

codicil In scanning several thousand articles, I've often "found" those that should be deleted through their poor spelling and formatting. Wandering from page to page won't always find every non-notable article on a particular topic, especially if the article in question is OR uploaded and never linked from another article by the creator. 

   * My recall criteria: User:MBisanz/Recall
   * Best Practices for sensitive deletions: Keeper76
   * My COI Statement
   * Articles I've created
   * Admin coaching stuff User:MBisanz/Coaching
   * Ref Car
   * To check an image for NFCC compliance, replace the image name in this link: http://tools.wikimedia.de/~betacommand/cgi-bin/check?&file=Image:HUSeal.gif
   * tools:~daniel/WikiSense/CheckUsage.php?i=ACTC_Main.jpg&w=_100000
   * http://toolserver.org/%7Emagnus/makeref.php
   * funny
   * poor man's checkuser
         o Userid
   * AfD checker
   * Watchlist counter
   * mw:Help:Range_blocks
   * User:MBisanz/Quotes
   * Image:AdminCoach.pdf
   * Category:All files proposed for deletion
   * Barnstars people gave me

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.41.222.137 (talk • contribs) 22:39, 14 December 2010

 Not done. This article was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Robert Eringer so, as stated at the top of this page, it cannot be undeleted here. If you believe that discussion was wrongly decided, you should first approach MBisanz (talk) who as closing administrator did not require specialist knowledge of Robert Eringer, only knowledge of Wikipedia's policies and the ability to assess the arguments presented. Nor will you gain anything by accusing him of "possible ulterior motives." If you are not happy with the response you get from him, you can take the matter to WP:Deletion review. You would also do well to read the policy on WP:Biographies of living persons. JohnCD (talk) 22:59, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_25&oldid=1142568568"