Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reann Ballslee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:27, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reann Ballslee[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP1E. Rd232 ^talk 23:16, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. One splash does not notability make. PhGustaf (talk) 03:44, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Drag_queen#Societal_reception. Subject is notable enough to be cited in encyclopedia, but not notable enough for its own article. Vynjj23 (talk) 11:10, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Struck comment was by sock of banned user User:Grundle2600, who created the article. Rd232 ^talk 11:53, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment One ref looks OK - the other doesn't give me any text. Otherwise, apart from the spammy mention down at the bottom, the article looks reasonable to me. We don't have homecoming queens in the UK, so I am a little confused as to the actual notability of electing a genetic male to the position (and even as to what a homecoming queen is...). Is this the first known case? If so, then it could pass notability. Peridon (talk) 14:54, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It would still be WP:BLP1E. Rd232 ^talk 15:10, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:BLP1E. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:34, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.