Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Etimesoy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Etimesoy}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.


Etimesoy[edit]

Related to User:Cydevil38 by self admission:

The following are the 3RR evidences....

May 7 / 3RR violation if confirmed, in Template:Goguryeo monarchs (edit | [[Talk:Template:Goguryeo monarchs|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views):

May 7-8 / 3RR violation if confirmed, in Goguryeo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views):

Added by Endroit 07:38, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


After tracking User:Etimesoy socks in Asuka period (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) before semi-protecting it, I believe that this user used roving IP addresses in the 75.6.X.X & 75.7.X.X ranges:

  • 05:57, 25 March 2007 75.7.18.92 (Talk)
  • 02:14, 25 March 2007 75.6.236.168 (Talk)
  • 14:38, 23 March 2007 75.6.236.168 (Talk)
  • 05:08, 23 March 2007 75.6.236.168 (Talk)
  • 14:36, 21 March 2007 75.7.26.76 (Talk) (rv)
  • 07:37, 21 March 2007 75.7.26.76 (Talk)
  • 16:51, 18 March 2007 75.7.26.76 (Talk) (rv)
  • 20:44, 17 March 2007 75.7.26.76 (Talk) (per discussion)

FYI, here are older sockpuppetry cases, which I suspect may be related:

One of the versions being reverted to above, was by User:Goguryeo, a previously confirmed sockpuppeteer.--Endroit 21:57, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Mediation Committee wishes to note that Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Goguryeo, a current Mediation Committee request, is in progress and involves people named in this request. Although the Mediation Committe is not implying anything, either way, towards the checkuser(s) by leaving this note, it was discussed and agreed that, in the interests of transparency, that this pending request be noted.
For the Mediation Committee, Daniel Bryant 06:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Red X Unrelated with regards to Cydevil38 and Fieldnoth.  Confirmed for Etimesoy and Fieldnoth being the same. Voice-of-All 08:14, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Etimesoy[edit]

In light of the revelation that Etimesoy was involved in sockpuppetry, I submit the following (ongoing) revert-war where Herrich & Etimesoy were involved together. There is clear meatpuppetry (if not sockpuppetry) here.

The following is the 3RR evidence from Asuka period (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)....

March 4 / 3RR violation:

March 5 thru 6:

March 13:

March 16:

March 17 thru 18 / 3RR violation:

March 19:

March 20:

March 21:

--Endroit 17:01, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed The Uninvited Co., Inc. 18:03, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Etimesoy[edit]

  • Code letter: E

See Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Odst... this is a follow-up request. There is a clear pattern of collaboration & ongoing revert-warring here. (There may be other sockpuppets / meatpuppets connected with these users, and other articles are clearly involved.) Endroit 16:37, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR violation (if confirmed) in Comfort women (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views):

--Endroit 16:39, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: CronusXT (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki) and Melonbarmonster (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki) are listed in both cases. Maybe one of them is the sockpupetter? -- lucasbfr talk 17:02, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed except that Melonbarmonster appears Red X Unrelated The Uninvited Co., Inc. 21:25, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.