Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Goguryeo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
To create a new request about this user, add {{subst:Newcheckusercase}} to the top of the page and save it. Then edit the page to replace the template text with your new request. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here). Do not go back and create a new page with a different name like /Case/User 2 or /Case/User 2nd request. We prefer to keep all requests regarding one suspected puppet master on the same page.
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Goguryeo[edit]

This is a new request.

From edit history of Sea of Japan[1]. --Endroit 16:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Additional information needed - Diffs? The Uninvited Co., Inc. 20:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR violation, if confirmed:

Version being reverted to (bolding of East Sea):

--Endroit 21:00, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed all, (and it looks like the ones confirmed in the previous checkuser were never blocked). Dmcdevit·t 00:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

information Note: All socks, and some old ones, indef blocked. Voice-of-All 01:07, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Goguryeo[edit]

From edit history of Sea of Japan naming dispute[2]

see also: There article keeps being interfered with by the Korean Users[3]

--NekoNekoTeacher 19:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

These were a series of vandalism and/or Japanese POV pushing revert war by anonymous Tokyo IP addresses and NekoNekoTeacher (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki) (and Jjok (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)). Several editors tracked these to maintain article stability. You can see from the article histories and NekoNeko's edit history that he "worked closely" with countless anon reverters on specifically anti-Korean edits, with similar edit comments, and many editors worked to stop them, warn them, and sprotect various articles. More sprotection is probably needed until the attacks stop. Korealist 20:39, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
NekoNeko and anon reverters have revert warred and simply ignored consensus like Talk:Toyotomi_Hideyoshi#Regarding_Yi-Sunsin. Also, Room218 and RichardMPT have already been shown to be unrelated [4]. Korealist 21:31, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk assistance requested: This is really long. Could one of the clerks please cut it down to just the essential points? Essjay (Talk) 09:13, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Removed the posts of the entire history of the articles. Hope its better now. --Srikeit 10:13, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Additional information needed. I'm seeing a lot of usernames on that list, including the name of the requesting party, and I'm not entirely clear why. My reading of the summary is that we're looking at NekoNekoTeacher and a bunch of IPs...Who are the other usernames? Essjay (Talk) 10:22, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It returns it to the first request. [5] A lot of users were added by the IP user.[6]

 Clerk note: The request was filed by NekoNekoTeacher (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) to check pro-Korean vandalism and possible sockpuppetry in edit wars over multiple articles. Korealist (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) complained about the pro-Japanese side of the edit war, and then 75.7.41.219 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)) added NekoNekoTeacher and a large number of IP addresses. I have reverted to an earlier version of the request above (the "pro-Korean" side, I think) and formatted the "pro-Japanese" side at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Goguryeo. Thatcher131 11:48, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The above of 75.7.41.219 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)) is most probably added by Room218 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki) (see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Room218) and the part of the request by 75.7.41.219 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)) has been divided into Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/NekoNekoTeacher. Jjok 14:58, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed, as follows:

  • Goguryeo, RichardMPT, TRS81, Korealist, Room218, & DanKim are all the same user. I brought Dmcdevit in on this, and we are both in agreement.
  • NekoNekoTeacher & ShinjukuXYZ are the same user, and are most if not all of the IPs listed.
  • The other users appear to be distinct users.

Q.E.D. Essjay (Talk) 10:08, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please check already archived case Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Room218. Goguryeo's case should be marged to this case. Thanks.--Gettystein 12:06, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We have had a similar situation: a huge pro-Korean fleet (Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Appleby) vs. pro-Japanese silent services (Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Kamosuke) (though I think some of wrong targets got entangled in all cases..) and application of the same policy, indefinite block for the fleet commander/choose one user account to save for the submariners, or choose each user account to save for both sides, is appropriate. The last case was taken care by User:Nihonjoe. Jjok 16:01, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.