Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 31

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 31[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 31, 2024.

Raman Raheja (entrepreneur)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 10#Raman Raheja (entrepreneur)

6.9[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:37, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

redirects to car model though not sure if this would be relevant enough to warrant a redirect. Possible disambig? Okmrman (talk) 23:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. This is a partial title match for several articles and topics, and the use of Search is better. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:15, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
no votes rn so I'm just gonna drop in a delete on my own discussion Okmrman (talk) 20:36, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

ZX-1[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to ZX1. ✗plicit 23:37, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The term is not currently mentioned on the target page (or on the redirect's former target page, 3-Fluoromethcathinone). I would suggest Retargeting to Vitus (bicycle company), where the term is used (and bolded already). Tevildo (talk) 22:16, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

6.9 million[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sure the number is significant to the article but 6.9 million is not that uncommon of a number to get in any research paper involving population Okmrman (talk) 21:39, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. There are 702 mentions of "6.9 million" and I can't see that there is a primary topic. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:41, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
only one vote rn so I'm just gonna drop in a delete on my own discussion Okmrman (talk) 20:36, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

7.92[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8#7.92

Lola B07/17[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect is not mentioned at target article. Declined speedy, so sending it here. DrowssapSMM 19:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: per WP:REDYES 🔥HOTm̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃🔥 (talk・edits) 20:42, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I believe that the B07/17 is a variant of the B06/10 as opposed to a new model, but looking through what sources I can find, it's not clear, certainly I'm not able to add anything to the current target. So then the only option is to delete. If something were added about this model/variant to the current target, then this could of course be kept/recreated. A7V2 (talk) 23:38, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wasp sting[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Arthropod bites and stings. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not interchangeable title. Awesome Aasim 17:32, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, the redirect Bee and wasp stings also redirects here. Diving into their histories as well as the history of the Bee sting article, I found the following:
  • Wasp sting was created in 2006 as a redirect to Bee sting. At this point, the Bee sting article was an unsourced stub that described the topic as also referring to wasp and hornet stings, as well as potentially horsefly bites.
  • Bee and wasp stings was created as a stub in 2009 by the project WP:DERM and thus took a medical stance at the issue. It was refined a bit, until R-with-merging with Bee sting. At this point, the Bee sting article had been fleshed out, and was slowly being molded into the shape we see today-- it still mentioned hornet and wasp stings in the first few sentences as a holdover from that initial stub, but it was now solidly about stings from bees.
  • Around 2011, the Wasp sting redirect was retargeted without obvious-to-me discussion to Wasp, then again to Vespid, by user:Alaxdar, before being reverted as a reversion of good faith edit back to Bee sting by User:Tyrol5. At this point, the Bee sting article still discussed wasp and hornet stings in the opening paragraph.
  • In June 2015, the sentence talking about how wasp and hornet stings are sometimes referred to as bee stings was finally removed from the opening paragraph, by user:Chiswick Chap.
  • The very last part of the article talking about wasps and hornets, a single sentence in the opener, would get removed by an IP editor in 2018.
Bee and wasp stings does deserve to get its own RfD. As for Wasp sting, I don't actually know of a good target-- Hornet#Stings exists and seems to be the most in-depth discussion on the topic Wikipedia has, but doesn't talk about non-hornet wasps, like the yellowjacket or paper wasp. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 22:35, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk pages.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 18:39, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hugin 2023.0.0.d88dc56ded0e built by Thomas[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 7#Hugin 2023.0.0.d88dc56ded0e built by Thomas

Medical-grade silicon[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I accidentally mistyped "silicone". I moved the redirect to Medical-grade silicone but of course that left a redirect. Medical-grade silicon is presumably a thing, but I think anyone searching for it is more likely to want medical-grade silicone; I'm not the only one to make this typo, it's quite common, and some people also don't know the difference.

I request discussion; I don't know what outcome would be best. Should this redir be a disambiguation page? Deleted? Redirected as a misspelling, or a a topic in its own right? HLHJ (talk) 16:40, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete: tbf there's no harm in just deleting it outright (and leaving it as WP:REDYES in case medical-grade silicon does become a thing with coverage on here). After all, nothing links to it, and there isn't really a 'correct' target for it as of now. 🔥HOTm̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃🔥 (talk・edits) 18:43, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Medical grade silicone as {{R from misspelling}}: I agree with the nom that thios could be a common mistake. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Medical grade silicone per Shhhnotsoloud. A7V2 (talk) 23:51, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • On consideration of the delete proponents' comments, especially Nickps, I am striking my !vote, and am now neutral. A7V2 (talk) 07:30, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:REDYES. We should not retarget to silicone because of WP:ASTONISH. While silicon and silicone are often confused in spelling, they both exist and are completely different things so redirecting one to the other would be confusing (especially for people who already can't tell them apart). Nickps (talk) 00:01, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above Okmrman (talk) 13:49, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Style (EP)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Style#Albums. ✗plicit 23:39, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At this title for five minutes at creation due to a mistake of page creator. Incorrect and potentially confusing. Rusalkii (talk) 05:04, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nickps (talk) 15:53, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Post-punk metal[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:24, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

term doesnt exist. this user is known for creating nonsensical and disruptive redirects FMSky (talk) 13:52, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Placeholder (Computing)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Placeholder#Mathematics and computer science. While the capital in the title is not correct, it's been around since 2007, and not hugely necessary to displace at this time. Alternate title created in meantime. (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 23:49, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Placeholder#Mathematics and computer science includes four potential targets. It does not appear obvious to me that the target of this redirect is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Nickps (talk) 18:42, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to the dab section as a {{R from incomplete disambiguation}} per nom. Thryduulf (talk) 19:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move to Placeholder (computing) without leaving a redirect as this is arguably an WP:RDAB situation as "computing" isn't a proper noun. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:15, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to the dab section as per Thryduulf, then create Placeholder (computing) as a second redirect that also targets to the same dab, both with {{R from incomplete disambiguation}}. I don't see how moving a redirect as per Crouch would be helpful, but if we have the incorrectly capitalized version, it only makes sense to also have the correctly capitalized version. Also, the bigger problem is still the target, not the name of the redirect. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 20:41, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree that the lowercase disambiguator should just be created as well (and mark this one as a {{R avoided double redirect}} of it) per Lunamann and WP:MOVEREDIRECT (basically don't move a redirect unless it's necessary, and moving this one isn't). "(Computing)" and "(computing)" are equally plausible search terms. Thryduulf (talk) 02:43, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Search takes care of capitalization, we don't need to keep incorrectly capitalized qualifier redirects without a good reason. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:37, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Search only takes care of capitalisation for a subset of the ways people navigate Wikipedia. The good reason to keep this redirect is to help people navigate to the target they are looking for, but what we actually need is a good reason to delete a redirect and incorrect but plausible capitalisation is never a good reason on its own to delete. Thryduulf (talk) 20:54, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That would be a good reason if those people exist. This page was visited by 6 people last month all of whom were almost surely looking for the non-existent placeholder (computing) instead. Is there an example of a way to navigate WP that actual people use and that would require the incorrectly capitalized version even if the correct one existed? If not, this redirect is useless and should be deleted moved to the correct title per Crouch. Nickps (talk) 16:52, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    It seems to be the case that such redirects can get less than 100 views in over 8 years where the correct version exists. See Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 29#Yoda (Song) and Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 13#Morbius (Film) though there is no data there. The point in any case is that of those less than 100 views its likely most would have got there without the redirect as the search takes you to the best capitalization it can if there isn't an exact match. And some may also have been from bots or people ending up on it for maintenance reasons or similar. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:01, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • disamig per nom and Thryduulf -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 03:43, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move to placeholder (computing) without a redirect and then change the target to the dab page. Since opening the RfD, I've come to see the incorrect disambiguator as a problem. I'd !vote delete if the correct version already existed. Nickps (talk) 01:32, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: While there is agreement on the target, there is still debate on whether the redirect should be moved to the uncapitalized version.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:18, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Burnie board[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8#Burnie board

Monkeyz and Dolphinz[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Petz#Animals. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:41, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of Petz, both of these redirects target a section that no longer exists. Notably, while the article also no longer mentions either of these by name, both refer to extant titles in the Petz series. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 19:28, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to add: Redirects were made in 2010, both by the same author. The section they pointed to was then deleted in August 2013, due to being, quote, "unsourced commentary." 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 19:32, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
and a quick part 2: I was going to notify the person who removed the section, but they seem to have left Wikipedia according to their talk page. With some rather angry words directed at ArbCom. Hm. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 19:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the ping, as I wouldn't have remembered that I had created these even if I saw them listed. Though I admit these redirects appear to be rarely used, I think the best thing to do would be to copyedit the article and include the other titles to give a complete picture of the series. The Gameplay section includes Pigz and Bunnyz, so including the other two wouldn't be that out of place (though arguably they could all be moved to a better section that lists the games). I'm unclear why the article would only include what it calls the "Main series" games, but exclude others, particularly when the infobox lists titles that are listed no where else in the article. Based on the existence of Petz: Dogz 2 and Catz 2 and without digging through the history, I suspect the article got confusing or contentious by trying to cover the Petz series without a page for Dogz: Your Computer Pet and Catz: Your Computer Pet, which led to the other animals or games being considered commentary or extraneous. So essentially, I would !vote keep, but to also copyedit the page to expand on games in the series, though I don't want to make those edits while this discussion is inconclusive. —Ost (talk) 00:35, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, my listing here is mostly due to the 'refined to nonexistent section' issue, and I agree with you that if they were added back to the article (which they should be), these redirects (...redirectz?) need to be kept and refined to wherever in the article they now show up. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 05:45, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the clarification, which may have been in response to my rather detailed reply. I made some edits to the page, including an Animals section, but you may have a better idea for what section should include the content. From what I saw when searching, there may not be a Pigz game, though the animals were in some later Dogz titles. —Ost (talk) 04:37, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For the record: The topic is now mentioned at Petz#Animals. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 21:45, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 09:36, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Central Booking[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 09:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect should probably be deleted. "Central booking" is a generic term which can be and is used to refer to processing centers for arrestees in jurisdictions all over the United States. (I don't know if this applies to elsewhere in the English-speaking world). It certainly does not have a stronger association with Baltimore, Maryland than any other municipality, all of which have their own central booking. If this redirect isn't deleted, it should maybe be targeted to either the prison or arrest article. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 19:06, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 09:33, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

;-;[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8#;-;

')[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8#')

-)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8#-)

Firestone (Pern)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8#Firestone (Pern)

2024 Rohan Bopanna tennis season[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Rohan Bopanna#2024: Doubles; oldest major champion and world No. 1:. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Flying Theme[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 10#Flying Theme

Jason Waterfalls[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 7#Jason Waterfalls

Would you like a Jelly Baby?[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 7#Would you like a Jelly Baby?

I am the one who knocks![edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 05:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An R from catchphrase that is not listed at the target article. Creator banned for sockpuppetry has had similar deleted catchphrase redirects in the past. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:11, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep {{R from quote}} / {{R from search term}} / {{R without mention}} -- the iconic catchphrase for this character, which is featured in several memes. It appears at wikiquote:Breaking Bad (season 4), so a link to wikiquote:Breaking Bad should be added to the article -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 04:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think we generally link to WikiQuote like that, and even if we did, I don't know how we'd include that naturally with encyclopedic content... Sergecross73 msg me 00:17, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Just add a WikiQuote linkbox to the see also or external links section -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 08:11, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Unless you literally plaster "I am the one who knocks" at the bottom of the page, it's not going to satisfy our redirect standards. And as you've likely noticed, we don't have quote collections at the bottom of fictional character articles. Sergecross73 msg me 16:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - per comments above, I can't imagine implementing this into the article in a meaningful, necessary way. Sergecross73 msg me 18:35, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:49, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. most people who even have the slightest clue about what breaking bad even is would probably already know what his name is and those who don't won't even really remember that he said that. Okmrman (talk) 03:56, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Cox's Bazar iconic railway station[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 05:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary editorializing. Rusalkii (talk) 03:46, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 04:33, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Mehedi Abedin 11:57, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

It's dangerous to go alone![edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to The Legend of Zelda (video game). Jay 💬 06:01, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is not really any mention of this quote on the actual page for the Zelda franchise and I doubt this quote is even notable enough to get mentioned on the Zelda franchise page anyways. Okmrman (talk) 03:40, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_March_31&oldid=1218152676"