Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 11

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 11[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 11, 2024.

List of busiest airports by passenger traffic(2010-2015)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, List of busiest airports by passenger traffic (2010-2015), is a redirect that targets the same target as the nominated redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 23:27, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The Strangers(2012 Film[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to lack of space between the title and the disambiguator, as well as the disambiguator missing the right parenthesis ")". Steel1943 (talk) 23:26, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Jermaine(1980 album)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Jermaine (1980 album), is the target of the nominated redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 23:24, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Natalia Oreiro Tu Veneno(2000 album)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Natalia Oreiro Tu Veneno (2000 album), does not exist. The titles with more ambiguous disambiguation, Natalia Oreiro Tu Veneno (album) and Natalia Oreiro Tu Veneno, also do not exist. Steel1943 (talk) 23:22, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per WP:RDAB with no prejudice on creating redirects at the other titles. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 07:39, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Possibly move to base name without redirect. It was an article for a few weeks in 2008 and has a list of names but not much else. Otherwise delete. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:08, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and previous discussions. InfiniteNexus (talk) 06:19, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Steel, Tu Veneno (album) also does not exist. My first choice is to move the nominated redirect to this page without leaving redirect, second is delete. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 11:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as malformed modifier --Lenticel (talk) 03:33, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Archduchess Maria Antonia of Austria(1899-1977)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Archduchess Maria Antonia of Austria (1899-1977), is a redirect that targets the same target as the nominated redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 23:18, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Archduchess Maria Antonia of Austria(1899–1977)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Archduchess Maria Antonia of Austria (1899–1977), is the target of the nominated redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 23:17, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tropical Cyclone Vivienne(1994)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:53, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Tropical Cyclone Vivienne (1994), is a redirect that targets the same target as the nominated redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 23:15, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The Gangster(2013 film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:53, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, The Gangster (2013 film), does not exist. Steel1943 (talk) 23:11, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Battle of Gallipoli(1312)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:53, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the lack of space between the title and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Battle of Gallipoli (1312), is the target of the nominated redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 23:07, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Jenny N.E. Dotz[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:53, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zero results on Google except Wikipedia and a mirror. SilverLocust 💬 20:55, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. See [1] for the motivation behind this redirect's creation. Not really a plausible misspelling. Tevildo (talk) 21:02, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Anatomy and physiology[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 18#Anatomy and physiology

Primitive cultures[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. There was no further participation after a second relist. There was agreement that Urgesellschaft was a better and superior target than the current, hence retargetting to it. Discussion on targets or disambiguation may continue outside this RfD. Primitive culture and Primitive peoples were not bundled into this discussion, hence these will not be affected by this RfD outcome. Jay 💬 14:12, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure that this phrase (along with Primitive peoples and Primitive culture) should link here, as the term may not always be in reference to this book. Thoughts? GnocchiFan (talk) 16:51, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget As with Jason Quinn, I went to see where Primitive society went. Urgesellschaft is not a great retarget, but it's superior to a book. ~ Pbritti (talk) 00:49, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree something needs to be done but note that Urgesellschaft doesn't mention "primitive culture" and its not obvious "primitive society" is synonymous with it. There was a RM in 2021 where there was a consensus to use the "book" qualifier rather than just have the book at the upper case base name. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:04, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Could a redirect page work with a link to the book and a link to Urgesellschaft? Johnson524 05:16, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Johnson524: sorry for the late reply, but are you suggesting a disambiguation page that lists both? That's a pretty decent idea. ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      @Pbritti: It was, thanks! Do you think this could work to close the discussion? Johnson524 17:42, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      I see that as an exceptional compromise, Johnson524. If any one else wants to consider it or whoever closes this discussion sees this as a good solution, I'll be glad. ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:44, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Retarget or disambiguate?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 20:44, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Innovation Party (Norway)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 19#Innovation Party (Norway)

University 'Dunarea de Jos' din Galați[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 19#University 'Dunarea de Jos' din Galați

20664-12-3[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 08:53, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

not mentioned at target article. It isn't a valid CAS number as seen from this. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:25, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom - I don't think CAS numbers should be redirects in the first place. 141Pr {contribs} 19:26, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete per R4. 108.21.221.8 (talk) 22:38, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Umm, this redirect is not eligible for WP:R4 since it is not in the "File:" namespace, amongst other things. Steel1943 (talk) 23:30, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as confusing. I thought about December 3rd, 20664 when I saw this redirect, but that's so far into the future that it's laughable. There are also barely any search results for this term on Google and nothing independent of our discussion onwiki, plus the redirect was only made on January 10th (yesterday in my timezone), so deletion won't hurt that much. Duckmather (talk) 04:03, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above findings --Lenticel (talk) 05:20, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not a valid CAS number. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:50, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Echo Lake, Washington[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 19#Echo Lake, Washington

Urduwood[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 19#Urduwood

Mr. Mohamed Zahir Hussain[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 18#Mr. Mohamed Zahir Hussain

Mr Mohammad Nematzadeh[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 18#Mr Mohammad Nematzadeh

Mr. Mohammed Ahmed Al-Odaini[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 18#Mr. Mohammed Ahmed Al-Odaini

Concent[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 05:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a strange redirect to have. I totally understand why someone might want it to lead to Consent, but concent is also one letter off from "content", "convent", "concept", or "concert", and three letters off from "concentric". Further more, wikt:concent states that this is an archaic synonym for harmony. Currently, my opinion is either to retarget to wikt:concent, or weak delete as too confusing and ambiguous to have a satisfying target, but I'd be open to other opinions. Duckmather (talk) 15:40, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - I strongly disagree with the rationale here. In my opinion, the redirect was made due to the phonetic similarities between c and s, rather than the word merely being one letter different from another word. Secondly, the proposed retargeting to Wiktionary suggests a lack of credible targets, which is probably what allowed the redirect to be created initially. A simple hatnote "redirects here" should be sufficient to rectify this. Respublik (talk) 17:48, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. While the first couple of pages of Google hits are dictionary definitions and proper nouns (multiple organisations, none appear notable), once you get to actual uses of the word it is exclusively people meaning "consent". The homonym makes this a very significantly more plausible misspelling than any other single letter error (especially as I can't find anybody actually making such errors). Thryduulf (talk) 20:43, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Thryduulf and Respublik: Fine, I'd be happy with either a keep + hatnote to wikt:concent, or a delete. Duckmather (talk) 04:13, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. In addition, the redirect seems to have the strongest connection in its definition to "concert" given that both can be about music. I think deletion is best over redirecting to Wiktionary in this case because at the end of the day, this redirect is a one-letter misspelling for several words. Steel1943 (talk) 15:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Concent is far far more likely to be a phonetic misspelling for consent than a typo or thinking-of-two-things-at-once misspelling for concert. J947 ‡ edits 04:45, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 03:59, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as potential phonetic misspelling of "consent" and no notable other uses of the term (including not being mentioned at harmony, which would be another potential target, per the archaic use). —Ost (talk) 04:37, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • (responding to ping) I wouldn't object to a Wiktionary hatnote, but I don't really think one is actually needed. Thryduulf (talk) 00:39, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hildegard ,wife of Charlemagne[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by Pppery per criterion G6. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 23:02, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not very likely term as has misplaced comma, only created by bad move which was quickly reverted. PatGallacher (talk) 01:07, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Dufferin—Peel—Wellington—Grey (federal electoral distri[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by Pppery per criterion G6. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 03:54, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely misspelling of "district)" Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:14, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yeah sorry this was a mistake by me. Please speedy. Ebbedlila (talk) 00:54, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ebbedlila: G7 is not applicable here because you didn't create the target article, but regardless, this redirect clearly qualifies for G6 (created in error). Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 01:45, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_January_11&oldid=1197561069"