Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 1[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 1, 2024.

Scone, Scotlan[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 08:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as implausable qualifier, although the qualifier Scotlan now exists as a redirect it didn't exist at the time of the move. Note that Perth, Scotlan doesn't exist for example. It was at this title for about a minute in 2018 and as noted the qualifier's redirect didn't exist. Crouch, Swale (talk) 00:01, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep - the redirect Scotlan is tagged as {{R from alternative language}} with the explanation that it is a redirect from Scots. If that is the case, then I would say this is a reasonable redirect as R from alt lang, even if created by accident. estar8806 (talk) ★ 23:00, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Even if "Scotlan" were Scots for "Scotland" (and the article Scotland doesn't suggest it is: "Scotland (Scots: Scotland; Scottish Gaelic: Alba), "Scone, Scotland" is a Wikipedia construct for disambiguation, not the common name of a place. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I can find no evidence that "Scotlan" is the Scots for "Scotland" (notably: sco:Scotlan doesn't exist, the article about the country is at sco:Scotland). Contra Shhhnotsoloud though, this would be an acceptable WP:RFOREIGN language redirect if "Scotlan" was the/a native name for Scotland because "Scone" is the town's name in Scotts as well as English in the same way that e.g. München, Deutschland and Abertawe, Cymru would be valid and useful redirects if those names were ambiguous. Thryduulf (talk) 18:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bing Chi Ling[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 13#Bing Chi Ling

Khalid bin Sultan bin Zayed Al Nahyan[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was restore article. (non-admin closure) QueenofHearts 04:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There were two articles about the same person, but it doesn't make for a good redirect now as Khaled bin Mohamed Al Nahyan doesn't have Sultan in his name. I would suggest deleting the former. Uhooep (talk) 10:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reply You are right, different person. I would now suggest moving Khalid bin Sultan bin Zayed Al Nahyan's redirect to House of Nahyan, if we are to keep it as a redirect. However my preferred action would be to delete the entry as a redirect altogether. --Uhooep (talk) 01:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for clarifying. Deletion seems fine with me, especially as he is not mentioned at House of Nahyan. I don't think the brief mention in Sultan bin Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan's infobox is useful enough to warrant targeting there either. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 15:15, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • This page has suffered from persistent vandalism, including to versions of the subject's name. Restore Revision as of 05:39, 23 December 2020 [1]. Khalid bin Sultan (Khalid son of Sultan) is clearly a different person from Khaled bin Mohamed. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:50, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or restore?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 20:23, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Restore article as per Shhhnotsoloud. RfD not the place to discuss deletion of an article that doesn't appear to meet any criteria for speedy deletion. Can be taken to AfD if desired. A7V2 (talk) 03:27, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Restore per A7V2 and Shhhnotsoloud. Thryduulf (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ubiquitous[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 9#Ubiquitous

Alien 2[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 10#Alien 2

Bid rival[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: there is no connection between the redirect title and the target. BobKilcoyne (talk) 18:59, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. I can't find good targets as well --Lenticel (talk) 00:29, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Diferences between the bulgarian and the macedonian language[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Longstanding redirect with both a typo and incorrect capitalization. Nominated for PROD by פעמי-עליון, but that process isn't applicable for redirects. An article previously existed for one month in 2004, but was redirected without merging to what would become the current target. Political views on the Macedonian language is likely a more appropriate target for a correctly-spelled redirect, although Differences between the Bulgarian and Macedonian languages does not exist at this time. signed, Rosguill talk 17:43, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Festival Of Snow[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect is obscure and the term is not mentioned in the target article. The term can also be confused with the articles listed at List of ice and snow sculpture events and Winter festival. Sparkltalk 17:26, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Raiders (NFL Team) (2020-present)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 09:30, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely search term, especially with two disambiguators. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are wrong. The reason why I put Raiders (NFL Team) is to avoid confusion with similar teams of the same name. Also, the reason why I put (2020-present) is because the Raiders moved from Oakland in 2020. It is meant to be like that. Abhiramakella (talk) 19:56, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Abhiramakella: There is only one team named the Raiders, so there's not an issue with teams with a similar name. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:59, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep:I am taking about the Las Vegas Raiders. The reason why I put 2020-present is to avoid confusion with their former name the Oakland Raiders. Abhiramakella (talk) 20:01, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Unambiguous and harmless. Thryduulf (talk) 21:28, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. -- Tavix (talk) 21:35, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Though, as the Raiders is the same franchise no matter where they play, the year span is unnecessary, the redirect is clearly a potential search term if someone is confused enough to have thought to make it. As Thryduulf says, it will not create confusion or direct people to something wrong, so if there's a chance the team changing city requires such a search term this redirect is only helpful (minimally, but still helpful). Kingsif (talk) 23:06, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep seems a wee bit plausible, and redirects are cheap. LEPRICAVARK (talk) 22:59, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 16:02, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hitler's cuisine[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 09:38, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like an unlikely search term Alextejthompson (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 19:09, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 16:01, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. It doesn't seem unlikely to me. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:14, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom as unlikely. To the best of my knowledge, individuals can have diets or dietary preferences, but they don't have their own cuisines. - Eureka Lott 03:13, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Butera (City)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Redirect are cheap, and a redirect now exists at the correctly capitalized title. (non-admin closure) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 17:39, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, Butera(City) is already at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 23#Butera(City) but even this has a capitalization error per WP:RDAB, although the correct title Butera (city) doesn't exist. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:01, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Unambiguous and harmless. Create the conventionally capitalised redirect as well, but there's no benefit to the project gained from deleting this one. Thryduulf (talk) 21:29, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as a typical example of WP:RDAB aggravated by the correct version being a redlink. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:39, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 16:01, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Move to Butera (city) without leaving a redirect to fix the title problem while preserving history. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 19:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That should just be created, there is no problem with the current title. Thryduulf (talk) 18:05, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    There is a problem with this title namely that its incorrectly formatted, we don't need redirects with incorrect qualifiers. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:44, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and create Butera (city) per Thryduulf. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 21:17, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per precedent. I'll create Butera (city). QueenofHearts 04:26, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Probably would've been preferable to move it without a redirect, as the search engine corrects capitalization differences, so the existence of two is pointless and removes the ability to access one by typing the other. However, now that it exists, it's not a big deal, so keep. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:01, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

DAC2[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 10#DAC2

CAT:UBX[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Withdrawing, likely a miss on my end. I felt stronger about deletion of "CAT:Userboxes" because it felt like an unnatural "shortcut" to a category that didn't need one, but I didn't think I could nominate it without bringing up "CAT:UBX" as well that had the same purpose. The latter redirect benefitted from an ideal shortcut structure, which muddled the initial justification. (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 19:00, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was very conflicted about this nomination admittedly, but I still feel as if it's the right call. The acronym of "UBX" is very much a shoe-in Wikipedia classic, in reference to it being short for userboxes. Obviously, the "Userboxes" category is a pretty important category, visited by people whenever they want to find something for their user page. This being said, I don't know how vital it is to have a PNR for this purpose.

This is not the type of category that needs to be maintained day after day and hawked for new changes. The people that would be visiting this category the most often would be people designing their user page, and in doing so, I don't think unfamiliar users would type in "CAT:Userboxes", using a pseudo-namespace yet keeping the rest of the title the exact same (This is the 2nd of 5 instances where this happens, with CAT:Chem being the first). Among these two, at least "CAT:UBX" is actually a shortcut, unlike the title that is just spelled out the exact same way as the category. But even then, this is just a category of decorations, and one not in need of occupying a mainspace PNR, much less two. Typing in "Category:Userboxes" works more than wonders, and is consistent with the rest of the pages in Category space. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:12, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Godsy:, because you wanted to know, this is another one of the 5 instances of a lowercase CAT: title. I was going to wait to respond to your question, as I was trying to consider the timing for future nominations. (Side note: While there are exactly four "Cat:" titles below, these I only recently found and were not actually factored into the remaining four "CAT:" titles statistic, just an ironic number similarity.) For full disclosure as I don't know if/when I'll nominate these, the three CAT titles that have lowercased names are CAT:Images, CAT:Incomprehensible, and CAT:NBL Canada. These, and the rest of the CAT: titles, are all viewable at Special:PrefixIndex, or this link just takes you to the search results: [2]. (Apparently there's one more that I haven't noticed until now, being CAT:MtW, but that one I'll have to assess the incoming links for). Utopes (talk / cont) 01:28, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I'm having a really hard time understanding why CAT:UBX was nominated, the nomination seems to demonstrate a solid explanation for its purpose. It sounds like you're making the bar for shortcuts way too stringent than it needs to be. I disagree that they are only needed for categories that need to be maintained day after day. If they are used, then that's good enough for me. And even if they aren't, unless there's some other problem with them they're harmless and should be left alone. -- Tavix (talk) 15:03, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Tavix. Wikipedia:Shortcut#Pseudo-namespaces states the CAT: PNR "may be used freely" for redirects to the category namespace so you need to demonstrate some actual (not just theoretical) harm caused by these redirects to justify deletion and show that that harm outweighs any usefulness. I'm not seeing any harm here. Thryduulf (talk) 18:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Leaning keep, but one relist seems prudent in case someone has a response to the keep arguments.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 15:49, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per Tavix and Thruduulf given CAT: is seen as a fine prefix to use in general. CAT:Userboxes is definitely the more marginal one but it's still shorter and since someone found it useful, keep since there's no harm. Skynxnex (talk) 15:22, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Cs2[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to CS2 (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 21:18, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect does not have a chemically accurate target. It was originally created with a target of Counter-Strike 2, before having its target changed in good faith to Carbon disulfide. However, as the "s" is a lowercase, it would not actually refer to carbon and sulfur, but instead Caesium. If a chemical target is maintained, Dicaesium (which is Cs2) already exists as a redirect. There's also CS2 (disambiguation), although none of the options there use a lowercase s, but its still a better alternative than where it's at currently I feel. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as no appropriate target. Alextejthompson (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 00:21, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to CS2 (disambiguation), where I've added Dicaesium. This is also a plausible search term for those not using correct capitalisation. Thryduulf (talk) 01:49, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Counter-Strike 2 although there is a disambiguation page for CS2, the video game is quite popular and most people researching CS2 will most likely be looking for Counter Strike 2 rather than Carbon disulfate. User:IPhoneRoots 10:21, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • This should have just been an edit; CS2 (disambiguation) is the right target. This need not have involved an RFD. -- C. A. Russell (talk) 12:26, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Given that there have been !votes to delete and to retarget to a different page, I think RfD was the right call here. Thryduulf (talk) 15:00, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    An observation that a dozen people showed up to debate which color the proposed bikeshed should be painted would not contradict anyone suggesting that the city council meeting where it occurred need not have been called in the first place. Likewise, RFDers RFDing is not a self-evident and ironclad argument that the application of the RFD process was judicious. -- C. A. Russell (talk) 11:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to CS2 (disambiguation) as plausible cap variant --Lenticel (talk) 02:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 15:48, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • REtarget to the disambiguation page -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 05:23, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to caesium - Cs2 is an allotrope of caecium. Christian75 (talk) 10:52, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to CS2 (disambiguation) rather than to any specific entry therein. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:36, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Walter Whyte School[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 10#Walter Whyte School

LGBT rights[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 21:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unsure if this is a good target or not. We do not have a "main page" on LGBT rights but maybe there could be a broad-concept topic on it? A user turned this page into a dab page, but I reverted for a clearer discussion. I see also that there is a section Outline_of_LGBT_topics#Rights that has more topics about LGBT rights. Natg 19 (talk) 18:33, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would love a broad-concept article on LGBT rights. Charles Essie (talk) 18:45, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think this would definitely be better as a standalone article. Alextejthompson (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 18:48, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as is until an article is actually written. The current redirect target seems to have a decent overview of the topic and be significantly better than a red link, and the outline section is just a list of links. Rusalkii (talk) 04:03, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose dabbing. There are other Wikipedias with articles in mainspace for this subject. --MikutoH talk! 00:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 15:47, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep until such time as a broad article on LGBT rights is written. - SchroCat (talk) 12:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I kind of wish we had something that could serve the same effect as a redlink, but for an {{r with possibilities}}. Like a hatnote that says "LGBT rights redirects here, but could be expanded into an article of its own." But if forced to pick between the binary options of redlink and imperfect redirect, in this case I think the redirect is better. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 01:37, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Draft:Justice League: Crisis on Infinite Earths - Part One (redirect)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 10#Draft:Justice League: Crisis on Infinite Earths - Part One (redirect)

Doctor Impossible[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Soon I Will Be Invincible. (non-admin closure) QueenofHearts 03:54, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned and no section, so I suggest a delete. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 07:25, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 15:35, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --BDD (talk) 20:03, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 15:45, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Gaza genocide[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 04:54, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 5 § Gaza genocide The sum of all human knowledge (talk) 13:33, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support Keep. Likely to be a user's intent given recent events and news coverage. Consistent with WP:RNEUTRAL policy. too_much curiosity (talk) 20:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Per reasoning above. Ecpiandy (talk) 22:06, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've added an old RfD list. I am neutral here, and am not saying that "Gaza Holocaust" and "Gaza genocide" are the same thing, but the two terms have been strongly linked in past discussions. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 06:42, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 03:24, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:23, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - now a valid WP:RNEUTRAL redirect due to the progression of the political situation since 2021. I'm honestly baffled that anyone would think it wasn't, given the extensive coverage and analysis of allegations of genocide in the context of the current war, regardless of what one thinks of the charges themselves. I'd argue that Gaza Holocaust is similarly valid at this time due to the close identification of the genocide charge in general with memory of the Holocaust in particular. signed, Rosguill talk 16:08, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per all of the above. Might end up being the primary term, unfortunately. — kashmīrī TALK 23:16, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Nothing to add to the explanations already presented in the Keep !votes above. Thanks.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 12:59, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Brumak[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 9#Brumak

Theron Guard[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 02:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A title with a bit of history from 2006, which is now a misplaced redirect with hardly any mention at the general Gears of War article (and a non-existent section to boot. There's quite a few of these but I don't think I'm going to get to all as a lot of these are on the fence). Utopes (talk / cont) 03:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. The target has: RAAM anticipated Sraak's actions and he has two Theron Guards shoot Sraak, destroying the chest piece of his formidable armor. Better have search results serve the reader (there is mention at Gears of War 3 as well). The pre-BLAR content was an unsourced stub from 2006. The BLARer did not find any content worth merging (except one line Theron appear to be slightly different than the Drones, but they are not different enough to be considered another race.) to its then target List of Gears of War characters which at the time had a section "Theron Guards". Jay 💬 10:18, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Yeezus II[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 10#Yeezus II

Anahí Costa and etc.[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep pages that were converted to articles, delete the rest. ✗plicit 00:25, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We have no encyclopedic content about any of these politicians. They exist(ed) as a red link, and have since been targeted to a page in which they have no mention. Per WP:REDLINK, it's better keep in a state to encourage the article's creation, as it's of no assistance as a redirect, and actively misleads people who expect to find information on the listed people. Utopes (talk / cont) 15:36, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all as no appropriate targets. Alextejthompson (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 18:22, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget all to List of Argentine deputies, 2021–2023. Jay 💬 16:24, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's worth noting that all of the listed redirects have pre-existing articles in their edit history, and would appear to meet WP:NPOL as elected members of Argentina's lower house. They were blanked and redirected to the current target by the pages' creator. signed, Rosguill talk 16:49, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Awesome Aasim 07:50, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all: I agree with Utopes that deletion would be more appropriate. All of these individuals would pass WP:NPOL as members of a national legistative body (Argentine Chamber of Deputies). Rosguill presented a valid and sensible target, but I think encouraging article creation (WP:REDLINK) is the better option here. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:12, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. All of these are notable, and it seems to be some weird stub mass creation in draftspace which were all BLARED by the creator. Don't redirect per WP:REDYES. QueenofHearts 19:37, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Specialty magazine[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Magazine#Types. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:12, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a synonym that is ever brought up at the target article, and doesn't seem like an automatic synonym to assume. There can be all sorts of "specialty" magazines that aren't necessarily "for fans". Utopes (talk / cont) 05:57, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete or retarget to Magazine#Types. I agree with the nominator, and the current target is not good. The content at Magazine#Types (which is the closest I can find) is a better match but I'm still unsure if it's useful enough. Thryduulf (talk) 12:22, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Agreement: retarget. -- C. A. Russell (talk) 13:42, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Jewish Nazis[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 9#Jewish Nazis

Hobby Magazine[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus, move without redirect to hobby magazine. No consensus to retarget, consensus to decapitalize magazine. I'll add a {{distinguish}} between Fan magazine and Fanzine. (non-admin closure) QueenofHearts 19:25, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Originally targeted Fanzine, which to me seems a bit more plausible as it has more of a focus at the target. However, this redirect had its target shifted to fan magazine, where hobbies are not addressed but is closer to this redirect's title. To me the two topics are so similar that it mind as well be the same article (despite how much the two are trying to distinguish the differences between). But I digress, I figured I'd bring it here to figure out where, if any, target should this title point to.

(I didn't initially intend on bundling these two because the characteristics of "specialty" =/= "hobby" =/= "fan" from my personal point of view, if another editor thinks these are virtually the same topic of discussion feel free to combine, as my initial reaction to keeping them as two diff sections was a subjective thought I'm not tied to.) Utopes (talk / cont) 06:06, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fanzines and fan magazines are indeed distinct topics (the key difference being the latter are professionally produced for fans while the former are amateur works made by enthusiasts), and a "hobby magazine" is closer to the latter than the former. The current target is much better than fanzine but it's still not great. Thryduulf (talk) 12:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For clarity I weakly support keeping the present target and explicitly oppose retargetting to fanzine. Thryduulf (talk) 12:45, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep a redirect after decapitalization and include a Template:Redirect hatnote at Fan magazine pointing to fanzine and vice versa. WP:RGUIDE applies. Additionally proposed merges should be dealt with by a proper merge proposal—not an RFD entry. -- C. A. Russell (talk) 13:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Additionally additionally: if the subject would benefit from a merge discussion, please do not initiate RFD before the discussion has been initiated and concluded. Order of operations matters; to do otherwise is a waste of finite resources. -- C. A. Russell (talk) 13:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget back to Fanzine; based on the edit summary I provided when I created the link, I believe that I came across a source that used the term "Hobby Magazine" in reference to Fanzines. BilledMammal (talk) 04:50, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. "Hobby Magazine", capitalised, infers a magazine called "Hobby" or "Hobby Magazine". If there is one, we don't have an article, or it seems any substantive content. "Hobby magazine", uncapitalised, is a magazine about hobbies. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:08, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

不[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 12#不

Dayalbagh Educational Institute(Deemed University)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the missing space between the word and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Dayalbagh Educational Institute (Deemed University), doesn't exist. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 06:05, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Solitaire(james bond)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the missing space between the word and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Solitaire (james bond), doesn't exist. However, the title with the correctly capitalized disambiguator, Solitaire (James Bond), is the target of the nominated redirect. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 06:03, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Alicante(Tomato)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the missing space between the word and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Alicante (Tomato), doesn't exist. However, the title with the correctly capitalized disambiguator, Alicante (tomato), is a redirect that targets to the same target as the nominated redirect, the one without parentheses. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 06:00, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Constantine(video game)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:37, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the missing space between the word and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Constantine (video game), is the target of the nominated redirect. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 05:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sabotage(Song)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:37, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the missing space between the word and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Sabotage (Song), is a redirect that targets to the same target as the nominated redirect. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 05:56, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Faultine(Musician)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:37, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the missing lowercase letter "l" between the lowercase letters "t" and "i" and the missing space between the word and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Faultine (Musician) and with the correct spelling, Faultline (Musician), don't exist. However, the title with the correctly spelled word and the correctly capitalized disambiguator, Faultline (musician), is the target of the nominated redirect. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 05:54, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Scaramouche(1952 film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:37, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the missing space between the word and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Scaramouche (1952 film), is the target of the nominated redirect. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 05:51, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Eggs and Sausage(In a Cadillac with Susan Michelson)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was move to Eggs and Sausage (In a Cadillac with Susan Michelson). ✗plicit 06:42, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the missing space between the word and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Eggs and Sausage (In a Cadillac with Susan Michelson), doesn't exist. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 05:49, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unbreakable(Westlife album)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:37, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the missing space between the word and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Unbreakable (Westlife album), doesn't exist. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 05:47, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

9012Live(Concert Film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:37, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the missing space between the word and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, 9012Live (Concert Film), is a redirect that targets to the same target as the nominated redirect. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 05:46, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Conquest of Paradise(DLC)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:37, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the missing space between the word and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Conquest of Paradise (DLC), is a redirect that targets to the same target as the nominated redirect. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 05:44, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

We Are One(concert)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:38, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the missing space between the word and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, We Are One (concert), is a redirect that targets to the same target as the nominated redirect. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 05:42, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ben 10: Omniverse(TV series)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:38, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the missing space between the word and the colon and disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Ben 10: Omniverse (TV series), doesn't exist. However, the title without the disambiguator, Ben 10: Omniverse, is the title with a space between the word and the colon, and also the target of the nominated redirect. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 05:40, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Miss Osbourne(film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:38, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the missing space between the word and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Miss Osbourne (film), doesn't exist. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 05:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bombe Heluthaithe(Raajakumara Title Track)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:38, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the missing space between the word and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Bombe Heluthaithe (Raajakumara Title Track), doesn't exist. However, the title without the disambiguator, Bombe Heluthaithe, is a redirect that targets to the same target as the nominated redirect. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 05:29, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Compliance(physiology)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:38, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the missing space between the word and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Compliance (physiology), is the target of the nominated redirect. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 05:26, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Halfway home(tv series)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:38, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the missing space between the word and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Halfway home (tv series), doesn't exist. However, the title with the correctly capitalized word and disambiguator, Halfway Home (TV series), is the target of the nominated redirect. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 05:24, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hustle(dance)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:38, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the missing space between the word and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Hustle (dance), is the target of the nominated redirect. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 05:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

A New Hope(song)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:38, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the missing space between the word and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, A New Hope (song), is a redirect that targets to the same target as the nominated redirect. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 05:20, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bluenose(tugs)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:39, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the missing space between the word and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Bluenose (tugs), doesn't exist. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 05:18, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

One Piece at a Time(album)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:39, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the missing space between the word and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, One Piece at a Time (album), is the target of the nominated redirect. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 05:17, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tolnaftate(USAN)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:39, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the missing space between the word and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Tolnaftate (USAN), doesn't exist. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 05:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Kibembe(Ebembe, or Ebondo)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:39, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the missing space between the word and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Kibembe (Ebembe, or Ebondo), doesn't exist. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 05:13, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Vince(nt) Spadea[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:39, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete since I still don't know what they mean, and for some, titles without parentheses exist. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 05:11, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment With Vice(nt) I understand it to mean he goes by either Vince or Vincent, but I don't think we need a redirect like that. Auguste(e) is similar; it should be indicating that the name may be spelled with or without a final e, but it's a mistake. However, it does appear like that in his entry on IPNI. HUH (the other major database of botanist names) has him as "August(e)". Plantdrew (talk) 17:18, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The parentheses make sense grammatically, but these are unlikely search terms (or links). InfiniteNexus (talk) 20:25, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete although the 1st has existed since 2010 its always been a redirect. Although the 2nd has existed since 2008 its always been a redirect. Although the 3rd has existed since 2010 its always been a redirect. The 4th was an article for a few hours in 2005 and doesn't appear to contain any useful history. Although the 5th has existed since 2011 its always been a redirect. Crouch, Swale (talk) 23:47, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Portuguese Basketball League(LCB)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:39, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the missing space between the word and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Portuguese Basketball League (LCB), is a redirect that targets to the same target as the nominated redirect. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 05:07, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Across the Universe(film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:40, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the missing space between the word and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Across the Universe (film), is the target of the nominated redirect. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 05:05, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

App Store(Mac)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:40, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the missing space between the word and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, App Store (Mac), is a redirect that targets to the same target as the nominated redirect. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 05:04, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Spore(game)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:40, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB due to the missing space between the word and the disambiguator. The title with the correct spacing, Spore (game), is a redirect that targets to the same target as the nominated redirect. 176.33.241.125 (talk) 04:59, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

France 2024 (Olympics)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to France at the 2024 Summer Olympics. (non-admin closure) 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 21:21, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I retargeted this to France at the 2024 Summer Olympics and was reverted. I believe my suggested target makes more sense given that the 2024 iteration of the Olympics is marketed as "Paris 2024", and not "France 2024". If I were to search Country YYYY (Olympics), I would expect to be redirected to Country at the YYYY Olympics. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:10, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This must be redirected to 2024 Summer Olympics, as it correctly identifies the event taking place in France (in this case, the Olympics). Also, to avoid this conflict, I recently created a redirect page called France 2024 (Olympics participation) and redirected it to France at the 2024 Summer Olympics. Thus the format must be Country YYYY (Olympics participation). Abhiramakella (talk) 17:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Abhiramakella: This event has not been marketed as "France 2024" and creating another redirect does not mean that it doesn't make sense to retarget this one. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:16, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Canada-Mexico-United States of America 2026 (Association football event)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely search term. If you know what you're looking for (the 2026 FIFA World Cup), you're unlikely to try to find it using this search. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Actually, when I searched Canada-Mexico-United States of America 2026 (Association football event) on Google, it does indeed show the 2026 FIFA World Cup search result. Thus, the result is Keep. Abhiramakella (talk) 20:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It will show something based off the key words that are searched, but that doesn't mean it's a likely or useful search term. Hey man im josh (talk) 21:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's literally what people call it. Give it up, mate. Kingsif (talk) 23:18, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kingsif: I'm not sure what you were hoping to accomplish with that comment, but I encourage you to stay on topic. It's unclear what you're even asking me to give up, considering I'm trying to engage in a discussion. Hey man im josh (talk) 23:37, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your proposal outright said that if the redirect was searched, you didn't believe it would show the intended article. Someone did the search and it showed the intended article. You then come up with a different reason to try and dismiss this. I am trying to assume good faith. It would be easier to do so if such... diversion... wasn't being used to try and get redirects you just don't seem to like deleted.
Because, here's the other thing I don't get, I will accept that you are unaware of the naming convention, but even if a lot of these redirects were not common names, they are still quite useful search terms - and even if you think not, at worst, they are not harmful (will not be mistaken as a redirect for something else), and so there is no valid deletion rationale. And yet, you want to delete them all indiscriminately. I don't get it. Kingsif (talk) 23:49, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kingsif: I said this was an unlikely search term, not that the keywords, when searched, wouldn't bring up something relevant. I don't appreciate the accusation that I'm making inappropriate nominations because WP:IDONTLIKEIT. If you'd like to discuss the volume of nominations or my general competence then I encourage you to reach out on my talk page because I think this is getting off topic and we're conversing across several discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:04, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will, thank you. Kingsif (talk) 00:25, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Kingsif, can you please provide evidence for your claim that it's literally what people call it.? Your curt "give it up, mate" comment makes it sound like it's obvious, but it's not. -- Tavix (talk) 14:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    There is no valid deletion rationale in the original nom, I'd be more interested in Josh or yourself providing a reason this redirect actively should not exist. Kingsif (talk) 15:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Kingsif: You state below that Based on how unlikely if not impossible it is that people will type even something close to that is a valid deletion rationale. That same argument is being used for this redirect. Redirects are kept based on usage. If you provide evidence for your claim that it's literally what people call it, then you are demonstrating that this redirect may be useful. On the other hand, language like "give it up, mate" has the opposite effect because it comes off as you not willing to have a civil discourse on the matter (subsequent responses show that may not actually be the case, but I do think it's important to point out how your comments can be perceived). -- Tavix (talk) 15:55, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That other discussion has eleven words in the redirect for discussion. It's quite different.
    Redirects are not kept based on usage, they are kept on utility or potential utility. The fact that somebody did the search (and I did again, just now) and it led to the right place shows that the redirect has potential utility. And while the most common shorthand names for this event that I've heard (in life) are "United 2026" (I think that's official branding) and "North America 2026" (perhaps because I'm in Europe), the "Canada-Mexico-USA bid" is also incredibly commonplace, e.g.: [4], [5], [6], [7]. Based on the searchability, it doesn't need to be a common name, but it is. Kingsif (talk) 22:28, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree that redirects should be kept if they have potential utility, but I disagree that this redirect has any. Yes, I'm aware of the names that are branded, and when searching this earlier I did seen some usage for the bid having all three country names hyphenated. But I still don't see the event itself being referred to in this manner, and adding the non-standard disambiguation puts this firmly in the implausible column for me. -- Tavix (talk) 14:14, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The extra disambiguation makes this an implausible search term. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 16:04, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Or someone searching the rest of the title will have added confidence that the link is the right one when they see that disambiguation. Especially considering the event is mostly to be held in countries where the sport is not popular, IMO. It's not incorrect, so it's not misleading, so no reason. Kingsif (talk) 22:30, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. As Presidentman says, the extra disambiguation makes this an implausible search term. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 06:49, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Too much stuff going on to be plausible. QueenofHearts 19:10, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Jakt[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 8#Jakt

Chengdong Sports Park Stadium[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 8#Chengdong Sports Park Stadium

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_February_1&oldid=1218977121"