Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 2

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 2, 2024.

Category of tangles[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 06:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Target article does not mention any category theory. There are passing mentions at Timeline of category theory and related mathematics and Timeline of manifolds. 1234qwer1234qwer4 18:22, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and add a short section on the category of tangles. [1] is the top Google hit and there are other suitable sources that are easy to find. Charles Matthews (talk) 07:34, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:52, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep and expand article per Charles Matthews. Needs more sources, though. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Waltair Productions[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 06:03, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Production company involved in several other films (Double Engine (2024 film) and Rohit–Sasi mention it), not significantly discussed in article. Rusalkii (talk) 19:18, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:52, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete to encourage article creation, and enable unhindered Search. Okmrman (talk) 02:05, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:RETURNTORED. Ambiguous redirect targets. Should be a redlink to encourage creation. Anarchyte (talk) 05:57, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Non-Western culture[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Anarchyte (talk) 03:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicted feelings about this one. Created initially pointing to cultural area, then changed to current target by Викидим. The current target defines "non-Western" culture in terms of its relationship with the west, and also excludes non-Eastern non-Western cultures, notably all of Africa and (depending on how you count) Latin America. The target also doesn't significantly cover culture. On the other hand, I can't think of a better target, and it's a commonly used term. Rusalkii (talk) 19:30, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My change was inspired by Western/Non-Western dichotomy (as defined by the Western culture) clearly present in the title, and the Non-West is (mis)labeled as East since at least Kipling: East is East, and West is West, and never the twain shall meet. Africa, if mentioned specifically, IMHO is part of another, North-South divide. Викидим (talk) 20:18, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:51, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless there is a better target Okmrman (talk) 02:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Nashid Al-Huriya[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 10#Nashid Al-Huriya

Smerf[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty much never referred to this way. A google search gives an acronym from the hotel industry, pediatrics doctor's program, and a smattering of other acronyms none of which we seem to have pages on. Also nominating Smerfs and The Smerfs, the latter of which is at least mostly unambiguous. Note that this user is responsible for a large number of recently nominated redirects. Rusalkii (talk) 22:45, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 01:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom Okmrman (talk) 03:19, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all as highly plausible phonetic guesses at the spelling. J947 ‡ edits 04:30, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, extremely short misspellings have a tendency of being more harmful than other misspellings, as they are highly likely to conflict with existing-word real estate. SMERF is apparently an acronym for "Social, Military, Educational, Religious, and Fraternal groups"; could very well be a search term for that. It is incredibly easy to find the correct spelling of Smurfs, Smerf is not a useful misspelling redirect. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Miriam Cummings[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Fixing double redirect. (non-admin closure) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would like this redirect deleted due to confusion with the Mill Valley, California mayor.

The redirect from Miriam Bridelia Cummings to Miriam Soljak should remain. Flurrious (talk) 22:13, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Finger station[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is this really the primary topic? * Pppery * it has begun... 22:09, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom 104.7.152.180 (talk) 04:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Button station[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is this really the primary topic? * Pppery * it has begun... 22:09, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom 104.7.152.180 (talk) 04:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Reserve station[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. The intended subject here is a station on the Winnipeg–Churchill train, and is mentioned at the line article, but that subject is not the primary topic for this generic term. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:55, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom 104.7.152.180 (talk) 04:08, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bird station[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. The intended subject here is a station on the Winnipeg–Churchill train, and is mentioned at the line article, but that subject is not the primary topic for this generic term. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:54, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom 104.7.152.180 (talk) 04:08, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete... or potentially retarget to Bird feeder as per Pppery's search. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 04:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Honey Hill Mews[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be a housing development that was mentioned in the Honey Hill article (although the sources cited do not use this name, only giving the location as Honey Hill). As the Honey Hill article was redirected, this was also redirected to the same target. Although Honey Hill is mentioned there, Honey Hill Mews is not. Peter James (talk) 20:40, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Honey Hill Mews is a one-street housing complex, which doesn't need a redirect to Cambridge — far too broad a topic for a redirect and it's not mentioned there. Never an article as such, so no useful history to consider. Rupples (talk) 17:15, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

March 2024 Ukraine missile strike[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Timeline of the Russian invasion of Ukraine (1 December 2023 – present)#March 2024. Anarchyte (talk) 03:05, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same as #March 2024 Ukraine missile strikes, with the added grammar problem as there has definitively not been one single missile strike in Ukraine in March. Super Ψ Dro 00:36, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cremastra (talk) 20:37, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Killah B[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Killah B is a record producer, but redirecting his name to the general record producer article doesn't provide any relevant information about him. This is an easy delete in my opinion. Sock (tock talk) 20:28, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not mentioned in article, delete per nom. Rusalkii (talk) 04:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per the above. A7V2 (talk) 08:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Big Nose[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 10#Big Nose

Meerkat Movies[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Compare the Meerkat#Campaign. Anarchyte (talk) 03:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can also refer to any documentary about meerkats or even the Lion King. Okmrman (talk) 19:09, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget/refine to Compare the Meerkat#Campaign. The redirect is mentioned in the target article. Per the target article, the subject of this redirect is a subtopic (or parent topic) of the target article's topic. Steel1943 (talk) 19:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Refine per Steel1943, where it is mentioned. CycloneYoris talk! 01:16, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wikipedia:THREE[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) ~ A412 talk! 21:08, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think this Wikipedia namespace -> userspace essay shortcut is actively detrimental, and leads to WP:UPPERCASE issues, where editors, especially new ones, citing the shortcut haven't actually read the THREE essay, and cite it as the interpretation ("GNG requires three sources"), nonwithstanding that that's not what the essay is about, it's an essay, and it's a userspace essay not necessarily reflecting consensus.

Alternatively, to raise a strawman, if we think that interpretation of THREE is consensus in practice, we should change WP:GNG. ~ A412 talk! 18:39, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: It's unclear as a matter of current policy whether (and to what extent) GNG allows notability outside of THREE. The guideline itself is silent on the issue; WP:NCORP explictily endorses it: An individual source must meet all of these criteria to be counted towards establishing notability; each source needs to be significant, independent, reliable, and secondary. In addition, there must also be multiple such sources to establish notability.; WP:NBIO explicitly rejects it: If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability. That leaves GNG in a middle state where it's not reaaally clear and varies by the interpretations of who's participating in any given discussion. I personally tend to lean towards the NCORP/THREE approach; claims made as a part of an in-depth, well-researched article are more reliable than claims made in passing, making "strung-together" articles usually of lower quality. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 18:59, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    claims made as a part of an in-depth, well-researched article are more reliable than claims made in passing is only sometimes true and conflates reliability with notability. Thryduulf (talk) 19:02, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    sources only count towards GNG if they're reliable for the claims they make, no? And articles that string together notability tend to have lots of glaring holes... theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 19:23, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand what you're proposing here. You are right that people often cite this without understanding what it's saying. That's unfortunate, but I can't cure the underlying cause of that. There's currently 3515 links to this. What are you going to do with all those? If you want to amend WP:GNG, propose an amendment. I agree that GNG is broken. But I don't see how deleting this redirect solves that problem. RoySmith (talk) 20:08, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. 3,516 uses. Folks that placed the link expect the current target. No convincing reason given for retargeting. There is no PAG or norm I am aware of that disallows WP shortcuts targeting userspace, nor that disallows WP shortcuts targeting essays. Hope that makes sense. –Novem Linguae (talk) 20:50, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm going to withdraw this nomination. It's clear to me that people consider any change here nonworkable in light of thousands of references to this shortcut, even if some agree that the references may be misguided. ~ A412 talk! 21:07, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Matarangas[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Mataranga family. Anarchyte (talk) 03:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mataragka is not, I don't believe, known as Matarangas (but is known as Mataranga). See edit history: this used to be a single-entry disambiguation page. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:49, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The redirects Mataranga and Mataranga (disambiguation) currently target the disambiguation page Mataragka. (The former redirect, Mataranga, targeted the nominated redirect's current target, Mataragka, Achaea, until I changed its target to its current target a few minutes ago; I did so WP:BOLDly after seeing mention of Mataranga family above.) Steel1943 (talk) 19:17, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Merger Regulation 2004[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 04:13, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The European Union merger law does not seem to be referred to as "merger regulation 2004", as the full title (including 2004) does not appear at the target, although "merger regulation" does. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 12:59, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 14:12, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Mighty Liberators Drum and Bugles Corps[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 15:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing at redirect target corresponds to this topic. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:08, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See also: Mighty Liberators Drum and Bugle Corps. I support a Delete for both. Why? I Ask (talk) 03:26, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I didn’t even see that one. Yes, it should be deleted, too. Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:48, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bundled Mighty Liberators Drum and Bugle Corps with this.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 13:51, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Cognitive Brain Research Unit[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. ✗plicit 14:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Cognitive Brain Research Unit is a unit at the University of Helsinki. The current target is the unit's founder, who also directed it from 1991-2006. Not much is said about the unit at the current target, so I'm not sure if it will be satisfactory for people looking for it. However, I don't see it mentioned on University of Helsinki, either. I'm curious what the best target for this could be. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:04, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep, I haven't been able to find a mention anywhere else on Wikipedia and a sentence seems better than nothing. Rusalkii (talk) 23:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the target talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 13:36, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Snow Golem[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 04:50, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably falls under WP:XY which could either be adventure time snow golem or minecraft snow golem Okmrman (talk) 04:47, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Also should be noted that neither snow golems are mentioned much on their respective page. Minecraft snow golem was already discussed here:Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 14 § Allay and Adventure Time snow golem only gets like one mention in the description of a single episode. Okmrman (talk) 04:52, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Even with the lack of votes, the writing is already on the wall. Obvious Delete. Okmrman (talk) 03:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Dan Schneider (film professional)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 04:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Schneider already exists without the disambiguation, which is the intended target. There's no reason why someone would add the parentheses, and this redirect wasn't created from a page move. Bandit Heeler (talk) 19:11, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. This redirect is a left-over from an article created that duplicated an existing article on the subject. Instead of deleting it as a duplicate, they just redirected to the other article. No articles link to this, it is not a likely search topic. Pointless to have. Nothing in the edit history was used in the other article so history retention also isn't important here. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:41, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. A {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}} that does not seem inaccurate. Steel1943 (talk) 06:40, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The problem is, it's not a likely search topic, or at least something that's not being used. Before the nomination of the redirect, it wasn't getting any views, aside from a singular view on the 23rd of March, and bearing in mind the target's recent surge in page views over the last few days. Bandit Heeler (talk) 16:58, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That argument is irrelevant for {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}} because WP:CHEAP applies and since there is no evidence why the disambiguator itself is problematic. "Not inaccurate" = "plausible" (regardless of page views) = deletion causes more harm than good. Steel1943 (talk) 19:45, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above Okmrman (talk) 04:53, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or keep?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 04:45, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per Steel1943. Keeping {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}} redirects is beneficial because the disambiguation might only be currently unnecessary and this allows links to the current target to remain accurate regardless of whether another person of this name becomes notable in the future. Thryduulf (talk) 18:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Steel1943 and Thryduulf. Unnecessary (but not incorrect/etc) disambiguation is not a reason to delete a redirect. A7V2 (talk) 08:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Phone computer[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 9#Phone computer

Adult anime[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 9#Adult anime

Kneck[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 06:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is this even a plausible typo? Okmrman (talk) 03:47, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Zero pageviews since creation, no evidence of usage in search. wikt:kneck is about something else. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:14, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Definitely not a plausible typo for a very simple word. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 15:22, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep. This does seem to be a misspelling (not a typo) that is in use in the wild, e.g. I've just corrected two uses in articles [2][3], most likely one made by non-native speakers under the influence of words like "knee". Thryduulf (talk) 18:49, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Could also be a misspelling for Kn*ck titles, such as Knack or Knock. Steel1943 (talk) 18:16, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, not useful as a typo redirect as it can refer to several different words. And at the end of the day, Neck is not a hard word to spell and does not need ANY typo redirects. Luckily and correctly, it has none. If anything, Neecap is a more viable misspelling of Kneecap (compared to "Kneck" and "Neck") as it replaces a "confusing" 'kn' with a "phonetic" 'n', but even "neecap" would be a pointless redirect and I would not suggest it. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

T&J[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Anarchyte (talk) 12:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Originally deleted but was restored by redostone. honestly, it feels way to ambiguous for an acronym Okmrman (talk) 03:44, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Kapish[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Kapish Mehra. Anarchyte (talk) 12:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target, unclear connection. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:31, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_April_2&oldid=1221165793"