Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 3

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 3[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 3, 2023.

Euphytica[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. There is a consensus that Euphytica should not be mentioned at the target article. signed, Rosguill talk 20:08, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Essentially goes against WP:REDLINK to a target so impossibly vast no specific information about that journal will ever be there. See also similar discussion in the past here and here and here. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:47, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment You've really dug for something of mine to delete haven't you.
Euphytica is unusual. It dates from 1952 and is one of Springer's oldest. Certainly this is one of the most Template:R with possibilities and may be appropriate for Springer Science+Business Media#Selected publications. Invasive Spices (talk) 22:50, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"You've really dug for something of mine to delete haven't you." what in the world are you even talking about? I saw a redirect that made no sense, I nominated it. Get off your high horse, whatever it is. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:43, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as there is not even mention of this at the current target. A7V2 (talk) 05:25, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • If there is a reliable source, I can add mention to the target. Springer's own history from 1945-1992 does not mention this journal, nor does the history of any other years. Springer has a page on Euphytica though. Some sources I found (this and this) appear auto generated. Jay 💬 10:56, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Euphytica is not a journal that should be mentioned on the Springer page. It's one of literally tens of thousands of Springer journals. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 12:36, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Those must be autogenerated. A secondary source which is not autogenerated showing high regard for the journal: doi:10.1007/BF02854999. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:37, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    That's an argument for Euphytica having it's own article, not being a redirect to Springer. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Right. Any source that corroborates Euphytica is unusual. It dates from 1952 and is one of Springer's oldest.. Jay 💬 07:59, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    It ain't. Springer started back in 1842. There's little that's peculiar about Euphytica that relates to Springer. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 10:44, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Garuda (upcoming film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio giuliano 09:31, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No longer an upcoming film. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 18:51, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Intergenerational ethics[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 25#Intergenerational ethics

Hypnozoite[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Apicomplexan life cycle. Jay 💬 09:55, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target; should probably be retargeted to an appropriate anchor at Apicomplexan life cycle as with the other terms mentioned there. 1234qwer1234qwer4 18:23, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • It is mentioned at the target. Nonetheless agree. Retarget per 1234qwer1234qwer4. It's an Apicomplexan life stage, not a specifically Plasmodium stage. Invasive Spices (talk) 22:58, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wo Long: Final Dynasty[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 11#Wo Long: Final Dynasty

Template:Station-stub[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 17#Template:Station-stub

Ram Nagar[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Ramnagar as an unopposed retarget proposal. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 06:59, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See the dab page at Ramnagar. Is this place in Barabanki with a population of 12,416 really a proper WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for "Ram Nagar"? I notice a reference to "Ram Nagar" in the article on Krishna Nagar, Delhi, but that's pretty clearly a reference to a different place. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 03:13, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Fuck You Noah[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Noah Cyrus discography#Singles per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 19:22, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently a song by this artist, but with no mention at the target it could easily be mistaken as offensive/abusive to the subject. An anonymous username, not my real name 02:48, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Lame man's terms[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Plain English. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 06:49, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion would probably be the best option for this strange and unambiguously unhelpful eggcorn. Wiktionary does have a small entry for it, but the number of searches is probably far too small to justify soft redirecting there. An anonymous username, not my real name 01:42, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Chaos carolinense[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 25#Chaos carolinense

Ketchup chips[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 17#Ketchup chips

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_March_3&oldid=1146570627"