Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 23

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 23[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 23, 2023.

Football at the 2028 Summer Olympics - Men's tournament[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as too soon. The article is silent about the qualification process. The only thing said about the tournament itself is the potential stadia to be used, which is too incidental to sustain a redirect. -- Tavix (talk) 22:56, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

[Nation] at the 2024 Summer Olympics[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eritrea was recently deleted at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 27#Eritrea at the 2024 Summer Olympics, but rather than G4 it, I think it's better to also discuss the rest of the redirects in this set. I think this is a straightforward delete per WP:REDLINK to show there is not yet an article at 2024 Summer Olympics#Participation. If athletes are participating, then an article on the topic is notable and should be created. If athletes are not participating, they should be removed from that table so there wouldn't be a mention anyway. -- Tavix (talk) 22:10, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eritrea was draftified. Pelmeen10 (talk) 22:46, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The mode[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to The Mode. ✗plicit 23:40, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is this really a common nickname for the band? Even if so, is it really safe to assume someone searching for such a fairly generic phrase is looking for Depeche Mode? 2A00:23C6:880C:E101:F96E:195F:9EAE:53E1 (talk) 19:42, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Dr. sixshot[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Originally created as an extremely short article that said just "Dr. sixshot" and then quickly speedy deleted and recreated as a redirect to Sixshot, which was itself changed to a redirect to The Transformers (TV series), so the redirect target was changed to Transformers: Generation 1.

There has never been any actual content in the "Dr. sixshot" article. A redirect to Transformers: Generation 1 or The Transformers (TV series) would be misleading as the Transformers character is called Sixshot, no one has ever called him with a "Dr." prefix. The name even contains a capitalisation error: "sixshot" vs. "Sixshot". There apparently is a real-life dance musician called Dr. Sixshot but Wikipedia does not seem to have any content about him/her.

I propose this redirect should just be deleted. JIP | Talk 16:05, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. The name is incorrectly capitalized and no character by that exact name exists in the target article's franchise. 〜 Askarion ✉ 18:46, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per the above. Sixshot should probably itself be deleted since there is no mention of this character at the target, and the former article was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sixshot (no merge appears to have taken place). A7V2 (talk) 08:46, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • I would think a better idea would be to change the redirect target of Sixshot to Transformers: Generation 1. It would suffice to add a short description of the Sixshot toy to the appropriate section of the year it was introduced in. JIP | Talk 15:59, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      Well yes that would be best but as is often the case with redirects to articles without mention, no mention is ever added. A7V2 (talk) 01:13, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Dedede Stone[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 30#Dedede Stone

Broom King (Kirby)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 30#Broom King (Kirby)

Etivac[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:58, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unhelpful, fails WP:RPURPOSE- "etivac" is "cavite" backwards. Delete unless a better target can be found. (Note: based on my searches, it looks to be a reference to some kind of meme. WP:NOTNEO.) Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 14:51, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Post nut clarity[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:08, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposing deletion — comments at Talk:Post-coital_tristesse#"Post-nut clarity" an opposite? suggest ‘post nut clarity’ is not the same as ‘post-coital tristesse’, and the term ‘post-nut clarity’ was recently removed from the destination article. A smart kitten (talk) 13:49, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Thanks for this. I do doubt whether we'll have an encyclopedic article on post-nut clarity any time soon. We have {{R from antonym}} but that's a redirect category I'd want to be very careful with, since there should be some context or an obvious relationship between the redirect's term and the target. --BDD (talk) 13:25, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Lori (Iron & Wine EP)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Restore article. signed, Rosguill talk 15:21, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only one short mention at target- unhelpful to the reader. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 13:12, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Revert to last version as a separate article. There's enough coverage from reliable sources to justify an article. - Eureka Lott 04:58, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Restore per Eureka Lott and nom. Also, given this includes the disambiguation someone searching this already knows the name of the artist. Pinging BLARer FormalDude. Can be taken to AfD if desired. A7V2 (talk) 08:51, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Searching For Soul Food[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 15:19, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

not present in target article -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:56, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This nomination was missing the target of the redirect; this has been fixed. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 08:01, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Michaela Clavell[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn in favor of AfD. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:06, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bit-part actress that was redirected to her father, where she is not mentioned. I could not restore and send to AfD because the last revision included a blacklisted external link. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could you not just edit out the blacklisted link while restoring it? QuicoleJR (talk) 15:59, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Minerva Bunkering (version 2)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was resolved. I went ahead and completed the round-robin page move. See my comment below for details. -- Tavix (talk) 20:37, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Improbable redirect title. Appears to have been part of some page moves around Minerva Bunkering and not something intended as a permanent redirect. It's possible it was retained for attribution history but I don't see any edits at the target page that reference it for attribution. Dylnuge (Talk • Edits) 05:34, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Indian National Democratic Inclusive Alliance[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. This is a search term that was in enough use to even appear in sources. Just because a redirect is from an incorrect name doesn't make it invalid – there is no policy-based reason that this should be deleted. (non-admin closure) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 05:12, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect name shouldn't be redirect, it can make confusion... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Indian_National_Developmental_Inclusive_Alliance#Merge DSP2092talk 03:54, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Plimp[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:35, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently refers to a specific product line by Plimp Airships, rather than a generic nickname for a Hybrid airship. The name is also used for various urban English terms as per Urban Dictionary. BilCat (talk) 00:13, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom and the fact that this is not mentioned at the target. A7V2 (talk) 09:24, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_July_23&oldid=1167967088"