Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 22

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 22[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 22, 2023.

Bittersweet (color)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 2#Bittersweet (color)

Vatnik[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 2#Vatnik

Google Zeitgeist[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 2#Google Zeitgeist

Partially hydrogenated oil[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 30#Partially hydrogenated oil

LaLiga[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 21#LaLiga

Feeling of relaxation[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 23:34, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely search term (we're no Google), barely used. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 16:19, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Leonard Anthony Sajdak[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 20:39, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect for a non-notable person not named in the target article to provide any context for why he redirects there. Going by the birth and death dates that this has been categorized in I'm presuming that this is probably Pat Sajak's father or grandfather, but the article doesn't say that — and even if the nature of his relationship to Pat were added now, we still do not routinely create redirects of this type if there isn't a reason why the father or grandfather might actually be semi-notable enough to be a plausible search term in his own right. Bearcat (talk) 14:24, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Karulaugu Sports Center[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:50, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No mention at target-misleading. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 14:13, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I was a creator. Good catch, User:Edward-Woodrow! Estopedist1 (talk) 15:48, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Steven Jones (poker player)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was moot. Has been expanded into new article. (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 19:33, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Placeholder which redirects to a generic article. Wire723 (talk) 13:07, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Even if there is a person by this name who merits an article, this redirect serves no purpose to that end. BD2412 T 19:10, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: The redirect was already changed to a proper article by User:TheElvisBelievingBumbleBee so this whole discussion is perhaps pointless now. JIP | Talk 16:11, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

2015–16 Bangladesh Championship League[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 9#2015–16 Bangladesh Championship League

Collaborate: The Art of We[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 01:43, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Book by a person only notable for the company he works for. I redirected the target. Having this re-direct make no sense now and I suggest we DELETE it. This book's page, the target Dan Sanker his empoyer CaseStack were all crated by an employee/management at CaseStack. Graywalls (talk) 04:28, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The nom has now (properly) redirected Dan Sanker to CaseStack where this (non-notable) book is not mentioned. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:10, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: it is currently a double redirect anyway. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 12:25, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have tagged the redirect with {{R with history}}. Although the AfD had closed as merge to author, this was not done, but instead BLARed by Huon with summary all sourced content already contained in target article: redirect, which in my opinion, was incorrect. Jay 💬 05:23, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete; if any merge took place it would have been from the same editor who created both pages – an attribution issue is unlikely. We should signify there's no information on the site on this book to the reader who searches this. J947 † edits 00:12, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Anglicanism/Alt Emerging Church[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:14, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsensical, weirdly formatted title. I have no idea what an "Alt Emerging Church" is supposed to refer to. I propose deletion. Veverve (talk) 04:18, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Only hits on Google for "Alt Emerging Church" are this redirect and Wikipedia mirrors/forks. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 12:49, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as a mainspace subpage with no content worth retaining. The title is supposed to refer to alternate emerging churches. Jay 💬 05:31, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Anglican cemetery[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 30#Anglican cemetery

Christian - Epsicopalian[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 05:40, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weird, unhelpful formatting; this should be deleted. Veverve (talk) 04:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. A search for "Christian" or "Episcopalian" will reveal useful results. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:20, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. A smart kitten (talk) 18:28, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: unhelpful formatting and an unlikely search term, the search results will be able to handle this if it is ever searched. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 12:26, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Although "Episcopalian" is apparently a synonym for Anglicanism, the title's single typo (Episcopalian -> Epsicopalian) in an already-long word makes it an unlikely search term. Duckmather (talk) 02:28, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Christian - Anglican[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 30#Christian - Anglican

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_July_22&oldid=1171517295"