Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 14

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 14[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 14, 2022.

2000 (Joey Badass mixtape)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 22#2000 (Joey Badass mixtape)

Angle (battle)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to The Angle. Jay 💬 18:35, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What appears to be the result of a move of material about Gettysburg from a mathematics article by someone not strictly familiar with military history. This results in a search term that is hopeless vague and isn't obviously related to Gettysburg any more than it is Battle of Spotsylvania Court House#May 12: The Bloody Angle, angles in battle lines, or any other such term. Back in 2005, the edit summary redirecting this suggested that it would be "probably better deleted"; I agree. Hog Farm Talk 18:45, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to The Angle. This indeed resulted from a WP:SPLIT of content from Angle (Special:Diff/9376331) that was added by an IP earlier the same day, being blanked and redirected to the current target later that year as noted by nom. There is an area of the Gettysburg battlefield referred to as "The Angle" for which there is an enwiki article, and it has an entry at Angle (disambiguation). The events and location at Spotsylvania are usually called the Bloody Angle (though I agree, arguably better known then the use of the term 'The Angle' with respect to Gettysburg), in addition to some other uses of the term disambiguated at that page, which is reachable by a hatnote at The Angle. Until/unless it is determined via subsequent discussion that The Angle needs further disambiguation, it seems like the most appropriate target as a primary redirect (though retargeting to Bloody Angle as incomplete disambiguation could also be considered). I share concern that this could have other meanings like angles in battle formations, though none of the articles linked from tactical formation use the word 'angle'. Thus, I do feel like anyone typing this would be seeking some sort of specific battle or battlefield topic and not something more general, and it is a plausible search term. Mdewman6 (talk) 00:13, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 19:55, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:36, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Batonga[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Jay 💬 03:11, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:19, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is it right that these target different articles? Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:19, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Disambiguate: It doesn't really seem like one is a WP:PTOPIC over the other (but I am absolutely not an expert here) so a DAB even with two entries is probably appropriate. TartarTorte 20:27, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dabify for now since we don't know what is the primary topic --Lenticel (talk) 00:18, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox RLWC[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:21, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The redirect implies incorrectly that the target template is for use on Rugby League World Cup articles. It was created through disruptive action by another editor and should be deleted. – PeeJay 13:54, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Environmental superintendent[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:20, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading. A quick google search reveals "environmental superintendent" is a job title but none of the ones I found look like janitor jobs. Retarget if a better option can be found, else delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 12:12, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Fenestration engineer[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:20, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently misleading. A quick google search suggests "fenestration engineer" is a type of structural engineering job not a window cleaner. Retarget if a good target can be found, else delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 12:11, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Home plaque removal instrument[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:20, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A bunch of apparent joke redirects created by the same user 478jjjz (talk · contribs) on the same day. None of them look useful or salvageable - delete all. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 12:01, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete worth a chuckle but otherwise unlikely synonym --Lenticel (talk) 00:19, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete these slightly-witty euphemisms as unlikely search terms. --Sable232 (talk) 21:02, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Meditation room[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Jay 💬 18:31, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can't find much evidence that "meditation room" is a commonly used euphemism for solitary confinement. Possibly created as a joke. Sending it here in case there are better retarget possibilities – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 11:53, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Clothesline (magazine)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Anarchyte (talk) 11:17, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the mention at the target as the magazine is completely lacking in notability. This also means that this new redirect is not included in the target and should be deleted as well. Fram (talk) 09:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Whatever. I don't feel that strongly about it. I created it because I'd encountered it quite a few times as a source, and as a successor to Rip It Up, thought that its origins and editors could be of interest to readers, hence the creation of the redirect. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 00:48, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 10:59, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 11:35, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Teliomycotina[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 22:11, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 11:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Listed here as a synonym of Pucciniomycetes (like Urediniomycetes, which is noted in the lede); however this is the only clear classification I can find - mentions like this are more confusing than helpful. I'm never quite sure about the reliability of BioLib either. Maybe drop at note at Wikiproject Fungi? --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:34, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A bot had already notified at Wikiproject Fungi.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:52, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 11:30, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Redirects to Laura White[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 22#Redirects to Laura White

Redistrict[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 22#Redistrict

VAHP[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 21#VAHP

Snowbird summit[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:19, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Most Google results for this are the actual summit of Snowbird resort and/or Snowbird Summit Restaurant. While the agile conference is referred to this way, I expect it to be confusing for the majority of searchers. Rusalkii (talk) 04:39, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Esoteric Runology[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 21#Esoteric Runology

Giant-MD[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:19, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible search term. This must mean the Giant Food store change based in Landover, Maryland (or Giant Food of Maryland). But without "Food", with the dash, with the postal abbreviation it just seems too vague to be useful. MB 03:25, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sociomedical assessment[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 21#Sociomedical assessment

Robotronics[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 19:58, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a partial match for the fictional company "United Robotronics" in the article. There is also a fictional company "Earth Robotronics" in Armitage III. IRL, there is an actual company Robotronics, Inc, a book, and possibly other things. Delete. MB 02:41, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for being too ambiguous. Partofthemachine (talk) 02:56, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Only a partial word match for a a fictional company name. Not very helpful and ambiguous. RoostTC(ping me!) 06:28, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 12:13, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, retarget or disambiguate - Keep as a suitable search term, retarget, or disambiguate. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:45, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete to make use of search results. Multiple articles with mention of the word and not significant enough for a retarget or a disambig page. Jay 💬 18:08, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

User:The Silent Partner (1871)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by Liz per WP:U2. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 09:29, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible cross-namespace redirect. Partofthemachine (talk) 01:29, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete per WP:U2, userpage of nonexistent username. From a move error, but only at this title in the incorrect namespace for a moment. Best to clean this up. Mdewman6 (talk) 03:37, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete U2. Uhai (talk) 05:42, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Cunt the Great[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 01:49, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whether this is a likely misspelling for Cnut the Great is questionable. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 01:28, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. May encourage vandalism. Dudley Miles (talk) 08:31, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Redirects can be protected to discourage vandalism. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 12:32, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, absolutely a plausible typo. Also a plausible misreading of the name on first glance considering initial ⟨cn⟩ in English doesn't usually occur. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 12:19, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per filelakeshoe. Seems highly plausible. A7V2 (talk) 23:00, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per filelakeshoe and protect to prevent vandalism. --Lenticel (talk) 12:12, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_December_14&oldid=1128958609"