Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 8

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 8[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 8, 2021.

Targetism[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:34, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete redirect. I could find no reliable sources to justify this redirect. This redirect is similar to #Goalism (see below) and was created by the same editor.
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:
Biogeographist (talk) 20:10, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Goalism[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:34, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete redirect as an apparent prank. I already reverted a change to the target page that replaced the article name with "Goalism", since I could find no reliable sources to justify the change. At Talk:Goal theory#Goalism? I asked the editor who created the "Goalism" redirect to provide a good explanation but none was forthcoming. Biogeographist (talk) 19:56, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. If/when an article about targetism (see above) is created this would be a useful redirect to it (as it seems to be a less common name for the same thing), but until then we have nowhere appropriate for this redirect to target. Thryduulf (talk) 20:37, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rachmanianof[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:35, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very strange misspelling that I've never seen before, and it looks very illogical. Sure, the pronunciation might be confusing insofar that Rachmaninoff might be accidentally spelled with one less "f", but "a" after "i" doesn't make sense. When typing "Rachm" in the search bar, this pops up first and not Rachmaninoff. Wretchskull (talk) 19:04, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment, the single versus double "f" is highly plausible (I'm unclear whether you are saying it is or it isn't), especially as some other Russian names are transliterated with a single "f", so that part is not really relevant here. The point regarding the search suggestion is also not relevant - people get to the correct article either way, and the internal search box is only one of many ways people use to reach Wikipedia content (and even those who do use it don't see the suggestions if they don't have JavaScript available and enabled). There is no way to exclude certain pages from the suggestions list (although phab:T24251 requests it, the request has been open over 11 years so don't hold your breath for the functionality to arrive soon), which means that if a misspelling, incorrect name, etc, is useful in some circumstances then we just have to live with it appearing in search suggestions. That leaves only the extra "a", I'm leaning towards it not being a plausible misspelling but I've not done enough investigation to be certain. Thryduulf (talk) 19:54, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, sure the f vs double ff would happen, but the idea that it would happen with a random a is nonsense. I'm basically echoing the nomination statement here, but if this exists we might as well do redirects for "Rachmanionof" or "Rachmaininof" which is pointless. Aza24 (talk) 08:17, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: This is an improbable misspelling. ―Susmuffin Talk 01:19, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as improbable misspelling. One typo might be plausible but this has two. --Lenticel (talk) 07:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: One "f" is plausible, but that in addition to a random "a" isn't. -- Dave12121212 ◎ 09:10, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Two mistakes is too many. Narky Blert (talk) 16:43, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wolfe (TV series)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 16#Wolfe (TV series)

Hitler's breakfast[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:35, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete redirect. No other uses on Wikipedia, no likelihood of expansion into an article, probably nonsense. Freelance-frank (talk) 14:36, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: I rearranged this to its chronological space, as new requests go at the top rather than the bottom of a page. Hopefully that helps. Regards, SONIC678 17:23, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Simply no reason for redirect to exist. Furthermore, breakfast would not necessarily be directly related to Hitler's vegetarianism as he had breakfasts before he was vegetarian. Plutonical (talk) 18:12, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, awkward, implausible and probably trolling. Aza24 (talk) 08:17, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Closest target that I got from my search is Operation Foxley where there's a plan to kill Hitler while he's eating breakfast. Anyways, I think the redirect is a stretch even for that article. --Lenticel (talk) 01:17, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: This is a bizarre redirect. ―Susmuffin Talk 01:21, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: The more broad term 'Hitler's meals' wouldn't be an appropiate redirect either, because Hitler ate meat before taking up veganism. Further narrowing it down to 'Hitler's breakfast' is just mind-boggling. (JayPlaysStuff | talk to me | What I've been up to) 13:51, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

ISO 639:none[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 15#ISO 639:none

Mobile personal computer[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 15#Mobile personal computer

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2021_November_8&oldid=1055482974"