Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 13

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 13[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 13, 2021.

Extinct canid stub[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 22#Extinct canid stub

Young Justice (film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete all except Outsiders (film) as that has the best chance at continuing as a redirect (to The Outsiders (film)). Jay (talk) 03:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a group of redirects with a (film) disambiguator to a comic book character or team that does not mention a film by that given name. Note that some of these articles do mention the character's appearance(s) in film, but that is quite a bit different from having an eponymous film. -- Tavix (talk) 23:33, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak retarget Outsiders (film) to The Outsiders (film), as even though that isn't exactly the film's title (and I'm not 100% sure this is the best course of action), people might misquote it that way, plus a Google search shows this other movie in the majority of search results (if that doesn't work, I'm also open to deleting it). Delete the rest per nom, as I couldn't find any movies by that title either (not even on the disambiguation pages!). Regards, SONIC678 17:19, 14 November 2021 (UTC), updated 17:23, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget Outsiders (film), Delete the rest per Sonic. The former has the best chance, so I'd recommend retargetting for now, and creating another RFD in at least 6 months if someone still doesn't think that redirect works. OcelotCreeper2 (talk) 23:21, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pair-instability hypernova[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 21#Pair-instability hypernova

Numeric symbology[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 21#Numeric symbology

94415 and other hentai serial (?) numbers[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. All are obscure identifiers. Jay (talk) 05:53, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, no relevant results in an internet search. Presumably a serial number, but unless this is a commonly used moniker it's not an appropriate redirect. Deletion seems the way to go. signed, Rosguill talk 20:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete All The source of these numbers is the scanlation website nHentai. This is not an acceptable alternate name redirect. Could 306936 (to The Titan's Bride) also be included for the same reason? Link20XX (talk) 20:30, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. -- Tavix (talk) 23:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all. Completely incomprehensible to anyone who's not a hentai enthusiast. No possible encyclopedic value. JIP | Talk 20:44, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per everyone above me, these numbers could also refer to anything else, hentai or not (I second JIP's reasoning as well). D8 also applies here. Regards, SONIC678 22:24, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all it isn't even a common identifier such as an ISBN, and isn't even specific to hentai piracy sites in general... It's specific to exactly one of them? Fail to see the point, and only useful to a fraction of a fraction of hentai readers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Canadianerk (talk • contribs) 21:42, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I'll be blunt, but the only people who would know URL numbers from a hentai site are porn addicts. It isn't even a well-known one like 177013. Actually, even 177013 is questionable, given that this number system is only used on 1 hentai site, not hentai sites in general. (JayPlaysStuff | talk to me | What I've been up to) 02:37, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No point of keeping them, and nobody would know these numbers except for porn addicts. ThatIPEditor - Public (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 19:23, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Awesome brah Island[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Obscure name. Jay (talk) 05:46, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible. Qwerfjkltalk 19:01, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete because "Awesome Brah Island" gets no hits other than this redirect. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:13, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Judahitish[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was deleted by Materialscientist per R3. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 19:20, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be completely unused anywhere and is linked to from nowhere. snood1205(Say Hi! (talk)) 17:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete, WP:CSD R3 Nonexistent word and by no means a likely typo for anything that is a word. I've submitted the page for speedy deletion accordingly. Largoplazo (talk) 17:35, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: this was deleted under R3 by User:Materialscientist, but I have no idea how a redirect created in 2017 qualifies as recently-created. - Eureka Lott 18:51, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

GUS[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 21#GUS

Megalomania[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 24#Megalomania

Tripla[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 21#Tripla

Flash templates[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 21#Flash templates

Repubulique du Rwanda[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 20#Repubulique du Rwanda

Sporting goods store[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 20#Sporting goods store

98.6°[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Human body temperature#Historical understanding. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 11:05, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

98.6°F is just one of a large number (infinite actually) of temperatures in the normal human body temperature range, which in any case is not well defined. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:28, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The temperature is in fact, very well defined as a historical value for the average normal human body temperature, which was determined so in 1868, and has been used widely ever since, even though recent research consistently found lower averages.[1]. Paradoctor (talk) 18:38, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

36.6[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 20#36.6

Earl of Bute[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 20#Earl of Bute

Ntsysv[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:33, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Term not mentioned at target article. This was previously a stub article which was redirected to its current target in December 2020. I propose deletion or restoring the stub article if possible. CycloneYoris talk! 23:07, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • I originally created this page as somewhere to store a reminder on how to find an rcconf equivalent for Redhat. I no longer have any stake in this page. I don't care it it's deleted 116.90.140.45 (talk) 01:00, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Note that the page was created by Jasen betts. Jay (talk) 05:20, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 05:21, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Enwiki has nothing about Ntsysv. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:46, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not mentioned at target article, too specific and marginal to be of use as a search term. JIP | Talk 14:50, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pipelinks[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 20#Pipelinks

Draft:Imran Ali[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 20#Draft:Imran Ali

Template:MCN[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 20#Template:MCN

Cutting head[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 24#Cutting head

Wikipedia:Zainul Abedin (Lawyer)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per G6, unambiguously incorrect namespace. There is also a bluster of snow. -- Tavix (talk) 21:48, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weird project page, maybe we should delete it. Did Q28 make a mess today? 04:27, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete Someone created a draft, someone else mistakenly moved it to Wikipedia namespace, I moved it back to Draft namespace with a corrected disambiguator. This redirect was a byproduct. It looks like the draft will remain abandoned, in which case it will be speedily deleted under G13 in the first quarter of next year, at which point this redirect could be speedily deleted under G8. The value of the redirect is near zero, so accelerating its deletion should be harmless. --Worldbruce (talk) 05:05, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this cross-namespace redirect. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:54, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, misuse of Wikipedia namespace. JIP | Talk 14:52, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. If it was clear that the page move was to an accidentally incorrect namespace (e.g. it's not uncommon for people to move things to the Wikipedia namespace when intending to move to the article namespace) then it would be speedily deletable under G6 as a page created by mistake (or when fixing a mistake), but in this case I have no idea what the page mover was intending so it might have been intentional. Regardless, the redirect is not useful. Thryduulf (talk) 16:32, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wikipedia:Delete. Implausible XNR, potentially cluttering search terms while looking for policy and essay pages. ~~~~
    User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)     16:53, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2021_November_13&oldid=1056920481"