Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 20

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 20[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 20, 2021.

Moue[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 31#Moue

Wuhan Flu Timeline[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 27#Wuhan Flu Timeline

Filipino Traditional Food:Bagoong[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 31#Filipino Traditional Food:Bagoong

PiB[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to PIB. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 15:08, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Might also refer to Pittsburgh compound B. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:55, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget, it makes more sense for a either a disambiguation page or use of an "X redirects here. for Y, see Y" template on Pittsburgh compound B since PiB currently redirects to a portion of an article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UppercutPawnch (talk • contribs) 12:43, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Messed up my own opinion so I edited it to what I meant. UppercutPawnch (talk) 12:45, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to disambiguation page PIB is the cleanest option. —Kusma (t·c) 13:06, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget with hatnote to PIB. -- intgr [talk] 13:09, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Intgr: To where? Also, you removed my comment. Please be more careful. —Kusma (t·c) 14:18, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Kusma: I'm sorry I deleted your post by accident :( it's been a while since I participated in Wikipedia. I originally thought retargeting to "Pittsburgh compound B" as proposed, but PIB disambig page makes more sense. -- intgr [talk] 11:16, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to PIB per Kusma. -- dylx 16:20, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to PIB per Kusma. Ivanvector's squirrel (trees/nuts) 17:35, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to PIB per above. J947's public account 22:21, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate retarget to the disambiguation page -- 67.70.27.180 (talk) 02:24, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nascar racing[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to NASCAR. There also seems to be a consensus to retarget NASCAR Racing after doing something with the content currently there, but I will leave it to others who actually looked at that article to undertake that. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 15:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While I am prepared to accept that the Papyrus simulations are the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for the full capitalised version of the name; the uncapitalised redirect should almost certainly be retargeted to another page, such as "NASCAR", or "'NASCAR Cup Series", or "NASCAR rules and regulations". The creator of the redirect does not appear to have been active for over five years. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 10:05, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure this qualifies for that, as the current usage seems likely to WP:ASTONISH readers, and is likely a WP:DIFFCAPS issue. Arguably "NASCAR racing" should be a disambiguation page. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 11:14, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep', the "This article is about X, for Y, see Y" is good enough in my book for this as as opposed to remaking a capitalization-based redirect into a disambiguation page. UppercutPawnch (talk) 12:38, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that there are a large number of different topics somebody could conceivably and reasonably expect "NASCAR racing" to refer to. Obviously there's the NASCAR Racing game series, but there's also NASCAR the sanctioning body, the page on NASCAR rules and regulations, the NASCAR Cup Series, the NASCAR Xfinity Series, the NASCAR Truck Series, the NASCAR Pinty's Series, the NASCAR Mexico Series, the EuroNASCAR series, the NASCAR Weekly Racing Series, the NASCAR Modified Tour, and the more general page on stock car racing. There are possibly others as well. Ultimately the game series is far less notable than many of those other subjects as well. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 14:26, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kwessely/Applied Spectral Imaging[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6 - obviously created in error. Thryduulf (talk) 10:43, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely redirect, remnant of a wrong pagemove which should have been speedied at the time. Fram (talk) 09:19, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ye maaya chesave serial[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 27#Ye maaya chesave serial

Adversarial input[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 27#Adversarial input

Pirating[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 15:19, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Piracy. The noun form (Pirate) redirects there, so I'm not sure why the gerund form doesn't.Dudhhr (talk) 21:56, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 06:57, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Blocking (Wikipedia)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 27#Blocking (Wikipedia)

Lunchtime O'Boulez[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 27#Lunchtime O'Boulez

Chyalothrin[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 27#Chyalothrin

Lance Weller[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 15:25, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not discussed at target article. Appears to have written a novel with some content about this battle, but there isn't a strong enough connection between this battle and this modern novelist for this to be a good redirect. Hog Farm Talk 01:46, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm assuming the book in question is Wilderness (Weller novel), which is also a redirect to that section. - Eureka Lott 02:04, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Keep. both redirects Weller and Wilderness (Weller novel). This author has written two books Amazon.com lists. One of them happens to be about a veteran of Battle of the Wilderness thirty years after the engagement. That's the entire linkage between the redirects (created about six years ago) and the target article. Based on a reasonable search unlikely either redirect subject would meet WP:GNG. Redirect creator (and still active editor) User:PamD has been contacted by the nominator about this discussion. Perhaps that contributor can shed additional light on these two redirects. BusterD (talk) 02:19, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
After explanation, reinsertion, review quotation and sourcing from PamD, changing to keep. Always glad to see improvement as opposed to the alternative. Every editor in this process is doing the right thing. I'm wondering whether the book and graphic novel ISBNs might do better service as citation as opposed to text that does appear to look like marketing compared to other entries. That's purely my opinion. BusterD (talk) 18:37, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, @BusterD: I'd wondered about keeping the publisher info as refs. I always prefer to include an ISBN alongside almost any mention of a book as it provides instant access to verification and info, but I'm aware that this is perhaps a minority preference! Perhaps the one editor who didn't "do the right thing" was the one who removed that publisher and ISBN info rather than making it into a reference, as it left the book "unsourced". Anyway, it's now retrieved. Yes, I'll tweak it now. PamD 20:07, 20 May 2021 (UTC) Have tweaked: isbns and publishers now in refs. PamD 20:21, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I have now reinstated the mention of Weller's book at the target. Looking at the history, at the time when I created the redirects (5 August 2016) the target section included:
  • The American novel "Wilderness" by Lance Weller (2012, Bloomsbury, London-New Delhi- New York-Sydney, ISBN 978 1 4088 3172 4) portrays the cruel and relentless fighting during one of the bloodiest clashes of the American Civil War.
which had been added by an IP a couple of months earlier.
By Feb 2018 the ISBN had been linked, always useful as a sort of source for a book, but a March 2018 edit "Tone down marketing" removed the publisher and ISBN and most of the text, leaving a minimal listing which was then removed as unsourced in July 2019. And now reinstated, sourced.
I have a faint memory that I read this book with my book club, looked it up in Wikipedia, found it mentioned there and made appropriate redirects from author and title. PamD 07:32, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Prngle manouver[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deletion. Prngle manouver was originally created with an incorrectly spelled title by 194.251.240.116. Content was moved to Pringle_manoeuvre, a correctly spelled title, by OldakQuill. This particular misspelling in not common, with only 1 view of the page in the last 30 days. Bibeyjj (talk) 13:05, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2021_May_20&oldid=1026049228"