Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 27

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 27[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 27, 2021.

Jimmy Zoppi[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 7#Jimmy Zoppi

Ken Gates[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 7#Ken Gates

1993 Kids' Choice Awards[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 7#1993 Kids' Choice Awards

Ciley Myrus[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 23:49, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

This redirect is a spoonerism, not a likely or plausible search term. I propose deletion under deletion criteria 3 and criteria 8 of Wikipedia:Redirect#Reasons for deleting unless justification can be provided. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 14:35, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:25, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I don’t agree that it is commonly used, it has had 674 views over the past ~5 years (and around 50 of those have been while this RfD has been open) , while Miley Cyrus has had over 30 million. I’m also not sure what purpose it serves, as surely someone who can search for this spoonerism is capable of reversing it and thereby getting the correct title? ƒirefly ( t · c ) 23:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Well, it's not like it's harming anything and it has saved time for 600 people at the very least. 600 people helped is a lot in the context of misnomer redirects. — J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 21:29, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Matt Halprin[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 04:50, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. There are passing mentions at Omidyar Network and Sunlight Foundation, however. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:19, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

File:W. S. Gilbert - Alice B. Woodward - The Pinafore Picture Book - Frontispiece - Original.[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 04:50, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused File: redirect seemingly created by accident, with no foreseeable use. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 16:44, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 04:49, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused File: redirect with no foreseeable use. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 16:42, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Jews against Zionism[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Jews Against Zionism. signed, Rosguill talk 04:49, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion. As per WP:RfD#DELETE If the redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject. The redirect is a campaign group; the target article mentions the philosophy and another group but not this one NOTE lower case a in against; a UK secular group, not the book or the US based religious group. Jontel (talk) 16:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Buttons for Eyes (film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. This did not need to be relisted. signed, Rosguill talk 04:49, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Not a nickname by which the film is called, nor was it a working title. I'm sure anyone looking for "that film where people have buttons for eyes" could Google it and find the Wikipedia article. Dominicmgm (talk) 22:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Added old RfD. — J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 23:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete there are lots of references to this film when searching for "Buttons for eyes" on google and excluding Wikipedia, but at least most of them are using it as a descriptor not a name and there are a nearly equal number of hits for other things such as using buttons for eyes of soft toys. Thryduulf (talk) 12:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lindi Cistia Prabha[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 9#Lindi Cistia Prabha

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2021_February_27&oldid=1011249842"