Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 12

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 12[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 12, 2021.

LazyTown Mayors[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 21#LazyTown Mayors

Fordmil[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Thryduulf (talk) 19:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target and could potentially be confused with a real carehouse in Scotland called Fordmill Care House. Dominicmgm (talk) 23:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rottenbeard[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of LazyTown episodes#ep12. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 01:04, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, should be retargeted to List of LazyTown episodes. Dominicmgm (talk) 23:49, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dr. Rottenstein[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of LazyTown episodes#ep11. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 01:04, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest this be retargeted to List of LazyTown episodes, as unlike the other noms, this is the name of an episode. Dominicmgm (talk) 23:49, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Meansbad[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of LazyTown episodes#ep27. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 05:16, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target. Dominicmgm (talk) 23:47, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fordmil Meansbad[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 20#Fordmil Meansbad

Scotty the Scoutmaster[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of LazyTown episodes#ep10. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 01:03, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target. Dominicmgm (talk) 23:45, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sherlock Foams[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of LazyTown episodes#ep6. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 01:02, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target article. Dominicmgm (talk) 23:44, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lazycus[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of LazyTown episodes#ep2. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 01:01, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target article. Dominicmgm (talk) 23:43, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Volcanic Asteroid[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 19:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Far too vague to be a viable redirect and could also potentially apply to real life (although volcanism on asteroids is not mentioned at Volcanism as far as I can tell). ZXCVBNM (TALK) 22:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:R slang[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Template:R from colloquial name. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 01:00, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 9#Template:R from slang term resulted in a retarget of two similar rcats to {{R from colloquial name}}; these two should be retargeted there, too. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy retarget. The previous RFD already established a consensus, even if these two specific redirects weren't listed. I think you'd be within your rights to just retarget them yourself and withdraw this. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 05:57, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Relation (OpenStreetMap)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to OpenStreetMap#Data format. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 00:58, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely searchterm Fram (talk) 10:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 18:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

S. Taylor (cricketer)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 20#S. Taylor (cricketer)

8 December 1980[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to December 1980#December 8, 1980 (Monday). signed, Rosguill talk 19:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The date is not synonymous with the incident like how 11 September 2001 is. Dominicmgm (talk) 18:57, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Annam Tower[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 20#Annam Tower

Jugend[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 21#Jugend

J. Barker[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 20#J. Barker

Omegalul[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 20#Omegalul

Quitter (social network)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 19#Quitter (social network)

Template:Redirect from maiden name[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Template:R from birth name. signed, Rosguill talk 19:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This should redirect to {{R from birth name}}, where {{R from maiden name}} also points. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 16:59, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Redirect from UK spelling[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Template:R from British English. signed, Rosguill talk 19:42, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This should redirect to {{R from British English}}. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 16:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Biden/Harris[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 19:42, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This could refer to Biden's campaign or his administration. Interstellarity (talk) 16:51, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: here are the last five administrations; there do not seem to be any comparable links for administrations earlier than that:
Trump Pence, Trump/Pence Trump-Pence
Obama Biden, Obama/Biden, Obama-Biden
Bush Cheney, Bush/Cheney, Bush-Cheney
Clinton Gore, Clinton/Gore, Clinton-Gore
Bush Quayle, Bush/Quayle, Bush-Quayle
Targets of the above redirects are all over the map. BD2412 T 17:28, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per consensus of other links. Also I feel it just makes since. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 22:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • While the other links suggest this should not be deleted they offer no consensus as to the appropriate target. Thryduulf (talk) 00:03, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I've left a note at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics/American politics inviting comments on this discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 00:03, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep should all be targeted to the most narrow campaign item that covers the term. And it should be the campaign, because administrations are almost universally known by the president's name, whereas campaigns often have the potential VP's name tagged on. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 09:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
  • Keep. The campaign article is the most reasonable target. --RL0919 (talk) 21:18, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

January 6th[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was snow keep. BD2412 put it best, not much more to say. El_C 15:44, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Listing for discussion to gauge consensus. There are plenty of days which are synonymous with events, e.g. September 11th , July 4th, December 25th, all redirect to articles on the corresponding day in the Gregorian calendars as these are the primary topics. These then link to specific events. So precedent seems to be to keep the redirect and not to create a disambiguation page. Polyamorph (talk) 15:30, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep redirect to the day in Gregorian calendar. Polyamorph (talk) 15:32, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Revert to disambiguation page. "9/11" redirects to the terrorist attack, so the precedent of "September 11th" is not relevant to this discussion. "January 6th" has become shorthand for 2021 storming of the United States Capitol, especially in the United States, but not exclusively so. A disambiguation page is the best compromise. The target page January 6 has this reference buried as a wl from the word "storm", making it very hard for the user to find it. Art Smart Chart/Heart 15:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Regardless of the outcome of this discussion, the solution to a link being buried is to improve the link as this will help everyone. Thryduulf (talk) 15:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as a redirect to the day page. There is no primary topic for this date - epiphany, the protests and Covid updates are all about equal in my search results. A disambiguation page would just be a subset of the day page so there isn't a need for it. Thryduulf (talk) 15:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep at it's current target. There have been repeated attempts to turn this into a DAB page including 2021 storming of the United States Capitol or just retargeting the page to the article on the storming which I disagree with, the clear primary topic of "January 6th" is the 6th day of January. I see no evidence that anyone is referring to the event as "January 6th" alone, all the names I could find including the date were variations like "January 6th capital riots". The event is already listed on the target page (although it could probably be made clearer), so it is already easily accessible to readers. Targeting this to the Storming of the US capital seems to me to be an textbook example of Americentrism and Recentism. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 15:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as is, consistently with September 11 (and September 11th), which both refer to the generic date and not to the specific event on that date. I note that September 11 states in the lede that the date is often used to refer to the terrorist attack, which may be appropriate here if a similar usage of the date can be sourced. BD2412 T 17:21, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as is per above. If I searched up January 6th on Wikipedia, I would expect to land on January 6. — J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 20:12, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:IX[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. No prejudice against recreation to WikiProject Christianity if a project member feels it useful. @Chicdat: Narky Blert had already answered your question. -- Tavix (talk) 21:55, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The related Wikipedia:Ⅸ was deleted at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 10#Wikipedia:Ⅸ as not a plausible shortcut as "Ⅸ"/"IX" refers to Christianity in general not India specifically. That redirect used a single unicode character Ⅸ, this one uses the two ascii capital letters IX but is otherwise the same. It's worth noting though that this redirect was created by a different editor and has been around since 2008. Thryduulf (talk) 13:25, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Perhaps it would be worth asking if WikiProject Christianity wants it? They already have WP:X pointing at them and if this is a common way to refer to Christianity it seems like a sensible target. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:35, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • I've left a note on the project talk page linking to this discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 15:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep because of the substantial number of incoming links. Otherwise delete. I oppose the suggested retarget to WikiProject Christianity. They already have WP:X so introducing a new, longer redirect is not helpful. --Un assiolo (talk) 17:10, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Copying my argument in the earlier discussion - "IX" is a Greek-letter Christogram (Iesos Christos; I = iota, X = chi), not exclusive to any specific Christian tradition. Narky Blert (talk) 18:00, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete WP:X is also unnecessary. What do they even stand for? 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:22, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Arco-flagellation[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target article or anywhere else on wikipedia. Unused, only 11 page views in the last year. There was an article here but following a 2007 AfD it was merged to another article. In the subsequent 13 years through a series of mergers and edits all content from the article has been removed, leaving this redirect without a target 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tijolinho[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget one, delete other.. signed, Rosguill talk 19:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessarily redirected from a stub to a page without mention instead of being CSDed, but mentioned at Patife Band (EP). Not sure about the "(character)" one though. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 10:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget Tijolinho to Patife Band (EP) as the name of a song on the record, Delete Tijolinho (character) as a non notable character without mention in the encyclopedia. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Prince Kravik[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Following Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 2#Charly Putoznwschvtzky, here are some more pages redirected from CSD-able stubs by Lord Opeth instead of being speedily deleted. They are neither mentioned at the target nor anywhere else on Wikipedia. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 10:51, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Prince Kravik appears to be a DC comics character, and is mentioned at Nightwing#Story arcs but not by name. Maybe retarget there?
Delete The other 3 as they appear to be non-notable characters without mention in the encyclopedia, and the current target is completely unhelpful. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:22, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all. Anyone searching for a specific character name is not going to expect to go to a general article like this that does mention the character. --RL0919 (talk) 17:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per RL0919. --Un assiolo (talk) 17:17, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Compqa[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Almost no pageviews. AKK700 08:44, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep. The Q and A keys are next to each other on a QWERTY keyboard, and someone might mix them up, although I'm not sure if this is very common. Regards, SONIC678 16:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No more or less likely than any other transposition of letters and the page views (13 last year) and google results don't indicate this is a particularly notable or especially common mistake (search results are almost identical for this and "Copmaq" for example, excluding a non-notable quality assurance company CompQA.) Thryduulf (talk) 16:43, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Thryduulf. --Un assiolo (talk) 17:15, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Latin alphabet. (non-admin closure) 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Implausible redirect. Most people are going to type "English Alphabet" like normal people. Aasim (talk) 02:05, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Julia (actress)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

The base "Julia (actress)" redirect in the TRAINWRECKED discussion a few days ago. It can refer to legions of actresses named Julia (like Roberts and the other 21 listed on Julia), notable and non-notable. Although I'm leaning towards deleting it, if kept, it should be retargeted to Julia. Regards, SONIC678 02:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2021_February_12&oldid=1138583061"