Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 14

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 14[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 14, 2021.

Frederic Rene Coudert, Jr,[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:27, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bot-created WP:UNNATURAL errors. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:37, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all, per nom, who would search with a comma at the end of a term, that isn't stylization? Regards, SONIC678, 03:12, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all, noting that versions without misplaced commas exist. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:37, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Shhhnotsoloud I noticed that the bot was creating these as ASCII-only variants of existing redirects using special characters. If you look at the edit summaries of the page creations, you will find the original redirects, of which two still exist. They resulted from page moves though, so should be discussed separately (feel free to nominate them if you wish). 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:52, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per nom. Implausible search terms with commas. Less Unless (talk) 13:49, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dragonfly,[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 22#Dragonfly,

Kpg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 00:49, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. Might refer to Kapingamarangi language, possibly more. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:22, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hanna-Barbera Island[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 22#Hanna-Barbera Island

Spongebob Squarepants: Diner Dash[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of SpongeBob SquarePants video games#Releases. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 00:52, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not mentioned in target article. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:21, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

School Milk Act 1946[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 21#School Milk Act 1946

Account creators[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedily deleted by Liz. (non-admin closure) — J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 04:43, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

seems fairly pointless, i'm not aware of our use of mainspace to project space redirects TAXIDICAE💰 16:55, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per WP:XNR. Cross-namespace redirects are okay sometimes, but a quick search shows that "account creators" is used in far wider contexts that WP, so this isn't a useful XNR. Hog Farm Talk 17:03, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Wikipedia:Cross-namespace redirects - unneeded, and could refer to other topics --DannyS712 (talk) 17:06, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete shouldn't be needed as a XNR for any reason. — xaosflux Talk 18:23, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedily delete as G5 and R2. --Paul_012 (talk) 04:32, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Because it's been tagged twice, I'm just going to point out that R2 is not applicable. But G5 definitely is. Speedy delete. — J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 05:14, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this unnecessary cross-namespace redirect. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:15, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Origin of amphibians[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Amphibian#Evolutionary history. signed, Rosguill talk 19:05, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While the target section does discuss that there is a general consensus that amphibians are from the target varmints, wouldn't Amphibian#Evolutionary history be a more comprehensive target? Suggest retargeting there. Hog Farm Talk 16:35, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Burmese–Siamese War (1824–1826)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:05, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The corresponding entry in the target page notes that these dates are actually those of the First Anglo-Burmese War, and there was no direct Burmese–Siamese conflict. I don't see the benefit of redirecting this term either to the current target or to Anglo-Burmese War article, so suggest deleting. Paul_012 (talk) 14:57, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Hong Kong Penitentiary System[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:05, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This seem to be machine translation of ru:Пенитенциарная система Гонконга [1]. The word "The" need not exist in the title. Also, the capitalization is incorrect. Implausible search with "The". Sun8908 Talk 13:23, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Burmese–Siamese War (1700–01)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:04, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These redirects were red-linked entries in previous versions of the Burmese–Siamese wars article, which were created as one-line substubs by a sockpuppeter who has since been blocked. Other editors then redirected the stubs back to the main list article, but later work on the article has removed mentions of wars corresponding to these dates, which are presumably inaccurate. Suggest deleting these redirects. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:13, 14 April 2021 (UTC), updated 15:03, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. If we can't provide the readers any information regarding these search terms, we probably shouldn't have the redirects. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:55, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Obi-Wan Kenobi (film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:04, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's gonna be series, not a film, so this redir is wrong and unnecessary and actually the section "Upcoming series" does not exist in Obi-Wan Kenobi AramilFeraxa (talk) 12:15, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:CR[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 21#Wikipedia:CR

Islamia college chiniot,[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:03, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Improbable capitalisation and punctuation (trailing comma in the name). – Fayenatic London 11:36, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

AcademicElitism[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 21#AcademicElitism

Ukraˈjina[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:03, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I only nominated one yesterday, but there are more redirects that should be deleted per 1, 2. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 06:49, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all as implausible search terms. I doubt someone would actually use transcription. Less Unless (talk) 13:54, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fuel industry[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Energy industry. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 07:38, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These redirects do not seem synonymous with their target in my opinion, fuel industry is a generic term that doesn't exclusivley refer to coal. I'm not sure where best to target these though, hence listing them here. Energy industry is the best target I could find, but I could also see an argument for turning them into a DAB or set index for all the various fuel / fuel industry articles (Coal industry, Petroleum industry etc). 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:04, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to Energy industry, these are synonymous in practice. The proposed target also prominently lists the main fuel industries in the lede, which accomplishes what an index would provide and more. -- Tavix (talk) 02:07, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dab or retarget. Coal is definitely not correct. While energy industry is an improvement, it is quite a bit broader, and electricity may dominate fuels as energy provider with the energy transition. Dab is better. FemkeMilene (talk) 19:58, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 06:36, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

寶馬汽車[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to BMW Brilliance. signed, Rosguill talk 19:02, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RLOTE. No specific connection between BMW and the Chinese language 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:08, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Ritch parents buying their kids BMW's isn't something that's uniquely Chinese, that happens basically everywhere. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 00:20, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 06:35, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Halo pc[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 21#Halo pc

Cominterm[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 19:01, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unlikely misspelling. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 01:55, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment the M key is next to the N key on an English-language QWERTY keyboard, so how is this not likely? The target is known as Comintern with an N -- 67.70.27.246 (talk) 04:14, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as misspelling of "Comintern". Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:38, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Seems like a plausible enough typo/misspelling. Pageviews indicate about 2 hits/day, which supports this. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:38, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as a plausible typo. Less Unless (talk) 13:55, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep 700 page views a year is enough to demonstrate that this is a plausible typo. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 22:54, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

RMS titanic[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 02:47, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization error. RMS Titanic is an already existing redirect. This one is unnecessary. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:43, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep this thing, I can see people forgetting to capitalize the first T, and this isn't ambiguous as to what it's meant to refer to. It also seems there's been a huge uptick in pageviews since August 14 last year. Regards, SONIC678 04:17, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, it's a perfectly standard {{R from miscapitalisation}}, and pageview chart shows that external links are likely. — J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 04:29, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. There's loads of redirects like this, so no valid reason for deletion. Dominicmgm (talk) 06:05, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Bog standard {{R from miscapitalisation}}, and at 500 - 700 page views a month this appears to be a miscapitalisation used by a lot of readers or that has some external links. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:58, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above --Lenticel (talk) 00:20, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

General Luna Avenue[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Restore annd proceed to AfD. signed, Rosguill talk 18:57, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect, General Luna Avenue, with a complicated history, should be deleted. The article doesn't have a paragraph that's specific to the avenue itself. Originally it was a standalone article that was slapped with notability tag from 2009, then PROD-ed by Doghouse09 on August 25, 2020 (date in accordance with Philippine time zone), then de-PROD-ed by Djsasso on August 28, 2020 claiming it is a national road. However, it is not listed at the Philippine highway network (perhaps a national tertiary road, but even listed there it will still fail notability guidelines). It was finally redirected to San Mateo, Rizal on March 31, 2021 by Mccapra, citing notability issue. However, as I said earlier the target seems inappropriate, and it is better to have this deleted as there is no such article as "List of roads in Rizal", "List of roads in CALABARZON" or any similar list articles to retain it (unlike those that redirect today at List of roads in Metro Manila). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:52, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this discussion also involves two other redirects that formerly redirected here (pinged the redirect creators per their edit histories, to add notice of RFD on those redirects shortly afterward): (@HueMan1:) (@Bluemask:) _ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:57, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

!vote: A version of the article of on the band General Luna (band) was created under the title Gen. Luna Avenue. I haven't read that the band ever referred with that "Avenue" name. --Bluemask (talk) 02:53, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. There's no policy reason to delete. "Gen. Luna Avenue" has x4 mentions in the article and the nom hasn't suggested it's ambiguous. The circuar wikilinks in the article do need to be removed though. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:04, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hog Farm Talk 01:09, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Restore article and discuss at AfD. Given the contested claims regarding notability, this needs proper discussion, for which RfD is not the proper venue. --Paul_012 (talk) 05:35, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree to Paul 012's suggestion. I originally intended to restore the article and have it submitted to AfD, though for some reason I thought it would be better to request deletion of the redirect directly here. Anyway, I will agree to use the AfD method, so I withdraw this RfD request. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:57, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Medieval(álbum)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:55, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The accent above the A may or may not be plausible since the band is Spanish (and this is pretty much the only album with that title we have on Wikipedia, on top of that there's Medieval (album)), but the lack of a space definitely makes this dubiously so. Delete unless someone can provide a justification. Regards, SONIC678 01:00, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete(per WP:UNNATURAL). 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:54, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2021_April_14&oldid=1019282640"