Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 25[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 25, 2020.

Wikipedia:BACAVIA & Wikipedia:PPCC[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 5#Wikipedia:BACAVIA & Wikipedia:PPCC

XFX play hard ATI Radeon HD 4550[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:25, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural nomination: a PROD was placed by BradleyReece with the justification Page redirected, but does it have any reason to exist? One discrete GPU SKU (whose chipset is covered in detail in the redirect) hardly seems significant.. I can't find any evidence that the Radeon HD 4550 was ever referred to this way, so I would second the call for deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 19:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Per prodder and nom. - 2pou (talk) 05:10, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. "Play hard" is a tagline for the graphics card brand XFX, but highly unlikely anyone would search for a single graphics card SKU. feminist (talk) 04:03, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

English newspapers[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:56, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this cross-namespace redirect as ambiguous. If it refers to English-language newspapers then the current target is an incomplete list. If it means newspapers in England then that is part of List of newspapers in the United Kingdom to which List of newspapers in England redirects. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:50, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 18:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, and I'd be open to the subsequent discussion Champion suggests. I don't like the status quo without a hatnote, and how would you even hatnote this? English-language newspapers can be found all over the world, and Lists of newspapers is far too broad. --BDD (talk) 20:25, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Quandt family[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 10#Quandt family

Ruth bader ginsburg death[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 04:02, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:RFD#Delete criterion 8. It is very doubtful that this poorly written redirect will be used by anyone looking to know about the death of Ginsburg. Lettlerhello • contribs 17:45, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Redirects are cheap, moreso than these types of discussions. So it's missing an 's, and the search engine doesn't case about case here.—Bagumba (talk) 09:59, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:CHEAP anyone who does use this will be taken to the article they are looking for and it will also help the search engine (and external search engines) point people who use similar search terms to what they want to read. Thryduulf (talk) 13:48, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I would be willing to bet that most people search the internet like this (including in lowercase). Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 04:38, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above. In addition, the nominator mentions D8, but that is outweighed by K4 and RHARMFUL. — J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 04:44, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:DFD[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 5#Wikipedia:DFD

Manor of Tottenham, Wiltshire[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 5#Manor of Tottenham, Wiltshire

One Loudoun[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Ashburn, Virginia. signed, Rosguill talk 17:32, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect from a housing subdivision to a stadium that never materialized in that subdivision; confusing that the redirect points this direction. First one has correct spelling, second one incorrect spelling. Vahurzpu (talk) 16:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(added after nomination) To be clear: I would support deletion or retargeting to Ashburn, Virginia as Shhhnotsoloud proposed. Vahurzpu (talk) 17:16, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a proposal to solve this confusion? -- Pemilligan (talk) 17:40, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Eu nacional[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 17:32, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Eu nacional" (in Portuguese) means, in word-by-word translation "I national", the sense is probably "National self". The few hit I got in searches are used in a generic sense: the conctruction of a national self in an article about Brazil history, or as "national self" as opposed to "foreign other" in an article about Austro-Hungary. The current target, Sebastianism, is considered by manyref needed :-)to be part of the Portuguese national identity.

So "Eu nacional" is a generic (and rarely used) Portuguese expression, it is not a national idiomatic expression, and even if it were (as in Portuguese national "identity") "Sebastanism" is not its meaning. Nabla (talk) 16:01, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Trump campaign controversies[edit]

 Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 2#Trump campaign controversies

Eejit[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. signed, Rosguill talk 17:30, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 09:27, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is a British slang term for idiot, which is presumably why it was originally created. However, it is doubtful many people would actually search using this term - QuiteUnusual (talk) 10:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to wiktionary.org/wiki/eejit. If someone is typing in "Eejit" I doubt they are actually looking for Idiot, but are looking for what it means (Scottish pronunciation of idiot), which Wiktionary provides. SilkTork (talk) 16:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
+1 support for Thryduulf's DAB. SilkTork (talk) 11:00, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambig. I've drafted a dab page beneath the redirect. If others don't like that though then soft redirect to Wiktionary is my second preference. Thryduulf (talk) 23:20, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate/stub per Thryduulf Would be a funny acronym for a technical school though. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:37, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thry's draft Dab looks good to go. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 01:03, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Six standard deviations[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Six Sigma -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:23, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The disambiguation page Sigma 6 does not disambiguate the term "Six standard deviations". Better target might be 68–95–99.7 rule (or Six Sigma). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Title[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. That being said, it may be worthwhile to bypass the transclusions. -- Tavix (talk) 01:44, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Too generic. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:31, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as it's likely to cause confusion. — Wug·a·po·des​ 18:54, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment this template redirect appears to be transcluded by 38 pages. signed, Rosguill talk 21:27, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 06:11, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep unless and until all transclusions are bypassed and evidence the redirect is causing/has caused actual (rather than simply theoretical) problems. A quick look shows no evidence of anyone being confused by it. Thryduulf (talk) 15:04, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Thryduulf. What are the other uses? There's a lot more leeway for ambiguity outside of mainspace. --BDD (talk) 20:19, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Replace all uses. Vague template redirects should be discouraged because they obfuscate the code; there aren't even any gains in brevity from the shortcut, as it's used only once per article and typically on a line of its own. Maybe keep an eye for further uses in the future, and boldly disambiguate if any competing ones show up. – Uanfala (talk) 23:14, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Unanimity criterion[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 12#Unanimity criterion

Settlement of Australia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 17:28, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously, Europeans weren't the only settlers. The only question is whether this should be retargeted to the article about the original settlement, or accommodate both uses and instead point to History of Australia? – Uanfala (talk) 22:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment there is already a hatnote "For the initial settlement of Australia by the First Peoples of Australia, see History of Indigenous Australians.". Thryduulf (talk) 00:13, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - even looking at the History of Indigenous Australians article it's clear that this is a term mostly associated with colonial settlement of Australia (the word settlement isn't used at all in reference to non-Europeans in that article). For those who were looking for Aboriginal or Torres Straight Islander migration/arrival/"settlement", the hatnote is there for them. A7V2 (talk) 01:35, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 05:13, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

iPhone (9th generation)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 2#iPhone (9th generation)

Siemens process[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 2#Siemens process

iPhone (Xth generation)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 2#iPhone (Xth generation)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_September_25&oldid=983113256"