Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 17

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 17[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 17, 2020.

Continuous differentiability[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Differentiable function#Differentiability classes. (non-admin closure) Asmodea Oaktree (talk) 21:30, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These should point at the same target. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:21, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

South Side Amusements Company[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn, now mentioned. Thanks! (non-admin closure) 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:39, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:19, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

FourBoys Entertainment[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn, now mentioned. Thanks! (non-admin closure) 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:40, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:18, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Shoelace Productions[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn, now mentioned. Thanks! (non-admin closure) 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 16:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:13, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Arena Productions[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn, now mentioned. Thanks! (non-admin closure) 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:10, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:12, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Next Entertainment (production company)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn, now mentioned. Thanks! (non-admin closure) 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:10, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Failed[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 23:38, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Although an {{R from move}}, it can be an alias for {{Failure}}. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 17:52, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Upon reflection, I think I was sidetracked by the fact that the redirect itself is prefaced with "Template:" but is not actually a template. So to me that seemed like a redirect from article space to template space. But apparently that is allowed per Wikipedia:Redirection#Template redirects. So nevermind. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 18:43, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambig Seems like a reasonable shortcut for either, so after a bot updates the links, it should probably be a disambiguation. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 18:38, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep this has nearly 150 transclusions. Of the ones I spot checked, not a single one is incorrect - which is unsurprising given that this title has been either the template for a failed proposal or a redirect to that template for an uninterrupted 15 years. While theoretically ambiguous this is not a big problem for internal templates like this one. Retargetting will be significantly disruptive and will not bring any significant benefits. Thryduulf (talk) 01:45, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Thryduulf --DannyS712 (talk) 04:32, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Wacky Wars[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 24#Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Wacky Wars

Piglin[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Thryduulf (talk) 16:08, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 16:30, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Falls under WP:GAMECRUFT, too, I think. SWinxy (talk) 16:36, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. We don't need an article for every Mincraft entity. That's what the official minecraft wiki is for. --Guy Macon (talk) 01:02, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I swear we need an entry for WP:MINECRUFT... SWinxy (talk) 01:23, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kashir[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy withdrawn. Thank you for showing the justification of the redirect. (non-admin closure) Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 09:19, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible misspelling. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 08:30, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Academic School[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 24#Academic School

John Derek (disambiguation)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 24#John Derek (disambiguation)

Jay Prince[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 24#Jay Prince

Corn off the cob[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 24#Corn off the cob

Royal Truck & Trailer 200[edit]

 Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 24#Royal Truck & Trailer 200

Private shows[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 23:37, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Musicians sometimes have private shows. Magicians sometimes have private shows. Lots of different professions have private shows. Just redirecting this to the sex trade seems like an overly narrow target. Hog Farm Bacon 01:55, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Nominator speaks the truth, but the remainder of the definitions of this term do not seem sufficiently notable for articles, so we can't build a disambiguation page here instead. Nonetheless we cannot convey a false impression of the actual definition of this term by having it redirect to just one of the things it could imply. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 03:51, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or retarget to Private Show. While that page mentions "sex shows" in the first line, the point still stands: we are not Urban Dictionary. Also, the latter article doesn't mention "private" in the article, so I don't see that as a suitable target either. Regards, SONIC678 04:46, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per nom. Same logic also applies to the first line of Private Show. --John B123 (talk) 07:44, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 18:58, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as overly vague. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:49, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Less Unless (talk) 09:08, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_October_17&oldid=985548090"