Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 4

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 4[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 4, 2020.

QLOC[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 11#QLOC

Hurricane season redirects[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget. (non-admin closure) Asmodea Oaktree (talk) 19:26, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Those redirects could also mean a hurricane season in the northeastern Pacific Ocean, so they are ambiguous. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 16:47, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Xiao Ding Dang[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of non-Japanese Doraemon versions. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) | Americans, unite 06:30, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target. Onel5969 TT me 21:26, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 05:48, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per the IP. Thryduulf (talk) 21:42, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per anon. --Lenticel (talk) 01:17, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per IP but just to let you know the user who created the page was blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of another user. ~Cupper (talk) 16:57, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:RDIS[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) | Americans, unite 06:30, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect is nearly never used; it's linked on around 6 pages and has 2 views in the last 30 days as of writing. Ghinga7 (talk) 03:39, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - A reasonable shortcut. Unless it could be pointed somewhere better, there is no reason to take action upon this. In existence since 2005; it may be linked externally etc. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 04:40, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @User:Godsy I found this by randomly typing different letters after "WP:." This could just as easily go here or even here. I still prefer deleting it, however, as it seems useless. Then again, the creator of the redirect was blocked years ago for making useless edits like the creation of this page. Ghinga7 (talk) 17:51, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Most projectspace shortcuts are ambiguous. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 18:16, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep – It means Resolution of DISpute when you expand the acronym. However, "dispute resolution" is still more common. --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 09:46, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Ambiguity is not an issue for project space redirects, especially when they are related to their target (as this is). Unless there is some better target for this (I'm not aware of any) then there is no benefit to anything other than keeping. Thryduulf (talk) 21:44, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nick Jr. (disambiguation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Revert to 7. November 2020 version.. (non-admin closure) Asmodea Oaktree (talk) 14:09, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Categories are not disambiguation pages, so either dabify or delete per WP:G14. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 01:00, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Revert to version of 7 November 2017 (link), which was a DAB page (though it could do with a light cleanup for WP:DABMENTION and WP:DBC). Narky Blert (talk) 08:32, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Revert to disambiguation page. Bringing it here was unnecessary. - Eureka Lott 16:00, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The list of international channels should be (and to a degree, is) at Nick Jr.#International. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:04, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Revert per above. If you think the disambiguation page should be deleted then by all means nominate it at AfD. Thryduulf (talk) 21:46, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Howard C. Cross[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 15:41, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 00:34, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete it seems that he's a scientist that works in said institution but his claim to fame is more about his alleged research on Roswell UFO's memory metal. Anyways, I think we don't have a good target for the redirect at the moment, even at Roswell UFO incident.--Lenticel (talk) 08:46, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_November_4&oldid=988221443"