Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 6

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< May 5
May 7 >

May 6[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 6, 2020.

Jennifer Jean[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 00:51, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

not mentioned in target article CrazyBoy826 (talk) 23:10, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep that and the one below, her credits on IMDb and filmography page reveal several credits under those names. But they're only mentioned in the "External Links" section, and "Jennifer Jean" could also refer to Jennifer Jean Hart among other people. Regards, SONIC678 02:00, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - mentioned in infobox, external links and the main article for her filmography - Kari Wahlgren filmography Isaidnoway (talk) 08:25, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep this is an early alias used by Wahlgren in her voice acting. She posted her roles in her resume and they were cross referenced to shows where she is credited as Jensen. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:41, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kay Jensen[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 00:51, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target CrazyBoy826 (talk) 23:09, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - mentioned in infobox, external links and the main article for her filmography - Kari Wahlgren filmography Isaidnoway (talk) 08:26, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep this is an early alias used by Wahlgren in her voice acting. She posted her roles in her resume and they were cross referenced to shows where she is credited as Jensen. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:41, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Jennifer Sekiguchi[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 00:51, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article and very unlikely connection. CrazyBoy826 (talk) 23:05, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. A search on IMDb reveals about 76 credits as Jennifer Sekiguchi, thirteen of which are in the target article, showing she sometimes goes by that name (the article also says she made her voice acting debut under that name). Regards, SONIC678 01:42, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep this is a well-known alias for Stephanie Sheh. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:35, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Uber-Local Food[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Uber-local food. signed, Rosguill talk 00:51, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No mention in article Tsla1337 (talk) 11:22, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Any delivery service can supply people with locally made food. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 11:51, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - neologism with no apparent coverage. Implausible search term.Dialectric (talk) 17:16, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This redirect may cause confusion (delivery service or very local food?). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:01, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • "very local" is what it means[1] A external link was then added to "UbrLocal" by another user and then it was mistakenly thought to be an article about that company (despite the different spelling) and was redirected as not notable. It could probably be merged as the content prior to that wasn't about a specific company, but the redirect should be moved to Uber-local food. Peter James (talk) 14:11, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 20:23, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting again in light of a new article created at Uber-local food
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 22:42, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Shaving (sexology)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Pubic hair. signed, Rosguill talk 00:50, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The connection between the redirect and the target is unclear. Steel1943 (talk) 17:11, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 22:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per AngusWOOF. Maybe even include the #Grooming section link (or add a <span id="Removal"></span> tag to the target section header to fix the WP:Broken section anchor for Pubic hair removal as well). That renamed section is where Pubic hair removal was supposed to go before this edit renamed the section. This target seems to be about as close to the original intent before it was "merged" as seen here, plus this is quite an old redirect. -2pou (talk) 05:45, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Category:Media in Novgorod[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 13#Category:Media in Novgorod

Gay Pneumonia[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 15#Gay Pneumonia

Gettin busy[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 00:49, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Potentially ambiguous, this phrase has other meanings. Hog Farm (talk) 19:59, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Strike virus[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 21:01, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous search term, which even in the current moment isn't clearly referring to strikes during the current pandemic and is likely to get even more confusing with time. I would suggest deletion unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 18:33, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Åby[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 13#Åby

Www2006[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 13#Www2006

NordicFest[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Nordic Fest. signed, Rosguill talk 18:26, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target; especially likely to cause confusion as Nordic Fest, a non-racist event, also exists. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 16:06, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • DELETE I created this on 4 July 2010‎ with the edit summary "Because I found a lot news results for it. It could probably be an article on its own". Since it doesn't get many views these days, and there might be some confusion, go ahead and delete it. Dream Focus 16:55, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak retarget to Nordic Fest, since this kinda looks like a CamelCase title. Regards, SONIC678 18:54, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Nordic Fest as {{R from mispelling}}. Narky Blert (talk) 12:02, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Net culture[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Internet culture. This probably could have been handled with a bold edit instead of bringing it to RfD. signed, Rosguill talk 18:25, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose retarget to Internet culture, as a more logical target. TheAwesomeHwyh 15:21, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support - sounds fine to me. Deb (talk) 15:22, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per nom, more focused target. Hog Farm (talk) 16:06, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Makes sense to me since the Internet culture page is more specific and aligned with the redirect name. - Dyork (talk) 21:48, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per nom. — J947 [cont] 22:06, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per nom. Seems to be the more accurate target. --Lenticel (talk) 00:44, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget, good call. Narky Blert (talk) 10:28, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Www g[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:24, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bizarre. I'm not sure if this is an acronym for something; it doesn't seem to be used online. TheAwesomeHwyh 15:14, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - I'm finding nothing using this as an acronym, either. Not sure what this is suppose to mean. Hog Farm (talk) 16:07, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Agree that this makes no sense and is an unnecessary redirect. - Dyork (talk) 21:50, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete as a misspelling at best of www --Lenticel (talk) 00:43, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Boondocks (2005TV series)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:24, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible search term that – due to the history merge – I don't believe is eligible for WP:CSD R3 Sceptre (talk) 12:17, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Later Mughal-Maratha Wars (1728-1763)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:24, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- This redirect is titled "Later Mughal-Maratha Wars (1728-1763)" but the target article is about the Mughal-Maratha War of 27 years which began in 1680 and ended in 1707. Actually, there was no such Mughal-Maratha War which began on 1728 and lasted till 1763. Its a redirection named after a hoax event. Dympies (talk) 09:35, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

A Famiy Man[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:23, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These redirects got only about 8 and 14 pageviews in 2019, possibly because of this questionably plausible misspelling...not sure what to do with them now. Regards, SONIC678 07:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Eastern War[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:23, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can refer to too many different things: not just the Crimean war but also the Eastern Front of either of the two world wars, the War in Donbass [2], various wars in the Middle East and Asia, or even a term for how war is perceived by "eastern" powers [3]. I believe this term is too vague for a disambiguation page to be helpful. buidhe 03:35, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I have no slightest recollection why I created this redirect. If someone occasionally calls some war "easternn", it is not a reason for redirect or disambig; It should be a reasonably known proper name (mentioned in wp, with refs) - Altenmann >talk 03:52, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. --Wow (talk) 05:25, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. This is a literal translation of the Russian Восточная война; which is a redirect to ru:Крымская война; which is the Crimean War. I've never heard that war called "Eastern War" in English. The English expression strikes me as thoroughly ambiguous. (Before I looked it up, I though that Russians might refer to the 1939 Battles of Khalkhin Gol as an Eastern War.)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wilber (mascot of GIMP)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 18:23, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect seems to be a duplicate of Wilber (mascot). Looking at "Category:Computing mascots", the established convention seems to be a redirect with the clarification "(mascot)", so this one should be deleted. Akakievich (talk) 01:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

keep. We do not delete redirects unless they are misleading. - Altenmann >talk 03:53, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hurricane cristobal[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:31, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrectly capitalized redirect which was left behind as a result of a page move. Correctly spelled counterpart Hurricane Cristobal already exists. CycloneYoris talk! 01:26, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Metamucil[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. I see a clear consensus for maintaining the status quo. signed, Rosguill talk 18:22, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a procedural nomination. I am neutral at this time, but am reserving the right to !vote during the discussion. A Draft:Metamucil has been submitted to Articles for Creation for review. There has previously been an article on Metamucil, and there has been discussion about whether to redirect it to Psyllium. There has been edit-warring in the past over redirection or an article. The article is currently stubbed down to a redirect. Since there is currently a redirect, the way to determine rough consensus of the community is a Redirect Discussion. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:18, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - See discussion at Talk:Metamucil. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:21, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Notifying User:KrzysztofC, User:Spintendo, User:Spencer, User:Klbrain, User:Doc James, User:Tom Reding Robert McClenon (talk) 01:21, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose as we redirect brands to generics for a bunch of reasons per WP:PHARMMOS Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:12, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose (as per my arguments at Metamucil): I'd recommend retaining the redirect, but developing a section for the brand on the Psyllium page, which is small enough to accommodate it, yet large enough that it wouldn't be swamped with tightly-written incoming content. The reason for this is that that product makes a medical claim (laxative) and in general drug brand names have one page under the name of the generic drug. In this case, we have a generic name for a medicine (so apply WP:PHARMMOS). As per WP:PRODUCT, products don't usually have a separate page, although I accept that this is a relatively important and long-lived brand; the alternative target of the article on the company isn't appropriate, as it is too big. Klbrain (talk) 07:27, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The principal difference between a branded and a generic pharmaceutical is the price. The only reasons I can easily think of for having an article about a brand name are if there's been a specific scandal, or if a trademark has become generic, as with e.g. aspirin (still protected in some countries) and heroin. Narky Blert (talk) 15:04, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Refine to top of article as with the Pepto-Bismol and Viagra. The Psyllium article could discuss the most popular brandings in its history or popularity. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:12, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Moomoo redirect protection removal[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was wrong venue. -- Tavix (talk) 12:28, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Moomoo protected redirect should be removed as there is now a trading platform called Moomoo created by Moomoo, Inc. www.moomoo.comRon John (talk) 13:21, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_May_6&oldid=956884151"