Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 26

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 26[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 26, 2020.

Sort key[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Collation#Sort keys. signed, Rosguill talk 05:26, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These should have the same target. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 22:00, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirecting both to Collation#Sort keys would be fine. - Patrick (talk) 10:11, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect both to Collation where there is more info. MB 18:50, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Thhrust air coaster[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 05:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not a common misspelling/typo. Likely created in error. CycloneYoris talk! 20:18, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Butter sock[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 19:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 19:45, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, it is a sock filled with a butter bar that Sam Puckett rarely uses to attack people. I can't find its relevance to the series as a whole. (CC) Tbhotch™ 19:55, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Waterways Series[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 3#Waterways Series

Right and Wrong[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 3#Right and Wrong

Talk:Tajiks (redirects)/Comments[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 05:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Given that Tajiks (redirects) does not exist anymore and the page has no significant history whatsoever, I think this redirect can be deleted as well. Pinging Jenks24, who deleted the main page. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:26, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Edible Communities[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Restore article. signed, Rosguill talk 05:24, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article PamD 15:42, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Revert to article. This is a notable network of magazines. - Eureka Lott 19:32, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Revert without prejudice to AfD per WP:BLAR. Thryduulf (talk) 14:34, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Beijing![edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 05:23, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unnecessary punctuation. Soumya-8974 (he) talk contribs subpages 14:57, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete! per nom. Dominicmgm (talk) 15:07, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete! per nom and Dominic! We don't need this exclamation mark!! Also, are there any similar redirects related to this that could be bundled here?! Regards, SONIC678! 16:08, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete! per nom and Sonic678! Seventyfiveyears (talk) 16:15, 26 December 2020 (UTC)![reply]
  • Delete per nom. I would expect this to be the title of some sort of media, but if it is we don't have any content about it that I can find. Thryduulf (talk) 16:45, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kiwis[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Kiwi. signed, Rosguill talk 05:23, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Given that there are multiple things that can be referred to as "Kiwis", this should probably be retargetted to Kiwi. However, this is somewhat well-linked, so I didn't want to do the change without some consensus. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 11:24, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to DAB page Kiwi and tag as {{R from plural}} and {{R from ambiguous term}}. I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of the inlinks referred to New Zealanders in general, or to Kiwis (rugby league), the national team. Narky Blert (talk) 13:42, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment out of the original 15 incoming links in mainspace, 5 of them intended to link to targets other than the bird (two each for Kiwi (people) & Kiwis (rugby league), and one for kiwifruit). I just fixed those links. 61.239.39.90 (talk) 14:09, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to dab per nom. Thryduulf (talk) 14:25, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget as there is no primary topic for the plural. Shouldn't this have been the automatic result of the recent RM? – Uanfala (talk) 21:16, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • You can't infer that singular and plural automatically have the same (lack of) primary topic. Thryduulf (talk) 23:40, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • True, in principle. But all the significant entries on the dab page could be pluralised, with equal likelihood, and there wasn't anyone in the RM arguing for different treatment of the plural. – Uanfala (talk) 01:15, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        • That's because there was no discussion of the plural at all. Thryduulf (talk) 14:35, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Regarget back to Kiwi per WP:PLURALPT its already been decided that the singular doesn't have a primary topic and all 4 main uses at the top appear to use this term (definitely the fruit) and when I Google kiwis the Kiwi (people) article is the 1st result and many other results are for the fruit or people, Images returns more for the fruit but there is also quite a few for the bird while Books is mixed. This is a case where we should have assumed the lack of primacy since although some of the less common uses (like the band) don't appear to use the plural there is Kiwis (rugby league) which does. This isn't a case like Oranges where the plural usually only has one topic or even like Suits where a plural may be more ambiguous and go to the DAB. This appears to just be an error with the bot fixing a double redirect but the redirect should have been boldly changed back to the base name. Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:29, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

12017[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate as the most well-supported alternative to deletion. There is no consensus to delete, but there is consensus to do something because no one wants it kept as-is. -- Tavix (talk) 22:52, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect is a ZIP code in Austerlitz, New York. However, it's is not mentioned at the target either, so since this title does not begin with "ZIP" or "ZIP code", "12017" is an unlikely search term. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 22:41, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Pichpich (talk) 23:37, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Austerlitz, New York (it's in the infobox) and tag with {{R from ZIP code}}. UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:57, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak disambiguate (drafted) given that there are multiple meanings each mentioned at respective articles, or just delete and show search results given that disambiguation pages for extremely unlikely search terms tend to go unmaintained (because no one ever looks at them), while search results are always up to date with whatever's been added to Wikipedia. In particular, I prefer deletion over retargeting to any one of those potential targets. 61.239.39.90 (talk) 11:03, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate per 61.xxx ; as 61.xxx shows, it is also a ZIP code in France -- 67.70.26.89 (talk) 03:59, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Dehradun Shatabdi Express as it's the only article that mentions the number. CaptainGalaxy 00:54, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • All of the articles mention the number in their respective infoboxes. 61.239.39.90 (talk) 03:41, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:42, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. It's also the postcode for Robilante, Italy (mentioned). Narky Blert (talk) 13:45, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambig it's also a minor planet listed at List of minor planets: 12001–13000. Thryduulf (talk) 14:28, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete are we going to create 90000 articles like this? The initial creation (in 2017, as 12017 was the year on the Holocene calendar) is clearly deletable, and the various zip code / minor planet / train number usages don't justify a DAB page in my opinion. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:48, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • If {{R from ZIP code}} are valid redirects, then it certainly can support a disambiguation page of ZIP codes; As pointed out, it's a ZIP code in the US, France, Italy. -- 67.70.26.89 (talk) 05:17, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • There are about 15 redirects tagged with {{R from ZIP code}}, and at a first glance none of them are necessary. power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:38, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        • Nevertheless, {{R from postal code}} and ZIP represent valid redirects, so it can support a disambiguation page. (3 postal code locations, 1 asteroid; atleast 4 options)-- 67.70.26.89 (talk) 12:26, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the proposed disambiguation solutions seem excessive and unnecessary. signed, Rosguill talk 05:23, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_December_26&oldid=998122492"