Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 18

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 18[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 18, 2020.

12017[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 26#12017

3alikevirus[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:57, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:36, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete not included at the target and seems like an unlikely search term. Jontesta (talk) 17:23, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

TexasBob DallasPants[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:57, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not a real title for the episode, not mentioned as an alt title at the target, only two old and poorly-maintained sites come up from a Google search. The title card, credits, and TV listings all call this episode "Texas", so that's what a reader will search for. Scrooge200 (talk) 19:51, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I don't recall this from the episode in question. Is it a hoax? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:56, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This started off as an unsourced article on a character that briefly appeared in the episode, but it appears that most of the information (including their name) was simply made up by the article creator. I can find no evidence that this was the character's real name and it is not mentioned at the target article. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:06, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wild man-eating clam in the backyard[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:57, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bizarre and overly-specific redirect. No information about this character is given in the summary. I'd say to delete it. Scrooge200 (talk) 19:49, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete The creation edit summary was "I know it's a silly redirect.". Non notable character, not mentioned at target, 0 page views in the last 90 days. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:11, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not a likely search term, and not included at the redirect target. Jontesta (talk) 17:22, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of Poptropica islands[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:16, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not a search term of any importance. The redirect target doesn't hold any content for this redirect. Jontesta (talk) 18:58, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, "islands" are basically the game's levels or worlds, and there are around 50 of them in total. I could see why people would want to know this, but it'd veer into non-notability and maybe original research considering the lack of independent coverage on the game. Scrooge200 (talk) 19:09, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The material on the island was merged into the article per consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Poptropica islands. It was removed without discussion in a single edit. The material has now been restored. If there is an issue with the material it should be discussed, as the prior consensus is that the material should be kept. I have added a tag that the material should be better sourced. SilkTork (talk) 03:57, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • For anyone trying to follow this discussion, the old AFD was closed as redirect in 2011. There wasn't a single merge !vote, let alone a consensus to merge. Lists of levels are not included in Wikipedia, per WP:VGSCOPE and WP:GAMEGUIDE. Jontesta (talk) 17:11, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of mini-games in Grand Theft Auto: Chinatown Wars[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:15, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not a search term of any importance. No content appears at the redirect target. Jontesta (talk) 18:55, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Weapons of Resident Evil 4[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:15, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not a search term of any importance. Lists of weapons aren't appropriate Wikipedia content per WP:GAMEGUIDE and WP:VGSCOPE and thus nothing appropriate to preserve. Jontesta (talk) 18:46, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Not useful to anyone. Popcornfud (talk) 19:36, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. There's a long precedent for this kind of RfD... –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:57, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of units in the Age of Mythology series[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:15, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not a search term of any importance. The list was removed per WP:GAMEGUIDE and no longer exists on Wikipedia. Jontesta (talk) 18:44, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Content is not at target, nowhere else it could sensibly be retargeted to. This was an article in 2009 and some of the content seems to have been merged to the main article following This deletion discussion and the subsequent deletion review, so I think the procedure is that it should be deleted by moving it to a talk page archive so attribution can be maintained? 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:18, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of SD Gundam G-Generation F mobile suits[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:15, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not a search term of any importance. No content appears at the redirect target. Jontesta (talk) 18:41, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Airport Dulles[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Per WP:G7, in the future you can tag pages created by you that have not received significant edits by anyone else with {{db-g7}} signed, Rosguill talk 20:51, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect page was created by me about a year ago as I was trying to move the main article to a new title. It serves very little practical purpose now as it is an unlikely search term. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 18:34, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mlol[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:15, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be a useless redirect, searching it up shows up nothing other than companies. Abbreviations.com has nothing on it other than "Malawi Leaders of Learning" which has no article which means retargeting is also useless. Neverbuffed (talk) 18:19, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete There is an entry in urban dictionary (terrible source, I know), which claims it stands for "Manically laughing out loud". I can find no other references to this acronym and no indication that it has seen any kind of use. This redirect has had 4 views in the last 90 days, so clearly not being used. As there are a number of companies and organisations that use the same initials (as noted above) this is potentially ambiguous. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:26, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:OR[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 25#Template:OR

Pékin[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:15, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Walking Dead Holiday Special[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. A duly sourced mention has been added to the target, withdrawing nomination. signed, Rosguill talk 17:40, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of a holiday special at the target, or anywhere else on Wikipedia. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 17:29, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

LA Knight Riders[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 25#LA Knight Riders

Independent Loughton Residents Association[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn Thryduulf (talk) 22:22, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is one of many residents associations - there is nothing about this particular one at Neighborhood association and it's not clear that it could be redirected anywhere else useful John Womble (talk) 16:01, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn - redirected to Loughton Residents Association instead which is the same organisation. John Womble (talk) 16:13, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Procopius (gens)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:14, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. No evidence for an ancient Roman family/gens of either name. Avilich (talk) 13:27, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all: the original links appeared to be malformed titles for Roman gentes, but when I searched for evidence that these were gentile names, I found no evidence that they were. They're both names occurring in late Roman history (from the fourth century onwards), and no examples found in either history or epigraphy are found with a praenomen immediately preceding either "Procopius" or "Vivianus" (which looks more like a cognomen anyway). It's extremely unlikely that a significant number of readers are searching for articles about gentes that probably didn't exist. P Aculeius (talk) 15:18, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mba at university of delaware[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:14, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Very unlikely search subject, misleading as it pops whenever someone looks for "MBA university" Muhandes (talk) 09:47, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nadao[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Nadao Bangkok. signed, Rosguill talk 19:14, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Judging from Google results, the Thai media company Nadao Bangkok is probably the primary topic for the term. But is a hatnote to Nadao Yoshinaga still warranted? Or should it be a given name page? Or is a redirect helpful at all here? Paul_012 (talk) 10:41, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Nadao Bangkok also has Nadao Music, so that could be primary topic. Another option is to disambiguate so as to let more Nadaos show up and also a see also to Nadal. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:47, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Nadao Bangkok as WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT by usage [1]. Hatnote for Nadao Yoshinaga for now; convert that into a hatnote for Nadao (name) if any more articles get created (as a Japanese name it's not particularly common, but Hirokichi Nadao is clearly notable and should probably get an English Wikipedia article at some point). 61.239.39.90 (talk) 02:40, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:35, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

One Million Dollars[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate -- JHunterJ (talk) 15:43, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion. This is an obscure reference to (arguably) humorous statements by the (fictional) target character. (If this redirect is kept, then perhaps it should be redirected to Hard Time for Princes instead.) PatricKiwi (talk) 07:08, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:33, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Right zero[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Absorbing element. signed, Rosguill talk 19:13, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This should be retargeted to absorbing element, where left zero already points at. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:47, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

I'll Be Your 1-Up Girl[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 25#I'll Be Your 1-Up Girl

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_December_18&oldid=1084348813"