Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 24

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 24[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 24, 2020.

Hig end smartphones[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Besides the misspelling of "High", it's unclear in the target article what is defined as "high end". Steel1943 (talk) 20:44, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Haptic phone[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Haptic technology#Mobile devices. Well, that was quick. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 20:46, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article, leaving the association between the redirect and the target unclear. Steel1943 (talk) 20:42, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

History and features of smartphones[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Though this redirect has a bit of an WP:XY issue with "history" and "features" being mentioned in the redirect, the target does have a "History" section, but defining "features" in the target article is a bit vague since there seems to be no clear place to target any mention of "features". If "history" and "features" were part of two separate redirects, I could see them both being plausible even with the aforementioned issues, but since they are together in one redirect, I don't see it helpful or plausible. Steel1943 (talk) 20:40, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.


I think that the article is missing a reference to the device SAGEM WA3050 which was released in Nov 2000 and was the first device where Windows included a version for mobile. (https://news.microsoft.com/2000/11/09/sagem-and-microsoft-announce-a-breakthrough-wireless-mobile-device/) Samhailuc (talk) 19:21, 2 November 2020 (UTC)Samhailuc[reply]

Q-Smartphone[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article, leaving the connection between the redirect and the target unclear. Steel1943 (talk) 20:36, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Telephone communication[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:11, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unsure if this redirect should remain targeting its current target, be retargeted to Telecommunication, or be deleted. One of these would probably be the most helpful for our readers, but I'm not sure which. Steel1943 (talk) 20:34, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

WikiProject AfroMuzik[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete by Boing! said Zebedee per criterion G6. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 19:04, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect violates criterion 6 of WP:RFD#DELETE. Lettlerhello 19:50, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Does not meet the standard for XNRs. Hog Farm Bacon 02:44, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Into the Abyss (band)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:23, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No article on the band or its members. All redirect to the Into the Abyss disambiguation page. Band has a couple tracks on the record label compilation album Gothic Rock Volume 2: 80's into 90's, but offers no info about the band and no mention of the others. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 18:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all. WP:SELFREDs are a nuisance at the best of times, but as a DABfixer I say that on DAB pages they're a real pest. No-one following any of these links will find any useful info. If the band is notable (though I suspect it isn't), the redirect fools readers into thinking that an article exists when it doesn't. It isn't even as if there's an article to restore and take to WP:AFD. Narky Blert (talk) 05:57, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all as an article for this band doesn't exist. We don't need circular links like these. 174.29.6.34 (talk) 16:27, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all. With the exception of Into the Abyss (band), all of these redirects are {{R avoided double redirect}}s to Into the Abyss (band) ... which is a redirect towards a disambiguation page. None of these redirects are helpful. Steel1943 (talk) 19:06, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

3l337[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 08:09, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't seem to be very logical of a search term. Hog Farm Bacon 18:37, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep or retarget to Elite. 3l337 either means "Eleet" or "Elite". Seventyfiveyears at 18:48, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as synonymous, as illustrated in the photo at the top of the target article. - Eureka Lott 00:18, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

13375934k[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 1#13375934k

13375l*34k[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:35, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not comprehending the meaning of this, delete unless a justification of significant use can be shown. Hog Farm Bacon 18:33, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fagzor[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:34, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not a commonly used term, apparently an abusive derivative of faggot. Hog Farm Bacon 18:31, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

H4xx0r[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:33, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Despite being old (2002), this is rather implausible, which the 6 pageviews this year backs up. Hog Farm Bacon 18:29, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

!337$P34K[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:33, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't seem plausible, especially given the odd capitalizations and that ! doesn't quite equal L Hog Farm Bacon 18:27, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Untied States redirects[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all except Untied States. signed, Rosguill talk 18:05, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These redirects are implausible and misleading. Besides, we don't have the redirects Untied States Supreme Court, Untied States Capitol Building, and other redirects like those. Seventyfiveyears at 18:22, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hackz0rz[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:23, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Random leet-speak, doesn't seem like a plausible search term, as a Google search is mostly bringing up user-generated sources. Hog Farm Bacon 18:19, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cold source[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 16:02, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PLA – redirect term does not appear in given target. Hildeoc (talk) 18:04, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Yeshay[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:20, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect is not mentioned in that article. Seventyfiveyears at 17:51, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Apparently it could either be an alternative spelling of the Bhutanese name Yeshey or the Hebrew name Yishai. (Jesse aka Yishai was the father of the biblical king David, and the base title David got hijacked for a name article at one point, which is probably how this ended up pointing to David (name).) I don't think the Bhutanese and Hebrew names are related, we do not have articles about either name (Jesse (given name) doesn't really cover the name Yishai), and as far as I can see from Google Books Jesse father of David is only very infrequently spelled this way, so I think search results are better than retargeting to Jesse. Alternatively, we could create Yeshey as a WP:APO index given that we actually have lots of articles about people by that spelling, and then disambiguate Yeshay. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 06:33, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment I expanded Yeshe (an article about the Tibetan term) so it now has references for the various alternative spellings of that term, including Yeshay and Yeshey. I now think we should mention Yeshay as an alternative spelling of the Hebrew name at some relevant article, and then disambiguate this for Yeshe and that article, so I struck some portions of my comment above to reflect that. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 03:51, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment 2 I have drafted a disambiguation page under the redirect, and a WP:APO index for the Hebrew name at Draft:Yishai (name), which mentions (with a source) that Yeshay is a variant spelling of that name. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 04:40, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Yellowstone Park Railroad[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:57, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blanked by User:2Q and restored by me, but I'm not seeing the usefulness of this redirect with its current target. This is linked to from List of Idaho railroads and List of Montana railroads, and mentioned on Belfry, Montana and Ashton, Idaho. Appears to be distinct from White Sulphur Springs and Yellowstone Park Railway, as both entries are on the Montana list. Ost (talk) 16:52, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete to encourage article creation. Not mentioned in the current target and no good alternative. It's quite difficult to think of a circumstance in which a documented railroad wouldn't be notable. Narky Blert (talk) 06:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Seems like a classic case of improper redirect creation to avoid a red link. --Paul_012 (talk) 20:31, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Altas[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Thanks to Uanfala and Narky Blert for the legwork. --BDD (talk) 15:59, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Altas" is ambiguous, and the current target has no more claim to the term than any other use. Delete to allow uninhibited Search (and remove the odd hatnote from the current target). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:32, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Convert to a disambiguation page or redirect to somewhere else. First option is my first choice. Howard the Duck (talk) 16:39, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • The only other use I can find is Altaş, Ardahan, others are partial titles and wouldn't be included in a disambiguation page just as High doesn't list place names such as High Wycombe. Peter James (talk) 17:19, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 16:49, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguation is certainly viable: the current target can apparently be referred to as just "Altas", and there's the Turkish village that's spelt the same way barring the diacritic. As already pointed out, the term is found as a component in a number of place names, but they are all partial titles, and can be reached either through the search (if the redirect is deleted) or via an {{in title}} link from the dab page. I've drafted one below the redirect. – Uanfala (talk) 18:25, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate per Uanfala. A good WP:TWODABS page. It should be linked from DAB page Alta; a natural assumption in English is that presence/absence of terminal 's' means plural/singular. Narky Blert (talk) 06:14, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hungarian State[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 31#Hungarian State

Pakistan Zindabad (song)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 16:56, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan Zindabad (song) was a confusing title so I moved it to Pakistan Zindabad (anthem) and it became a redirect. Being so it still creates confusion, so this redirect be deleted. USaamo (t@lk) 14:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as a valid {{R from move}}. The redirect must not be deleted because there are several incoming links. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:01, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Shhhnotsoloud. Narky Blert (talk) 13:18, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Copied from my Talk page: "Hi, I nominated Pakistan Zindabad (song) to be deleted because this redirect is confusing. I moved the anthem page from this title because there are many Pakistan Zindabad songs while this one was an anthem to a former wing of the country. I want you to reconsider your vote of keep since this redirect still is confusing because there are various Pakistan Zindabad songs made in recent years so someone searching for those songs will be redirected to anthem page. USaamo (t@lk) 19:02, 18 August 2020 (UTC)"[reply]
    @Shhhnotsoloud: those were very few main space links, I've corrected them all as per new title. Will you let it delete now? USaamo (t@lk) 19:32, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 16:45, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That's actually a good idea. I agree with this proposal. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by USaamo (talk • contribs) 22:32, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

SucKIT[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:55, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article, appears to be a specific brand of malware. Hog Farm Bacon 14:16, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I got curious since the redirect was made in December 2003 and the rootkit article at the time was barely one. It wasn't until the article expanded around 2005 where you see it referenced - one revision from October 2005. Then, the article got improved and the examples weren't listed unless they were notable. Perhaps there are other possible redirects to list here. – The Grid (talk) 16:01, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This redirect is confusing without a mention in the article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:02, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak retarget to David Wallace (The Office). This minor character has a several-seasons-long plot arc where he is fired from the titular company, creates a device called the "Suck It" (stylized different ways throughout the series), sells it to the U.S. military, and uses the proceeds to purchase the company. If there's nothing else to target to then that's a valid option. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:39, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like there might be another possible target Elvir_Omerbegovic#Suckit. – The Grid (talk) 17:38, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 16:45, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No obvious target. Might be a good candidate for disambiguation, but in the meantime, it should be red. --BDD (talk) 15:50, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Johnson sandwich[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Withdrawn (non-admin closure) Hog Farm Bacon 17:14, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not finding any usage of this term anywhere. Hog Farm Bacon 16:38, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Volkswagen ID[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Volkswagen I.D. series. I'll do the same for Volkswagen I.D. --BDD (talk) 15:47, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Volkswagen plans to use the ID brand on other future electric models not just the ID3 but there is also a ID4 that already has a article 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 20:18, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Convert to set index since there are multiple models using this. UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:18, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
On second thoughts, there probably should be a redirect from Volkswagen I.D. to the section in Volkswagen ID.3 discussing the concept car, which can then be linked to from Volkswagen I.D. series and wherever else (currently liked from the series article under a different name which is a bit confusing). A7V2 (talk) 09:11, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 16:35, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wall candy[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:38, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An internet search for this term did not suggest that it has anything to do with the current target. Delete unless a justification an be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 15:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, it appears to be dark humor slang about children eating lead paint. Not a helpful redirect, since the slang receives basically no usage that I can find. Hog Farm Bacon 16:36, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of bitcoin wallets[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 31#List of bitcoin wallets

Korail Class 21000[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. CSD G7 - author request Mojo Hand (talk) 18:36, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete this page as no Korail Class 21000 rolling stock exists, the rolling stock correct official name is Korail Class 210000 (EMU-150) (this name is inline with the Korean wikipedia in which the article was translated from) and unofficially Korail Class 21. In addition, please avoid redirecting to avoid confusion as there's simply no such rolling stock with that name. Thanks you Paper9oll | Talk:(Paper9oll) 14:35, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Nom is the substantive contributor. Sawol (talk) 11:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

I hate Mondays[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to I Hate Mondays. I'll do the same for the redirect identified by the IP. --BDD (talk) 15:33, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Garfield does say "I hate Mondays", but I do not have proof why this page redirects to that article. Seventyfiveyears at 13:22, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Minion craze of 1983[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:32, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article. Chompy Ace 09:48, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The redirect makes zero senses, in terms of real world and in-universe lore. 1983 has nothing to do with Minions or this film as a whole. This also gets barely any visits. CaptainGalaxy 20:53, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Southeast Asian Minion craze of 1983[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:31, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article. Chompy Ace 09:47, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The redirect makes zero senses, in terms of real world and in-universe lore. 1983 nor Southeast Asia have nothing to do with Minions or this film as a whole. This also gets barely any visits. CaptainGalaxy 20:54, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:VIETCON[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Hog Farm Bacon 14:44, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The target page doesn't have any consensus that it should be a policy and hasn't for 7 years, so I don't see why it should (or needs to) have shortlinks. ItsPugle (please use {{reply|ItsPugle}}) 03:42, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep; there's no reason why these shouldn't be shortcuts – no rule states that essays may not have shortcuts. — J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 05:05, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per J947. Not a policy, but a useful guide for naming conventions related to Vietnam. --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 05:34, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep As per above. Shortcuts are not only for consensus necessarily. --SuperJew (talk) 07:03, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep these redirects are for convenience, and are used in multiple discussions from 10 years ago when diacritics for Vietnamese were (unsuccessfully and disruptively) challenged by Kauffner and other editors. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:38, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Yeshayahu[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 07:09, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The lemma as such only appears once explicitly in a navbox header, in fact. Is there any better way – in terms of WP:PLA – than just redirecting it to the given page, as is? Hildeoc (talk) 02:50, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Draft:Darth Vadar (TV series)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete by Fastily per criterion G7. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 19:22, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weird page history, but apparently created as a XNR from the draft space to the article space. Looks useless. Hog Farm Bacon 02:29, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's no such series in existence or that's been announced; should be deleted. UpdateNerd (talk) 04:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No such series to date, and WP:NOTCRYSTAL. Were it to be kept or retargeted, the character's name is Vader, not Vadar. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 05:44, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No such thing, and the misspelling is annoying as heck. oknazevad (talk) 06:23, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. While yes, this series is rumored to be in the works, we don't know if this is true, and I'm not sure if "Vadar" is a plausible misspelling for "Vader." I'm also adding the related Draft:Untitled Darth Vadar series to the discussion. Working on it...
    Oh, I didn't realize it was also nominated. Regards, SONIC678 15:26, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

La puta madre que te remil parió[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:30, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Another Spanish profanity not mentioned in the target article as an example, except this one apparently means " The fucking mother who gave birth to you". The fucking mother who gave birth to you doesn't exist, and this is about the same thing. Just because something is profane and in Spanish doesn't mean it needs to be redirected to the Spanish profanity page. Hog Farm Bacon 02:25, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Narky Blert (talk) 15:24, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Is just one uncommon and elaborate way to express anger, that includes the profanity puta. Frodar (talk) 16:04, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

La remil concha de tu puta madre[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:30, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article as an example, and it seems like a bit of overkill to have redirects from every conceivable profane phrase. Google translate suggests this means "The prissy shell of your fucking mother" Hog Farm Bacon 02:22, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Narky Blert (talk) 15:25, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Is just one uncommon and elaborate way to express anger, that includes the profanities puta and concha. Frodar (talk) 16:06, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Spirytus rektyfikowany[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No particular connection between rectified spirits and Poland, delete per WP:RFFL. Hog Farm Bacon 02:16, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

TheyFit[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:28, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article, apparently it's a NN product sold in Europe. Hog Farm Bacon 02:12, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Sky[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Sky (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 07:07, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand why this page redirects to that article. Seventyfiveyears at 01:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_August_24&oldid=1056713701"