Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 2, 2019.

Module:Rail[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 11#Module:Rail

Roy Dennefer[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Thryduulf (talk) 18:06, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Target section was previously deleted because the character only appears twice ([1]). Page should be deleted. Namenamenamenamename (talk) 23:46, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. No article mentions this name anymore. Deryck C. 14:21, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Phyliss Dennefer[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Thryduulf (talk) 18:07, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Target section was previously deleted because the character only appears twice ([2]). Page should be deleted. Namenamenamenamename (talk) 23:45, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Daddy Longlegs (comics)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 16#Daddy Longlegs (comics)

Dark Mother[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:59, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Character does not meet WP:GNG. She appears 10 times according to Marvel Wikia. The information about this character on the target page was deleted for this reason ([3]). There are no incoming links to this page in article space. Namenamenamenamename (talk) 23:34, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete seems to be the moniker of several goddesses and similar figures such as Hecate, Kali and Lilith. Not sure who's the best target though. --Lenticel (talk) 00:59, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Centurion (comics)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 16#Centurion (comics)

Chaka (comics)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 16#Chaka (comics)

Claw (Marvel Comics)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 16#Claw (Marvel Comics)

Clear-Cut (comics)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 13#Clear-Cut (comics)

Isolationist (comics)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 13#Isolationist (comics)

Crimson Daffodil[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:20, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects to broken anchor. Only link in article space is from a disambiguation page. Should probably be deleted. Namenamenamenamename (talk) 22:31, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Godfrey Calthrop[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 13#Godfrey Calthrop

Lisa Chang[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:52, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects to broken anchor. Only incoming link in article space is a passing mention which provides enough context. Should be deleted. Namenamenamenamename (talk) 22:15, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Massimo Cesare[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:01, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects to a broken anchor. No links in article space. Should be deleted. Namenamenamenamename (talk) 22:11, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Neil Crawford (Marvel Comics)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:51, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect is to a broken anchor. Only link in article space is from a disambiguation page. Should be deleted. Namenamenamenamename (talk) 22:10, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Phillip Campbell (comics)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:50, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No links in article space. Should be deleted. Namenamenamenamename (talk) 22:08, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Canelo (comics)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:00, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No links to this redirect in article space. Should be deleted. Namenamenamenamename (talk) 22:01, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. "Delete" not because of what the nominator said (because I would say "Keep" for that since incoming links have nothing to do with the usefulness of a redirect), but target because the redirect is not mentioned in the target article. Steel1943 (talk) 13:16, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Amber (comics)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:00, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No links to this page, no notable page history Namenamenamenamename (talk) 21:56, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. "Delete" not because of what the nominator said (because I would say "Keep" for that since incoming links have nothing to do with the usefulness of a redirect), but target because the redirect is not mentioned in the target article or at List of Marvel Comics characters: A. Steel1943 (talk) 13:18, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mister Marvel[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:00, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No information about this character at the target, no links from articles to this page, page has apparently been deleted multiple times previously. Namenamenamenamename (talk) 21:52, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. "Delete" not because of what the nominator said (because I would say "Keep" for that since incoming links have nothing to do with the usefulness of a redirect), but target because the redirect is not mentioned in the target article or at List of Marvel Comics characters: M. Steel1943 (talk) 13:19, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of marvel comics supervillains that are more than one superheroe's enemie[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:59, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a term anyone is likely to search for? It should be deleted. Namenamenamenamename (talk) 21:47, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This name is quite long and really inconsistent as well. Goveganplease (talk) 20:43, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

مكوك الفضاء[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:59, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RFOREIGN. Space Shuttles have no affinity with the Arabic language. -- Tavix (talk) 19:27, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Braces(clothing)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:00, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think the redirect should be deleted. A similar redirect, Braces (clothing) already exists; it is not syntactically correct to omit a space between a word/phrase and a parenthetical; and nothing redirects to this page. --ElKabong888 (talk) 13:10, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dexter's Laboratory (Season 2, Episode 11)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:22, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is formatted very oddly and is not in line with the rest of the redirects for this series. I don't have a proper target for this to point to because most DL episodes contain three segments. Just delete it. Paper Luigi TC 12:39, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Planet[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) B dash (talk) 07:19, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect is unused and should not be supported. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Infoboxes#Consistency between infoboxes requires that the infobox be in the style of Template:Infobox some subject. In addition, this infobox name is very ambiguous and does not seem clear at all that it is used for an infobox. Gonnym (talk) 12:12, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. This has been a blue link since 2004, and it's always served the same purpose: an infobox related to planets. Why break old revisions? And given the ambiguous name, who's going to add {{planet}} anew? Nyttend (talk) 18:35, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I created the redirect when I moved the template to a more standard name way back in 2007. I have no objection to either deleting or keeping it. I don't think it's used. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:30, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Nyttend. There is no benefit that will arise from deletion and breaking the old revisions is at least undesirable. Thryduulf (talk) 13:19, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The concern stated in the nomination is about the name of the page itself, which does not apply to redirects in most cases. This is one of those cases. In addition, since this redirect is in a non-article namespace, the requirements for it to meet naming standards are not as strict. Steel1943 (talk) 17:33, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Big Fat Awesome House Party for fosters home for imaginary friends[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 13#Big Fat Awesome House Party for fosters home for imaginary friends

List of secondary Imaginary Friends at Foster's[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 13#List of secondary Imaginary Friends at Foster's

Cheese (Fictional Character)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Cheese (disambiguation). — JJMC89(T·C) 01:02, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Too vague? Is there another fictional character named Cheese? I think this redirect is pointless. Paper Luigi TC 11:41, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bloo clones[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:21, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? I don't know where this redirect's name comes from, and I was once a big fan of the show. Paper Luigi TC 11:37, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mac (character)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Mac. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:02, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect seems too vague on its own to redirect to FHFIF. Surely there is more than one notable Mac in television/film/literary history. Paper Luigi TC 11:32, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bowling Paul the bowling pin (Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:03, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if this is a real character from the show or not, but the redirect seems costly regardless. Maybe a better redirect could be put it its place? Paper Luigi TC 11:30, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - may or may not be a character in the series, but it is not mentioned in the target.Onel5969 TT me 02:09, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I would expect "Bowling Pin" to be capitalised, since it's seemingly part of the character's name. What are the chances that you'd get everything else correct in this 66-character page title, including all the other capital letters, but mistype these two? Nyttend (talk) 22:19, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I'm not familiar at all with this show but List of Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends characters seems comprehensive and doesn't mention this character. Thryduulf (talk) 13:25, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Alexandria Union[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) B dash (talk) 07:20, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused redirect, not a possible variant name for the club. Ben5218 (talk) 06:22, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • al-ittihad is an Arabic word meaning "union". – Uanfala (talk) 14:30, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • That's correct.. Al Ittihad means United or Union in Arabic, but our case here is a different one; sport clubs' names shouldn't be translated. For example, Eintracht Frankfurt is a German football team, and the word Eintracht in their name would mean United in English. Should we change their name to something like Frankfurt United? Of course no, and the same works with Al Ittihad Alexandria. We shouldn't have something like Alexandria Union or Alexandria United on Wikipedia just because that's the translation for their name. Ben5218 (talk) 16:06, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • Yes, tranlsations such as these aren't suitable for article titles, but they could be plausible search terms, and that's what matters here (along with potential conflicts with other articles: there's one with Alexandria Union Station, which is in a different part of the world). In this case, I don't think the use of "union" is particularly far fetched, especially given that the article lists variants like "Union club" and the like in the discussion of the history of the club. – Uanfala (talk) 19:07, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ben5218, you might also want to add Alexandrian Union to the nomination. – Uanfala (talk) 14:35, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • I'd be glad to see this one go too alongside all other redirects related to Al Ittihad Alexandria Club, but let's wait to see other people's opinions first about the one I nominated before I add the rest. Ben5218 (talk) 16:06, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep'. I can see how this is a feasible search term. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:24, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 13:56, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - possible search term. GiantSnowman 13:58, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per the above and add a hatnote to the station. Thryduulf (talk) 13:26, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Abdallah El Saiïd[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:03, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not a variant name and not used; and so this redirect should be deleted. Ben5218 (talk) 06:17, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as an unlikely search term. @Ben5218: I notice, by the way, that the Arabic in the article indicates his name is Abdallah Mahmoud El Said Mohammed, not Abdallah Mahmoud El Said Bekhit. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:29, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, that's weird. I think Bekhit is the correct one since it's sources unlike the latter one. I'll fix the name on the Arabic article by myself now. Thanks for noticing it. Ben5218 (talk) 12:16, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 13:56, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I can't see this being used. GiantSnowman 13:59, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Byah[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 12#Byah

2015 September 28[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:04, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects from randomly created days are WP:COSTLY B dash (talk) 02:37, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete without precedent. There is nothing particularly special about this day, but redirects from some other days should exist (e.g. 2001-09-11, 2005-07-07) so they all need discussion before any deletion. Thryduulf (talk) 13:33, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.