Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 December 20

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 20[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 20, 2019.

Ploopy[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 20:14, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No reference to this in-series phrase on any related articles. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:48, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete – no mention in article, non-notable topic. If you do a Google search, you'll see it's clearly related to the Diary of a Wimpy Kid series, but it will not be a search term or something that is worthy of mention in the article. – UnnamedUser (talk; contribs) 00:06, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Diary of a Wimpy Kid: The Time Forgotten[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 20:14, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not a book in the series. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:40, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Peridole[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. MBisanz talk 13:10, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peridole could equally be a misspelling of Peridiole (which rightfully redirects to Peridium) or of Peridol (which redirects to Haloperidol). I would suggest deletion per WP:XY. signed, Rosguill talk 23:38, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think all of the examples at WP:XY are of searches where someone has typed two or more searches into the search box at the same time and it is up to them to decide which one to search for, i.e., Law, crime, and punishment, Illness and death etc.
I don't think "peridole" and "peridol" are as easy to confuse as the "e" is more visibly, there or not, and the pronunciation is too different for a native speaker, generally, to make that misspelling on purpose (peridowle and peridoll).
I created the redirect after entering the typo in the search box. It's not a big issue for me individually but, I wonder sometimes if the algorithms used on a misspelled search need some updating, so I'm searching around to see if I can find where that is or was done to find out... if anyone knows anything about that can you send me the right way please? ~ R.T.G 00:12, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 22:08, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. N.b., as the person who wrote XY, while the text focuses specifically on the "X and Y" format redirects, the principle has been applied more broadly to any case where a redirect could equally point to two or more places (and disambiguation isn't appropriate). --BDD (talk) 19:59, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

PENTASA[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. No strong case for either keeping or deleting the redirect. signed, Rosguill talk 20:19, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PENTASA not needed. Pentasa already exists. Whywhenwhohow (talk) 02:22, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, old and harmless. Indeed not necessary for searching. —Kusma (t·c) 17:16, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 21:59, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep; no harm's caused by this and historical. Can't mean anything else as evidenced by a cursory search. Happy Festivities! // J947 (c) 04:59, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. There's no need for an all caps version of this. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:27, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Aik Aur Sitam Hai[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to A-Plus TV. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 03:04, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Same logic as the similar RfD for Apni Apni Love Story, but for a completely different actress and a completely different television project. An article makes much more sense in this location, as a redirect would cause confusion, and doesn't serve a useful purpose. Utopes (talk) 01:54, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: N.b., the other RfD referred to in the nomination was relisted yesterday.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 21:53, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Diary of a wimpy kid:my last year[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 08:15, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No mention in the target; possibly not a book in the series. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:03, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This was the first result I got in a Google search. It appears to be a title in the series. https://www.bookemon.com/book-profile/diary-of-wimpy-kid/91376 --Adam Black GB (talk) 06:36, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, the page linked refers to a poorly designed fan fiction by someone other than the original writers. Clicking "Preview book" shows this. Jalen Folf (talk) 06:47, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Definitely not a part of the actual series. The redirect is also incorrectly capitalized and missing a whitespace, so even if this was a part of the series, it still should be deleted. Not a very active user (talk) 08:33, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Title of a non-notable fanfiction, not mentioned in the article (and definitely shouldn't be), implausible typos. No reason to keep this around. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 16:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete extremely unlikely search term, we cannot have a redirect from every name of a fan fiction to the notable series. – UnnamedUser (talk; contribs) 20:30, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not a part of the series --DannyS712 (talk) 22:54, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 02:09, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. Seco86484 (talk) 18:21, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

"Common star of Bethlehem"[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 08:15, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No point to including quotes. I'm a little confused by the history of this and Common star of Bethlehem, but involving a move to create a redirect is unorthodox. Plantdrew (talk) 03:43, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete The proper redirect Common star of Bethlehem exists; having another one with quotes around the name is completely wrong. Peter coxhead (talk) 11:37, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – in the search bar, it redirects to the proper article even without the quote. If someone is searching for a URL, this is an unlikely search term; we do not have every link for [Cat], "Cat", 'Cat', {Cat} etc. – UnnamedUser (talk; contribs) 20:33, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 02:09, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_December_20&oldid=933359911"