Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 24

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 24[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 24, 2019.

Pietro Stroik[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:19, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear why this redirect exists, Pietro is not mentioned in the target article, and searching online turns up nothing of note. signed, Rosguill talk 22:06, 24 April 2019 (UTC) There were other articles that linked to this page, which links to another page. It seems to be an unnecessary page, random, and seemingly not representative of any known person. See wikipedia:notability.Chasepsyche (talk) 03:33, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lucknow pistol[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 May 2#Lucknow pistol

Korymbos[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 May 2#Korymbos

Mortal Kombat character redirects[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:18, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Various minor fictional characters that are not mentioned at the target or anywhere else. —Xezbeth (talk) 19:48, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom, especially masked guard which seems to also apply to any kind of guard that wears a mask as in Batman video games. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:17, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Apple (Italy)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:18, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These are confusing redirects given that the target does not discuss anything related to Italy. -- Tavix (talk) 19:35, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

JointVenture[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 May 2#JointVenture

Away team (Star Trek term)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 May 2#Away team (Star Trek term)

Buoyant Armigers[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:18, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Another very minor fictional element that isn't mentioned at the target article or anywhere else. Xezbeth (talk) 12:45, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. If the element is notable then it should be mentioned somewhere, even if it is reception. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:30, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gilvas barelow[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:18, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A minor character that isn't mentioned at the target article or anywhere else. —Xezbeth (talk) 12:42, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

N'wah[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:18, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A trivial video game element that is not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. —Xezbeth (talk) 12:35, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as not discussed in either Morrowind or Skyrim. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:32, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Honor 9 Lite[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 May 2#Honor 9 Lite

Kingdom of North Sudan[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 May 2#Kingdom of North Sudan

Anti sexism[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) B dash (talk) 03:03, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To where should these redirects point? The first 2 used to point to Sexism but I retargetted them to the disambiguation page Anti-sex because I considered them to be ambiguous. The 3rd is a new creation. My retargetting was undone by @Flyer22 Reborn:, so bringing here for discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:14, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: You were pointing these pages to the Anti-sex disambiguation page, which currently lists "Anti-sexism, against sexism" because you added it there. So you were taking readers away from the page on Sexism, where it's easy for them to deduce that "anti-sexism" means "against sexism" to a disambiguation page that states "Anti-sexism, against sexism." That is circular and unnecessary. And I see nothing ambiguous about "anti-sexism." I also don't see how anyone can think of "anti-sexism" when thinking of "anti-sex." That listing should be removed from the disambiguation page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 03:00, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Flyer22 Reborn: I considered it to be ambiguous with Pro-feminism: various groups coined and defended other terms like antisexism and pro-feminism. Anti-sex disambiguates anti-sex, antisex and antisexism. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:30, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep pointed to sexism Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:44, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate. In my view, Gender equality would be the most precise target. The Sexism article mainly talks about sex/gender-based prejudice, not opposition to sexism. Not sure if Anti-sex is a good title for the disambiguation page. feminist (talk) 05:22, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
feminist, given what I stated about the circular aspect, and that it's common sense that anti-sexism is opposition to sexism, how does it make sense to disambiguate in this case? Disambiguate, how? The way that Shhhnotsoloud did it? The Sexism article clearly addresses opposition to sexism. The literature on sexism is to not support sexism rather than to support it. If you reply to me on this, I'd rather not be pinged. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 07:39, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 02:23, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and tag {{R from acronym}}. It is difficult to interpret what the reader is looking for. At least this would give the reader plenty of starting topics. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:58, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

300-metre tower[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 May 2#300-metre tower

Template:Cairo[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:12, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to a user template from a title which would conventionally be used for a city navbox. The see-also links What-links-here show usages which expect this title to be a template for use in mainspace. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:21, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per the first sentence of the nomination (I don't understand the second sentence - the template has no "see also"s or similar). This is a redirect from a move, but the target template was at this title for less than 2 hours after creation in 2008, meaning the likelihood of incoming links from outside en.wp is tiny (especially as such links to userbox templates are significantly unlikely generally) and there are unlikely to be many (if any) old revisions broken. Thryduulf (talk) 02:35, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Thryduulf. High potential for accidental use in mainspace. feminist (talk) 11:12, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Related discussion: WP:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Cairo. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:14, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this only serves to confuse. Legacypac (talk) 18:46, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_April_24&oldid=1072177104"