Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 20

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 20[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 20, 2019.

Template:Sovietpd-text[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 18:55, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These were nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 October 18 and closed as retarget, but the retargeting was never carried out, and the target was since TfD'd by Fastily. My original argument, Copyvios are not in the public domain ..., continues to apply. * Pppery * has returned 21:55, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Cmt[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Template:Comment. (non-admin closure) B dash (talk) 02:16, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vague template name, one would not think that the name "cmt" refers to something mountain-related. Suggest retarget to Template:Comment. * Pppery * has returned 21:38, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • @King of Hearts, Hike395, Gonnym, and Peter James:. (Pinging participants in the requested move that led to the template being renamed). * Pppery * has returned 21:41, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Support retarget to Template:Comment, although I'll have to run AWB to fix non-mainspace transclusions. —hike395 (talk) 21:47, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    The non-mainspace transclusions look to me like they were intending to point to Template:Comment. * Pppery * has returned 21:59, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @Pppery: I fixed the ones that were intended to point to {{Mountain table cell}}. The fact that people are already using {{cmt}} as a shortcut to {{comment}} is further evidence that changing target of redirect to {{comment}} is a good idea. —hike395 (talk) 00:49, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Suggested destination is a good one. I also support just completely deleting it as I personally am not in favor of shortcut templates which can lead to needless confusion - like was the case with {{cmt}} leading to a mountain related template. But if this must be kept, {{Comment}} is the obvious option. --Gonnym (talk) 21:49, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per RM. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:16, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This redirect has transclusions. Unless the transclusions are bypassed before this discussion concludes, the redirect should not be retargeted as there is potential that pages will break. Steel1943 (talk) 15:50, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Steel1943: AFAICT, the transclusions that are left are actually errors -- they are using {{cmt}} to mean {{comment}}. Retargeting will make the template match the intent. —hike395 (talk) 11:34, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Steel1943: I missed the remaining ones out on purpose because it was clear that they did not refer to the mountain table cell but to a comment. SITH (talk) 12:27, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support retarget to Template:Comment. As the closer of the requested move discussion, I updated all of the transclusions except those made in error i.e. those which thought "cmt" meant "comment". I use the abbreviation all the time in edit summaries and it's clear people think it redirects to the comment template as opposed to the relatively obscure, now retitled template. SITH (talk) 12:25, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cardinal protopresbyter[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 28#Cardinal protopresbyter

Ataro[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 28#Ataro

Arayan[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Since it's not clear where the best redirect location is, I am not going to recreate it but the redirect may be recreated as a normal editorial decision if desired. As for protection, that may be requested at WP:RFPP. -- Tavix (talk) 19:02, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

History is ripe with copyright violations. Some have been revdelled, but every meaningful revision is a copyvio. I recommend deleting, re-creating as redirect, and protecting. wumbolo ^^^ 08:50, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 01:20, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Not mentioned in target. Isn't this a valid alternative spelling for Aryan, though? I'm pretty sure it stems from the same root. --Paul_012 (talk) 06:33, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and then re-create/salt as redirect to Ethnic groups in Kerala where mentioned in one of the tables. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:11, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It's clear the old content isn't desirable, but the question of where to point this remains.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:39, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Results of the 2020 Rio Carnival[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 28#Results of the 2020 Rio Carnival

Conservation ecology (disambiguation)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 19:04, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I recently redirected Conservation ecology to Conservation biology and added a hatnote there to Conservation Ecology. Per WP:2DABS, disambiguation pages are not necessary when only two pages share the ambiguous title. Cnilep (talk) 05:31, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The target is not a disambiguation page (or similar). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:05, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given the history of the target, I think this is worth getting more input on
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:36, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tropical depression 01w(2012)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was move to Tropical depression 01w (2012) without redirect. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:07, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects are not properly written. Title has no space between name of the storm and the year. Properly titled redirect already exists which is Tropical depression 01w (2012), I see no reason why we should keep this B dash (talk) 01:24, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The [age history suggests there may have been a merge of content, which could cause attributions concerns that should be discussed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:34, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Schoolstrikes4Climate Ireland[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. -- Tavix (talk) 19:06, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The schools strike for climate has occurred in many countries, redirect to those countries who had joined in are WP:COSTLY B dash (talk) 16:19, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Portal:English[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 28#Portal:English

Vegetable soups in Filipino cuisine[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 29#Vegetable soups in Filipino cuisine

More missing brackets[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:39, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Full list (337 total)

Delete all per WP:RDAB and prior concensus. All have missing brackets in the title, no indication that they are in any way useful, no mainspace links and no significant history. PC78 (talk) 11:56, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please nominate all of these (and similar ones beginning with letters D-Z in the future) for CSD G6: Housekeeping to save us a repetitive discussion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 12:49, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • They don't explicity meet any of the WP:G6 criteria, otherwise I would. PC78 (talk) 12:57, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • They are "unambiguously created in error". Thanks. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:28, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
        • I don't think that's necessarily true though, some of these may have been created intentionally, but if this nom is successful I'll give it a go. In the meantime, surely it's not too taxing to say "delete per nom"? PC78 (talk) 18:19, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
          • information Administrator note I would agree that these are not inherently G6-able. Some are clearly created intentionally, and redirects missing a final parenthesis have even recently been kept here at RfD. I'll try and dig up some of the other conversations, but the short answer is some places, most notably reddit, can't handle urls that end in ). ~ Amory (u • t • c) 21:54, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This is a solution in need of a problem. When I miss off the end bracket the page asks me if I meant the correct title, for example the page at Captain Marvel (film asks me if I meant Captain Marvel (film) - is that not enough?--Launchballer 00:12, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – All those malformed titles simply pollute the namespace, and pollution is bad. If Reddit can't handle trailing closed brackets, it's their problem. --Deeday-UK (talk) 10:23, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • In for a penny, in for a pound... I've expanded this nom from 60 redirects to 337 in total, per UnitedStatesian there's little sense in dragging this out over any more discussions than necessary since the arguments will only be the same. I'd be happy to keep any of these if it can be shown that they are genuinely useful, but I do think that needs to be demonstrated on a case-by-case basis rather than just assumed. The vast majority of these have no comment in the opening edit summary so their intended purpose is unclear. Some were no doubt created intentionally (though not necessarily for a valid reason), others are probably mistakes; a few – e.g. HMAS Sydney (FFG 03 – were originally created as vandalism, some – e.g. Sutphin Boulevard-JFK (New York City Subway – were bot created. None of them have been discussed previously at RfD. PC78 (talk) 18:46, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delte all since we need not, and should not, accommodate other websites' every shortcoming. We have enought trouble accommodating those of our own. UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:42, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fuck Apologies.[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep as there is consensus that it is a reasonable search term, due to the single being stylised with a full stop. (non-admin closure) Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 20:25, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A search will find the target before it finds the errant fullstop at the end of the redirect title. Superfluous in all respects. Richhoncho (talk) 11:07, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. It is not "errant" nor "superfluous". The title is "stylized" with a full stop on the cover art and on social media posts and e-commerce listings (iTunes, for example); there are plenty of examples of stylized titles created as redirects like this. Redirects are WP:CHEAP; there is no need to go through and get rid of them all—nor attempt to. Ss112 12:41, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If the fullstop in the artwork was significant it would have been mentioned in the article. As for the necessity of this redirect, the search engine will have found the actual article just before the searcher types the fullstop. So I will repeat my opinion that it is errant and superfluous to requirements. --Richhoncho (talk) 11:27, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And I'll repeat my opinion that it's not. A mention can be added to the article quite easily. Ss112 19:23, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Egggate[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:39, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Useless redirect referring to a hashtag that was made on Twitter about an "egg attack" that occurred during the show's final. Clearly outdated and confusing for most readers. CycloneYoris talk! 09:30, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Advisor (comics)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:40, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This used to be a separate article, until it was merged into List of Marvel Comics characters: A. It has since been removed for being too insignificant of a character. This redirect was then pointed to a completely different character which has a single mention of it. I have no problem with the list being pruned but I do have a problem with this redirect which can only mislead someone looking for information on this character. —Xezbeth (talk) 09:18, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It appears there are a lot of these, see Adria (comics) which has the same problem. If they aren't notable enough for the list then the redirect should not exist; pointing to a different character article that happens to mention them is a bad idea. See Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018_December 1#Shirow Ishihara for a similar redirect that was correctly deleted after it was removed from the relevant list. —Xezbeth (talk) 09:22, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unneeded. Even if someone were to decided to look the character up the brief mention on the War Machine article that he killed an single individual is far to trivial them to find useful.--64.229.166.98 (talk) 13:31, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Portal:Intellectual freedom[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:40, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:SURPRISE; these redirects are not synonymous with their target. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:10, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Self-irony[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 28#Self-irony

Armorial of the United States[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Procedural close, nominated page is no longer a redirect (non-admin closure) UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:09, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have been largely inactive on Wikipedia for the past year or two. I recently discovered that Historical coats of arms of the U.S. states from 1876, a list article that I started, developed, and brought through the FLC process to Featured List, was redirected to Armorial of the United States. The substance of the FL Historical coats of arms of the U.S. states from 1876 was copied and pasted into Armorial, along with the FL tag. Since this merge the content that was Historical coats of arms of the U.S. states from 1876 has been hacked to pieces. I think this was an inappropriate redirect and destruction of a FL that was on a very specific aspect (engraving) of coats of arms based on a 1876 publication by engraver Louis Prang.--Godot13 (talk) 21:39, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 02:53, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 02:10, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

KFMASH[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Feel free to recreate once content has been added to the article. FWIW, I have also removed the empty section heading for now. -- Tavix (talk) 18:46, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Section heading was added Feb 28th, but no content. Unhelpful redirect until there's some content in the article. PamD 16:13, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 02:49, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 02:10, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Georgia State Route 77 Spur (Hartwell)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 28#Georgia State Route 77 Spur (Hartwell)

Portal:Queen[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 28#Portal:Queen

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_April_20&oldid=1072177083"