Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 29

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 29[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 29, 2019.

Vegetable soups in Filipino cuisine[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:32, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Declined db-6 by @Spinningspark: based on the rationale that "Article was here for many years, external links may break and redirects are cheap."

1. The length of time an erroneous article stayed up is irrelevant.
2. External links breaking means they can be found faster so they can be fixed.
3. This title is NOT a valid redirect. The previous contents of the page (which was moved) refers to a single specific dish: sinabawang gulay, which I have fixed. This redirect, in contrast, seems to be referring to vegetable soups in Filipino cuisine in general (i.e. a list article). There are many different kinds of vegetable soups in the Philippines. This is merely one of them. Redirecting this title to one specific dish is incorrect. It would be like redirecting Cities of the United States to New York. OBSIDIAN†SOUL 12:01, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Redirect was not tagged. There is also a variant redirect that I am adding for completeness.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 18:52, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Resident Evil: Outbreak – File ＃2[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 May 6#Resident Evil: Outbreak – File ＃2

Encore from The Dutchess[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 May 6#Encore from The Dutchess

Book (divination with)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 14:52, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Misplaced disambiguator makes this a very unlikely redirect. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:20, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep A quick Google search finds this precise string being used by Oxford's Dictionary of English folklore. This book review picks up on the definition in question, as well. Note that the freely online content doesn't use the term bibliomancy; one might plausibly look for this definition here. One might turn it around, of course, but would it be "divination with a book", "divination with book", "divination with books", or something else? I know if I encountered this phrase in this dictionary and wanted to look it up here, I'd start by using the exact phrase. Nyttend (talk) 03:57, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Nyttend's findings, this is clearly a useful search term. Thryduulf (talk) 11:48, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Choi Ji-su[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. @Ohmyfifthharmony: Please update the article with a mention of this birth name as you proposed. Deryck C. 19:57, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any mention of Choi Ji-su in the target signed, Rosguill talk 07:30, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


  • That is her birth name. Lia would have had to be used with some add on like (singer) so I went with her full name.Ohmyfifthharmony (talk) 15:20, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Might be useful to add the member's real names to the article. PC78 (talk) 15:43, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I will update their birth names on their official article to avoid further confusion. Ohmyfifthharmony (talk) 11:39, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Christianity in Jerusalem[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Christianity in Israel. Deryck C. 19:56, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The words may be similar, but the meaning is totally different. I don't think this is a useful search term. @PPEMES: signed, Rosguill talk 07:21, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Canada International Film Festival[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 May 6#Canada International Film Festival

Parsey McParseface[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 14:24, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not in target article. Seems like a Boaty McBoatface reference but no need to redirect here when there's no information about it Joseph2302 (talk) 20:57, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect. It is in the target article but the section name has changed. Fixed redirect. Widefox; talk 21:18, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep (per above) Widefox; talk 10:21, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep the redirect now points to a section which is relevant to the redirect in question. The first sentence in the section talks about "Parsey McParseface". Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 20:21, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 01:17, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ajax (superhero)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Marvel Comics characters: A#Ajax. (non-admin closure) Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 11:53, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently this name was used for this character in Brazil for a period of time. There's no mention of it in the article. —Xezbeth (talk) 09:10, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to List of Marvel Comics characters: A#Ajax and tag with {{R avoided double redirect|Ajax (comics)}}. While neither of the characters listed there seem to be superheroes, this still seems like a likely search term for a superhero. There can be a hatnote there for Martian Manhunter if ever warranted. --BDD (talk) 15:13, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 01:14, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
  • Just in case this ever comes up, my comment should read "While neither of the characters listed there seem to be superheroes, this still seems like a likely search term for a superhero comics character." --BDD (talk) 18:30, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Counos[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:47, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in article. feminist (talk) 08:37, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Okay... It is simple one of the dozens of types of crytocurrencies (for which we have paid editors trying to write articles). Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:49, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • redirecting minor instances to the group is perfectly appropriate. Helps prevent more spam on the topic. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:58, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: Not on the list of cryptocurrencies sounds like WP:NOTDIR. –84.46.53.123 (talk) 23:45, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This is a misleading redirect because someone searching for information on this will not find it at the target. The proper way to prevent spam on a topic for which Wikipedia does not have any information is to salt the page from being created. -- Tavix (talk) 16:02, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 01:14, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Racism of low expectations[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 May 9#Racism of low expectations

Days of the Week panties[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:23, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target; a PROD was previously applied by an administrator; I am making this discussion on their behalf. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 00:23, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_April_29&oldid=1146470689"