Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 September 28

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 28[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 28, 2018.

A Journey to Meet Love[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Redirect First Love (series) to DAB, delete the rest, and move First Sword (TV series) to base name. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 15:55, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These all appear to be series in some stage of development, however the target gives no information on any of these, which leaves the searcher none the wiser. -- Tavix (talk) 21:23, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Genecyst[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close. Bundle up to Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_September_30#Gnuboy. Deryck C. 09:36, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Leftover from when the list included non-notable software. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:36, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Right. It was closed as redirect when the target article mentioned it (along with a whole bunch of other non-notable examples that have since been removed). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:59, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. From the history it looks as though the target only ever contained a single table row about Genecyst (see e.g. this revision); as far as I can tell no merge of any more substantial content ever occurred, so there are no attribution-related reasons to keep this. Genecyst is mentioned in passing at Sega Genesis#Re-releases and emulation; retargeting there would be preferable to keeping this at the current target, but the mention is so insubstantial that I think deletion is the best option. @Rhododendrites: Do you want to add the capitalised version GENECYST (which points to the same target) to this nomination? – Arms & Hearts (talk) 22:51, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Let you be right[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 04:01, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Another pointless redirect considering the song's title spelled out in any case would lead to the targeted article anyway. NØ 18:14, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Let you be right m[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 15:56, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like a completely pointless redirect. The song it is referring to is called Let You Be Right, not "Let you be right m". NØ 18:12, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. A simple typo on creation that was rectified later the same day, but not one that is especially plausible and there is no need to retain it. Thryduulf (talk) 18:40, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above; this was clearly created by accident (after which I moved it to the correct title), and having this misspelled and implausible redirect continue to exist seems pointless. IntoThinAir (formerly Everymorning) talk 18:44, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Incomplete thought, leaving it as "let you be right" would go to the same place. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:59, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete per G6; specifically, per the template {{db-error}}; failing that, Delete per all. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). This message was left at 23:39, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Charm (physics)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 October 8#Charm (physics)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_September_28&oldid=1052826686"