Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 26

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 26[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 26, 2018.

Jesus: Empty tomb[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 22:08, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is the result of a poor attempt at disambiguation in 2007. I don't think this is a plausible search term, but it was the title of the article for about a year and a half. -- Tavix (talk) 21:15, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Formatted this awkward way, I'd think that we're talking about a book's title or a documentary's name or something like that. Deletion seems like the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 10:08, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as useless, even though it is a redirect from a move ([1] followed by [2]). – Fayenatic London 22:36, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of multiplayer gametypes in Halo 2[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 2#List of multiplayer gametypes in Halo 2

The Spirit Guide[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 22:09, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target, and the title itself is vague in its nature. Steel1943 (talk) 16:36, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. I don't see it in the Zelda wikia either. I do see stuff like Spirit Temple though. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:07, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The legend of zelda ocarina of time.[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 22:09, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely and WP:COSTLY due to the period at the end. Steel1943 (talk) 16:34, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

N64 zelda[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 22:09, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Could also refer to The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask. Steel1943 (talk) 16:33, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Overly vague, and just searching for it brings up the 2 N64 Zelda games as the top hits, so it's not necessary to be redirected.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 19:52, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I originally created Zelda 64 as a disambiguation page (back in 2005). A later editor decided, apparently based on Google hits, that "Zelda 64" almost never refers to Majora's Mask. —Gordon P. Hemsley→✉ 20:09, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Oot2d[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 22:09, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Per the redirects history, seems that this title represented a fan remake of the target subject that never was completed or gained notability. Steel1943 (talk) 16:32, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete It's a fan remake [3], but since it's not discussed in the article, this should be deleted AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:31, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. OoT2D as a concept has been around for over 15 years, so I'm not sure I agree that it lacks notability, but it does seem to be vaporware at this point. (The last updates on the website/Facebook page are from mid-2016.) —Gordon P. Hemsley→✉ 20:19, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • In a situation like this, if notability of the subject can be proven, then at this present time, I'd say that this redirect qualifies for WP:REDLINK deletion. Steel1943 (talk) 00:38, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Трамп[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 22:09, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Trump is not Russian and has no Russian heritage, and the current target is very inappropriate as it seems to suggest Trump himself has connections to Russia. Iffy★Chat -- 14:07, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Marko Jovanovic (musician)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 07:20, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Marko Jovanovic was reverted to a redirect to a disambiguation page per an AfD, making double redirects that were later fixed. There are no other musician or composer articles listed at the target, so now these redirects no longer make any sense. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:35, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 07:26, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both - I agree. The musician doesn't appear to be particularly notable, and so it makes sense for him to neither have a page nor a mention anywhere in a broader article. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 09:06, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

A double redirect to a category[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 07:45, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:XY, could also refer to Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as unused redundant templates. Also, the first is a double redirect. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 15:11, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 07:25, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate per Fayenatic London. A pointer to the correct categories would be more helpful than a redlink. - Eureka Lott 19:07, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

PS/2[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Killiondude (talk) 07:20, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Per the page views of the redirect's current target versus the page views of PS/2 port, as well as the fact that searching "PS/2" on third party search engines returns more results for the port than the IBM computer line (well, and some results for PlayStation 2, but I have never seen the abbreviation for the video game console using a "/"), there really is no primary topic for this redirect. For that reason, I believe this redirect should be retargeted to PS2 (disambiguation) where the rest of the "PS2" variants are listed. Steel1943 (talk) 18:09, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep IBM PS/2 is primary topic. The PS/2 port is based on the IBM PS/2. The hatnote can go to PS2 (disambiguation) if there are other possibilities to settle. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:54, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @AngusWOOF: This sounds more like a situation where the current target/topic (the computer line) was the original topic, but then its existence led to the creation of a topic that eventually became just as notable (if not more) than its original. This reminds me of the situations that happened with Gouda (the city versus the cheese) and Angus (the region versus the cow breed); the original primary topics, originally at the ambiguous titles, were moved to titles with a comma and their respective disambiguation pages were moved to the base titles due to the notabilities of the cheese and cow breed, respectively. Steel1943 (talk) 23:00, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
PS/2 still refers to just those two items of which one is primary topic, so WP:TWODABS applies. If Sony decided to add slashes to its product and start calling them PS/4 or PS/5, leading to retro-labelling of PS2 as PS/2, then I would see a problem. Is there a third item referred to as PS/2? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:08, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I share these thoughts; in addition to not knowing of a third topic that "officially" uses a slash, I don't see any references showing any abbreviation of any PlayStation console using a "/". However, I wonder ... maybe it may not be an official abbreviation for it, but people (who may or may not be readers of Wikipedia) may use a "/" to locate consoles in the PlayStation line (kind of like a common misspelling.) But, I currently cannot find any way to prove this except for the fact that results for "PlayStation 2" show up on third party engines when searching "PS/2" with the slash. Steel1943 (talk) 23:18, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's also a question of whether the PS/2 port is mononymously referred to as "PS/2", which I do not see. It's almost always a PS/2 port or PS/2 connector or PS/2 bus or PS/2 keyboard or PS/2 mouse. The existing hatnotes already cover any generic searches for the Sony product that might have added the slash so they are served as well. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:27, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 07:24, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Categories: Universities and Colleges in Turkey[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 07:19, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Bad precedent, that what may look like it comes from the Category namespace is actually in the article namespace because it is malformed. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:52, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Categories:Monasteries suppressed under the Icelandic Reformation[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. by User:Fayenatic_london Lenticel (talk) 14:39, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Leftover cross-namespace redirect resulting from a faulty category creation followed by page move. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:50, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

1990 College football[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 February 2#1990 College football

Locations in Zelda II: The Adventure of Link[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 07:18, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target. Possibly settings within the target article's subject which are not notable enough to pass WP:GAMEGUIDE with a mention on Wikipedia. Steel1943 (talk) 00:42, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

First Zelda[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 07:17, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The redirects are not alternative names for the target. That, and this target is not the first Zelda; that claim probably goes to someone with the given name. Steel1943 (talk) 00:35, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: These titles seem to be excessively descriptive and informal to be redirects. --SnorlaxMonster 00:58, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not an expression used in any of the Zelda games. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:34, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both - I agree. These don't seem appropriate. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 09:08, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Hyrule Fantasy: Zelda no Densetsu[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Killiondude (talk) 07:17, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely search terms due to mixed languages used in the redirects. Steel1943 (talk) 00:33, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep all. The Japanese titles for these games use mixed languages, see for instance this JP cover for The Legend of Zelda. Link no Bouken is similarly the Japanese subtitle for Zelda II.--Alexandra IDVtalk 00:54, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: In my experience, English renderings of Japanese names that use the original English word for loanwords while simply romanizing hiragana is fairly common. As I recall, I created the redirect Link no Bouken because I was going through a list of game titles on which it showed up, and I wanted to easily find out what the game was. There's an even stronger case for The Hyrule Fantasy: Zelda no Densetsu, since the original Japanese actually uses Latin letters to render that title. The Legend of Zelda 2: Rinku no Bōken is a weird mixing of languages, and I have no opinion on that one. --SnorlaxMonster 00:58, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The Legend of Zelda 2: Rinku no Bōken per Alexandra IDV; actual box artwork (e.g. zh:檔案:Zelda2.jpeg) and in-game title screen had an English main title and a Japanese subtitle (of which this is a correct romanisation). No opinion on the other two; which are non-standard mixed spellings. "Zelda no Densetsu" (though not the full phrase "The Hyrule Fantasy: Zelda no Densetsu") is somewhat widespread in news articles, but Link no Bouken seems to be used almost exclusively on illegal ROM download websites (one of them had an idiosyncratic habit of spelling wasei-eigo and katakana-ised names in English rather than in standard Japanese romanisation, and I guess all the others copied it). 59.149.124.29 (talk) 10:52, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Keep the other two as well given that MOS:JA#General guidelines point #2 recommends this style of romanisation: For transliterations from katakana, use the English spelling if available (e.g., Thunderbird (サンダーバード, Sandābādo) instead of just Sandābādo). 59.149.124.29 (talk) 18:16, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_January_26&oldid=1037876549"