Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 September 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 3[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 3, 2017.

Manifest (convention)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close, page is no longer a redirect. -- Tavix (talk) 20:32, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect redirect from an AFD to list that should only contain conventions with articles. Redirect should be deleted. Esw01407 (talk) 16:39, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Draft:Aaamer Hameed[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:03, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged this redirect for G8, but then an administrator tried to "fix" it. However, there is a typo in the title, as stated in the move reason by Johnlp, which is not so common as to warrant a redirect either in the main or the draft namespace. Also, the target is disambiguated. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 13:40, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Inaccurate spelling. Steve Quinn (talk) 16:13, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Hasn't really spent time in draft as a curated article. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 00:07, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - the page was created in article space and moved through draft space later. There's no reason to have this particular misspelling sitting in draft space, especially given that the other draft: titles this page was moved through have all been deleted. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:59, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bardot discography[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:03, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Made sense in 2007 when Wikipedia only had an article called "Bardot" about Bardot (Australian band). Now we have Bardot (English band), and pointing to the Bardot dab page is just not satisfactory when looking for the discography of either band. Better delete the redirect and let the search engine do its job. — JFG talk 04:42, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Nothing links here, and there are no separate discography pages. bd2412 T 02:37, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and BD2412. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 09:06, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Could also refer to Brigitte Bardot's discography. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 20:57, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 00:36, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:35, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.