Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 September 27

September 27[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 27, 2017.

1st Regiment of Riflemen (United States)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep , noting that deleting all the links to a redirect is not a reason for deletion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:41, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1st Regiment of Riflemen (United States) → 1st Regiment of Riflemen (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

I have deleted all the links to this page. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 15:44, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per {{R from move}} and {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}}. Thryduulf (talk) 20:08, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Aura Soma[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aura Soma → Chromotherapy (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This is the second RfD for this redirect, see Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2012_April_28#Aura-Soma. Writing about Aura-Soma on en.wp has been disallowed because of WP:FRINGE (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aura-Soma). Articles on Aura-Soma still exist on the Slovak and Hungarian Wikipedias. Until recently those articles were listed on WikiData as interwikis for "Chromotherapy", which is probably why this has been created - as on de.wiki "Aura Soma" redirects to "Farbtherapie".

However this is inaccurate and not helpful. Aura-Soma is a company, not a synonym for Chromotherapy, and our article on Chromotherapy does not mention Aura-Soma once. I finally fixed the Wikidata issue and created a new entry just for sk:Aura-Soma and hu:Auraszóma and removed them from the one for Chromotherapy, so let's finally stop misdirecting users to places where the information they're looking for isn't. The result of that AfD was pretty clear, if someone wants info on Aura-Soma, they'll have to look somewhere else than en.wikipedia. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  14:13, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. "Aura-soma" (with a hyphen) is mentioned in passing at Aura (paranormal) but only in the sentence "Many New Age techniques that aim to clear blockages of the chakras were developed during those years [1980s and 1990s], such as crystal healing and aura-soma." As this wont help someone looking to learn even what this is it is not a useful target either. Thryduulf (talk) 20:17, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Does it matter is not so important. --Reinraum (talk) 17:03, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Himalayan languages[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:35, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Himalayan languages → Pahari languages (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Himalayan languages are simply the languages of (the broader area of) the Himalayas. This includes the Pahari languages, but also other Indo-Aryan groups (like Dardic) and, more significantly, also a large number of Tibeto-Burman languages. In recent decades, the topic has received treatment as a language area, so this is an eligible title for an article. I'd rather have it deleted to encourage the creation of such an article rather than try redirecting to a place (like Himalayas#Culture, or Languages of South Asia) that doesn't yet have any relevant content. – Uanfala 12:21, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:REDLINK per nom. Thryduulf (talk) 20:18, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.