Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 October 31

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 31[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 31, 2017.

List of Pop culture news media events[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 November 16#List of Pop culture news media events

Dream Diary (video game)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 14:42, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The English term is a literal translation that has no significant official nor unofficial use as a title for said game (as opposed to use in commentary that discusses the title). The parenthetical disambiguation makes this less likely as a search term. Although this is the reverse of WP:RFOREIGN, it still seems to fall under WP:RFD#D8. SoledadKabocha (talk) 04:38, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment it's a possible translation of the title, although it's also been translated to Dream Journal as per this book: [1] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:37, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 15:54, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete As unlikely search term.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 10:31, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I created this redirect, but looking back it seems pretty implausible, like redirecting "Clump Spirit" to Katamari Damacy or "Bullet Refute" to Danganronpa. I don't really care if this is delted or not. Raymond1922 (talk) 21:49, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Conservative Government 2015–2020[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 November 20#Conservative Government 2015–2020

Nick Cameron[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 14:41, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per the result of this discussion from July. --Nevé–selbert 13:43, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: I don't recall creating this, but obviously did. Not sure what my logic was for doing so, but I probably thought it was a likely search term. It was six years ago though, and, as they say, I've been to bed since then. This is Paul (talk) 14:51, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Third MacDonald ministry & 3rd MacDonald ministry[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 20:32, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely search term. --Nevé–selbert 13:30, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

plus Added Fourth MacDonald ministry & 4th MacDonald ministry to nomination.--Nevé–selbert 13:35, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Diocese of Jerusalem[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 November 13#Diocese of Jerusalem

🏣[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 November 16#🏣

Lua:Error[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 November 13#Lua:Error

NCS Artist redirects[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 14:41, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The rest

All of these redirects are not mentioned in the target article. Since I cannot find suitable targets for these titles, I suggest deletion for each. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 04:10, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The creator of some if not all of these is Zawl. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 15:32, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cornish alphabet[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 14:40, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is not notable. There is no Cornish alphabet so it does not form an integral part of the Cornish language article. A page of the same name was earlier deleted. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 00:19, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

keep Looking at [2] it appears Cornish does use the latin forms of letters, but the alphabet is not the same as English, there is no q, x or z and rather than a c there is a ch. It seems like a reasonable search term and redirects do not need to be notable.--Salix alba (talk): 08:34, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The Cornish alphabet has historically had some differences to the English one, although the same latin letters are used, as is the case with Welsh orthography. I don't think there is enough coverage to make a standalone article about the cornish version at this time. There are infact several different alphabets from different time periods, with different orders and letters. For convenience the alphabet has been aligned with the English one for the standard written form [3] [4] [5]. Dysklyver 09:19, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above. Even if the above was not true, I think it would be a valid redirect, since the link between languages and alphabets is strong, and it's reasonable to assume that a different language would have differences (big or small) in their alphabet. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 15:21, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Cornish language revival, the only article where the various orthographies are discussed. – Uanfala 09:17, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_October_31&oldid=1088105986"