Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 October 13

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 13[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 13, 2017.

Thirtysomething redirects[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Thirtysomething. Adding hatnotes can be done manually. (non-admin closure) J947( c ) (m) 05:41, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One of the redirects was retargeted to the 1980s series thirtysomething per previous RfD discussion. Right now, I am torn between retargeting both to either the series, the dabpage, or ageing#Dividing the lifespan. I would prefer retargeting both to the dabpage; I am uncertain whether readers typing those redirects want to search for either ageing or the series.— Preceding unsigned comment added by George Ho (talk • contribs) 21:00, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect both to the TV series as the actual term doesn't really have an article and is more of a dictionary definition. Add "redirects here" and hatnote to the Aging and society or Ageing article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:43, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect both to the TV series and add the hatnote to thirtysomething per AngusWOOF. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 00:06, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Soulero[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 October 24#Soulero

Wikipedia:Contact us/blocked[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not exactly sure what this redirect is for? Does it have any purpose? DrStrauss talk 17:13, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Children´s and Young Adult Program of the Berlin International Literature Festival[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 16:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I redirected this to its current target per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Extraordinary Book, but I am not so sure if this is a plausible search term, with its acute accent. feminist 16:19, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bug (dog breed)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 16:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article, is a {{R from history}} redirected 5 days after it was created in November 2005. Steel1943 (talk) 15:59, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete can be re-created if it's been added to the list with notability. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:12, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per AngusWOOF. At the moment, there's no coverage of such a breed, but when there is and it's added to the list, the redirect can be recreated. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 00:08, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Border Jack[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 16:50, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article. However, Border jack is a {{R with history}}. Steel1943 (talk) 15:55, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete until the breed is common enough to have an entry. Currently not linked from other articles, just talk pages, AFDs and wikiproject discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:27, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per AngusWOOF. Same as Bug, no coverage, but can be recreated under one redirect if there's enough coverage to add the breed to the list. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 00:09, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Glares[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Glare. (non-admin closure) feminist 09:49, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The primary topic of "Glares" would be the plural of any of the various meanings of "Glare"; the term should redirect there. bd2412 T 15:53, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

  • Retarget to Glare which is a dab page. I've added Gloor as an entry. Glar and Glaar can still point to Gloor. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:18, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Brug[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Fun fact: "brug" is Dutch for "bridge". -- Tavix (talk) 16:48, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. However, this redirect is a {{R with history}} and was redirected in 2009. Steel1943 (talk) 15:52, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete until the breed is common enough to have an entry. Currently not linked from other articles, just talk pages, AFDs and wikiproject discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:30, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete until there's enough coverage from reliable sources to warrant addition to the list. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 00:10, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Lord family tree[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was move to Lord family tree without leaving a redirect. --BDD (talk) 18:04, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cross namespace redirect, unlikely search term Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:42, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Good name[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. -- Tavix (talk) 16:45, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not in target and generally means something other than given name - like reputation PRehse (talk) 14:51, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a dab to this, as there was another album titled Good Name. If it applies to India culture and there's a section, please add that as well. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:32, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 01:56, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dabify per the draft. Good job AngusWOOF. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:09, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dabify per AngusWOOF. When someone creates an article about given names in South Asia, then this could be redirected there and the dab page moved away from the primary title. – Uanfala 13:12, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Michael D'Orazio[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 October 24#Michael D'Orazio

ImPlicitNgine[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 16:43, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target. Was supposedly merged into the target but has since been removed entirely. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 00:43, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Wikipedia is not a directory of users or groups for Roblox. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:35, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Roblox Egg Hunt[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 16:42, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target. Most likely was removed from the current article for fancruft, but doesn't appear to be getting hits. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 00:39, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Wikipedia is not a directory of users or groups for Roblox. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:35, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rayblon[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 16:41, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible. Why would anyone think this is an alternate name for Roblox? jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 00:38, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Wikipedia is not a directory of users or groups for Roblox. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:35, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gooblox[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 16:41, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirect. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 00:37, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Wikipedia is not a directory of users or groups for Roblox. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:35, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Roblox base wars[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 16:41, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target. Assuming this was referring to a game mode, this could easily be renamed to Natural Disaster Survival as an image exists for it, otherwise should be deleted for misinformation. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 00:36, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Wikipedia is not a directory of users or groups, or in this case, someone's scenarios, for Roblox. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:36, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

National Rail ROBLOX[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 16:41, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target and not notable. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 00:35, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete With 1.7 million creators using Roblox, why should this user group have notability? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:34, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_October_13&oldid=1138582015"