Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 May 28

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 28[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 28, 2017.

Biggest clock[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. A plurality of editors support deletion. Various retargeting and disambiguation options were proposed but there isn't much agreement on these alternatives. Deryck C. 17:22, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect refers to a more ambiguous subject that its target. The target article is exclusive to clock faces whereas the redirect could refer to the entire clock structure (which the clock face is only one part of the entire structure.) Steel1943 (talk) 04:24, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Uanfala (talk) 20:33, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both - WP:REDLINK appears to apply here since what we need is an article called "List of the world's largest clocks" or something like that. And said article would include the entire device and not just the specific part that's the "clock face". CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 03:45, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. --BDD (talk) 16:07, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to List of clocks where all notable clocks, including those noted for their size, should be listed. I'll note that the see also has links to a couple lists, including the current target. -- Tavix (talk) 14:15, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Uanfala (talk) 13:09, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect both to List of largest clock faces, because that contains the content that the user wants to see. - Richard Cavell (talk) 12:07, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both per CoffeeWithMarkets; also per Thryduulf's comment about how biggest and largest should link to the same thing. PCN02WPS 22:07, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Wikilinked[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 15:18, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why this was created as redirect to Wikipedia:Protection policy#Office actions which seems like an inappropriate target. Template:Wikilink and Template:Wikilinking are red; Template:Wikilinks redirects to Template:Underlinked. Leaning towards deletion. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 09:06, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete Amounts to patent nonsense. – Train2104 (t • c) 15:34, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Daillou and others[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 15:18, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Redirects in question is apparently for a thing called "grounded videos", which is primarily made with GoAnimate where a section about this was added, without reliable sources. The section has been added before, and removed before. The section itself may or may not be notable, but the redirects in question (which are for a "cast list", which vary from video to video), is most certainly not, so the redirects should not exist as a result. SkyWarrior 01:54, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all these aren't even mentioned in the article as notable voices or characters. It's as if someone took Google Maps and listed the names of all the voice characters there or grabbed some of the usernames of people who used the program. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:51, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_May_28&oldid=1088106427"