Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 March 8

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 8[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 8, 2017.

Adobe distiller[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 21:30, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the redirect page because it's redundant. RMAX86 (talk) 23:00, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:Opera basic topics[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. WJBscribe (talk) 08:30, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Project-to-mainspace redirects are not useful. The redirect has been here since December 2005. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 03:26, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 21:58, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per my opinion in the previous discussion. My thoughts on the matter haven't changed. -- Tavix (talk) 19:16, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I don't believe that this is really that helpful. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 22:45, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Not useful or helpful. Being in projectspace, my initial instinct was that this would go to something about Opera (web browser). — Train2104 (t • c) 14:47, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per BDD. Perhaps the prior discussion didn't draw much attention partly due to the list of nominated redirects being collapsed in the manner they were. I probably wouldn't support deleting the ones created in 2001 and 2002 by the conversion script or Larry Sanger (from a quick spot check). However, the ones created in 2005, which seemingly lack the substantial history the older ones have, can go as far as I'm concerned. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 10:20, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Small Penis Syndrome[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Human penis size. --BDD (talk) 15:32, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The target doesn't mention either "small penis" or any "syndrome", so the redir is misleading. 81.96.84.137 (talk) 09:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to Human penis size, which discusses small penises. One of the references (presently number 12), used several times, does contain "small penis syndrome" in the title, but the abstract suggests that it is not the formal name of an actual syndrome. Regardless, I don't think anyone searching for this will be surprised to land at the article about penis size even if it doesn't explicitly mention their search term. Thryduulf (talk) 13:08, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to micropenis. I think that's a more precise target than human penis size. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 17:57, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 16:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - The odd capitalization and the lack of a proper target make it seem like we should just get rid of this. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 06:13, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 21:58, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @CoffeeWithMarkets: Why do you think this lacks a proper target, given the comments above from myself and the ip user? This capitalisation is not what we would use for an article title but we have thousands of redirects from title case search terms to sentence case article titles - what makes this one "odd"? Thryduulf (talk) 01:05, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep (with convert to set index as second choice) - WebMD refers it to anxiety over fears of penis size. So do other sources: [1][2][3][4]. The encyclopedia distinguishes it from "micropenis". This book considers it a part of Body dysmorphic disorder, whose article doesn't mention "penis". I don't know what this book refers it to. George Ho (talk) 08:25, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I created a Wiktionary definition of wikt:small penis syndrome. George Ho (talk) 08:50, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per Thryduulf, whose suggestion makes the most sense to me. -- Tavix (talk) 17:02, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose a retarget to micropenis, as this term is not synonymous with that per 217.140.96.140. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 17:45, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Human penis size, whose section #Male self-perception has the relevant scope for what I glean from George Ho's findings. I don't really see how the redirect could stay pointing to Penis envy, which is a about a rather niche psychoanalysis topic, and it doesn't seem to mention anything about size. – Uanfala (talk) 14:38, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Important Events of 2005[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 15:30, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The word "important" is subjective. Also, no other pages beginning with "Important Events" exist. Steel1943 (talk) 22:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • weak keep per WP:RNEUTRAL. The information sought can be found at the target. Thryduulf (talk) 15:16, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Additional comment from nominator: The use of the word "important" on this redirect could be seen by readers having the same problem as most redirects starting with the word "other". The reader may go to the list page without the word "important" present in its title, and in most cases (like the one of this redirect,) that page is the target of this nominated redirect. So, of the reader doesn't consider any of the items listed at the list page "important", they may look up the title with the word "important" (this redirect), and be redirected here. With this being said, this causes a similar problem as the redirects that start with the word "other", and that it ... it is unclear what the word "important" as defined in this redirect is meant to exclude. Steel1943 (talk) 16:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Thryduulf. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 20:52, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 21:58, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - No more affinity for "important" than any other similar adjectives, for example, "significant" (e.g. Significant Events of 2005); a redirect of this nature has no more affinity for this list of events by year than any other, making it costly. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 18:31, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Godsy. -- Tavix (talk) 19:13, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dej Buh Stesti[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:29, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Similar to Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 November 18#Zwolf. WP:RFOREIGN is applicable since there's no usage of this term in English. -- Tavix (talk) 21:50, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

January 20, 2004[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete. That being said, there was no objection to GeoffreyT2000's suggestion, so feel free to carry that out. -- Tavix (talk) 16:59, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Exact date not mentioned in target. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:57, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 11:07, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Very bad trip[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:26, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure about these two, so I'm bringing them here for discussion. Even though these words are in English, I am not sure if they should be deleted per WP:FORRED or not. So ... how could I be wondering whether or not these redirects qualify for WP:FORRED? Well, these titles were only used for their releases in France/French language. So, I'm not sure if that would mean that these redirect have affinity to the French language since from what I can find, these redirects are only used in conjunction with the French language. Steel1943 (talk) 17:32, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 11:04, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both, since there is no mention of them in the targets and no need to mention foreign release titles. I thought of retargeting to bad trip, but the second one doesn't work for that. — Gorthian (talk) 01:17, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of restaurant chains in Bahrain[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was restore article. The nominator appears correct in arguing that Bahrain doesn't fit the main list's inclusion criteria. The restoration is indeed done without prejudice to future action, such as AfD. --BDD (talk) 21:23, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose to delete redirect as it's target leads to a section that doesn't exist in target article nor is there any mention of it anywhere else. Ajf773 (talk) 06:19, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Restore section and/or article without prejudice to AfD. This was previously an article, converted to a redirect by Unitedstatesian in 2009 with the edit summary "merge back to main article" but I can't find any evidence the merge was actually done. The small amount of content in the main article (the specific has always been more extensive) was removed from the main article with the apparently misleading edit summary "cleanup" by Funandtrvl in 2013. Thryduulf (talk) 10:28, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • None of the list entries are actually unique to Bahrain. They are all global restaurant chains. This is potentially the limit of what merging could have been done. Ajf773 (talk) 18:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Restore section, I apologize for deleting it, it must have been because it was red-linked and no reference. But I have found a "chain" in Bahrain, called Veranda, at this link, so that could be added once it's restored. Funandtrvl (talk) 19:59, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • The list criteria of List of restaurant chains stipulates all list entries must have a (blue linked) article. Veranda does not. There is no point restoring the section unless at least one list entry in the section is notable. Ajf773 (talk) 10:08, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Restore per Thryduulf. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 20:59, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Downhill (film) (2014)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 13:32, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The odd punctuation here makes this an unlikely search term. No incoming links. — Gorthian (talk) 05:30, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Downhill (upcoming film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:20, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not an upcoming film any more. There were two incoming article links that I've fixed; it's ready to be deleted. — Gorthian (talk) 05:28, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Martin Pagel[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 March 15#Martin Pagel

Nerukku Ner (2015 film)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 March 15#Nerukku Ner (2015 film)

Dixon Hill[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 March 15#Dixon Hill

Moana (2018 film)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted, G7. -- Tavix (talk) 03:25, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a bit of a faulty crystal ball. Moana was released in 2016, not 2018. -- Tavix (talk) 02:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as creator: no incoming links, and implausible search term. StAnselm (talk) 03:07, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, StAnselm. I'll take care of it via G7. -- Tavix (talk) 03:25, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Gaelic handball by region[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:17, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The template no longer has a "by region" section as all regional articles have been deleted. -- Tavix (talk) 00:55, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Trumpcare[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to American Health Care Act. There's been enough input where the result seems inevitable at this point. -- Tavix (talk) 13:29, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should this go to 2017 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act replacement proposals instead? - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:10, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_March_8&oldid=1088106591"