Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 18

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 18[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 18, 2017.

GEOCITIES[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 27#GEOCITIES

Wikipedia:Obituary[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 July 7#Wikipedia:Obituary

Redirects to Wikipedia:Good articles[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 July 20#Redirects to Wikipedia:Good articles

L:RB[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Reckitt Benckiser. (non-admin closure) feminist 16:56, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, "L:RB" is not the initialism of Lego Rock Band, which would be simply "LRB"; unlikely anyone will look for it this way. Lordtobi (✉) 19:56, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. We shouldn't expect people to remember if there is a colon in a proper title where there logically could be one. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:22, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Reckitt Benckiser which shows up as "L:RB" in news articles. RB seems to be its stock symbol for whatever the L stock market is. [1] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 07:18, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 07:31, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've added that information to the L (disambiguation) page, AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:49, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

LSW3[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Lego Star Wars III: The Clone Wars. (non-admin closure) – Uanfala 09:53, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, The Complete Saga is the third in the franchise, but not the third in the story arc, as it is simply a compilation of the two prior games. Lordtobi (✉) 15:08, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 07:31, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Iceland–Yugoslavia relations[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 18:06, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A redirect that does not even mention any such relationship in the target article. Calton | Talk 03:58, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:36, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Damien Darhk Wikipedia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. I'll take care of it now before the WP:SNOW storm gets any worse. -- Tavix (talk) 19:11, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure this is a useful redirect. Who puts "Wikipedia" in a search here? Adam9007 (talk) 01:10, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete technical, housekeeping. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:25, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - This doesn't seem helpful at all. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 06:28, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Damien Darhk was created as an article by user:Cosmosport7. This was then prodded. About 12 hours later it was deprodded, and about an hour after that nominated at AfD and then boldly merged and redirected by the prodder and AfD nominator user:DJAustin. Between Damien Darhk being deprodded and being nominated for deletion Damien Darhk Wikipedia was created by the original author Cosmoport7. Over the next 40 minutes this was copyedited and then redirected to Damien Darhk almost simultaneously with that being merged. As Damien Darhk exists there is no attributional need to keep this one. As this all happened yesterday the chance of external links is about as low as it can be and as it is not otherwise a good search term, deletion is the best course of action. Thryduulf (talk) 09:03, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - A more plausible redirect already exists.- MrX 11:42, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - there's no reason to keep this, and if we keep this, we would have to allow similar redirects for millions of articles - Richard Cavell (talk) 13:20, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_June_18&oldid=1138581750"